建構口腔癌術後病人口腔評估表

Development of the Oral Assessment Scale for Post-Operational Patients With Oral Cancer

10.6224/JN.000025

李怡珍(Yi-Chen Lee)；許雅娟(Ya-Chuan Hsu)；江惠英(Hui-Ying Chiang)

口腔癌 ； 口腔評估表 ； 心理計量 ； oral cancer ； oral assessment scale ； psychometric properties

護理雜誌

64卷2期（2017 / 04 / 01）

66 - 75

繁體中文

背景　目前國內外口腔評估表所適用的對象，以癌症病人接受放射線療法或化學藥物療法後口腔狀況評估為主，並非針對口腔癌術後病人整體口腔狀況所建構。然而一份具有信效度的口腔評估工具，能指引護理人員正確評估口腔癌術後病人口腔狀況，且能依評估結果來制定個別化口腔照護措施。目的　發展及建構口腔癌術後病人口腔評估表之信效度。方法　透過五場專家諮詢會議及5位專家二次內容效度檢定，編製完成十題項「口腔癌術後病人口腔評估表」，於南部某一醫學中心之口腔顎面外科加護病房及一般病房，收案30位及100位入院接受口腔惡性腫瘤切除、手術治療前未接受過化學治療或放射線治療者，分別進行預試及正式測試，以兩位評估者於預試階段檢定評估者間信度，於正式測試階段檢定量表之內在一致性信度及同時效度。結果　本量表之專家效度指標CVI（content validity index）值為1.0；預試評估者間信度除評估題項「唇」及「舌」ICC（intraclass correlation coefficient）值為.97外，其餘八題項皆為1.0；整體Cronbach's α係數為 .72。口腔狀況及口腔舒適程度呈顯著負相關（r = -.93, p ＜ .001）。結論／實務應用　「口腔癌術後病人口腔評估表」具有適當信度及效度，可用以評估口腔癌術後病人口腔狀況。

Background: Current oral assessment scales are designed to assess the severity of oral health in cancer patients who have undergone radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Currently, no scale is available that assesses the overall oral health situation of patients. However, this type of scale is critical for guiding nursing staff to understand the oral status of postoperative patients and for facilitating the development of patient-centered oral nursing treatments. Purpose: To develop the oral assessment scale for post-operational patients with oral cancer (OASPOCa) and establish its psychometric properties. Method: The ten associated items of the OASPOCa were determined using a series of five professional council meetings and two verifications of content validity by 5 experts in the field of oral cancer care. A pilot study was conducted on 30 participants and a formal study was conducted on 100 participants at the ICU and the oral and maxillofacial surgery ward at a medical center in southern Taiwan. All of the participants were oral cancer patients who had been admitted to excise tumors of oral cancer. None of the participants had been treated previously for oral cancer using chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity of the OASPOCa were evaluated. Result: A content validity of 1.0 was obtained. The inter-rater reliability assessment in the pilot study yielded ICCs of .97 for two assessment items (＂lips＂ and ＂tongue＂) and 1.0 for the remaining eight items. The Cronbach's α coefficient was .72 for the OASPOCa. Further, a statistically significant negative relationship was found between overall oral status and oral comfort level (r = -.93, p ＜ .001). Conclusions / Implications for Practice: The oral assessment scale for post-operational patients with oral cancer was found to have good reliability and validity. This scale is a reliable tool for assessing the oral status of postoperative oral cancer patients.

1. 衛生福利部（2016，8月）．104 年國人死因統計結果．取自http://www.mohw.gov.tw/news/572256044 [Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, ROC. （2016, August). Cause of death statistics in Taiwan, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.mohw.gov.tw/news/572256044]
2. Campana, J. P.,Meyers, A. D.(2006).The surgical management of oral cancer.Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America,39(2),331-348.
3. DeVellis, R. F.(2003).Scale development: Theory and applications.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
4. Dijkstra, P. U.,Huisman, P. M.,Roodenburg, J. L. N.(2006).Criteria for trismus in head and neck oncology.International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,35(4),337-342.
5. Eilers, J.,Berger, A. M.,Petersen, M. C.(1988).Development, testing, and application of the oral assessment guide.Oncology Nursing Forum,15(3),325-330.
6. Huskinson, W.,Lloyd, H.(2009).Oral health in hospitalised patients: Assessment and hygiene.Nursing Standard,23(36),43-47.
7. Lindmeier, A.(2011).Modeling and measuring knowledge and competencies of teachers: A threefold domain-specific structure model for mathematics.Gottingen, Germany:Waxmann Verlag.
8. Sato, J.,Goto, J.,Harahashi, A.,Murata, T.,Hata, H.,Yamazaki, Y.,Kitagawa, Y.(2011).Oral health care reduces the risk of postoperative surgical site infection in inpatients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.Supportive Care in Cancer,19,409-416.
9. Shrout, P. E.,Fleiss, J. L.(1979).Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin,86(2),420-428.
10. Waltz, C. F.,Strickland, O. L.,Lenz, E. R.(2005).Measurement in nursing and health research.New York, NY:Springer.
11. 田沁潔、賴惠玲、許文玲、彭逸稘、李茹萍(2007)。護理衛教對頭頸部癌症病人口腔照顧認知、健康信念及自我效能之成效。實證護理，3(3)，215-224。
12. 吳明隆(2012)。SPSS 操作與應用─問卷統計分析實務。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan:五南=Wunan。
13. 吳明隆(2006)。SPSS 統計應用學習實務─問卷分析與應用統計。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan:知城數位科技=Kochi Castle。
14. 吳明隆(2009)。SPSS 操作與應用─問卷統計分析實務。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan:五南=Wunan。
15. 吳明隆、涂金堂(2012)。SPSS 與統計應用分析與應用統計。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan:五南=Wunan。
16. 李怡珍、顏欽堉、林玫吟、于錫倩、張敏德(2014)。探討口腔癌術後早期介入吞嚥訓練及監測進食安全之成效及影響因素。臺灣口腔顎面外科學會雜誌，25(1)，1-7。
17. 周繡玲、謝嘉芬、李佳諭、江孟冠、紀雯真(2011)。癌症病人口腔黏膜炎臨床照護指引。腫瘤護理雜誌，11(2，增訂刊=2, Suppl)，61-85。
18. 林采蓉、楊慶怡、吳昭瑩、廖玉美(2013)。提升口腔癌病人顯微游離皮瓣存活率之改善專案。護理雜誌，60(6)，68-75。
19. 洪秀琴、陳淑卿、高婉琪、許月香、李孟英(2008)。口腔癌皮瓣重建術後執行口腔護理之改善專案。腫瘤護理雜誌，8(1)，35-49。
20. 胡月娟、高紀惠(1990)。口腔護理方案對急性白血病患者口腔黏膜改變成效之探討。護理雜誌，37(2)，21-34。
21. 陳嬿如、葉芳君、莊紫雲、林小玲(2003)。化學治療癌症病人口腔黏膜炎發生率調查方案。榮總護理，20(1)，65-74。
22. 黃麗娟、李珍珍、梁子翎、楊于瑩、倪正怡(2015)。提升加護病房護理師執行經口留置氣管內管病人口腔清潔之成效。馬偕護理雜誌，9(1)，19-30。
23. 楊榮武、黃鈺芬、康家郡、陳威齊、蔣維凡(2015)。以高位邊緣性骨切除術合併咀嚼肌群剝離術治療頰黏膜癌導致之張口受限─病例報告。臺灣口腔顎面外科學會雜誌，26(1)，55-63。
24. 楊翠雲、高紀惠、馬素華、賴允亮、陳君侃(1996)。頭頸部放射線療法之癌症病人施行口腔護理方案成效之探討。長庚護理，7(3)，15-29。
25. 楊慶怡、林翠姬、林采蓉(2015)。提升護理人員執行口腔癌皮瓣重建術後病人口腔照護之改善專案。高雄護理雜誌，32(1)，30-40。
26. 劉玉雅(2001)。頭頸部癌化學治療患者口腔衛教效果之評價研究。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌，21，81-89。
27. 蔡紫暄、周繡玲、陳麗糸(2011)。口腔癌患者術後症狀困擾及其相關因素探討。腫瘤護理雜誌，11(2)，23-35。
28. 簡于芬、翁光瑞、蘇淑娟、陳孟清、翁新惠(2014)。提昇口腔癌術後口腔清潔完整率改善專案。榮總護理，31(2)，208-218。

1. 楊美玲,張淑芳,丁珮珈(2022)。照護一位女性舌癌手術病人之護理經驗。彰化護理，29(1)，126-136。