地理資訊系統在集域分析及地景空間的應用：以鵝鑾鼻第三／四文化相遺址為例

Application of GIS to Catchment Analysis and Landscape Room: A Case Study of OLP III/IV Cultural Phase Sites

10.6152/jaa.2013.12.0003

劉亭攸(Ting-Yu Liu)

鵝鑾鼻第三／四文化相 ； 集域分析 ； 費由面 ； 視域分析 ； 動物遺留 ； 地景空間 ； OLP III/IV phase ； catchment analysis ； cost surface ； viewshed analysis ； fauna remains ； landscape room

考古人類學刊

79期（2013 / 12 / 01）

47 - 70

繁體中文

集域分析（catchment analysis）在研究方法的發展上，從簡單的同心圓逐漸修正，並在地理資訊系統（geographic information system）的幫助下將更多變數納入考量。而同時考量取得海、陸資源的能力並建立模型，可以對遺址居民在其環境中的活動有更細緻的了解。透過費由面和視域分析之後，可發現鵝鑾鼻第三／四文化相遺址在集域範圍與地景空間上相互對應。而共享同一地景空間的龜山與猴仙洞遺址，在活動範圍上也各自佔據了山與海的活動範圍，可能衍生出不同的互動模式，應可作為日後檢視兩遺址動物遺留與生業工具時的參考依據。

Through the calculation of cost surface, GIS enables site catchment analysis to move beyond models with simple geometric circles to allow for irregular ranges by considering the different costs of transportation over landscapes. Taking both terrestrial and marine data into consideration, the different accessibility of resources within a site catchment can be understood in more detail, and archaeologists can use this information to create a model of interaction between sites and their environment.According to the location of six sites from the O-luan-pi III/IV phase, and through the analysis of cost-surface and viewshed of digital elevation model (DEM) in GIS, I divide the coastal area of the O-luan-pi peninsula into four different landscape rooms. Two landscape rooms are separately occupied by a single site, and the other two landscape rooms each have two sites within them. It would seem natural to expect that catchments of sites sharing the same landscape room would overlap and that the activities of the sites on land would influence each other on land. However, through the analyses of current and wind data, it appears that sites sharing the same landscape room have different accessibility to terrestrial and marine environments. These variations may have led those sites to maintain their independent site catchments rather than competingwith each other for resources.

1. von Thünen, Johann Heinrich 1947[1826] 《孤立國：孤立國與農業及國民經濟之關係》（Der Isolierte Staat）。顧綏祿譯。上海：正中書局。
2. Bell, Tyler,Lock, Gary R.(2000).Topographic and Cultural Influences on Walking the Ridgeway in Later Prehistoric Times.Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies,Tokyo:
3. Boaz, Joel S.,Uleberg, Espen(2000).Quantifying the Non-Quantifiable: Studying Hunter-Gatherer Landscape.Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies,Tokyo:
4. Bronitsky, Gordons(ed.)(1983).Ecological Models in Economic Prehistory.Tempe, Arizona:Arizona State University.
5. Castro, Peter,Huber, Michael E.(2005).Marine Biology.New York:McGraw-Hill.
6. Chen, Maa-ling(1998).What Dating Result Imply: Redefining the separation of OLP Phase III and Phase IV, and the Potential Relationship between OLP Phase II and III.國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊,53,125-144.
7. Chen, Maa-ling(1997).Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University.
8. Chisholm, Michael(2007).Rural Settlement and Land Use.New Brunswick:Aldine Transaction.
9. Conolly, James,Lake, Mark(2006).Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology.New York:Cambridge University Press.
10. Flannery, Kent V.(ed.)(1976).The Early Mesoamerican Village.New York:Academic Press.
11. Gaffney, Vincent,Stančič, Zoran(1991).GIS Approaches to Regional Analysis: A Case Study of the Island of Hvar.Ljubljana:Znanstveni in?titut Filozofske fakultete.
12. Higgs, Eric Sidney(ed.)(1975).Palaeoeconomy.London:Cambridge University Press.
13. Higgs, Eric Sidney,Vita-Finzi, Claudio(1972).Prehistoic Economies: A Territorial Approach.Papers in Economic Prehistory,Cambridge:
14. Lock, Gary R.(2003).Using Computers in Archaeology: Towards Virtual Pasts.New York:Routledge.
15. Lock, Gary R.(ed.),Stančič, Zoran(ed.)(1995).Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective.Bristol, PA:Taylor & Francis.
16. Lock, Gary R.,Harris, Trevor M.(1996).Danebury Revisited: An English Iron Age Hillfort in a Digital Landscape.Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems,New York:
17. Reitz, Elizabeth Jean,Wing, Elizabeth S.(2008).Zooarchaeology.New York:Cambridge University Press.
18. Schiffer, Michael B.(ed.)(1979).Advance in Archaeological Methods and Theory.New York:Academic Press.
19. Smith, Adam、嚴復譯(2009)。原富。台北:臺灣商務。
20. 王德琦編(1985)。墾丁國家公園史前文化及生態資源。屏東:內政部營建署墾丁國家公園管理處。
21. 李光周(1985)。,台北:內政部營建署墾丁國家公園管理處。
22. 陳玉美(2003)。考古學中人與環境關係的研究：以 Site Catchment 為例。國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊，60，97-114。
23. 陳瑪玲(2000)。鵝鑾鼻 III-IV 期文化相的聚落模式與系統。國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊，54，63-96。
24. 臧振華(1994)。,台北:內政部。
25. 臧振華(1994)。,台北:內政部。
26. 劉益昌、李匡悌(1993)。,屏東:國立海洋生物博物館籌備處。
27. 劉益昌、李匡悌(1995)。,屏東:國立海洋生物博物館籌備處。
28. 鄭建文(2009)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學人類學硏究所。

1. 吳牧錞(2019)。攝影測量法在考古學舊社遺址研究與空間分析中的運用：以高士排灣Saqacengalj為例。考古人類學刊，90，45-73。