建構護理資訊系統改善電腦斷層定位合併顯影劑施打完整率專案

Establishing a Nursing Informatics System to Improve the Completion Rate of Computed Tomography Simulation With Contrast Injection

10.6224/JN.201812_65(6).10

曾寶秀(Pao-Hsiu TSENG)；紀怡蓉(Yi-Rong JIH)；楊靜鈺(Ching-Yu YANG)

護理資訊系統 ； 顯影劑施打 ； 完整率 ； nursing informatics system ； contrast injection ； complete rate

護理雜誌

65卷6期（2018 / 12 / 01）

78 - 86

繁體中文

背景：電腦斷層定位合併顯影劑施打過程，因醫療人員執行過程步驟不一致與遺漏，顯影劑滲漏及副作用處置能力不足，且無訂定顯影劑施打流程的規範使臨床醫療人員可遵守，進而可能影響病人定位過程的安全與品質，故引發專案小組改善動機。現況分析確立顯影劑施打完整率低的主因為：缺乏顯影劑施打的標準作業資訊系統、缺乏專屬的氧氣及抽痰設備、無顯影劑放入溫箱的規範、護理師未覆核病人顯影劑過敏史、未落實靜脈留置針施打規範、接受電話口頭顯影劑醫囑、未落實病人辨識及對顯影劑施打的評估與認知不足。目的：電腦斷層定位合併顯影劑施打完整率由65%提升至95%。解決方案：自2016年4月1日至2016年12月31日止，執行改善策略包括：(1)護理引導跨科部合作建置顯影劑施打標準作業之護理資訊系統；(2)建立及落實病人辨識的標準做法；(3)靜脈留置針施打與顯影劑放入溫箱的規範；(4)建置專屬的氧氣及抽痰設備；(5)教育課程及顯影劑施打的操作訓練。結果：電腦斷層定位合併顯影劑施打過程的各層面的完整率由65%提升至95%。結論：期望藉此專案分享團隊合作改善電腦斷層定位合併顯影劑施打的完整率及提升病人安全的照護品質。

Background & Problems: Problems that influence the safety and quality of the patient-positioning process during computed tomography (CT) simulation with contrast injection include: 1) inconsistent and incomplete procedures performed by medical staffs, 2) poor prevention of developer leakage and handling of side-effects, and 3) the lack of a standardized protocol. Desire to improve this situation encouraged us to do this project. Adverse events during CT simulation with contrast injection procedures are largely attributable to the lack of a standardized nursing informatics system, with other causes including nurses incorrectly performing allergy history assessments, incorrect communications with the doctor due to verbal orders given by phone, failure to perform proper patient identification and intravenous catheterization procedures, lack of assessment and knowledge about contrasts, lack of guidelines for warming contrast in the incubator, and lack of oxygen and sputum suction equipment. Purpose: To improve the rate of completion of CT simulation with contrast injection procedures from 65% to 95%. Resolution: This project was conducted between April 2016 and December 2016. Our strategy included establishing a nursing informatics system for the CT simulation with contrast injection process. This system included a standard patient-identification procedure, protocol for the correct placement of intravenous needles, standard specifications for the using an incubator with contrast, installation of oxygen and sputum suction equipment, and implementation of a nursing education and training program. Result: This project with associated strategies improved CT simulation with contrast injection completion rates in all domains from the original 65% to 95% at the end of the project period. Conclusions: This project improved significantly the completion rates of the CT simulation with contrast injection process. We want to share this experience to help other hospitals and to improve patient safety and quality of care.

1. 李作英(2017)。資訊科技決策中護理資訊人員之角色功能。護理雜誌，64(4)，5-9。
   連結：
2. 馮容莊、葉雨婷(2014)。護理新視界—護理資訊的演變與發展。護理雜誌，61(4， 附冊=4, Suppl.)，78-84。
   連結：
3. Baerlocher, M. O.,Asch, M.,Myers, A.(2010).Allergic-type reactions to radiographic contrast media.Canadian Medical Association Journal,182(12),1328.
4. Evans, W. K.,Ashbury, F. D.,Hogue, G. L.,Smith, A.,Pun, J.(2014).Implementing a regional oncology information system: Approach and lessons learned.Current Oncology,21(5),224-233.
5. Katayama, H.,Yamaguchi, K.,Kozuka, T.,Takashima, T.,Seez, P.,Matsuura, K.(1990).Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media: A report from the Japanese committee on the safety of contrast media.Radiology,175(3),621-628.
6. Kubicek, G. J.,Kovacs, J. E.,LaCouture, T.(2015).CT contrast in radiation oncology simulation.American Journal of Cancer Review,3(1),Article ID 20140605.
7. Morcos, S. K.(2005).Acute serious and fatal reactions to contrast media: Our current understanding.The British Journal of Radiology,78(932),686-693.
8. Schopp, J. G.,Iyer, R. S.,Wang, C. L.,Petscavage, J. M.,Paladin, A. M.,Bush, W. H.,Dighe, M. K.(2013).Allergic reactions to iodinated contrast media: Premedication considerations for patients at risk.Emergency Radiology,20(4),299-306.
9. Tonolini, M.,Campari, A.,Bianco, R.(2012).Extravasation of radiographic contrast media: Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology,41(2),52-55.
10. 張意宜、江村煌、東雅惠(2013)。某區域醫院病人使用含碘顯影劑產生立即性不良反應之研究。臺灣臨床藥學雜誌，21(2)，95-104。
11. 許秀央、蔡榮美、高美華、吳妙(2015)。提升門診病人辨識完整率之專案。馬偕護理雜誌，9(1)，7-18。
12. 許意敏、李垣林、林川雄、黃文濤、張振榮、廖龍泉(2013)。運用失效模式與效應分析評估接受磁振造影檢查之病患安全性。健康管理學刊，11(1)，29-44。
13. 陳雅凰、賴佳玟、汪姍瑩、陳佳伶、黃兆駿、李柏葦、陳銘樹(2016)。應用「醫療照護失效模式與效應分析」HFMEA評估核醫造影給藥安全並改善作業流程以提升整體醫療品質。核子醫學暨分子影像雜誌，29(3)，105-125。
14. 陳榮邦、賴映蓉、陳震宇、張政彥、林明芳、李三剛、黃國茂(2007)。臺灣醫學中心放射線科檢查流程之病人安全調查。中華放射線醫學雜誌，32(4)，193-203。
15. 趙育玲、李亭亭(2015)。加護病房護理人員使用臨床資訊系統之滿意度研究。護理暨健康照護研究，11(2)，109-118。
16. 劉奇芝、黃德兒、蔡松益(2010)。運用失效模式與效應分析（HFMEA）於電腦斷層檢查之顯影劑給藥流程安全評估。中華放射線技術學雜誌，34(2)，101-108。
17. 衛生福利部統計處（2018）．106 年死因結果統計分析．取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-3960-41756-113.html[Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, ROC. (2018). 2017 cause of death statistics.Retrieved from https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-3960-41756-113.html]
18. 謝明芝、陳啟昌、李潤川、陳榮邦(2008)。放射線檢查之用藥安全流程。中華放射線技術學雜誌，33(2)，85-90。