運用創造思考教學提升二年期護理師腹部引流管照護完整率

Using Creative Thinking Teaching to Improve Abdominal Drainage Tube Care Integrity Among Two-Year Post Graduate Nurses (PGNs)

10.6224/JN.202210_69(5).10

羅心怡(Hsin-Yi LO)；林育嘉(Yu-Jia LIN)；張瑋(Wei CHANG)；鄭青青(Ching-Ching CHENG)

創造思考教學 ； 護理師 ； 外科引流管 ； 管路滑脫 ； creative thinking teaching ； nurses ； surgical drain ； tube slippage

護理雜誌

69卷5期（2022 / 10 / 01）

86 - 95

繁體中文

背景：腹部引流管是治療疾病及維護病人生命的重要設備，若發生滑脫，可能產生合併症、延長住院時間及增加醫療成本。統計2019年外傷科病房腹部引流管滑脫件數共11件，較2018年上升7件，其中發生於二年期護理師佔9件。目的：提升二年期護理師執行腹部引流管照護完整率達94%。解決方案：建立外傷科病房腹部引流管照護標準模組；運用「引流管模型」及腹部引流管照護多媒體教材進行教學，增加技術熟練度；調整專科管路照護課程時間並運用創造思考教學模式（creative thinking teaching model）進行教學活動；設計腹部引流管直接觀察操作型技術評量表（direct observation of procedural skills），評值護理師技術；建立引流管照護技能稽核機制。結果：二年期護理師腹部引流管照護完整率提升至98.1%、腹部引流管照護認知提升至100%、病人腹部引流管滑脫率0%。結論：本專案成效良好，解決對策平行推展其他外科系病房，運用創造思考教學模式進行教學活動護理師學習回饋佳，因此將此教學模式納入病房在職教育標準；下階段計畫為將腹部引流管直接觀察操作型技術評量表進行資訊化並與二年期護理師電子學習護照結合，讓學習歷程更加完整。

Background & Problems: The abdominal drainage tube is an important device used in disease treatment and life maintenance. Drainage tube slippage leads to complications that increase both length of stay and costs of care. Four and seven cases of drainage tube slippage were reported, respectively, in 2018 and 2019 in our trauma wards. Among these, 9 cases were under the care of nurses in their post graduate year (PGY) training program. Purpose: To increase to 94% the abdominal drainage tube care-completeness rate of nurses in the PGY program. Methods: Methods used included: establishing a standardized care module for abdominal drainage tube in the trauma wards, using the ＂drainage tube model＂ and multimedia teaching material in education to enhance skill proficiency, flexibly adjusting education schedules, using a creative-thinking teaching model in education, employing direct observation to evaluate PGY nurses' abdominal drainage tube skills; and establishing a drainage tube skill proficiency audit mechanism. Results: After the intervention, the rate of care completeness for the abdominal drainage tube rose to 98.1%, participant awareness rose to 100%, and the rate of abdominal drainage tube slippage reduced to 0%. Conclusions: This project achieved good outcomes that may be expanded horizontally to other surgical wards. The use of the creative-thinking teaching model in training activities received good feedback from the nurse participants and will be incorporated into in-service education standards along with the computerized direct observation of procedural skills in the PGY e-learning passport to strengthen the completeness of learning processes.

1. 王美惠, M.-H.,林火嬌, H.-C.,陳雅琳, Y.-L.(2016)。降低傑克森引流管滑脫率。源遠護理，10(1)，54-61。
   連結：
2. 呂詩敏, S.-M.,紀淑真, S.-J.,謝佩真, P.-C.(2018)。降低某內科病房膽道引流管滑脫率之專案。彰化護理，25(2)，21-34。
   連結：
3. 張明真, M.-C.,鈕淑芬, S.-F.,張元玫, Y.(2019)。醫院臨床護理教學策略模式。領導護理，20(3)，22-31。
   連結：
4. 陳尹甄, Y.-C.,郭素真, S.-C.,夏惠珍, H.-J.,陳淑芬, S.-F.(2018)。提升NPGY學員Pig-tail引流管照護完整性。榮總護理，35(2)，185-194。
   連結：
5. 陳玫君, M.-C.,李碧娥, B.-O.,張素嫻, S.-H.(2018)。愛的（ATDE）創造思考教學模式於護理創新作品教學之應用。護理雜誌，65(6)，20-25。
   連結：
6. 曾淑倩, S.-C.,周傳姜, C.-C.(2016)。新進護理師的學習經驗。榮總護理，33(2)，186-195。
   連結：
7. 趙莉芬, L.-F.,黃湘萍, H.-P.,倪麗芬, L.-F.,蔡佳蘭, C.-L.,黃翠媛, T.-Y.(2017)。護理創新教學科技的建置與應用。護理雜誌，64(6)，26-33。
   連結：
8. 蔡香薇, H.-W.,郭貞嬋, C.-C.,邱存梅, T.-M.,余沛瑀, P.-Y.,林秋子, C.-T.(2020)。提升腹部急症病人引流管自我照護正確率。長庚護理，31(1)，62-76。
   連結：
9. 蔡麗珍, L.-C.(2017)。提升護理臨床教師直接觀察操作型技術評量法（DOPS）應用之教學研究。領導護理，18(1)，59-69。
   連結：
10. Barutcu, C. D.(2017).The relationship between problem solving and creative thinking skills among nursing students.International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies,4(2),34-41.
11. Clark, K.,Hoffman, A.(2019).Educating healthcare students: Strategies to teach systems thinking to prepare new healthcare graduates.Journal of Professional Nursing,35(3),195-200.
12. Green, J. K.,Huntington, A. D.(2017).Online professional development for digitally differentiated nurses: An action research perspective.Nurse Education in Practice,22,55-62.
13. Ke, L.,Li, J.,Hu, P.,Wang, L.,Chen, H.,Zhu, Y.(2016).Percutaneous catheter drainage in infected pancreatitis necrosis: A systematic review.Indian Journal of Surgery,78(3),221-228.
14. Orth, K.(2018).Preventing surgical site infections related to abdominal drains in the intensive care unit.Critical Care Nurse,38(4),20-26.
15. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會（2020，10月20日）．台灣病人安全通報系統 2018年 TPR年報 ‧台灣病人安全資訊網。https://bit.ly/3uY29SA [Joint Commission of Taiwan. (2020, October 20). Taiwan Patient Safety Reporting System, annual report 2018. Taiwan Patient Safety Net. https://bit.ly/3uY29SA]
16. 張孟玲, M.-L.,邱國琄, K.-C.,高木榮, M.-J.,劉祥得, H.-T.(2018)。護理人員維護病人安全之影響因素探討。北市醫學雜誌，13(3)，123-136。
17. 陳龍安（編）, L.-A.(Ed.)(2006).創造思考教學的理論與實際.心理=Psychology.

1. (2023)。提升新進護理師學習Pig-tail引流照護之改善方案。榮總護理，40(4)，417-426。