自由談的督導團體運作－精神衛生護理人員的經驗

The Mechanism of Free-Floating Discussion in a Psychiatric/Mental Health Nursing Supervisory Group

10.6224/JN.62.3.41

蔣欣欣(Hsien-Hsien Chiang)

自由談 ； 團體分析 ； 深度學習 ； 對話 ； 督導團體 ； free-floating discussion ； group analysis ； deep learning ； dialogue ； supervisor group

護理雜誌

62卷3期（2015 / 06 / 01）

41 - 48

繁體中文

背　景　自由談或自由聯想的討論（free-floatingdiscussion），通常應用於治療性團體，以此運作督導團體的機制並不明確。目　的　本研究旨在探討自由談督導團體促成學習的運作機制。方　法　採用現象學研究方法，收集進階精神衛生護理臨床實習中督導團體之內容與學習心得進行分析，督導團體是每週一次，每次150分鐘，共計12次團體。結　果　自由談的督導團體具有體驗與引導兩種功能，分別是由體驗而領悟，由引導而自明。體驗的內容包括他人的經驗、身體的感知、自身的行動；引導的方式是，鼓勵陳述事例、跟隨話題的流動、引發彼此的映照。結論與應用　自由談督導團體的體驗與引導，是經由帶領者的無為而為，以及督導過程的平行運作，使臨床人員產生自發性、創造力、自信心，促進深度的學習，蘊生出實踐性智慧。

Background: Although the free-floating discussion format is widely used in group therapy, the application of this format in the context of supervisory groups has yet to be clarified. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the mechanisms involved in facilitating and learning the free-floating discussion format in a supervisory group. Methods: A phenomenological approach was used to investigate the group content and personal feedback of a psychiatric- nurse supervisory group. The group held on 12 sessions. Each session was conducted once weekly and lasting 150 minutes. Results: The findings identified the functions of free-floating discussions in the context of supervisory groups as: embodied interaction and initiation by handling. Embodied interaction included: reflection on the experience of the other, sense of body, and present action. Initiation by handling included: facilitating the self-narrative, following the lead of the group, and reflecting in accordance with the group. Conclusions / Implications for Practice: The role of the facilitator is to parallel process rather than to lead in order to produce practical wisdom. Free-floating discussion and self-evidence from initiation by handling has the potential to promote spontaneity, creativity, and self-confidence in clinical practice and to promote deep learning.

1. 蔡錚雲, C. Y.(2006)。現象學心理學的理論與應用（第二部份）：實徵與詮釋兩種應用模式系譜上的對照。應用心理學，29，53-70。
   連結：
2. Benner, P.,Sutphen, M.,Leonard, V.,Day, L.(2010).Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation.Stanford, CA:Jossey-Bass.
3. Borders, L. D.(1991).A systematic approach to peer group supervision.Journal of Counseling & Development,69(3),248-252.
4. Buber, M.(1988).The knowledge of man: Selected essays.Amherst, NY:Humanity Books.
5. Casement, P. J.(1991).Learning from the patient.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
6. Clair, M. S.(Ed.)(1996).Object relations and self psychology: An introduction.London, England:Brooks/Cole.
7. Cohn, H. W.(1988).Phenomenological elements in grouptherapy: Papers from continental Europe.Group Analysis,21(4),283-287.
8. Cohn, H. W.(1993).Martix and Intersubjectivity: Phenomenological aspects of group analysis.Group Analysis,26(4),481-486.
9. Doehrman, M. J.(1976).Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy.Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic,40(1),1-104.
10. Foulkes, S. H.(1991).Introduction to group-analytic psychotherapy.London, England:Karnac Books.
11. Friedman, R.(2014).Group analysis today-Developments in intersubjectivity.Group Analysis,47(3),194-200.
12. Giorgi, A.(1997).The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research.Journal of Phenomenological Psychology,28(2),235-260.
13. Holloway, E. L.,Johnston, R.(1985).Group supervision: Widely practiced but poorly understood.Counselor Education and Supervision,24(4),332-340.
14. Leszcz, M.,Murphy, L.(1994).Supervision of group psychotherapy.Clinical perspectives on psychotherapy supervision,Washington, DC:
15. McNeill, B. W.,Worthen, V.(1989).The parallel process in psychotherapy supervision.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,20(5),329-333.
16. Moss, E.(2008).The holding/containment function in supervision groups for group therapists.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy,58(2),185-201.
17. Potthoff, P.(2014).Foulkes and intersubjectivity: A pioneer in uncharted territories.Group Analysis,47(3),268-282.
18. Schön, D. A.(1987).Educating the reflective practitioner.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
19. Schön, D. A.(1983).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.New York, NY:Basic Books.
20. Sumerel, M. B.(1994).Parallel process in supervision.ERIC digest
21. Yalom, I. D.(1995).The theory and practice of group psychotherapy.New York, NY:Basic Books.
22. 余培林, P. L.(2012).老子：生命的大智慧.台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC:時報出版=Time Express.
23. 陳鼓應, G. Y.(1999).莊子今註今譯.台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC:商務=The Commercial Press.
24. 陳榮華, W. W.(2011)。高達美實踐智（phronesis）與道德生命的成長。「生命與現象學反思」現象學研討會，台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC:
25. 劉盈君, Y. C.,蔣欣欣, H. H.(2014)。臨終照護中的實踐智慧。護理雜誌，61(5)，33-42。
26. 歐美, M.,劉盈君, Y. C.,黃靖淇, C. C.,招雁翔, Y. H.,李作英, T. Y.,蔣欣欣, H. H.(2013)。護理人員在護持與承擔中的轉化—以臨終照護反思團體為例。護理雜誌，60(3)，31-39。
27. 蔣欣欣, H. H.(2013).團體心理治療.台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC:五南=Wu Nan.
28. 蔣欣欣, H. H.,廖珍娟, J. J.,劉盈君, Y. C.(2014)。為人與成己之間—面對他者的照護倫理態度。護理雜誌，61(2)，44-53。

1. 蔣欣欣(2015)。團體對話中的自我反思－精神衛生護理人員的經驗。護理雜誌，62(4)，73-81。
2. 蔣欣欣(2016)。真實人生─同儕團體之倫理諮詢。中華團體心理治療，22(1)，3-13。
3. 蔣欣欣(2019)。照護行動的身體感。護理雜誌，66(5)，26-31。
4. 蔣欣欣(2021)。小組對話教學。中華團體心理治療，27(1)，19-27。
5. 蔣欣欣,廖淑貞(2021)。船來了～相遇於自由談團體。榮總護理，38(4)，331-341。
6. 蔣欣欣,廖珍娟(2021)。小組對話的師生共學：精神衛生護理學實習為例。中華心理衛生學刊，34(1)，3-24。
7. 蔣欣欣,王美惠(2019)。團體的相遇：團體對話的教與學。中華團體心理治療，25(2)，6-16。
8. 蔣欣欣、廖家惠(2016)。團體對我與家庭之影響─面臨癌末親人之家庭互動。中華團體心理治療，22(1)，25-38。
9. 蔣欣欣、廖珍娟(2017)。人性化照護的感通。護理雜誌，64(5)，50-58。
10. 李宗諭(2017)。社會劇中的身體感。中華團體心理治療，23(1)，3-19。