工業隙縫裡的盆栽景觀：人與樹在失調環境中的符應與共生

Bonsai-scape in an Industrial Crevice Space: On the Possibilities of Co-dwelling and Correspondence of Humans and Trees in a Disturbed Environment

10.6152/jaa.202112_(95).0001

呂欣怡(Hsin-yi Lu)

盆栽 ； 符應 ； 人與植物的關係 ； 都市民族誌 ； bonsai ； correspondence ； human-plant relationship ； urban ethnography

考古人類學刊

95期（2021 / 12 / 01）

1 - 43

繁體中文;英文

斑駁鏽蝕的工業設施與綠意盎然的盆栽矮樹之並置，構築了前高雄煉油廠周 邊饒富興味的盆栽景觀。本文從Tim Ingold提出的「寓居視角」來檢視後勁盆栽園裡的生命境況，分析人與樹如何可能在受到工業嚴重干擾的失調環境中寓居與共生。「符應」（correspondence）是本文的關鍵概念，用來描述人與樹的親近性，以及盆栽與工業環境的共存。本研究有三項主要發現，首先，盆栽農在長期養樹的過程中，藉由修剪塑型等等身體動作，以及樹（包括樹皮、樹枝、樹葉等）的觸感給予的回應，與樹共同造就了盆栽。第二，在盆栽園中，由於樹需要密集澆灌與修剪，以及其固著一地的特性，召喚人每日定時至園中勞動，從而打造了一個符應樹之日常需求的共同寓居場所，園中盆栽之可視狀態，替代了言語而成為符應照顧之人生活狀態的具體線索。第三，我從區域的經濟與地景變遷來理解盆栽園出現於此地的緣由，並由此詮釋盆栽形貌與工業都市的符應。人、樹、社群的生命共振，構築了工業設施隙縫中的生機世界。

The juxtaposition of rustic industrial facilities and lush potted trees in Houjin community creates an intriguing bonsai-scape in the space adjacent to the former Kaohsiung oil refinery. This paper examines the life world in Houjin's bonsai garden from the "dwelling perspective," conceptualized by Tim Ingold, and analyzes how people and trees can live and grow together in an environment severely disturbed by industrial activities. "Correspondence" is the key concept adopted in this paper to explicate the affinities between humans and trees, as well as the coexistence of bonsais and the industrial environment in which they reside. I draw three conclusions from the field study: First, bonsai can be viewed as a co-creation by the bonsai grower and the tree because its long cultivation process involves a combination of human actions such as pruning and shaping, as well as the tree's tactile responses through bark, branches and leaves. Second, the intensive watering and pruning required to meet the trees' biological needs, as well as the trees' fixation with the ground, have structured the regular work pattern in the garden and created a dwelling place that corresponds to the daily needs of the tree. The visible state of the garden plants has replaced words as concrete clues that correspond to the life conditions of the bonsai growers. Third, I investigate the reason why bonsai agriculture was able to emerge in this area and how the appearance of the bonsai garden corresponds to the formation of the industrial city. The people, the trees and the community have co-constructed a vibrant world with their lives resonating in this crevice amidst industrial facilities.

1. Lu, Hsin-yi(2009).Place and Environmental Movement in Houjin, Kaohsiung.Journal of Archaeology and Anthropology,70,1-44.
   連結：
2. 朱衣仙(2020)。盆栽、雜碎、枯山水：劉大任作品中「離散∕反離散」交映的風景。中山人文學報，49，87-116。
   連結：
3. 林開世(2016)。什麼是「人類學的田野工作」？知識情境與倫理立場的反省。考古人類學刊，84，77-109。
   連結：
4. 陳榮裕,雷立芬,鍾啟宏,陳均宏(2019)。看見臺灣盆栽產業新未來。產業管理評論，10(2)，71-86。
   連結：
5. 黃錦樹(2008)。Negaraku：旅台、馬共與盆栽境遇。文化研究，7，75-104。
   連結：
6. 蔡晏霖(2020)。金寶螺胡撇仔：一個多物種實驗影像民族誌。中外文學，49(1)，61-94。
   連結：
7. Amin, Ash(2002).Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity.Environment and Planning A,34(6),959-980.
8. Armstrong, Donna(2000).A Survey of Community Gardens in Upstate New York: Implications for Health Promotion and Community Development.Health & Place,6(4),319-327.
9. Asquith, Pamela J.(ed.),Kalland, Arne(ed.)(1997).Japanese Images of Nature: Cultural Perspectives.Oxfordshire:Taylor & Francis.
10. Battaglia, Debbora(1995).On Practical Nostalgia: Self-prospecting among Urban Trobrianders.Rhetorics of Self-making
11. Battaglia, Debbora(1990).On the Bones of the Serpent: Person, Memory, and Mortality in Sabarl Island Society.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
12. Chao, Sophie(2018).In the Shadow of the Palm: Dispersed Ontologies among Marind, West Papua.Cultural Anthropology,33(4),621-649.
13. Chao, Sophie(2020).A Tree of Many Lives: Vegetal Teleontologies in West Papua.HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory,10(2),514-529.
14. Checker, Melissa(2005).Polluted Promises.New York:New York University Press.
15. Chevalier, Sophie(1998).From Woollen Carpet to Grass Carpet: Bridging Home and Garden in an English Suburb.Material Culture: Why Some Things Matter,London:
16. Cloke, Paul,Jones, Owain(2001).Dwelling, Place, and Landscape: an Orchard in Somerset.Environment and Planning A,33(4),649-666.
17. Degnen, Cathrine(2009).On Vegetable Love: Gardening, Plants, and People in the North of England.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute,15(1),151-167.
18. Domene, Elena,Sauri, David(2007).Urbanization and Class-produced Natures: Vegetable Gardens in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region.Geoforum,38(2),287-298.
19. Doody, Brendan J.,Perkins, Harvey C.,Sullivan, Jon J.,Meurk, Colin D.,Stewart, Glenn H.(2014).Performing Weeds: Gardening, Plant Agencies and Urban Plant Conservation.Geoforum,56,124-136.
20. Follmann, Alexander,Viehoff, Valérie(2015).A Green Garden on Red Clay: Creating a New Urban Common as a Form of Political Gardening in Cologne, Germany.Local Environment,20(11),1148-1174.
21. Gagliano, Monica(2015).In a Green Frame of Mind: Perspectives on the Behavioral Ecology and Cognitive Nature of Plants.AoB PLANTS,7
22. Gibson, James J.(2015).The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition.New York, NY:Psychology Press.
23. Hartigan, John Jr(2015).Plant Publics: Multispecies Relating in Spanish Botanical Gardens.Anthropological Quarterly,88(2),481-507.
24. Hartigan, John Jr.(2017).Care of the Species: Races of Corn and the Science of Plant Biodiversity.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
25. Hartigan, John., Jr(2019).Plants as Ethnographic Subjects.Anthropology Today,35(2),1-2.
26. Harvey, David J.(1996).Justice, Nature & the Geography of Difference.Blackwell Publishers.
27. Head, Lesley,Atchison, Jennifer(2009).Cultural Ecology: Emerging Human-Plant Geographies.Progress in Human Geography,33(2),236-245.
28. Hitchings, Russell(2003).People, Plants and Performance: On Actor Network Theory and the Material Pleasures of the Private Garden.Social & Cultural Geography,4(1),99-114.
29. Hossein, Sadri(2018).Urbanization: Planting Forests in Pots.Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs,2(2),122-129.
30. Ingold, Tim(2015).A Life of Lines.London:Routledge.
31. Ingold, Tim(2018).Back to the Future with the Theory of Affordances.HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory,8(1-2),39-44.
32. Ingold, Tim(2013).Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art, and Architecture.London:Routledge.
33. Ingold, Tim(2018).One World Anthropology.HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory,8(1-2),158-171.
34. Ingold, Tim(2006).Rethinking the Animate, Re-animating Thought.Ethnos,71(1),9-20.
35. Ingold, Tim(2010).Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description.London:Routledge.
36. Ingold, Tim(2017).On Human Correspondence.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute,23(1),9-27.
37. Ingold, Tim(2000).The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill.London:Routledge.
38. Jung, Shaw-wu(2020).From Resistance to Co-living: Rural Activism in Contemporary Hong Kong.Inter-Asia Cultural Studies,21(3),406-424.
39. Kahn, Miriam(1993).Always Hungry, Never Greedy: Food and the Expression of Gender in a Melanesian Society.Long Grove:Waveland Press.
40. Kato, Saburo 1983 Bonsai no Kokoro: The Spirit and Philosophy of Bonsai. David Fukumoto, Haruko Kiyabu, and Ted Tsukiyama, trans. Electronic document, http://www.fukubonsai.com/5a2.html, accessed April 17, 2021.
41. Kingsley, Jonathan,Townsend, Mardie(2006).Dig in’ to Social Capital: Community Gardens as Mechanisms for Growing Urban Social Connectedness.Urban Policy and Research,24(4),525-537.
42. Kirksey, Stefan,Helmreich, Stefan(2010).The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography.Cultural Anthropology,25(4),545-576.
43. Koreshoff, Deborah(1984).Bonsai: Its Art, Science, History and Philosophy.Portland:Timber Press Inc.
44. Kuletz, Valerie(1998).The Tainted Desert: Environmental Ruin in the American West.London:Routledge.
45. Langwick, Stacey Ann(2018).A Politics of Habitability: Plants, Healing, and Sovereignty in a Toxic World.Cultural Anthropology,33(3),415-443.
46. Lerner, Steve(2005).Diamond: A Struggle for Environmental Justice in Louisiana’s Chemical Corridor.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
47. Lewis-Jones, Kay E.(2016).Introduction: People and Plants.Environment and Society,7(1),1-7.
48. Long, Charles R.(1971).An Informal History of Bonsai.Arnoldia,31(5),261-273.
49. Malinowski, Bronislaw(2013).Coral Gardens and Their Magic: The Description of Gardening.London:Routledge.
50. Marder, Michael(2013).Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life.New York:Columbia University Press.
51. Martinez-Alier, Joan(2003).The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing.
52. Maurer, Megan(2020).Nourishing Environments, Caring Cities: Gardening and the Social Reproduction of the Urban Environment in Deindustrial Michigan.City & Society,32(3),716-737.
53. Miller, Theresa L.(2019).Plant Kin: A Multispecies Ethnography in Indigenous Brazil.University of Texas Press.
54. Moore, Glenn,Atherton, Cassandra(2021).Shrine Forests, Bonsai and Public Parks in Tokyo: Old Trees as Symbols of Continuity.The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus,19(6:4)
55. Poe, Melissa R.,LeCompteb, Joyce,McLain, Rebecca J.,Hurley, Patrick T.(2014).Urban Foraging and the Relational Ecologies of Belonging.Social & Cultural Geography,15(8),901-919.
56. Resnick, Elana(2021).The Limits of Resilience: Managing Waste in the Racialized Anthropocene.American Anthropologist,123,222-236.
57. Seshia Galvin, Shaila(2018).Interspecies Relations and Agrarian Worlds.Annual Review of Anthropology,47,233-249.
58. Stein, Rolf Alfred(1990).The World in Miniature: Container Gardens and Dwellings in Far Eastern Religious Thought.Redwood:Stanford University Press.
59. Tilley, Christopher(2006).The Sensory Dimensions of Gardening.The Senses and Society,1(3),311-330.
60. Trewavas, Anthony(2015).Plant Behaviour & Intelligence.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
61. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt(2014).Blasted Landscapes (and the Gentle Arts of Mushroom Picking).The Multispecies Salon,Durham, NC:
62. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt(ed.),Swanson, Heather A.(ed.),Gan, Elaine(ed.),Bubandt, Nils(ed.)(2017).Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
63. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt,謝孟璇（譯）(2018).末日松茸：資本主義廢墟世界中的生活可能.臺北:八旗文化.
64. Tuan, Yi-fu(1999).Geography and Evil: A Sketch.Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain,New York:
65. Vining, Donald M.(1971).Bonsai: Nature in Miniature.Arnoldia,31(5),274-282.
66. Weller, Robert P.(2006).Discovering Nature: Globalization and Environmental Culture in China and Taiwan.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
67. 中國石油公司(1996).來自地心：石化與石油工業.臺北:中油通訊編委會.
68. 田口文哉,林容伊（譯）(2019)。盆栽的圖像學——浮世繪所見的江戶盆栽文化。故宮文物月刊，432，64-73。
69. 耳東盡2019 〈盆栽藝術與迷思〉。「大紀元」，https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/19/10/9/n11578456.htm，2021年4月20日上線。
70. 何明修(2006).綠色民主：台灣環境運動的研究.臺北:群學出版社.
71. 呂欣怡(2016)。土地、社群、信仰：解析俗民環境論述。科技、醫療與社會，22，63-108。
72. 李根政2013 〈【工業污染】我庄，保生大帝與後勁反五輕〉。「李根政部落格」，ttps://leekc95kh.blogspot.com/2013/10/blog-post.html，2021年8月4日上線。
73. 李根政,王敏玲,邱花妹,余嘉榮,林淑靜,姜玫如,廖于瑋(2015).堅持：後勁反五輕的未竟之路.臺南:透南風文化創意有限公司.
74. 林文玲(2020)。活力的部落，培力的評鑑？原住民族部落活力計畫現場的民族誌觀察。臺灣人類學刊，18(2)，129-174。
75. 林明華(1985)。盆栽。中外文學，14(6)，64-75。
76. 林欽榮2016 〈張政委南下高雄巡視並為產業轉型提供戰略佈局指示〉。「林欽榮Facebook粉絲專頁」，https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1999755416834308&id=505552919587906，2021年4月11日上線。 1999755416834308&id
77. 侯如綺(2010)。王鼎鈞〈土〉、劉大任〈盆景〉與張系國〈地〉中的土地象徵與外省族裔的身分思索。臺北教育大學語文集刊，17，235-264。
78. 徐世榮(1995)。試論科技在地方環保抗爭運動中所扮演的角色─以後勁反五輕運動為例。台灣社會研究季刊，18，125-152。
79. 高雄市政府2021 〈「中油高雄廠土地污染整治」專案報告〉。「高雄市議會」，https://cissearch.kcc.gov.tw/Upload/Attachment/ProjectReport/2135/f0965365-4d9c-44e6-ac6f-ff77941cac52.pdf，2021年12月10日上線。
80. 陳榮裕(2014)。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系。
81. 陳漢光(1960)。台灣板輪牛車之今昔。臺灣文獻季刊，11(4)，14-33。
82. 結繩志2021 〈‧它们‧多物种关怀‧编按‧〉。「tying_knots」，https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/tctwEECw965y8dMmxNrCfw?fbclid=IwAR3mko9eOaYAsE8S2A_npGH4VMns0TUcQZIDtsSonWsH-5PLdsRuK5TxTSI，2021年4月
83. 黃泗山年代不詳 〈台灣盆栽發展史〉。「中華盆栽藝術總會」，http://www.taiwan-bonsai.org.tw/about-02.aspx，2021年7月30日上線。
84. 楊木村(2011)。台湾盆栽发展之困境与展望——以榕树盆栽为例。花木盆景盆景賞石），10，12-17。
85. 楊修(2013)。明道大學設計學院碩士班。
86. 劉大任(2009).殘照.臺北:聯合文學出版社.
87. 鄭水萍(2000).後勁大代誌.高雄:高雄市立文化中心.