個別化行銷下的最適折價券與産品線設計

The Optimal Couponing Strategy and Product Line Design under Individual Marketing

10.6504/JOM.2006.23.06.03

周善瑜(Shan-Yu Chou)；陳其美(Chyi-Mei Chen)；戴翊亘(Yi-Hsuan Dai)

個別化行銷 ； 産品線設計 ； 差別取價 ； 折價券 ； Individual marketing ； Product line design ； Price discrimination ； Coupon

管理學報

23卷6期（2006 / 12 / 01）

691 - 709

繁體中文

本研究旨在以賽局理論探討「低端産品」折價券的發行對産品線設地的影響。廠商可依是否使用區辨消費者的能力而選擇發行「大眾折價券」或「個別化折價券」。本文在假設高端消費者具有較高的品質偏好及折價券使用成本下，獲致如下結果：(1)當折價券使用成本很高時宜採眾折價券，可無辨認風險地使産品售價及品質均達效率水準；而在非整合通路下，製造商宜引導零售商發行大眾折價券，雙層産品線競蝕問題可獲得解決。(2)大眾折價券的最適面額可能與折價券使用成本有關，而均衡時最適個別化折價券面額乃隨低端産品品質之上升而增加。(3)折價券使用成本較小、製造商或零售商辨識力愈大時，製造商最適策略爲個別化銷售策略。(4)發行個別化折價券相對於大眾折價券更能改善零售商誘因問題，因此製造商在整合通路時更傾向採個別化銷售策略。

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of issuing a coupon attached to a low-end product at the retail level on the manufacturer's profits and its product line design. The manufacturer can choose to issue a mass coupon to all consumers, or an individual coupon targeted at low-valuation consumers. The mass coupon can help alleviate the cannibalization problem in the product line but its effect is limited by the magnitude of the redemption cost of the high-valuation consumers. The individual coupon serves to extract the surplus of the high segment at the expense of mistargeting. Manufacturers could segment consumers and extract much consumer surplus to increase their profits by issuing coupons. With the development of information technology and the possibility of mass customization, manufacturers could provide consumers customization goods and service successfully. And through the data-mining, they could target specific segments. Rossi Robert and Greg (1996) show that designing the optimal face value of individual coupon by the record of consumers' purchase history is more profitable than issuing the blanket couponing for manufacturer. But if the target ability isn't perfect, it may result in the loss of consumers and profit (Chen et al., 2001). Thus, we will provide a more clear relation of the optimal couponing strategy and product line design under individual marketing. Assuming high-valuation consumers incur a higher cost when redeeming coupons than low-valuation consumers, we find the following results: (1) When the redemption cost of the high segment is high enough, the mass coupon allows the firm to implement perfect price discrimination, thus setting the prices and the quality levels of products at the highest possible levels; (2) Unlike the mass coupon, the value of which may equal the redemption cost of the high segment, the optimal value of the individual coupon always increases with the quality level of the low-end product; (3) In a non-integrated channel, the higher the redemption cost of the high segment, the more the mass retail coupon helps alleviate the cannibalization problem and thus the retailer's incentive problems, which in turn increases the manufacturer's profits until the integrated profits can be achieved; (4) If the consumers' redemption cost is lower or the retailer's targetability is sufficiently high, the manufacturer is better to induce the retailer to issue the individual coupon. (5) The individual coupon alleviates the retailer's incentive problems to a greater extent than the mass coupon does. Thus the manufacturer may prefer inducing the individual coupon to inducing the mass coupon despite the opposite is true in an integrated channel.

1. Besanko, David,Jean-Pierre Dubé,Sachin Gupta(2003).Competitive Price Discrimination Strategies in a Vertical Channel Using Aggregate Retail Data.Management Science,49(9),1122-1138.
2. Chen, Yuxin,Chakravarthi Narasimhan,Z. John Zhang(2001).Individual Marketing with Imperfect Targetability.Marketing Science,20(1),23-41.
3. Gerstner, Eitan,James D. Hess(1995).Pull promotions and channel coordination.Marketing Science,14(1),43-60.
4. Gerstner, Eitan,James D. Hess(1991).A theory of channel price promotions.Journal American Economic Review,80(4),872-886.
5. Kim, Kilsun,Dilip Chhajed(2002).Product Design with Multiple Quality-Type Attributes.Management Science,48(11),1502-1511.
6. Lin, Hsin-Yi(2003).The Optimal Product Line Design under Individual Marketing, unpublished manuscript Graduate Institute of Business Administration, ational Taiwan University.
7. Moorthy, K. Sridhar,I. P. L. Png(1992).Market Segmentation Cannibalization and Timing of Product Introductions.Management Science,38(3),81-94.
8. Mussa, M.,S. Rosen(1978).Monopoly and Product Quality.Journal of Economic Theory,18,141-168.
9. Narasimhan, C(1988).Competitive Promotion Strategies.Journal of Business,61(4),427-449.
10. Preyas Desai(2001).Quality Segmentation in Spatial Markets: When does Cannibalization affect Product Line Design.Marketing Science,20(3),265-283.
11. Rossi, Peter E.,Robert E. McCulloch,Greg M. Allenby(1996).The Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing.Marketing Science,15,321-340.
12. Shaffer, Gerg,Z. John Zhang(2002).Competitive One-to-One Promotions.Management Science,48(9),1143-1160.
13. Shaffer, Gerg,Z. John Zhang(1995).Competitive Coupon Targeting.Marketing Science,14(4),395-416.
14. Tirole, Jean(1988).The Theory of Industrial Organization,169-198.
15. Villas-Boas, J. M(1998).Product Line Design for a Distribution Channel.Marketing Science,17(2),156-169.
16. Young, S.(1997).AT&T marketing reaches out and touches the wrong someone.Dow Jones News Service

1. 陳其美、周善瑜、吳惠婷(2012)。不對稱資訊下雙產品獨占廠商最適定價機制選擇：序列定價與組合定價。管理學報，29(6)，583-617。
2. 李能慧,李佳亭,吳桂森(2011)。高階產品創新保密期與品質水準決策之分析。國立金門大學學報，1，85-100。
3. 李能慧、吳桂森(2010)。創新廠商對低階破壞性產品品質、產量與保密期之決策分析。嶺東學報，28，77-92。
4. 劉書助、林有俊(2014)。電腦維修服務差別定價之研究。管理與系統，21(2)，277-293。