题名

結合土壤雨量指數與頻率比法建構坡地災害潛勢模式

并列篇名

Establishing a Hillslope Failure Susceptibility Model Based on the Soil Water Index and Frequency Ratio Method

DOI

10.29417/JCSWC.201809_49(4).0004

作者

劉宜君(Yi-Jun Liu);陳樹群(Su-Chin Chen)

关键词

筒狀模式 ; 土壤雨量指數 ; 崩塌潛勢分析 ; 頻率比法 ; 坡地災害潛勢值 ; Tank model ; Soil water index ; Landslide susceptibility analysis ; Frequency ratio method ; Hillslope failure susceptibility value

期刊名称

中華水土保持學報

卷期/出版年月

49卷4期(2018 / 12 / 01)

页次

243 - 253

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究結合土壤雨量指數與崩塌潛勢值來建構坡地災害潛勢模式。土壤雨量指數(SWI)為筒狀模式中三層筒水深總和,可視為土體中儲存之雨量深度。首先收集土砂災例繪製災害涵蓋率曲線,並透過災害涵蓋率訂定SWI警戒值再以災例涵蓋率曲線轉為SWI水文危險度;其次使用頻率比法建構崩塌潛勢值,頻率比法基本假設為崩塌發生與否由崩塌相關因子所決定,後續將崩塌潛勢值正規化得地文危險度。最後結合SWI水文危險度及地文危險度建構坡地災害潛勢值。

英文摘要

This study established a hillslope failure susceptibility model for sediment disasters by combining the soil water index (SWI) and landslide susceptibility values to formulate a basis for warning release. The sum of the rainfall depth in the three tank of tank model can be considered as the rainfall retention depth in soil layer. This study collected data of disaster cases and used them to establish lines of disaster coverage. The results indicated that the SWI alert value corresponded to the line of disaster coverage and the hydrological risk was related to disaster coverage. Furthermore, a landslide susceptibility model was constructed involving the frequency ratio method, which is based on landslide factors. The physiographic hazard level was obtained and normalized according to the landslide susceptibility value. This study established a hillslope failure susceptibility model for sediment disasters by combining hydrological risk and frequency ratio based physiographic hazard levels.

主题分类 生物農學 > 農業
生物農學 > 森林
生物農學 > 畜牧
生物農學 > 漁業
生物農學 > 生物環境與多樣性
工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. 何秋燕, C.Y.,詹錢登, C.D.,楊思堯, S.Y.(2017)。應用證據權重法評估土石流發生潛勢─以高屏溪流域為例。中華水土保持學報,48(2),92-100。
    連結:
  2. Chen, W.,Ding, X.,Zhao, R.X.,Shi, S.L.(2016).Application of frequency ratio and weights of evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping for the Shangzhou District of Shangluo City, China.Environmental Earth Sciences,75,64.
  3. Ding, Q.,Chen, W.,Hong, H.(2017).Application of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and evidential belief function models in landslide susceptibility mapping.Geocarto International,32(6),619-639.
  4. Lee, S.,Pradhan, B.(2007).Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models.Landslides,4(1),33-41.
  5. Lee, S.,Sambath, T.(2006).Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models.Environmental Geology,50(6),847-855.
  6. Lee, S.,Talib, J.A.(2005).Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis.Environmental Geology,47,982-990.
  7. Mohammady, M.,Pourghasemi, H.R.,Pradhan, B.(2012).Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: A comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,61,221-236.
  8. Osanai, N.,Shimizu, T.,Kuramoto, K.,Kojima, S.,Noro, T.(2010).Japanese early-warning for debris flows and slope failures using rainfall indices with Radial Basis Function Network.Landslides,7(3),325-338.
  9. Ozdemir, A.,Altural, T.(2013).A comparative study of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: Sultan Mountains, SW Turkey.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,64,180-197.
  10. Shahabi, H.,Khezri, S.,Ahmad, B.B.,Hashim, M.(2014).Landslide susceptibility mapping at central Zab basin, Iran: A comparison between analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio and logistic regression models.Catena,115,55-70.
  11. Wu, C.Y.,Chen, S.C.(2013).Integrating spatial, temporal, and size probabilities for the annual landslide hazard maps in the Shihmen watershed, Taiwan.Natural Hazardsand Earth System Sciences,13,2353-2367.
  12. 吳俊鋐, C.H.(2014)。以崩塌率為依據建構邏輯式迴歸崩塌潛勢評估模式。中華水土保持學報,45(4),257-265。
  13. 吳俊鋐, C.H.(2016)。崩塌率為依據邏輯式迴歸法、頻率比法及證據權重法於崩塌潛勢模式應用之比較。臺灣水利,64(1),47-61。
  14. 李嶸泰, J.T.,張嘉琪, C.C.,詹勳全, H.C.,廖珮妤, P.Y.,洪雨柔, Y.J.(2012)。應用羅吉斯迴歸法進行阿里山地區山崩潛勢評估。中華水土保持學報,43(2),167-176。
  15. 林彥享, Y.H.(2003)。Taiwan,國立中央大學應用地質研究所=National Central University。
  16. 牧原康隆、平沢正信(1993)。斜面崩壊危険度予測におけるタンクモデルの精度。気象庁研究時報,45(2),35-70。
  17. 柴田徹、清水正喜、八嶋厚、三村衛(1984)。文部省科学研究費自然災害特別研究突発災害研究成果文部省科学研究費自然災害特別研究突発災害研究成果,未出版
  18. 陳怡睿, Y.R.,林洧全, W.C.,謝舜傑, S.C.(2011)。坡地利用影響山崩潛勢之評估模式建置—以寶來地區歷經莫拉克颱風為例。中華水土保持學報,42(3),251-262。
  19. 陳振宇, C.Y.(2013)。以雨量為基礎之土砂災害警戒系統成效評估—以台灣及日本為例。中華水土保持學報,44(1),50-64。
  20. 陳樹群, S.C.(2011)。,行政院農業委員會水土保持局=Soil and Water Conservation Bureau。
  21. 陳樹群, S.C.,吳俊毅, C.Y,謝政道, C.D.(2012)。崩塌危害分析模型之建立─以臺北水源特定區為例。中華水土保持學報,43(4),332-345。
  22. 陳樹群, S.C.,馮智偉, J.W.(2005)。應用 Logistic 迴歸繪製崩塌潛感圖-以濁水溪流域為例。中華水土保持學報,36(2),191-201。
  23. 陳樹群, S.C.,蔡喬文, C.W.,陳振宇, C.Y.,陳美珍, M.C.(2013)。筒狀模式之土壤雨量指數應用於土石流防災警戒。中華水土保持學報,44(2),131-143。
  24. 楊明德, M.D.,黃奕達, Y.D.,黃凱翔, K.H.,張益祥, Y.H.(2012)。利用崩塌潛勢圖做風險評估之應用—以陳有蘭溪流域為例。中華水土保持學報,43(1),1-11。
  25. 鈴木雅一、福嶌義宏、武居有恒、小橋澄治(1979)。土砂災害発生の危険雨量。砂防学会誌,31(3),1-7。
  26. 蘇苗彬, M.B.,陳毅輝,方俊傑, J.J.(2009)。應用不安定指數法於坡地崩塌之潛勢分析。水保技術,4(1),9-23。
被引用次数
  1. 傅金城,張國楨,李雅鈞(2023)。應用降雨量與頻率比方法於淹水災害潛感圖之研究。中國土木水利工程學刊,35(6),551-563。