鳳山縣舊城南門段城牆考古地層的廢棄形成過程

The Formation Process of Archaeological Stratigraphy during the Abandonment of the South Gate Wall of Old Fongshan County

10.6152/jaa.202012_(93).0004

鍾國風(Kuo-feng Chung)

考古地層 ； 哈里斯矩陣 ； 鳳山縣舊城 ； 形成過程 ； archaeological stratigraphy ； Harris Matrix ； Old Fongshan County ； formation process

考古人類學刊

93期（2020 / 12 / 01）

133 - 168

繁體中文

史坦（J. Stein）倡議文化地層單位，並呼籲考古學家將人為作用於地表所形成的考古地層從地質學沉積地層中解放出來，同時關注文化轉型與自然轉型並進的遺址形成過程。此一深具人為文化意義的考古地層，不同於自然地層純物理性的沉積原則，更反映著人們佔居地表的複雜作用能力。而哈里斯矩陣（Harris Matrix）層位分析系統，尤適用於複雜考古地層的紀錄方式。本研究採開放區域發掘策略與自然層位發掘方法，且應用哈里斯矩陣於發掘鳳山縣舊城歷史遺址的考古地層堆積分析，嘗試探究圍繞在清代城牆的建造、使用、廢棄、拆毀等過程，呈現地層堆積、疊壓、打破、填埋等一系列形成過程背後的堆積事件與行為意義，建構舊城南門段城牆的地層堆積與疊壓時間序列。同時，本研究方法能有效提升考古發掘田野上思考層位判斷與紀錄的系統性關聯，豐富考古地層形成過程的意義與脈絡性解釋。

With the idea of ethnostratigraphic unit, Stein (J. Stein) urged archaeologists to free themselves from the concept of geological sedimentary strata when looking at archaeological stratigraphy created by human action and to pay attention to the cultural and natural transformations during site formation processes. Rich in cultural significance, the archaeological stratigraphy is not always directly subject to the laws of natural deposition. Instead, it more strongly reflects the diverse forces and impact on the ground of human occupations. To document the complex archaeological stratigraphy, the Harris Matrix system is considered particularly desirable and applicable. The excavation of Old Fongshan County Historical Site applied open area excavation strategy, natural layer excavation methods, and the Harris Matrix. This research attempts to unravel a series of depositional events of strata accumulation, superposition, removal of deposits, and land filling that resulted from the construction, use, abandonment and destruction of the Ching Dynastic city walls. In doing so, we reconstruct the stratigraphic sequence of the south gate wall of Old Fongshan County. It is concluded that the Harris Matrix can serve as an extremely useful aid in recognizing distinct deposit units on site and in making systematic correlations of the recording of these units, thereby enriching the meanings and contextual interpretations of the processes by which archaeological stratigraphy is formed.

1. Atalay, Sonya(2007).Global Application of Indigenous Archaeology: Community Based Participatory Research in Turkey.Archaeologies,3(3),249-270.
2. Barker, Philip(1975).Excavations at the Site of the Baths Basilica at Wroxeter 1966-74: An Interim Report.Britannia,6,106-117.
3. Biddle, Martin(1964).Excavations at Winchester, 1962-3: Second Interim Report.Antiquaries Journal,44(2),188-219.
4. Biddle, Martin(1975).Excavations at Winchester, 1971: Tenth and Final Interim Report: Part II.Antiquaries Journal,55(2),295-337.
5. Biddle, Martin(1975).Excavations at Winchester, 1971: Tenth and Final Interim Report: Part I.Antiquaries Journal,55(1),96-126.
6. Binford, Lewis R.(1964).A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design.American Antiquity,29,425-441.
7. Borao Mateo, José E.(2015).Overview of the 2011 and 2012 Field Seasons’ Excavation in Heping Island.Recovering the Past of Jilong: New Archaeological Findings from Heping Island of Northern Taiwan,Taipei:
8. Carver, Martin(2005)。Key Ideas in Excavation。Archaeology: The Key Concepts，北京:
9. Crutzen, Paul J.,Stoermer, Eugene F.(2000).The “Anthropocene”.Global Change Newsletter,41,17-18.
10. Cruz Berrocal, María,Herrero, Elena Serrano,Moret, Marc Gener,González, Antonio Uriarte,Pérez, Mar Torra,Rodríguez, Susana Consuegra,Chevalier, Alexandre,Valentin, Frederique,Tsang, Cheng-hwa(2018).A Comprised Archaeological History of Taiwan through the Long-Term Record of Heping Dao, Keelung.International Journal of Historical Archaeology,29,425-441.
11. Cruz Berrocal, María,Herrero, Elena Serrano,Rodríguez, Susana Consuegra,Pérez, Mar Torra,Moret, Marc Gener,Subías, Sandra Montón,Tsang, Cheng-hwa(2015).Continuity and European Disruption in the Heping Island Archaeological Record: Excavation of Test Pits T2P8 and T3P1.Recovering the Past of Jilong: New Archaeological Findings from Heping Island of Northern Taiwan,Taipei:
12. Gilbert, Allan S.(ed.)(2017).Encyclopedia of Geoarchaeology.New York:Springer.
13. Harris, Edward C.(1977).Units of Archaeological Stratification.Norwegian Archaeological Review,10(1),84-94.
14. Harris, Edward C.(2014).Archaeological Stratigraphy: A Paradigm for the Anthropocene.Journal of Contemporary Archaeology,1(1),105-109.
15. Harris, Edward C.(1989).Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy.London:Academic Press.
16. Harris, Edward C.(1979).Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy.London:Academic Press.
17. Harris, Edward C.,Brow, Marley R.n, III,Brown, Gregory J.(1993).Practices of Archaeological Stratigraphy.London:Academic Press.
18. Harris, Edward C.,Ottaway, Patrick J.(1976).A Recording Experiment on a Rescue Site.Rescue Archaeology,10,6-7.
19. Hodder, Ian(2000).Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Ç atalhöyük.Cambridge:McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
20. Hodder, Ian(1997).Always Momentary, Fluid and Flexible: Towards a Reflexive Excavation Methodology.Antiquity,71,691-700.
21. Hooke, Roger LeB(2000).On the History of Humans as Geomorphic Agents.Geology,28(9),843-846.
22. Kenyon, Kathleen M.(1952).Beginning in Archaeology.London:Phoenix House.
23. Lucas, Gavin(2001).Critical Approaches to Fieldwork: Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice.London:Routledge.
24. Redman, Charles L.(1987).Surface Collection, Sampling, and Research Design: A Retrospective.American Antiquity,52(2),249-265.
25. Richards, Julian D.,Heighway, Carolyn,Donaghey, Sara(1989).Union Terrace: Excavations in the Horsefair (The Archaeology of York).London:Council for British Archaeology.
26. Ruddiman, William R.(2005).Plows, Plagues,and Petroleum: How Humans Took Control of Climate.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
27. Salvador, Amos(1994).International Stratigraphic Guide: A Guide to Stratigraphic Classification, Terminology, and Procedure.Boulder:Geological Society of America.
28. Schiffer, Michael B.(1972).Archaeological Context and Systemic Context.American Antiquity,37(2),156-165.
29. Smith, Claire(ed.)(2014).Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology.New York:Springer.
30. Stein, Julie K.(2005)。Principles of Stratigraphic Succession。Archaeology: The Key Concepts，北京:
31. Stein, Julie K.(1987).Deposits for Archaeologists.Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory,11,337-395.
32. Stein, Julie K.(1990).Archaeological Stratigraphy.Archaeological Geology of North America, Centennial Special Volume 4,Boulder:
33. Stein, Julie K.(2001).A Review of Site Formation Processes and Their Relevance to Geoarchaeology.Earth Sciences and Archaeology,New York:
34. Stein, Julie K.,Holliday, Vance T.(2016).Archaeological Stratigraphy.Encyclopedia of Geoarchaeology,Dordrecht:
35. Wheeler, Mortimer(1954).Archaeology from the Earth.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
36. Wheeler, Mortimer 1943 Maiden Castle, Dorset: Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, XII. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.26530/OAPEN_1002324
37. Wilkinson, Bruce H.(2005).Humans as Geologic Agents: A Deep-Time Perspective.Geology,33(3),161-164.
38. 伊能嘉矩,楊南郡（譯註）(1996).台灣踏查日記（下）.臺北:遠流出版公司.
39. 伊能嘉矩,楊南郡（譯註）(1996).台灣踏查日記（上）.臺北:遠流出版公司.
40. 何傳坤,劉克竑,鄭建文,陳浩維(2001)。,高雄市政府民政局。
41. 尾崎秀真 1936 〈第10：舊城址〉。刊於《史蹟調查報告》第二輯。臺灣總督府內務局編，頁37-38。臺北：臺灣總督府內務局。
42. 李丕煜(1961).鳳山縣志.臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室.
43. 姚瑩(1957).東槎紀略.臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室.
44. 國家文物局(2009).田野考古工作規程.北京:文物出版社.
45. 郭吉清,廖德宗(2018).左營二戰密史：震洋特攻隊駐臺始末.高雄:高雄市政府文化局.
46. 湯惠生(2013)。哈里斯矩陣：考古地層學理論的新進展。考古，3，91-99。
47. 臧振華,高有德,劉益昌(1993)。左營清代鳳山舊城聚落的試掘。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊，64(3)，763-865。
48. 趙金勇,劉益昌,鍾國風(2013)。花岡山遺址上層類型芻議。田野考古，13(2)，53-79。
49. 趙輝,張海,秦岭(2014)。田野考古的“系絡圖”與紀錄系統。漢江考古，131，41-49。
50. 劉益昌,李德河(2004)。,高雄市政府文化局。
51. 劉益昌,趙金勇,鍾國風(2015)。從花岡山遺址2014考古試掘談斜坡堆積的自然層位發掘問題。「2014年度臺灣考古工作會報」學術研討會
52. 劉益昌,顏廷伃,王淑津,林美智(2009)。,高雄市政府文化局。
53. 鍾國風,劉益昌(2019)。,高雄市政府文化局。
54. 鍾國風,劉益昌,趙金勇(2018)。,內政部營建署壽山國家自然公園籌備處。
55. 顏廷伃(2014)。,高雄市政府文化局。
56. 顏廷伃(2015)。,高雄市政府文化局。