從獨白到對話－糖尿病自我管理教育的演變

From Monologue to Dialogue: The Evolution of Diabetes Self-Management Education

10.6224/JN.201810_65(5).04

林瑞祥(Boniface J. LIN)；李佩芬(Pei-Fen LEE)

糖尿病控制 ； 共享門診 ； 共享決策 ； 糖尿病自我管理教育與支持 ； diabetes control ； shared medical appointment ； shared decision making ； diabetes self-management education and support

護理雜誌

65卷5期（2018 / 10 / 01）

20 - 26

繁體中文

糖尿病是一種慢性病，病友需要積極改變自己的飲食習慣和運動習慣，不能只靠藥物治療。有糖尿病的人需要控制高血糖、高血壓、高血脂等三高的控制。但糖尿病控制現況在美國及台灣目前都不盡理想，文獻研究結果也顯示，將來所引發的糖尿病併發症，如失明和洗腎的病人會越來越多。本文從探討三高控制不佳可能的因素如：醫師的治療惰性（又稱慣性），病人的服藥順從性（adherence）及糖尿病自我管理教育目前所面臨的挑戰等，提供臨床醫護人員在糖尿病自我管理教育所需改變的方向。過去我們提供衛教課程時，往往站在講台上獨白（monologue），近幾年我們嘗試運用在美國發展出來的共享門診及共享決策等創新看診模式，盡量鼓勵病人與病人、病人與衛教團隊人員的對談（dialogue）。初步研究結果皆有不錯的成效。最後台灣在健保論量計酬的環境裡，要推廣這樣費時的工作，確實困難。希望健保局早日改行論價值（考量成本的品質）計酬的制度，讓更多的醫護人員偕同病友，努力提升糖尿病照護的品質。

Diabetes is a chronic disease. Patients with diabetes must actively change their eating and exercise habits and cannot rely solely on medication. Moreover, these patients need to control high blood glucose, high blood pressure, and high blood cholesterol, commonly known as control of the ＂three highs＂. As the current state of diabetes control is not ideal in the United States and Taiwan, disease-related complications such as blindness and the need for dialysis is expected to continue to increase in these countries in the future. This article highlights the possible factors of poor control of the ＂three highs＂ such as the therapeutic inertia of physicians (also known as clinical inertia), patient adherence, and current challenges in diabetes self-management education. In the past, courses in health education at our institution have been frequently delivered in monologue format. In recent years, we have tried a form of group therapy known as shared medical appointment (SMA) in order to encourage dialogue among patients and minimize didactic teaching. The preliminary results have been promising. In recent weeks, we began to discuss targeting SMA therapy on the topics of food metabolism and the typical effects and side effects of new and old drugs. We hope this will ease our introduction of shared decision making (SDM) in the near future. Promoting time-consuming procedures such as SDM is difficult in Taiwan because national-insurance health insurance payments to the healthcare provider are based on volume rather than value. We hope that the Health Insurance Bureau begins to recognize and appreciate the contribution of nurse educators and dietitians in the care of patients with diabetes and approve compensation for their hard work.

1. 邱世哲、杜瀛岳、黃銘源、李英芬(2015)。案例討論於社區醫療照護團隊教育成效之初探。安寧療護雜誌，20(1)，13-23。
   連結：
2. 蔡美慧、曹逢甫、盧豐華(2004)。揭開病人面具─從傾聽病人開始。醫學教育，8(3)，336-349。
   連結：
3. Alston, C.,Berger, Z. D.,Brownlee, S.,Elwyn, G.,Fowler, F. J., Jr.,Hall, L. K.,Henderson, D.(2014).,未出版
4. American Diabetes Association(2003).Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus.Diabetes Care,26(1, Suppl.),s33-s50.
5. American Diabetes Association(2018).4. Lifestyle management: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2018.Diabetes Care,41(1, Suppl.),S38-S50.
6. American Heart Association. (2015, August). Cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Retrieved from http://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/diabetes/why-diabetes-matters/cardiovascular-disease--diabetes
7. Charles, C.,Gafni, A.,Whelan, T.(1997).Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).Social Science & Medicine,44(5),681-692.
8. Cooke, D.,Bond, R.,Lawton, J.,Rankin, D.,Heller, S.,Clark, M.,Speight, J.(2013).Structured type 1 diabetes education delivered within routine care. Impact on glycemic control and diabetes-specific quality of life.Diabetes Care,36(2),270-272.
9. Edelman, S. V.,Polonsky, W. H.(2017).Type 2 diabetes in the real world: The elusive nature of glycemic control.Diabetes Care,40(11),1425-1432.
10. Grant, R. W.,Buse, J. B.,Meigs, J. B.(2005).Quality of diabetes care in U.S. Academic Medical Centers.Diabetes Care,28(2),337-442.
11. Haas, L.,Maryniuk, M.,Beck, J.,Cox, C. E.,Duker, P.,Edwards, L.,Youssef, G.(2014).National standards for diabetes self-management education and support.Diabetes Care,37(1, Suppl.),S144-S153.
12. Handelsman, Y.,Bloomgarden, Z. T.,Grunberger, G.,Umpierrez, G.,Zimmerman, R. S.,Bailey, T. S.,Zangeneh, F.(2015).American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology - Clinical practice guidelines for developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan - 2015 - Executive summary.Endocrine Practice,21(4),413-437.
13. Huitt, W. (2003). The information processing approach to cognition. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/infoproc.html
14. Khunti, K.,Gomes, M. B.,Pocock, S.,Shestakova, M. V.,Pintat, S.,Fenici, P.,Medina, J.(2018).Therapeutic inertia in the treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism,20(2),427-437.
15. Li, R.,Shrestha, S. S.,Lipman, R.,Burrows, N. R.,Kolb, L. E.,Rutledge, S.(2014).Diabetes self-management education and training among privately insured persons with newly diagnosed diabetes--United States, 2011-2012.MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,63(46),1045-1049.
16. National Committee for Quality Assurance. (n.d.). The healthcare effectiveness data and information set, HEDIS. Retrieved from http://www.ncqa.org/hedis-quality-measurement/hedis-measures
17. Steinsbekk, A.,Rygg, L.,Lisulo, M.,Rise, M. B.,Fretheim, A.(2012).Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis.BMC Health Services Research,12,213.
18. Strawbridge, L. M.,Lloyd, J. T.,Meadow, A.,Riley, G. F.,Howell, B. L.(2017).One-year outcomes of diabetes self-management training among medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with diabetes.Medical Care,55(4),391-397.
19. Tamhane, S.,Rodriguez-Gutierrez, R.,Hargraves, I.,Montori, V. M.(2015).Shared decision-making in diabetes care.Current Diabetes Reports,15(12),112.
20. Yu, N. C.,Su, H. Y.,Tsai, S. T.,Lin, B. J.,Shiu, R. S.,Hsieh, Y. C.,Sheu, W. H. H.(2009).ABC control of diabetes: Survey data from National Diabetes Health Promotion Centers in Taiwan.Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,84(2),194-200.
21. 中央健康保險署（2018）．糖尿病病人加入照護方案比率．取自https://www1.nhi.gov.tw/mqinfo/Map_1.aspx?Type=DM&DAID=568&List=4 [National Health Insurance Administration, Taiwan, ROC. (2018). The ratio of diabetes patients in healthcare programs. Retrieved from https://www1.nhi.gov.tw/mqinfo/Map_1.aspx?Type=DM&DAID=568&List=4]
22. 中華民國糖尿病學會(2018)。2018糖尿病臨床照護指引。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC:作者=Author。
23. 王治元（2018）．台灣第四次TADE（2018）品管調查初報．取自https://www.tade.org.tw/upload/News/file/1326- 90.pdf [Wang, C. Y. (2018). The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among patients with diabetes, 2011-2018, the 4th National Survey in Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.tade.org.tw/upload/News/file/1326-90.pdf]
24. 林瑞祥、李佩芬(2017)。共享門診在台灣之照護經驗。中華民國糖尿病衛教學會會訊，13(2)，19-22。
25. 黃柏霖(2018)。臺中市=Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC，國立中興大學企業管理學系所=National Chung Hsing University。
26. 蔡孟甫(2018)。臺中市=Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC，國立中興大學企業管理學系所=National Chung Hsing University。
27. 衛生福利部統計處（2018）．106 年主要死因統計結果分析． 取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-3960-41756-113.html [Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, ROC. (2018). Analysis of the causes of death, 2017. Retrieved from https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-3960-41756-113.html]
28. 蕭偲吟(2018)。臺中市=Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC，國立中興大學企業管理學系所=National Chung Hsing University。

1. 張靜雯(Chin-Wen Chang);徐琬茵(Wan-Yin Hsu);辛怡君(I-Chun Hsin)(2024)。運用自我管理於蜂窩性組織炎合併初患糖尿病個案之護理經驗。高雄護理雜誌。41(1)。182-193。