資訊系統使用階段變革歷程之研究－以動態觀點，檢視“使用慣例”與介入措施交互調適的影響效應

A Study of Change Process within Information System Post-adoptive Phase-A Dynamic Approach to Review the Impact of Mutual Adaptation between Routine Effects and Intervention

10.6504/JOM.2006.23.05.05

林尚平(Shang-Ping Lin)；吳建明(Chien-Ming Wu)；陳怜秀(Ling-Hsiu Chen)

資訊系統使用階段 ； 科技關聯之組織變革 ； 使用慣例 ； 介入措施 ； Post-adoption period of information system ； Technology-related Organizational Change ； use routine ； intervention

管理學報

23卷5期（2006 / 10 / 01）

601 - 622

繁體中文

「企業資訊系統使用階段變革歷程」與組織能否從資訊系統得到實質效益的密切關係。然而，這方面的研究始終有限，特別是變革「介入措施」係由管理者或作用者所主導的爭議，迄今仍有多種論述。基此，本研究透過對台灣大型傳産企業長期作用資訊系統變革歷程的參與觀察、歷程文件蒐集與敘事分析，試圖理解居間原委。研究發現：「作用階段變革歷程」，除涉及「介入措施」效應用外，還包括共存的「作用慣例」與之交互調適的影響。這種交互調適「介入措施」對「使用慣例」所産生增強、抑制或衝突效應；以及「使用慣例」反向對「介入措施」的促進或抑制影響。這種情境底下，管理者或使用者主導變革情況皆有可能發生；這意味著，實務者在關注「介入措施」議題同時，尚須把焦點放在「使用慣例」，才能促進最終的組織效能。

The purpose of this study is to explore the change process with regard to key actors within the information system post-adoptive phase. This research concerns with agents that trigger change, and relate to the intention and behavior of manager and users, especially focus on issues of who dominates the intervention, how the related actors within the post-adoptive phase interact, and what impact is generated from the change process. This study draws upon one large enterprise of the Traditional Industry in Taiwan through participant observation, process documents, and the narrative analysis to understand the reason why this situation happened. The phenomena observed consist of two significant events in the change process and five post-adoptive phases, and the interaction between key actors. Information system involves uncertainty of the investment and the risk of losing profits. Although many information system researches had been conducted, there were questions not clarified yet. Researchers started to introspect the research approach to see if it was too ”adaptation-oriented” to ignore ”user's phase”. In the meantime, some researches on ”user's phase” started to be published in top-tier journals. However, most of them were limited to either user's attitudes or system construction and none of them studied both the users and the information system at the same time. Moreover, the lack of longitudinal and multi-dimensional researches might lead to deficiency in theoretical implications. Due to all the gaps mentioned, this research studied the post-adoptive phase in a company that has used information system for a long time. Therefore, the study discovers that the whole change process within post-adoptive phase has related to intervention effort, routine effectiveness, co-exist and mutual adaptation effective. The mutual adaptation includes the reinforcement, restraint, and conflict impact produced by the invention to the routine use; the promotion or restraint impact produced by the routine use to the invention. Under the situation, the change of post-adoptive phrase predominated by manager or user has possible. It means the routine effect issue can not be neglected when we focus on the past perspective. The use routine can make the ultimate organization efficiency. By delineate the change process among the post-adoptive phase of information system; we contribute to organization study on routine and technology-used.

1. Adam, F.,O`Doherty, P.,G. Shanks,P.B. Seddon,L.P. Willcocks(2003).ERP Projects: Good or Bad for SMEs.Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementing for Effectiveness,275-298.
2. Barley, S. R.(1986).Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments.Administrative Science Quarterly,31,78-108.
3. Beaudry, A.,Pinsonneault, A(2005).Understanding User Response to Information Technology: a Coping Model of User Adaptation.MIS Quarterly,29(3),493-524.
4. Bhattacherjee, A.(1998).Managerial Influences on Intraorganizational Information Technology Use: a Principal-Agent Model.Decision Sciences,29(1),139-162.
5. Boudreau, M.,Robey, D.(2005).Enacting Integrated Information Technology: a Human Agency Perspective.Organization Science,16(1),3-18.
6. Carr, N.G.(2004).Does it Matter? Information Technology and the Corrosion of Competitive Advantage
7. Chen, Hsiang-Ming(2004).Qualitative Research of Social Science
8. Chi, Li.,Li Chi,Pen-Hsuan Lin(2003).Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods.Qualitative Research Method and Data Analysis,1-18.
9. Clandinin, D. J.,Connelly, F. M.(2000).Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research
10. Cooper, R. B.,Zmud, R. W.(1990).Information Technology Implementation Research: a Technological Diffusion Approach.Management Science,36(2),123-139.
11. Cummings, T. G.,Worley, C. G.(2001).Organizational Development and Change
12. Daft, R.L.(2000).Organization Theory and Design
13. Davenport, T. H.(1998).Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System.Harvard Business Review,76(4),121-132.
14. Desanctis, G.,Monge, P.(1999).Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations.Organization Science,10(6),693-704.
15. Desanctis, G.,Poole, M.S.(1994).Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory.Organization Science,5,121-147.
16. Dewett, T.,Jones, G. R.(2001).The Role of Information Technology in the Organization: a Review, Model and Assessment.Journal of Management,27,313-346.
17. Earl, M. J.,D. A. Marchand,T. H. Davenport,T. Dickson(2000).Every Business is an Information Business.Mastering Information Management
18. Edgerton, D.(1999).From Innovation to Use: Ten Eclectic Theses on the Historiography of Technology.History and Technology,16,111-136.
19. Edmondson, A. C.,Bohmer, R. M.,Pisano, G. P.(2001).Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals.Administrative Science Quarterly,46,685-716.
20. Emirbayer, M.,Mische, A.(1998).What`s agency.American Journal of Sociology,103(4),962-1023.
21. Evans, B. 2003(2003).IT Doesn`t Matter?.Information Week,12
22. Feldman, M. S.(2000).Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change.Organization Science,11(6),611-629.
23. Feldman, M. S.,Pentland, B. T.(2003).Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change.Administrative Science Quarterly,48,94-118.
24. Gable, G. G.,Chan, T.,Tan, W. G.,G. Shanks,P. B. Seddon,L. P. Willcocks(2003).Offsetting ERP Risk through Maintaining Standardized Application Software.Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems,220-237.
25. Gosain, S.(2004).Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: the New Iron Cage?.Journal of the Association for Information Systems,15(4),151-182.
26. Huber, G. P.(1990).A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making.Academy of Management Review,15,47-71.
27. Jasperson, J.,Carter, P. E.,Zmud, R. W.(2005).A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems.MIS Quarterly,29(3),525-557.
28. Klein, H. K.,Myers, M. D.(1999).A set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems.MIS Quarterly,23(1),67-94.
29. Kumar, K.,Sibley, E. M.(1990).Post Implementation Evaluation of Computer-based Information Systems: Current Practices.Communication of the ACM,33(2),205-213.
30. Langley, A.(1999).Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data.Academy of Management Review,24(4),691-710.
31. Latour, B,J. Law(1986).The Powers of Association.Power, Action and Belief,264(280)
32. Leanna, C. R.,Barry, B.(2000).Stability and Change as Simultaneous Experiences in Organizational Life.Academy of Management Review,25,753-759.
33. Leonard-Barton, D.(1988).Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization.Research Policy,17,251-267.
34. Lincoln, Y. S.,Guba, E.(1985).Naturalistic Enquiry
35. Markus, M. L.,Axline, S.,Petrie, D,Tanis, C.,G. Shanks,P.B. Seddon,L. P. Willcocks(2003).Learning from Experiences with ERP: Problems Encountered and Success Achieved.Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems,23-55.
36. Markus, M. L.,D. A. Marchand,T. H. Davenport,D. Tim(2000).How Workers React.Mastering Information Management,233-238.
37. Markus, M. L.,Keil, M.(1994).If We Build it, They Will Come: Designing Information System that Users Want to Use.Sloan Management Review,35(4),11-25.
38. Markus, M. L.,Tanis, C.,R. W. Zmud(2000).The Enterprise Systems Experience-from Adoption to Success.Framing the Domains of IT Research: Glimpsing the Future through the Past,173-207.
39. Markus, M.L.,Robey, D.(1988).Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research.Management Science,34(5),583-598.
40. Mintzberg, H.,Westley, F.(1992).Cycles of Organization Change.Strategic Management Journal,13,39-59.
41. Moynihan, G. P.(1993).An Executive Information System: Planning for Post-implementation at NASA.Journal of Information Management,44(7),8-13.
42. Newell, J. C.,Huang, J. C.,Galliers, R. D.,Pan, S. L(2003).Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning and Knowledge Management Systems in Tandem: Fostering Efficiency and Innovation Complementarity.Information & Organization,13,25-52.
43. Oliver, K. L.(1998).A Journey into Narrative Analysis: a Methodology for Discovering Meaning.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,17,244-259.
44. Orlikowski, W. J.(1996).Improving Organizational Transformation over Time: a Situated Change Perspective.Information System Research,7(1),63-92.
45. Orlikowski, W. J.(2000).Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A practice lens for Studying Technology in Organization.Organization Science,11(4),404-428.
46. Orlikowski, W. J.(1992).The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations.Organization Science,3(3),398-427.
47. Orlikowski, W. J.,Yates, J.(2002).It`s about Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations.Organization Science,13(6),684-700.
48. Pettigrew, A. M.(1990).Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice.Organization Science,1(3),267-292.
49. Pettigrew, A. M.(1987).Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm.Journal of Management Studies,24(6),649-670.
50. Piderit, S. K(2000).Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: a Multidimensional View of Attitudes toward an Organizational Change.Academy of Management Review,25,783-794.
51. Robey, D.,Ross, J. W.,Boudreau, M. –C.(2002).Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: an Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change.Journal of Management Information System,19,17-46.
52. Rogers, E. M.(1995).Diffusion of Innovations
53. Ross, J. W.,Vitale, M. R.,Willcocks,L. P.,G. Shanks,P. B. Seddon,L. P. Willcocks(2003).The Continuing ERP Revolution: Sustainable Lessons, New Modes of Delivery.Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementing for Effectiveness,102-132.
54. Roth, G.,D.A. Marchand,T. H. Davenport,T. Dickson(2000).IT and the Challenge of Organizational Learning.Mastering Information Management,233-238.
55. Smith, N. C.(1990).The Case Study: a Useful Research Method for Information Management.Journal of Information Technology,5,123-133.
56. Stajkovic, A. D.,Luthans, F.(2001).Differential Effects of Incentive Motivators on Work Performance.Academy of Management Journal,44(3),580-590.
57. Tyre, M. J.,Orlikowski, W. J.(1996).The Episodic Process of Learning by Using.International Journal of Technology Management,11(7-8),709-798.
58. Tyre, M.J.,Orlikowski, W. J.(1994).Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations.Organization Science,5(1),98-118.
59. Zuboff, S.(1988).In the Age of Smart Machine: the Future of Work and Power