從waya看資本主義的轉化過程：一個賽德克部落的經濟變遷

Exploring the Transformation of Capitalism from Perspectives of Waya: Economic Changes in a Sediq Community

10.6152/jaa.2014.06.0003

王梅霞(Mei-Hsia Wang)

家戶生產模式 ； 鄉民經濟 ； 結合方式 ； 工作 ； 資本主義 ； 賽德克族 ； domestic mode of production ； peasant economy ； articulation ； work ； capitalism ； the Sediq

考古人類學刊

80期（2014 / 06 / 01）

53 - 101

繁體中文

本文聚焦在賽德克族種植不同作物期間，生產力與生產關係在不同「生產模式」中相互衝突、結合或轉化的方式，其中還涉及技術、知識、資金等新的生產要素形成過程，希望透過這些角度討論當地社會文化秩序之延續與變遷，以及新的社會秩序或文化觀念的形成。首先，人類學者對於部落社會的「家戶生產模式」」或鄉民社會的「家庭農場」及其與資本主義生產模式的結合方式，或者可能面對的矛盾與衝突等議題，已經累積許多研究成果。在賽德克部落的經濟變遷過程中，「家戶生產模式」在種植不同作物階段所扮演的角色，而且「家」的意涵在不同脈絡有不同界定方式。其次，經濟人類學討論「生產模式」中上層結構與下層結構的辯證關係，尤其關心社會變遷過程中人與文化的主動性，並且觸及更基本的議題－「經濟是什麼」。賽德克族民族誌要進一步凸顯：當地人如何透過原有文化來理解新的生產關係，但是在這過程中也改變了原有的文化；另一方面，資本主義也具有自我轉化的特質，當地人生活方式的慣習也協調了對於資本主義的經驗。因此，賽德克族原有社會文化性質與新的生產方式之間呈現出多元複雜關係，也發展出當地資本主義的特殊形貌。除了討論「家戶生產模式」在經濟變遷過程中如何結合不同的生產關係，以及當地人最重要的文化概念－waya與資本主義文化之間的關係，本文也呈現賽德克人創造新的社會秩序或文化觀念的過程。透過這些面向的討論，筆者的基本關懷在於：賽德克族如何在臺灣和全球政經變遷脈絡中，如何以其不同的社會網絡與文化能動性中介回應各種外力對地方社會所造成的衝擊，並且創造出新的社會文化。

This paper investigates the transformation of capitalism from the Sediq viewpoints of production. Economic anthropology is concerned with how the different mechanisms of exchange, production and consumption work to integrate different aspects of society. In regard to the issue of production, this research deals with the capitalist mode of production, domestic mode of production, peasant economy, and the articulation of different modes of production. The meaning of production in local contexts should be considered firstly; especially, how production connects and transforms the relationships among different levels. Further questions follow, including how the locals perceive the process of production and measure the value of objects, and whether the images of work, land and money synthesize several meanings and embody history itself in Sediq society. The Sediq began to grow cash crops and were incorporated into the capitalist market system in 1960s. In deciding whether to become involved in growing new crops, they were not solely influenced by questions of market price and stability, but also had to take into account how new crops fit into their traditional understanding of work and the values they placed on it. In addition, traditional social relationships continued to influence the planting of commercial crops, for example, in the exchange of labour and the lending of land. The use of money, like the choice of new crops and exchange of labour, reflects the fact that the Sediq have not been alienated from each other and from their products by these changes. This research, further, reveals how cultural production and transformation involve each other. On the one hand, the Sediq's key cultural concept-waya, which is thought to constitute a person's identity-still influences their acceptance of new crops and the transfer of new agricultural technology. On the other hand, a person's identity and social relationships changed when the community was drawn into the capitalist system and cash crop production Objective social structure and subjective individual consciousness then become related dialectically.

1. Wang, Mei-hsia(2008).The Reinvention of Ethnicity and Culture: A Comparative Study on the Atayal and the Truku in Taiwan.Journal of Archaeology and Anthropology,68,1-44.
   連結：
2. 王梅霞(2012)。「文化動起來」︰賽德克族文化產業的研究。民俗曲藝，176，233-286。
   連結：
3. 王梅霞(2009)。從「交換」看族群互動與文化再創造：日治初期苗栗地區泰雅族的研究。考古人類學刊，71，93-144。
   連結：
4. Bloch, Maurice(1975).Marxist Analyses and Social Anthropology,London:
5. Bloch, Maurice(ed.)(1975).Property and the End of Affinity.Marxist Analyses and Social Anthropology,London:
6. Carrithers, Michael(ed.),Collins, Steven(ed.),Lukes, Steven(ed.)(1985).The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
7. Collier, Jane Fishburne(ed.),Yanagisako, Sylvia Junko(ed.)(1987).Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
8. Comaroff, Jean(1985).Body of Power, Spirit of Resistance: The Culture and History of a South African People.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
9. Comaroff, Jean,Comaroff, John(1999).Occult Economies and the Violence of Abstraction: Notes from the South African Postcolony.American Ethnologist,26(2),279-303.
10. Comaroff, Jean,Comaroff, John(2000).Millennial Capitalism: First Thoughts on a second Coming.Public Culture,12(2),291-343.
11. Douglas, Mary(1995).The Cloud God and the Shadow Self.Social Anthropology,3(3),83-94.
12. Foster, George M.(1965).Peasant Society and the Image of Limited Good.American Anthropologist,67,293-315.
13. Frank, Andre Gunder(1969).Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil.New York:Monthly Review Press.
14. Geertz, Clifford(1963).Peddlers and Princes: Social Change and Economic Modernization in Two Indonesian Towns.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
15. Godelier, Maurice(1972).Rationality and Irrationality in Economics.London:Monthly Review Press.
16. Godelier, Maurice(1986).The Mental and the Material.Norfolk:Verso.
17. Godelier, Maurice(ed.)(1977).Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
18. Godelier, Maurice(ed.),Strathern, Marilyn(ed.)(1991).Big Men and Great Men: Personifications of Power in Melanesia.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
19. Gudeman, Stephen(1978).The Demise of a Rural Economy: From Subsistence to Capitalism in a Latin American Village.London:Routledge.
20. Gudeman, Stephen(1986).Economics as Culture: Models and Metaphors of Livelihood.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
21. Gudeman, Stephen,Rivera, Alberto(1990).Conversations in Colombia: The Domestic Economy in Life and Text.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
22. Jamieson, Mark(2003).Miskitu or Creole? Ethnic Identity and the Moral Economy in a Nicaraguan Miskitu Village.The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute,9(2),201-222.
23. Leclair, Edward E.(ed.),Schneider, Harold K.(ed.)(1968).Economic Anthropology: Readings in Theory and Analysis.New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
24. Meillassoux, Claude(1981).Maidens, Meal and Money.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
25. Miller, Daniel(1997).Capitalism: An Ethnographic Approach.Oxford:Berg.
26. Miller, Daniel(ed.)(1997).Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter.London:UCL press.
27. Parry, Jonathan(ed.),Bloch, Maurice(ed.)(1989).Money and the Morality of Exchange.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
28. Sahlins, Marshall(1972).Stone Age Economics.Chicago:Aidine Atherton Inc..
29. Sahlins, Marshall(ed.)(2000).Culture in Practice: Selected Essays.New York:Zone Books.
30. Sennett, Richard(2006).The Culture of the New Capitalism.New Haven:Yale University Press.
31. Siikala, Jukka(ed.)(1990).Culture and History in the Pacific.Helsinki:The Finnish Anthropological Society.
32. Strathern, Marilyn(1988).The Gender of the Gift.Berkeley:University of California Press.
33. Taussig, Michael(1980).The Devil and the Commodity Fetishism in South American.Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina Press.
34. Terray, Emmanuel(1972).Marxism and Primitive Societies.London:Monthly Review Press.
35. Thorner, Daniel(ed.),Kerblay, Basile(ed.)(1986).A. V. Chayanov on the Theory of Peasant Economy.Madison, Wis.:The University of Wisconsin Press.
36. Tsai, Chih-wei(2009).Indigenous Peoples Customary Land Tenure and Governance Structure: Case Study of the Sediq Peoples.Journal of Natural and Human Environment of Indigenous Peoples,1,11-144.
37. Wallerstein, Immanuel(1974).The Modern World-System.New York:Academic Press.
38. Wolf, Eric R.(1982).Europe and the People without History.Berkeley:University of California Press.
39. Wolf, Eric R.(1966).Peasants.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
40. 王梅霞(2006)。泰雅族。台北:三民。
41. 王梅霞(2010)。從治病儀式看泰雅族與太魯閣族的情緒展演。台灣原住民巫師與儀式展演論文集，台北:
42. 王梅霞(2012)。儀式語言、觀念與意象︰賽德克族的宗教變遷。第一屆台灣研究世界大會
43. 王梅霞(2011)。從小米到茶葉：賽德克族的經濟發展。第三屆族群、歷史與地域社會
44. 王梅霞(2003)。從 gaga 的多義性看泰雅族的社會性質。臺灣人類學刊，1(1)，77-104。
45. 王梅霞(2012)。「人的感情像流動的水」︰太魯閣人的家與情感。什麼是家？學術研討會
46. 呂理哲、簡婕妤、李問、杜建邦(2010)。98 學年度國立台灣大學人類學系文化田野實習報告98 學年度國立台灣大學人類學系文化田野實習報告,未出版
47. 杜維、祝愷信、李唐、王明易(2011)。99 學年度國立台灣大學人類學系文化田野實習報告99 學年度國立台灣大學人類學系文化田野實習報告,未出版
48. 沈明仁(1998)。崇尚祖靈的民族─賽德克人。台北:海翁。
49. 依婉‧貝林(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立東華大學民族發展所。
50. 黃應貴(2008)。存在、焦慮與意象─新自由主義經濟下的東埔地方社會。文化創造與社會實踐研討會，台北:
51. 黃應貴(1993)。作物、經濟與社會：東埔社布農人的例子。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，75，133-169。
52. 黃應貴(1986)。光復後高山族的經濟變遷。台灣土著社會文化硏究論文集，台北市:

1. 王梅霞(2018)。轉化、交織與再創造：賽德克族的宗教變遷。考古人類學刊，89，1-55。
2. (2024)。當代傳統、自由未來：從陳豪毅的阿美家屋論傳統藝術在當代的雜揉重生。東台灣研究，31，57-81。