题名

以混沌觀點探討產業發展

并列篇名

A Chaotic View on Industrial Development

DOI

10.6504/JOM.2004.21.03.07

作者

洪世章(Shih-Chang Hung)；黎正中(Chang-Chung Li)；涂敏芬(Min-Fen Tu)

关键词

混沌理論 ； 李雅普諾夫指數 ； 產業發展 ； 專利 ； chaos theory ； Lyapunov exponent ； industry development ； patent

期刊名称

管理學報

卷期/出版年月

21卷3期（2004 / 06 / 01）

页次

391 - 410

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究基於混沌理論的觀點與特性，探討產業發展是否具有混沌現象。在變數操作與衡量上，本研究以產業的技術產出，即為專利權申請數目，做為產業發展之代理指標，搭配李雅普諾夫指數做為產業時間序列的衡量係數，並佐以全球軟體產業、半導體產業與生物科技產業為例，探討說明混沌現象對產業發展的啟示。本研究的實證結果顯示，產業發展遵從回饋循環、內生變化、路徑依賴與制度效果的概念性隱喻，特別在創新行動引發系統內生變化後，混沌現象的表現更為顯著。本文最後討論理論與實務意涵。
英文摘要

An industry is dynamic in nature, and, over its evolution from emergence to growth and maturity, associated with various aspects of structures and actors involved. Creative destruction is typical, and there is an emerging view on the significance of spontaneous self-organization, unpredictability, and underlying order on industrial activities. In line with this stream of research, many scholars have considered chaos theory which is the study of nonlinear dynamic systems as a useful framework for explaining the dynamics of industries and their distinctive growth patterns. Accordingly, the purpose of the paper is to draw on chaos theory to study the nonlinear nature of industrial development. Important aspects of chaos theory include non-linear equation, parameters, the initial conditions, and in particular the character of strange attractors. The emphasis is to examine dynamic feedback systems as geometrical forms and consider creative and continuous change behavior. The advantage is centered on the theory's ability to demonstrate how a simple set of deterministic relationships can result in patterning yet unpredictable outcomes. As the outcomes of the chaotic systems are bounded and embody mathematic constants, it is likely to detect a fundamental order behind complex events and actions. Interests on the application of chaos theory to understanding industry activity and firm behavior arise greatly thus, and Brown and Eisenhardt (1998), Levy (1994), Radzicki (1990), Stacey (1995), Radzicki (1990), Young (1997), and Wolfgang (2003), for example, have provided important implications of chaos theory both for research and practice. Following this emerging literature, in this paper, we use chaos theory to examine how an industry evolves over time. Using the number of patents in USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) as a proxy of industry outcomes, we focus on the analyses of three industries-software, semiconductor and biotechnology-with the application of Lyapunov exponent (λ) as a measurement of chaos. Our search strategies in the USPTO database are specified as below: ACLM/software and APD/1/1/1997-＞1/31/1997 ACLM/semiconductor and APD/1/1/1997-＞1/31/1997 ACLM/DNA and APD/1/1/1997-＞1/31/1997 The calculation of λ values of the software industry is 0.1722 during 1992-1996, of semiconductor industry is 0.1434 during 1988-1997, and of the biotechnology industry is 0.2924 during 1993-1996. These results show that all of the industries had evolved from the period of λ＜0 through the bifurcation point to the period of λ＞0 during the time observed. Comparatively, the biotechnology had the highest value of λ, implying that the industry embodied a higher competitive condition and shorter life cycle. We also show that the three industries were all structured as non-linear, open-ended systems and as far-from-equilibrium paradoxes where the dynamics of the industries were both stable and unstable at the same time. All had affected by positive and negative forces that may co-exist during the evolving process. Path dependence was observable, and industry development was socially sensitive to technological innovation associated with self-organizing forces and endogenous change. Implications of our study are many, but the most critical is that we extend the use of chaos theory to the study of industry development which has been so far dominated by the industry organization school (e.g., five forces analysis) emphasizing on competition and stability. Our analysis shows that an industry, although containing the character of unpredictability and complex interactions among a variety of intended and unintended actions, is likely to be evolved in different yet distinctive growth patterns. Forecast and thus firm strategy are thus possible, as organizations retain the capacity of knowledgeability to adapt to the changing environment.
主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Allen, P. M.(1988).Dynamics models of evolving systems.System Dynamics Review,4,109-130.
  2. Anderson, P.(1999).Complexity theory and organization science.Organization Science,10(3),216-232.
  3. Basberg, B. L.(1987).Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature.Research Policy,10(3),131-141.
  4. Brown, S. L.,Eisenhardt, K. M.(1998).Competing on the edge: strategy as structured chaos.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
  5. Brown, T. A.(1996).Chaos Theory in the Social Science.MI:University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.
  6. Butler, A.(1990).A methodological approach to chaos: are economists missing the point?.Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis,72,36-48.
  7. Cambell, R. S.(1983).Patenting the future: a new way to forecast changing technology.The Futurist,17,62-68.
  8. Chase, R.(1985).A theory of socioeconomic change: entropic processes, technology, and evolutionary development.Journal of Economic Issue,19,797-823.
  9. Detlev, J. H.,Cyriac R. R.,Gert P.,Sandro, K. L.,Ralph M.(2002).Secrets of Software Success: Management Insights from 100 Software Firms Around the World.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
  10. Evenson, R. E.(1993).Patents, R&D, and invention potential: International evidence.American Economic Review,83,463-469.
  11. Feigenbaum, M. J.(1983).Universal behavior in nonlinear systems.Physica,7,16-39.
  12. Forrester, J.(1958).Industrial dynamics: a major breakthrough for decision-making.Harvard Business Review,36(4),37-66.
  13. Francis, N.,Elliot, N.,Ross, P.(1987).Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength.Research Policy,16,143-156.
  14. Freeman, C.(1981).Long waves, inventions, and innovations.Futures,13,308-323.
  15. Gleick, J.(1987).Chaos: Making a New Science.Penguin Books:New York.
  16. Gregersen, H.,Sailer, L.(1993).Chaos theory and its implications for social science research.Human Relations,46(7),777-802.
  17. Grupp, H.(1994).The measurement of technical performance of innovations by technometrics and its impact on established technology indicators.Research Policy,23,175-194.
  18. Hansson, P. A.(1991).Chaos: implications for forecasting.Futures,23(1),50-58.
  19. Hayek, F. A.(1948).Individualism and Economic Order.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  20. Hilborn, R. C.(1994).Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics.New York:Oxford University Press.
  21. Hirschhorn, L.(1990).The Workplace Within: Psycho-Dynamics of Organizational Life.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  22. Irene, S.(1999).Chaos theory and institutional economics: metaphor or model?.Journal of Economic Issue,33,141-167.
  23. Jayanthi, S.,Sinha, K. K.(1998).Innovation implementation in high technology manufacturing: a chaos-theoretic empirical analysis.Journal of Operations Management,16(4),471-494.
  24. Kauffman, S. A.(1991).Antichaos and adaptation.Scientific American,265,78-84.
  25. Kelsey, D.(1988).The economics of chaos of the chaos of economics.Oxford Economic Papers,40,1-31.
  26. Kingston, W.(2001).Innovation needs patent reform.Research Policy,30,403-423.
  27. Koput, K. W.(1997).A chaotic model of innovative search: some answers, many questions.Organization Science,8(5),528-542.
  28. Langlois, R. N.,Steinmueller, W. E.(2000).Strategy and circumstance: the response of American firms to Japanese competition in semiconductors, 1980-1995.Strategic Management Journal,21,1163-1173.
  29. Levy, D.(1994).Chaos theory and strategy: theory, application, and managerial implications.Strategic Management Journal,15,167-178.
  30. Leydesdorff, L.,Besselaar, P. V.(1994).Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies.London, UK:St. Martin`s Press.
  31. Liu, B. Z.(1994).Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaotic Basis.Taipei, Taiwan:Foundation of Shyu Press.
  32. Lorenz, E.(1993).Deterministic nonperiodic flow.Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences,20,130-141.
  33. Mandelbort, B.(1977).The Fractal Geometry of Nature.Freeman:New York.
  34. Mary, E. M.(2000).Foreign patenting behavior of small and large firms.International Journal of Technology Management,19,149-164.
  35. Mathews, K. M.,White, M. C.,Long R. G.(1999).Why study the complexity sciences in the social sciences?.Human Relations,52(4),439-467.
  36. Mayer-Kress, G.,Grossman S.(1989).Chaos in the international arms race.Nature,337,701-704.
  37. Mcdonough, P. V.,Noonan J. P.,Hall G. R.(1995).A new chaos detector.Computers Electronic Engineering,21,417-431.
  38. Meyers, P. W.(1990).Non-linear learning in large technological Firms: period four implies chaos.Research Policy,19(2),97-113.
  39. Overman, E. S.(1996).The new science of administration: chaos and quantum theory.Public Administration Review,56(5),487-491.
  40. Radzicki, M. J.(1988).A note on Kelsey`s the economics of chaos or the chaos of economics.Oxford Economic Papers,40,692-693.
  41. Radzicki, M. J.(1990).Institutional dynamics, deterministic chaos, and self-organizing systems.Journal of Economics Issue,24,57-101.
  42. Richardson, G. P.(1984).Proceedings of the 1984 International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.Oslo, Norway:
  43. Rivise, M.(2001).Peculiar patents.Field & Stream,105,83-84.
  44. Ruelle, D.(1989).Chaotic Evolution and Strange Attractors.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  45. Ruelle, D.,Takens, F.(1971).On the nature of turbulence.Communications Math Physics,20,167-192.
  46. Saperstein, A. M.(1984).Chaos: a model for the outbreak of war.Nature,309,303-305.
  47. Schumpeter, J. A.(1934).The Theory of Economic Development.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  48. Senge, P. M.(1990).The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization.New York:Doubleday Currency.
  49. Stacey, R. D.(1995).The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change processes.Strategic Management Journal,16(6),477-495.
  50. Teece, D. J.(1996).Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,31,193-224.
  51. Thietart, R. A.,Forgues, B.(1995).Chaos theory and organization.Organization Science,6(1),19-31.
  52. Torbert, W. R.(1996).The chaotic action awareness of transformational leaders.International Journal of Public Administration,19(6),911-939.
  53. Wolfgang, W.(2003).Sociodynamic approach to mathematical modeling in the social sciences.Chaos, Solitons and Fractals,18,431-437.
  54. Wolfram, S.(1986).Computer software in science and mathematics.Scientific American,255,19-26.
  55. Wyke, A.(1998).A Survey of Biotechnology the Genetic Alternative.The Economist,307,1-17.
  56. Young, T. R.(1991).Change and chaos theory: metaphysics of the postmodern.The Social Science Journal,28,289-305.
print cancel