本土婚姻教育方案之推展與評估：以「牽手戀家」家庭共學方案為例

蕭英玲; 利翠珊

doi:10.53106/172851862022050064001

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P1 - 34

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.7082/CJGC

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

本土婚姻教育方案之推展与评估：以「牵手恋家」家庭共学方案为例

The Promotion and Evaluation of the Marriage Education Program in Taiwan: A Case of the ＂Holding Hands＂ Family Program

萧英玲(Ying-Ling Hsiao) ；利翠珊(Tsui-Shan Li)

中华辅导与谘商学报； 64 期 (2022 / 05 / 01) ， P1 - 34

繁体中文 DOI： 10.53106/172851862022050064001

台湾夫妻；「牵手恋家」家庭共学方案；婚姻教育；＂Holding Hands＂ family program ； marriage education ； Taiwanese couples

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (39) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Context and Object: The ＂Holding Hands＂ family program is a marriage education program that focuses on interactional characteristics of Taiwanese couples, emphasizes the enjoyability of shared activities, and pays attention to individual privacy and differences between husband and wife. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to evaluate the ＂Holding Hands＂ family program across four major characteristics: localization, enjoyability, privacy, and professionalism; (2) to assess the effects of the ＂Holding Hands＂ family program in enriching marital relationships. Method: Survey, focus groups, and individual interviews were employed to collect relevant data in this study. The survey included items for examining the degree of learning and satisfaction that couples felt towards the program. It also investigated changes in the quality of marriage before and after couples participated in the program. Focus groups and individual interviews were used to understand the feelings of the couples towards the characteristics of the program and to explore the processes of how marital relationships improve over time. A total of 17 couples participated in the program and completed the questionnaire. Seven couples participated in focus groups or in-depth interviews. Results: In evaluating this program, 78% of participants felt that the interaction method they learned was suitable for Taiwanese couples, showing the localization of the program; 89% of participants found the activities to be entertaining, showing the enjoyability of the program; 77% of participants were satisfied that the program provided alone time for couples, demonstrating the privacy of the program; and 78% of participants acquired professional knowledge about marriage, reflecting the professionalism of the program. In assessing the impact of this program, the results showed that among seven couples who completed pretest and posttest questionnaires, three couples' marital quality increased over time, three couples showed different patterns between husbands and wives in marital quality changes (one's marital quality increased and the other's marital quality decreased), and one couple's marital quality remained the same as before. It seemed that the program had the effect of revitalizing the partnership for most of the participants. How exactly did the ＂Holding Hands＂ family program enrich the relationship between husband and wife? The qualitative findings showed that this marital education program promoted marital quality by designing courses that (1) allowed the couples to realize what was previously overlooked and to understand each other better, (2) generated new perspectives on relationship development and rethought the meanings behind their spousal behaviors, and (3) allowed for couples to change their thoughts and then adjust their approaches. Conclusion and Suggestions: This program achieved breakthroughs and demonstrated strength across the four major characteristics. The program also provided activities for couples' children to enable couples to participate. By emphasizing enjoyability and privacy, the program appealed to participants in various groups and genders. The concepts for this program were all derived from the results of localized research, which was tailored to the life experiences and ways of communications among Taiwanese couples. Future marriage education research may consider combining activities with the husband and wife, children, and even the whole family, which should increase couples' participation and acceptance of marriage education. To promote future marriage education, government and non-governmental organizations can combine resources from the industry, government, and academia sources to examine the effect of marriage education currently implemented in Taiwan, understand the main mechanism by which marriage education improves marital relationship, and explore the applicability of marriage education programs to couples at different phases of family life.

参考文献 ( 39 ) 〈TOP〉

利翠珊, T. S.(2012)。夫妻关系间的忍与婚姻满意度之关连。中华心理卫生学刊，25(3)，447-475。
连结：
利翠珊, T. S.,萧英玲, Y. L.(2016)。夫妻内隐情感经验：感恩、忍与婚姻满意度。本土心理研究，45，93-128。
连结：
利翠珊, T. S.,萧英玲, Y. L.,陈富美, F. M.,邓皓引, H. Y.,丁品瑄, P. H.(2018)。本土夫妻共识形成与情感增温—以参与式行动研究深化家庭理论建构与教育实践。本土心理研究，49，207-276。
连结：
李新民, H. M.,陈蜜桃, M. T.(2006)。实用智能、缘分信念与心理健康、工作表现之相关：以幼儿教师为例。中华心理学刊，48(2)，183-202。
连结：
林明杰, M. C.,陈慧女, H. N.,许正昊, C. H.,黄淑贞, S. J.,王招兰, Z. L.,陈靖佩, D. P.(2016)。集团结婚之新人对参与简易婚姻教育方案成效之研究。亚洲家庭暴力与性侵害期刊，12，45-80。
连结：

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址