華人虛榮：構念分析與效度檢驗

莊詔鈞; 許功餘

doi:10.6254/IPRCS.202006_(53).0003

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P103 - 180

社会科学 > 心理学

DOI： 10.6254/IPRCS

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

华人虚荣：构念分析与效度检验

Chinese Vanity: Theoretical Analysis and Construct Validation

庄诏钧(Shao-Chun Chuang) ；许功余(Kung-Yu Hsu)

本土心理学研究； 53 期 (2020 / 06 / 01) ， P103 - 180

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6254/IPRCS.202006_(53).0003

效度检验；华人文化；虚荣特质；虚荣量表；构念分析； Chinese culture ； construct analysis ； validation tests ； vanity scale ； vanity trait

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (89) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

People want to present themselves as different from others by mimicking a high-class lifestyle. This behavior may be driven by vanity. Western scholars have defined vanity as having a concern for and a positive even inflated view of one's personal achievements and physical appearance and developed a measure. Researchers have tested whether this measure can be applied across different cultures, especially eastern cultures. The results indicated that the vanity scale could be applied to different countries under some particular constraints. However, the vanity scale may be not applicable to eastern cultures. Using a western scale to probe Chinese phenomenon easily results in the imposed-etic problem. Hence, we adopted an indigenous approach to conceptualize vanity in Chinese culture and developed a measurement tool for Chinese people. Based on the fundamental lexical hypothesis, we started by analyzing Chinese adjectives and proverbs in order to conceptualize vanity. We found that Chinese vanity is conceived of as someone who attempts to pursue the praise or enviableness from others through material products, celebrity friends, or an admirable reputation and achievement in order to satisfy their own need to make a positive impression. It includes three theoretical dimensions, namely physical vanity, achievement vanity, and interpersonal vanity. Next, we generated 98 items based on the theoretical dimensions. 18 items were removed from the item pool as they were only indirectly related to vanity. An expert group inspected and evaluated each remaining item. They removed 20 items due to vague connotations. The initial version of the Chinese Vanity Inventory (CVI) consisted of 60 items with three dimensions: appearance vanity (22 items), achievement vanity (22 items), and interpersonal vanity (16 items). Items were measured with a Likert-type scale ranging from 1(very untrue of me) to 7 (very true of me). Study 1 developed the new CVI measure. A total of 605 Taiwanese participants (371 college students, 234 adults; 179 males, 426 females) were recruited online. They filled out the CVI and demographic information. We used hierarchical factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine the number of factors and delete inappropriate items. The results identified 40 items with four dimensions, namely socialite vanity, appearance vanity, achievement vanity, and popularity vanity. Socialite vanity (13 items) emphasized showing status by being the friends with a celebrity to gain praise and envy and satisfy one's need to make a positive impression. A sample item is: ＂I believe that associating with a celebrity will help my life.＂ Appearance vanity (13 items) is use of fashionable or enviable products to present themselves to gain praise and envy to satisfy one's need to make a positive impression. A sample item is: ＂If a new or limited product makes a debut, I will try to get it.＂ Third, achievement vanity (8 items) emphasizes presentation or boasting about one's abilities in order to gain an enviable reputation and satisfy one's need to make a positive impression in work performance. A sample item is: ＂I want to be better than others, no matter what kind of competition.＂ Lastly, popularity vanity (6 items) is when someone seeks to be Mr./Ms. Popularity in order to satisfy one's need to make a positive impression as being popular and beloved. A sample item is: ＂I would like others to consider me a people person.＂ The Cronbach'sα coefficient for socialite, appearance, achievement, and popularity vanity were .86, .91, .80, and .77 respectively. Study 2 tested the validity of the CVI. For the construct validity, we used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm that the inventory had four factors (socialite vanity, appearance vanity, achievement vanity, and popularity vanity). We re-tested measurement invariance in two random samples with multi-group CFAs to re-examine construct validity. For criterion-related validity, following the past research, we regarded materialism, money attitude, narcissism and conspicuous consumption as criterion-related indicators. Consumption choice for gifts and personal use was also regarded as an indicator of validity to reinforce convergent validity and discriminant validity. A total of 1,070 Taiwanese participants (male = 467, female = 589, unknown = 14; M_(age) = 22.32, SD_(age) = 3.58) were recruited online and asked to fill out the CVI, the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (40 items), the Taiwanese Materialism Scale (TMS), Conspicuous Consumption Orientation (CCO), the Consumption Scale for Gift and Personal Use, and the Multidimensional Chinese Personality Inventory (MCPI). In order to decrease fatigue from watching the screen too long, the full questionnaire was divided in two: questionnaire A (N = 586) and questionnaire B (N = 484). In addition, to test construct validity of the vanity scale, we randomly divided participants into two groups: the calibration sample (N = 535) and the validation sample (N = 535). To examine construct validity of the CVI, we first used the calibration sample for confirmatory factory analysis (CFA) to test whether the inventory had a 4-factor structure. The results showed that 4-factor model did indeed fit most of the criteria (χ^2/df =3.31, RMSEA = .066, SRMR = .067, NNFI = .806, CFI =.817) and had the lowest AIC value. Moreover, we tested the chi-square difference testing across models and found that the 4-factor model was significantly different from the 3-factor model (Δχ^2 = 390.53, Δdf = 3, p ＜ .001). Next, the multiple-group CFA was used to test the equivalence of the 4-factor model across the calibration sample and the validation sample. The results showed that the factor structure, loading, and intercepts and error variance of items were invariant across the two random samples. For criterion-related validity, the simple correlation and partial correlation analyses were used to test the relationship between criterion-related indicators and Chinese vanity. The results showed that appearance vanity was positively correlated with Narcissism's exhibitionism, Materialism's conformity and possession pleasure, as well as conspicuous consumption. Socialite vanity was positively correlated with Narcissism's entitlement, Materialism's money first, and conspicuous consumption. Achievement vanity was positively correlated with Narcissism's authority. Finally, popularity vanity was positively correlated with Materialism's possession pleasure and conformity. In sum, the subscales of the CVI had clear convergent validity and discriminant validity. To reinforce convergent and discriminant validity, regression analysis was used to test the relationship between consumption behavior and vanity. The results showed that appearance vanity positively predicted gift-giving behavior (β= .12, p ＜ .01) and appearance vanity (β= .19, p ＜ .01) and achievement vanity (β= .09, p ＜ .05) positively predicted consumption behavior for personal use. That is, whether consumption was for a gift or personal use, people high in appearance vanity had a tendency to buy higher-class products; people high in superiority vanity had a tendency to purchase higher-class products for personal use. The main propose of this paper was to conceptualize the constructs associated with vanity in Chinese culture and to develop an instrument. Based on a theoretical analysis, we developed the Chinese vanity inventory and found four dimensions: appearance vanity, socialite vanity, achievement vanity and popularity vanity. Compared with the concept of vanity in Western culture, vanity in the Chinese culture presents not only through people's appearance and achievements, but also through interpersonal interaction with celebrities (socialite vanity) or with general others (popularity vanity). In addition to these dimensions, the connotations of vanity in the two cultures were different. In Western culture, vanity was identified by an inflated opinion of the self and an excessive concern for oneself. However, in a Chinese society, vanity included an inflated view of oneself, and also the pursuit of praise from others. Overall, the findings of the current research make an important theoretical contribution to the concept of vanity in the context of Chinese culture. The Chinese vanity inventory has good reliability and validity. The limitations of this paper are discussed and possible direction for future study are indicated.

参考文献 ( 89 ) 〈TOP〉

李敏龙,杨国枢(1998)。中国人的忍：概念分析与实徵研究。本土心理学研究，10，3-68。
连结：
林耀南(2012)。台湾物质主义测量暨信效度评估。测验学刊，59，103-129。
连结：
洪淑苓(2013)。论朱介凡及其对谚语的研究。成大中文学报，43，211-247。
连结：
许功余(2018)。华人青少年性格向度的构念检核：与北美性格向度之异与同。中华心理学刊，60，1-31。
连结：
韩贵香(2012)。没面子与情绪：事件归咎对象与相对权力的影响效果之探讨。应用心理研究，53，131-152。
连结：

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址