比較住院病人對隱私權的重視與獲得程度之差異

The Comparison of the Difference between the Emphasis on and the Receipt of Patient Privacy in the Hospital Setting

10.6224/JN.62.5.61

李秋桂(Chiu-Kuel Li)；林秋芬(Chiou-Fen Lin)

住院病人 ； 隱私 ； 權益 ； inpatients ； privacy ； right

護理雜誌

62卷5期（2015 / 10 / 01）

61 - 71

繁體中文

背景　隱私權是人類獨有的權利，加強病人隱私權的重視與獲得的平衡，可以讓醫病關係更融洽。目的　探討住院病人對隱私權之重視與獲得程度的差異情形，以提供未來醫療機構對於維護病人隱私權的規劃之參考。方法　本研究採橫斷式設計，分層隨機抽樣北區的三家醫院為樣本醫院，採用經信效度檢定之自擬「病人隱私權量表」為工具，調查符合收案條件之住院病人，以頻次及百分比描述基本資料，並運用t檢定比較其在對隱私權的重視與獲得程度間的差異性。結果　本研究共回收有效問卷296份，有效回收率84.57%。住院病人對隱私權的重視和獲得程度都以資訊隱私最高、生理隱私最低，而生理隱私（t=3.04, p ＜ .001）及心理隱私（t=2.42, p ＜ .01）的重視與獲得程度間呈現統計學上的顯著差異。病人基本屬性中的性別、年齡、教育程度、婚姻、職業、醫院等級及病房類型等，與病人隱私權的重視及獲得程度有相關。結論／實務應用　病人對於生理和心理隱私的重視比獲得程度高；已婚、教育程度高的年輕女性重視程度較高；男性、教育程度低者獲得程度較低。未來醫院應加強病人的生理和心理隱私之提供，以提升病人對隱私權獲得的滿意度。

Background: Privacy is a unique privilege for humans. Enhancing the balance between the importance given to patient privacy and the receipt of this privacy by patients is one key approach to improving the relationship between patients and the hospital. Purpose: This study compared the difference between the importance of patient privacy and receipt of this privacy by patients as a reference for future patient privacy policy planning. Method: This study was a cross-sectional design. We randomly sampled three hospitals in northern Taiwan and investigated patients using a questionnaire. The questionnaire was self-designed and verified for reliability and validity. We used frequency and percentage to describe demographic data and used a t-test to compare the deviation between the emphasis on and receipt of patient privacy. Results: There were 296 valid samples in this study and the effective rate was 84.57%. The highest degree of importance was information privacy and the lowest was physical privacy. Physical privacy (t=3.04, p ＜ .001) and mental privacy (t=2.42, p ＜ .01) exhibited significant differences between emphasis and receipt. Demographic data on gender, age, education level, marital status, and occupation. Type of hospital and ward level correlated with the emphasis and receipt of privacy. Conclusion: The importance of privacy for physical and mental wellbeing was higher than the actual receipt of this privacy among the patient sample. The importance of privacy for married individuals and young women with high education levels was higher, while males and less-educated individuals scored lower in terms of privacy receipt. Medical agencies must provide higher levels of physical and mental privacy in order to enhance patient satisfaction.

1. 張乃文, N. W.,宋佩珊, P. S.(2010)。各國個人醫療資訊隱私標準之法制研析。醫事法學，17(2)，73-87。
   連結：
2. 程永明, Y. M.(2009)。醫療服務補救不一致對醫院形象與醫病關係維繫影響之研究：公平理論觀點。東吳經紀商學學報，64，93-128。
   連結：
3. Back, E.,Wikblad, K.(1998).Privacy in hospital.Journal of Advanced Nursing,27(1),940-945.
4. Chochinov, H. M.(2010).Dignity-conserving care - A new model for palliative care.JAMA: The Journal of American Medical Association,287(17),2253-2260.
5. Davison, S. N.(2006).Facilitating advance care planning for patient with end-stage renal disease: The patient perspective.Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology,1(5),1023-1028.
6. Lin, Y. K.,Lee, W. C.,Kuo, L. C.,Cheng, Y. C.,Lin, C. J.,Lin, H. L.,Lin, T. Y.(2013).Building an ethical environment proves patient privacy and satisfaction in the crowded emergency department: A quasi-experimental study.BMC Medical Ethics,14,8.
7. Matiti, M. R.,Trorey, G. M.(2008).Patients’ expectations of the maintenance of their dignity.Journal of Clinical Nursing,17(20),2709-2717.
8. Nayeri, N. D.,Aghajani, M.(2010).Patients’ privacy and satisfaction in the emergency department: A descriptive analytical study.Nursing Ethics,17(2),167-177.
9. Neame, R.,Hammond, A.,Deighton, C.(2005).Need for information and for involvement in decision making among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A questionnaire survey.Arthritis Care & Research,53(2),249-255.
10. Özturk, H.,Bahçecik, N.,Özçelik, K. S.(2014).The development of the patient privacy scale in nursing.Nursing Ethics,21(7),812-828.
11. Schopp, A.,Leino-Kilpi, H.,Välimäki, M.,Dassen, T.,Gasull, M.,Lemonidou, C.,Kaljonen, A.(2003).Perceptions of privacy in the care of elderly people in five European countries.Nursing Ethics,10(1),39-47.
12. Spies, C. D.,Schulz, C. M.,Weiß-Gerlach, E.,Neuner, B.,Neumann, T.,Von Dossow, V.,Elwyn, G.(2006).Preferences for shared decision making in chronic pain patients compared with patients during a premedication visit.Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica,50(8),1019-1026.
13. 王玲玲, L. L.,林秋芬, C. F.(2013)。住院病人對病人權利的重視與獲得。北市醫學雜誌，10(3)，244-253。
14. 宋維村, W. C.(2009)。醫療的隱私和守密。醫療品質雜誌，3(4)，75-78。
15. 沈屮, C.,許文潔, W. J.(2010).隱私權論兼析人格權.大陸=Shanghai, China:上海人民=Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe.
16. 張菊惠, C. H.(2009)。台灣婦女親善就醫環境的省思。護理雜誌，52(3)，5-9。
17. 莊秋華, C. H.,林惠美, H. M.,吳寬墩, K. D.(2007)。某醫學中心員工對病歷隱私保護的認知與態度調查。醫院雜誌，40(1)，1-14。
18. 陳美伶, M. L.(2012)。維護病人尊嚴。志為護理—慈濟護理雜誌，11(4)，66-71。
19. 彭少貞, S. J.(2011)。必要的界線病人隱私與訊息分享。志為護理—慈濟護理雜誌，10(5)，14-15。
20. 曾志仁, C. J.,邱政元, J. Y.,蔡亭儀, T. Y.,梁竣傑, J. J.,許瑋庭, W. T.(2012)。使用電子病歷保障病人隱私之探討—以中山醫學大學附設醫院病歷電子化為例。電腦稽核期刊，25，112-119。
21. 馮蕙麗, H. L.,孫月琴, Y. C.,王宥蓁, Y. C.,陳桂英, K. Y.,邱燕甘, Y. G.(2008)。提升門診病人對內診時身體隱私維護之滿意度。長庚護理，19(3)，378-388。
22. 黃惠滿, H. M.,洪春榮, C. J.,孫凡軻, F. K.,侯佩儀, P. Y.(2010)。病人隱私權保護和公眾權利的衝突以台灣病人個案分析為中心。長庚護理，21(4)，457-467。
23. 黃惠滿, H. M.,高家常, C. C.,孫凡軻, F. K.,侯佩儀, P. Y.(2010)。隱私權及病人隱私權之概念與法律規範。長庚護理，21(3)，314-322。
24. 盧美秀（編）, M. S.(Ed.)(2013).護理倫理與法律.台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC:華杏=Farseeing.
25. 戴志展, C. J.(2011)。病人權利常在我心。中國醫訊，90，27-29。

1. 胡瑛麒,吳展宇,何清治(2023)。病患與護理人員知覺病患隱私之比較研究。弘光學報，91，117-129。
2. 黃麗華,曾瓊誼,張鶯蘭,林佳諄,周貞秀(2018)。提升毒癮住院病人護理服務滿意度專案。弘光學報，82，1-12。
3. 蘇琬茲,郭倩琳,郭宏杉,李佩育(2021)。臨床護理人員對病人個人資料保護之知識調查。護理雜誌，68(5)，41-50。
4. 謝美玲(2022)。社群媒體應用與病人隱私的倫理衝突。志為護理-慈濟護理雜誌，21(5)，63-69。