鋼構防砂壩承受土石流作用力之力學分析

Mechanical Analysis of Steel Check Dam Subjected to Loading of Debris Flow

10.29417/JCSWC.202306_54(2).0001

林德貴(Der-Guey Lin)；黃郁博(Yu-Po Huang)；邱雅筑(Ya-Chu Chiu)

鋼構防砂壩 ； 單元結構 ； 鋼管構件 ； 最大組合拉應力／壓應力比 ； 最大水平變位 ； 徑厚比 ； Steel check dam ； unit structure ； steel-pipe member ； maximum combined tensile-to-compressive stress ratios ； maximum horizontal displacement ； diameter-to-thickness ratio

中華水土保持學報

54卷2期（2023 / 06 / 01）

91 - 107

繁體中文;英文

本研究針對華山溪格子型及曾文水庫加強B-型鋼構防砂壩（以下簡稱格子型及加強B-型鋼構壩）兩工程案例，進行整體結構承受土石流組合載重之3-D有限元素應力及變位分析。格子型鋼構壩頂部水平連結鋼管構件（或簡稱桿件）可串接所有單元結構，貫入兩側壩翼提供固定端束制作用，其能有效地將載重由壩心往壩翼傳遞，並限制各單元結構之桿件最大應力比（即剪力、撓曲、組合應力比）及最大水平變位之擴大發展，而由壩心往壩翼方向逐漸減小。反之，加強B-型鋼構壩各單元結構間無水平連結桿件串接，各自獨立承受載重而不會進行載重傳遞，因此各單元結構之桿件最大應力比及最大水平變位約略相同。鋼構壩上游側直立桿件及下游側水平桿件主要受拉應力控制，而下游側直立桿件及上游側水平桿件主要受壓應力控制。土石流巨礫撞擊力對兩鋼構壩案例造成之最大水平變位，皆符合國外之檢核要求，其值小於壩體有效高度之2%。在參數研究方面，鋼構壩之最大組合拉應力／壓應力比，對鋼管構件之徑厚比很敏感，會隨徑厚比之增加而明顯降低。

This study performed three-dimensional finite element stress and deformation analyses on a grid-type steel check dam (i.e., grid-type dam) in Hua-Shan Creek and an enhanced B-type steel check dam (i.e., B-type dam) in Tseng-Wen Reservoir through debris flow loading. For the grid-type dam, two horizontal connection members were connected on the top run. The connection members stringed together the unit structures of the dam and penetrated the dam wing at fixed ends, which provided a restraint effect on the entire dam structure. The grid-type design could effectively transfer the loading from the unit structures at the dam center to those of the dam wing and prevent higher maximum stress ratios (e.g., shear, bending, and combined stress ratios). The maximum horizontal displacement of the unit structure gradually decreased from the dam center to the wing. For the B-type dam, all the unit structures only bore their own loading because no horizontal connection member was present to transfer the loading between structures. Consequently, each unit structure demonstrated similar maximum stress ratios and maximum horizontal displacement. Additionally, the maximum tensile stress occurred at the vertical upstream member and horizontal downstream member, whereas the maximum compressive stress occurred at the vertical downstream member and horizontal upstream member. In both cases, the maximum horizontal displacements occurred when the boulder impact force of debris flows was smaller than 2% of the effective dam height, which satisfied standard international inspection requirements. Moreover, the maximum combined stress ratio was sensitive to the diameter-to-thickness ratio of the steel-pipe member, which significantly decreased as the maximum combined stress ratio increased.

1. (2007).STAAD-Pro Manual.USA:Bentley Systems incorporated.
2. 中構日建股份有限公司 (2014)，「http://www.ncmp.com.tw/」。(Nikken & CSSC Metal Products Co., Ltd. (2014). http://www.ncmp.com.tw/. (in Chinese))
3. Fu, T.,Xu, T.,Heap, M.J.,Meredith, P.G.,Mitchell, T.M.(2020).Mesoscopic time-dependent behavior of rocks based on three-dimensional discrete element grainbased model.Computers and Geotechnics,121,103472.
4. Goodwin, G.R.,Choi, C.E.(2020).Slit structures: Fundamental mechanisms of mechanical trapping of granular flows.Computers and Geotechnics,119,103376.
5. Jeong, S.,Lee, K.(2019).Analysis of the impact force of debris flows on a check dam by using a coupled EulerianLagrangian (CEL) method.Computer and Geotechnics,116,103214.
6. Leonardi, A.,Goodwin, G.R.,Pirulli, M.(2019).The force exerted by granular flows on slit dams.Acta Geotechnica,14(6),1949-1963.
7. Leonardi, A.,Pirulli, M.(2020).Analysis of the load exerted by debris flows on filter barriers: Comparison between numerical results and field measurements.Computers and Geotechnics,118,103311.
8. McArdell, B.W.,Bartelt, P.,Kowalski, J.(2007).Field observations of basal forces and fluid pore pressure in a debris flow.Geophysical Research Letters,34(7)
9. Nakano, H.,Kasai, S.,Moriymam, H.,Mizuno, M.(2003).Safer and More Economical Steel Sabo Dam Designs.Kobe Steel Engineering Reports,53(1),86-90.
10. Ono, G.I.,Mmizuyama, T.,Matsumura, K.(2004).Current practices in the design and evaluation of steel sabo facilities in Japan.Internationales Symposion Interpraevent 2004,Riva/Trient:
11. Patrice, M.,Pierre, L.,Rene, T.(2006).Post-processing of finite element stress fields using dual kriging based methods for structural analysis of concrete dams.Finite Elements in Analysis and Design,42(6)
12. Shen, W.,Li, T.,Li, P.,Lei, Y.(2020).Numerical assessment for the efficiencies of check dams in debris flow gullies: A case study.Computers and Geotechnics,122,103541.
13. Terzaghi, K.(1955).Evaluation of Coefficients of Subgrade Reaction.Geotechnique,297-326.
14. 內政部營建署 (2010)，「鋼構造建築物鋼結構設計技術規範(容許應力設計法規範及解說)」。(Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior. Taiwan (2010). Design and Technique Specifications of Steel Structures for Buildings. (in Chinese))
15. 日本道路協會(2012)。道路橋示方書．同解說─鋼橋篇。
16. 日本鋼製砂防構造物委員會(2009)。鋼製砂防構造物設計便覽。財團法人砂防、地すべり技術センタ一=Sabo & Landslide Technical Center。
17. 水土保持局(2013).鋼構防砂壩設施本土化可行性評估與設計手冊彙編期末報告書.
18. 水土保持局=Soil and Water Conservation Bureau(2002)。,未出版
19. 水土保持局=Soil and Water Conservation Bureau(2006).水土保持手冊.
20. 水土保持局 (2020)，「水土保持技術規範」。SWCB (Soil and Water Conservation Bureau) (2020). “Soil and Water Conservation Technical Specification.” 224. (in Chinese)
21. 水土保持局=SWCB=Soil and Water Conservation Bureau(2005).水土保持手冊.
22. 水土保持局南投分局=SWCB=Soil and Water Conservation Bureau(2009)。,Nantou Branch Office。
23. 巨廷工程顧問股份有限公司=GT International(2012).曾文水庫沙力基支流欄目設施工程規劃設計報告書.經濟部水利署南區水資源局=Southern Region Water Resources Office, WRA, MOEA, Taiwan.
24. 林德貴, D.G.,黃伯舜, B.S.,黃隆明, L.M.(2010)。梳子壩在土石流作用下之三維數值分析。中華水土保持學報，41(1)，49-60。
25. 段錦浩, C.H.,林明威, M.W.,黃立勳, L.H.(2004)。廢輪胎材料對土石流撞擊力消能之研究。中華水土保持學報，35(2)，151-163。
26. 陳裕仁, Yu-Jen(2006)。Taiwan，國立中興大學水土保持學系=National Chung Hsing University。
27. 黃雅各, Y.G.(2014)。Taiwan, ROC，國立中興大學水土保持學系=National Chung Hsing University。