「老鷹回來了」：從新竹科學城到有機共和國

"Eagles Are Back!": From City of Science to Organic Republic

10.6152/jaa.202112_(95).0002

莊雅仲(Ya-chung Chuang)

本體論 ； 多重世界 ； 都市 ； 友善耕作 ； 新竹 ； Ontology ； multiple worlds ； the urban ； eco-friendly farming ； Hsinchu

考古人類學刊

95期（2021 / 12 / 01）

45 - 87

繁體中文;英文

近幾年我在新竹沿山甚至靠近市區的田野中經常發現老鷹蹤影，也聽到不同人提及他們的遭遇經驗，我的種菜老師阿伯樂將老鷹的回來歸因於有機與友善耕作風潮。雖然官方統計有機耕作田地面積僅約全國農地1%，加上各地自主的生態友善田地，應該也不會超過2%，但是這2%的另類農耕正在產生可觀的變化。新竹近年區域發展雖然讓市容熱絡，但各類汙染公害或生態破壞事件層出不窮，在這樣的條件下，到底鷹兒是怎麼回來的？本文檢視讓老鷹回來的一個另類世界形成，我稱為「有機共和國」。新竹區域因為1980年成立的新竹科學工業園區以及1993年提出的科學城計畫，造成都市紋理的蔓延，同時也產生許多重點不同但同樣強調反污染、護生態、保荒野與救田地的論述與行動。本文會說明一個具本體反思性的都市自然概念，如何帶領我們探索這個世界裡的各類行動者及其關連。

I among many watchers spot eagles more often in the skies close to the Hsinchu metropole. My gardening teacher Abole attributes it to the emerging eco-friendly farming in the area. According to the official statistics, the lands for certified organic agriculture comprise only 1% of the farmlands nationwide. Even including those lands where self-help natural farming is practiced, the unconventional farmlands would not exceed 2% of the total farmlands. This paper investigates why under the heavy environmental pressure due to the intensive industrialization and urbanization in the area, this 2% alternative farming is able to make an enormous difference. Why have the eagles returned to the urban skies? This paper examines an alternative worlding that have helped to bring the eagles back. I call the world evolving from this worlding process "the Organic Republic." The Hsinchu Science Metropole has been in the making since the Hsinchu Science Park was created in 1980. There has been an urban sprawl since the early 1990s when a large-scale urban expansion and renewal plan was proposed. However, we also find that many environmentalist and eco-conscious discourses, actions and networkings have come into existence. This paper contends that an ontological reflection on the concepts such as city and nature can lead us to explore diverse actors and their relations across this alternate worlding process.

1. 方至民,翁良杰(2004)。制度與制度修正：台灣積體電路產業發展的路徑變遷（自1973至1993）。人文及社會科學集刊，16(3)，351-388。
   連結：
2. 蔡晏霖(2016)。農藝復興：臺灣農業新浪潮。文化研究，22，23-74。
   連結：
3. Amin, Ash,Thrift, Nigel(2017).Seeing Like a City.Cambridge:Polity.
4. Appadurai, Arjun(1986).Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective,Cambridge:
5. Benjamin, Walter(2002).The Arcades Project.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
6. Bennett, Jane(2010).Vibrant Matter: A Political Sociology of Things.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
7. Blaser, Mario(2009).Political Ontology: Cultural Studies without ‘Cultures’?.Cultural Studies,23(5-6),873-896.
8. Blaser, Mario(2016).Is Another Cosmopolitics Possible?.Cultural Anthropology,31(4),545-570.
9. Brenner, Neil(2004).New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
10. Brenner, Neil(2019).New Urban Spaces: Urban Theory and the Scale Question.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
11. Brenner, Neil(ed.)(2014).lmplosions / Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization.Berlin:Jovis.
12. Callon, Michel(1986).Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of knowledge?,London:
13. Castells, Manuel(1977).The Urban Question.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
14. Davies, Jeremy(2016).The Birth of the Anthropocence.Berkeley:University of California Press. DOI.
15. de la Cadena, Marisol,Blaser, Mario(2018).Introduction: Pluriverse Proposals for a World of Many Worlds.A World of Many Worlds,Durham, NC:
16. Debord, Guy(1970).The Society of the Spectacle.St. Petersburg:Black and Red.
17. DeLanda, Manuel(2006).A New Philosophy of Society.London:Continuum.
18. DeLanda, Manuel,Harman, Graham(2017).The Rise of Realism.Cambridge:Polity.
19. Escobar, Arturo(2016).Thinking-Feeling with the Earth: Territorial Struggles and the Ontological Dimension of the Epistemologies of the South.Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana,11(1),11-32.
20. Farias, Ignacio,Bender, Thomas(2010).Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies.London:Routledge.
21. Frey, Darrell,Czolba, Michelle(2017).The Food Forest Handbook: Design and Manage a Home-Scale Perennial Polyculture Garden.Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers.
22. Gordillo, Gastón(2019).The Metropolis: The Infrastructure of the Anthropocene.Infrastructure, Environment, and Life in the Anthropocene,Durham, NC:
23. Graham, Stephen,Marvin, Simon(2001).Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition.London:Routledge.
24. Henare, Amiria,Holbraad, Martin,Wastell, Sari(2007).Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically.London:Routledge.
25. Hodder, Ian(2012).Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things.Hoboken:Wiley.
26. Holbraad, Martin,Pedersen, Morten Axel(2017).The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
27. Igbozurike, Matthias(1971).Ecological Balance in Tropical Agriculture.Geographic Review,61(4),519-529.
28. King, Franklin Hiram(2004).Farmers of Forty Centuries: Organic Farming in China, Korea, and Japan.Mineola:Dover Publications.
29. Kohn, Eduardo(2013).How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human.Berkeley:University of California Press.
30. Latour, Bruno(2013).An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
31. Latour, Bruno(2005).From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik - or How to Make Things Public.Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy,Cambridge, MA:
32. Latour, Bruno(2017).Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime.London:Polity.
33. Latour, Bruno(2004).Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
34. Latour, Bruno(2005).Reassembling the Social.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
35. Lii, Ding-tzann(2017).The Cultural Politics of Food: Rice as an Anti-Globalization Project.Gastronomica - The Journal for Food Studies,17(3),24-35.
36. Masanobu, Fukuoka(1978).The One-Straw Revolution.New York:New York Review Books.
37. Merrifield, Andy(2014).The New Urban Question.London:Pluto.
38. Negri, Antonio(2018).From the Factory to the Metropolis.Cambridge:Polity.
39. Okada, Mokichi(1984).Foundation of Paradise: From the Teachings of Meishu-sama.Torrance:Johrei Fellowship.
40. Owen, Sri(1993).The Rice Book.New York:St. Martin’s Griffin.
41. Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria(2017).Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
42. Rademacher, Anne(2015).Urban Political Ecology.Annual Review of Anthropology,44(1),137-152.
43. Riordan, Michael,Hoddeson, Lillian(1998).Crystal Fire: The Invention of the Transistor and the Birth of the Information Age.New York:Norton.
44. Scott, James C.(1977).The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia.New Haven:Yale University Press.
45. Shields, Rob(2013).Spatial Questions: Cultural Topologies and Social Spatialisation.London:Sage. DOI.
46. Smith, Neil(1996).The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City.London:Routledge.
47. Stengers, Isabelle(2018).The Challenge of Ontological Politics.A World of Many Worlds,Durham, NC:
48. Thrift, Nigel(2008).Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect.London:Routledge.
49. Tsai, Yen-ling(2019).Farming Odd Kin in Patchy Anthropocenes.Current Anthropology,60(Supplement 20),S342-S353.
50. Tsing, Anna(2005).Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
51. van der Ploeg, Jan Douwe(2018).The New Peasantries: Rural Development in Times of Globalization.London:Routledge.
52. Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo(2014).Cannibal Metaphysics.Minneapolis:Univocal.
53. 台灣樸門永續設計學會年代不詳 〈關於樸門永續生活設計！〉。「台灣樸門永續設計學會」，http://www.permaculture.org.tw/about-permaculture，2021年10月8日上線。
54. 行政院農業委員會(2012).耕耘臺灣農業大世紀：農業紀實.臺北:行政院農業委員會.
55. 吳音寧(2007).江湖在哪裡？──台灣農業觀察.臺北:印刻.
56. 李政隆 2015 〈伍之貮、臺灣平埔族-- 4 --臺灣北部開拓〉。「李政隆的新台灣史」，https://happydavid119.blogspot.com/2015/08/4.html，2021年10月8日上線。
57. 李雅明(2013).半導體的故事.臺北:暖暖書屋.
58. 李翹宏(2014)。清代番地治理與族群地權關係：以鳳山溪流域的竹塹社與客家佃戶為例。全球客家研究，2，259-300。
59. 沈振中(1998).鷹兒要回家.臺中:晨星.
60. 秀明自然農法協會年代不詳 〈秀明自然農法實施綱要(日本版)〉。「秀明自然農法協會」，https://sites.google.com/site/urfarm/guidelines，2021年10月8日上線。
61. 孟磊,江慧儀(2011).向大自然學設計：樸門Permaculture啟發綠生活的無限可能.臺北:新自然主義.
62. 林玉茹(2000).清代竹塹地區的在地商人及其活動網絡.臺北:聯經.
63. 林如貞(2015).稻田裡的教室.臺北:林如貞（個人出版）.
64. 邵式柏(2016).臺灣邊疆的治理與政治經濟（1600-1800）.臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心.
65. 邱創裕(2016)。國立臺灣師範大學臺灣史研究所。
66. 施添福(2001)。清代「番黎不諳耕作」的緣由—以竹塹地區為例。清代台灣的地域社會：竹塹地區的歷史地理研究，新竹:
67. 施添福(2001)。清代竹塹地區的土牛溝和區域發展—一個歷史地理學的研究。清代台灣的地域社會：竹塹地區的歷史地理研究，新竹:
68. 施添福(2001)。竹塹地區傳統稻作農村的民宅—一個人文生態學的詮釋。清代台灣的地域社會：竹塹地區的歷史地理研究，新竹:
69. 柯志明(2001).番頭家：清代臺灣族群政治與熟番地權.臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所.
70. 洪聖芬 2017 4月28日〈竹北農夫田守喜〉。《農夫與他的田》。臺灣：大愛電視。
71. 徐世榮(2016).土地正義：從土地改革到土地徵收,一段被掩蓋、一再上演的歷史.新北市:遠足文化.
72. 財團法人國際美育自然生態基金會年代不詳 〈首頁〉。「財團法人國際美育自然生態基金會」，http://www.moa.org.tw，2021年10月8日上線。
73. 張忠謀(2018).張忠謀自傳（上）：一九三一–一九六四.臺北:天下文化.
74. 莊雅仲 2021 〈竹科：人類學的觀點〉。「芭樂人類學」，https://guavanthropology.tw/article/6857，2021年10月8日上線。
75. 陳東升(2008).積體網路: 臺灣高科技產業的社會學分析.臺北:群學.
76. 陳惠雯(2006).我的幸福農莊.臺北:麥浩斯.
77. 彭明輝(2011).糧食危機關鍵報告：台灣觀察.臺北:商周.
78. 曾獻緯(2015).戰後臺灣農業科學化的推手：以農業推廣體系為中心（1945-1965）.臺北:國史館.
79. 游修齡,曾雄生(2010).中國稻作文化史.上海:上海人民出版社.
80. 黃宣衛(2018).共築蓬萊新樂園：一群池上人的故事.臺北:唐山.
81. 黃應貴（編）,林開世（編）(2019).政治的消融與萌生：新自由主義國家的治理效應.臺北:群學.
82. 奧田彧 1932 《農業經營ニ關スル調查 》。新竹州新竹郡等，手稿[18]。臺北：國立臺灣大學圖書館典藏。
83. 蔡侑霖(2018)。土地金融化下的地方社會與另類農耕實踐。臺灣社會學年會
84. 賴月貴 2012 〈尋自然而行詹武龍的耕種哲學〉。「大紀元時報」，http://www.epochtimes.com.tw/12/7/18/197322.htm，2021年10月8日上線。
85. 賴青松(2007).青松e種田筆記：榖東俱樂部.臺北:心靈工坊.
86. 藤原俊六郎,周若珍（譯）(2017).超圖解土壤的基礎知識.臺北:晨星.

1. 呂欣怡(2022)。從時間面向重思離岸風電與沿岸漁業的衝突。考古人類學刊，97，123-168。