Poor Performance Experience and Explorative Actions: A Synthesis of Prospect Theory and Threat-Rigidity Theory

10.6504/JOM.2006.23.04.05

Hsuan Lo

Poor performance experience ； Explorative actions ； Prospect theory ； Threat-rigidity theory

管理學報

23卷4期（2006 / 08 / 01）

473 - 484

英文

By synthesizing threat-rigidity theory and prospect theory, this study hypothesizes a U-shaped relationship between poor performance experience and the likelihood of adopting explorative actions. The study also considers the negative moderating effect of peer adoption of such actions on the relationship. The examination of the purchasing behavior of hospitals of new types of high technology equipment is a fundamentally explorative action and confirms the proposed hypotheses. This study finds that hospitals with less poor performance experience are likely to undertake explorative actions. As poor performance experience accumulates to a certain level, hospitals are less likely to undertake explorative actions. However, as poor performance experience increases to an extremely high level, hospitals are more likely to undertake explorative actions. In addition, the U-shaped curve becomes smoother as more peers concurrently pursue explorative actions. This study demonstrates a way of reconciling the conflicts between threat-rigidity theory and prospect theory, and contributes to an understanding of the effects of performance on successive organizational exploration.

1. Baker, L., Birnbaum, H., Geppert, J., Mishol, D.,Moyneur, E(2003).The relationship between technology availability and health care spending.Health Affairs.
2. Barker, V.L, III,Duhaime, I.M(1997).Strategic change in the turnaround process: Theory and empirical evidence.Strategic Management Journal,18,13-38.
3. Baum, J.A.C.,Korn, H.J(1996).Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry.Academy of Management Journal.
4. Boeker, W(1997).Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth.Academy of Management Journal.
5. Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W.H.,Huber, G..P(2001).Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities.Academy of Management Journal.
6. Chen, M.-J.,MacMillan, I.C(1992).Nonresponse and delayed response to competitive moves: The roles of competitor dependence and action irreversibility.Academy of Management Journal.
7. Greve, H.R(1998).Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change.Administrative Science Quarterly.
8. Henderson, J.,Cool, K(2003).Learning to time capacity expansions: An empirical analysis of the worldwide petrochemical industry.Strategic Management Journal,24,393-416.
9. Henisz, W.J.,Delios, A(2001).Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990-1996.Administrative Science Quarterly.
10. Kahneman, D.,Tversky, A(1979).Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk.Econometrica.
11. Kondra, A.Z.,Hinnings, C.R(1998).Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory.Organization Studies.
12. Kuehberger, A(1998).The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
13. March, J.G.(1991).Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.Organization Science.
14. March, J.G.,Shapira, Z(1987).Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking.Management Science.
15. Miller, K.D.,Leiblein, M.J(1996).Corporate risk-return relations: Return variability versus downside risk.Academy of Management Journal.
16. Neumann, C.L., Blouin, A.S., Byrne, E.M.,Reed, W.C(1999).Achieving success: Assessing the role of and building a business case for technology in healthcare / Commentaries/Reply.Frontiers of Health Services Management.
17. Sitkin, S.B(1992).Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses.Research in Organizational Behavior.
18. Smith, K.G., Grimm, C.M.,Gannon, M.J(1992).Dynamics of Competitive Strategy.
19. Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E.,Dutton, J.E(1981).Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis.Administrative Science Quarterly.
20. Sutton, R.I(1990).Organizational decline process: A social psychological perspective.In Research in Organizational Behavior.