對精神疾病患者得減刑之態度－以臺灣大學生為例

Ruo-Ching Lin; Ching-En Lan; Lang-Wen Huang

doi:10.7014/SRMA.2023100005

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P205 - 234

社会科学 > 社会科学综合

DOI： 10.7014/SRMA

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

对精神疾病患者得减刑之态度－以台湾大学生为例

Social Attitudes toward Sentences Commuted for Mental Illness: The Case of College Students in Taiwan

林若晴(Ruo-Ching Lin) ；蓝璟恩(Ching-En Lan) ；黄朗文(Lang-Wen Huang)

调查研究-方法与应用； 51 期 (2023 / 10 / 01) ， P205 - 234

繁体中文;英文 DOI： 10.7014/SRMA.2023100005

接触经验；媒体影响；精神疾病罪犯；减刑态度；行为认知； contact experience ； media influence ； criminals with mental illnesses ； attitude toward commutation policy ； behavior cognition

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (52) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Over the past few years, there has been a contentious debate in Taiwan regarding the punishment of individuals with mental illness who have committed crimes. The issue revolves around the public's expectations for criminals to face appropriate legal consequences, which becomes particularly complex when mental illness is a factor. Article 19 of Taiwan's Criminal Code grants criminals with mental illness the right to assert their condition and request commutation or exemption. Given this, this legal provision has not been immune to criticism and has faced considerable public backlash in high-profile cases where mental illness is presented as a defense. Our attempt here is to not only navigate the delicate balance between safeguarding the human rights of this special group and upholding societal justice, but also to provide valuable empirical insights for future deliberations. Existing research has primarily concentrated on abolishing the death penalty for this group of criminals, however there is surprisingly limited information on public attitudes toward their commutations. Moreover, with the enactment of the National Judges Act in 2023, which introduces citizen involvement in the sentencing process, relative discussions are expected to become more indispensable. In encouraging their students to adopt diverse perspectives, universities in Taiwan have emphasized the importance of a well-rounded general education. In this sense, we believe a more inclusive discourse will enhance the analysis. To achieve a more inclusive discourse, this study aims to investigate the attitudes of Taiwanese university students toward criminals with mental illness and whether they should receive a chance of reduced sentences. The study has three primary objectives: (1) to comprehend how university students perceive the behavior of these criminals; (2) to assess their attitudes toward granting commutation to these individuals; and (3) to identify the key factors that influence these attitudes. In order to achieve our research goals, a questionnaire was conducted with 847 students. This quantitative analysis involved employing descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and the moderated mediation effect. Our study proposed four research hypotheses and found that two of them were empirically supported: (1) one's contact experience has a significantly positive effect on one's behavior cognition toward criminals with mental illness; and (2) contact experience also has a significant effect on one's attitude toward commutation for these criminals. However, two hypotheses were not supported: (1) media influence has no moderation effect between one's contact experience and one's behavior cognition toward criminals with mental illness; and (2) one's behavior cognition toward these criminals also has no mediation effect between one's contact experience and one's attitude toward their commutation. Besides, one's behavior cognition on criminals with mental illness has no significant effect on one's attitude toward commutation of these certain criminals. In summary, we found that the public often holds contradictory social attitudes toward criminals with mental illnesses, characterized by both empathy for their disability and aversion when they attempt to use mental illness as an excuse for commutation or exemption. Furthermore, although contact experience helps reduce social distance, we argue that tolerance for deviations in the daily behavior of these criminals and attitudes toward commutation should be considered as two distinct contexts. Lastly, our university student sample could serve as an example for future research, offering precious insight into the better practices of citizen judges. In essence, this study enhances the ongoing dialogue regarding societal attitudes towards commutation for individuals with mental illness who have committed crimes. We anticipate that our research will serve to foster a deeper comprehension of the complex issues surrounding this particular demographic.

参考文献 ( 52 ) 〈TOP〉

Li, S. M.,Ho, C. Y.(2009).Contact Theory and Social Distance in Schizophrenia.Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry,23(3),223-229.
连结：
Su, Y. H.,Li, S. M.,Tsai, Y. A.(2013).Applying Rasch analysis to Assessing the Social Distance Scale in Patients with Schizophrenia.Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry,27(4),329-333.
连结：
王志豪, Chih-Hao,颜铭汉, Ming-Han(2017)。接触理论於精神疾病的去污名化效应。台湾精神医学，31(4)，346-354。
连结：
范耕维, Keng-Wei(2019)。以违法侦查作为量刑因子之正当化根据：一个刑罚理论的观察。台大法学论丛，48(4)，2131-2198。
连结：
郭宇恒, Yu-Heng,李俊宏, Chun-Hung,吴文正, Wen-Cheng,欧阳文贞, Wen-Chen(2021)。精神疾病犯罪者监护处分时间的决定因子。中华心理卫生学刊，34(2)，157-179。
连结：

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址