题名

企業經營型態與研發活動績效

并列篇名

Business Types and R&D Activities Performance

DOI

10.6504/JOM.2008.25.02.03

作者

王曉雯(Hsiao-Wen Wang);王泰昌(Tay-Chang Wang);吳明政(Ming-Cheng Wu)

关键词

創新資本與經營績效關連程度 ; 自有品牌 ; 代工 ; 核心能耐 ; Innovation capital and performance link ; OBM ; ODM/OEM ; Core competence

期刊名称

管理學報

卷期/出版年月

25卷2期(2008 / 04 / 01)

页次

173 - 193

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文主要研究目的在探討企業根據核心能耐選擇之經營型態(如自有品牌與代工)如何影響創新發展策略,並進一步影響研發活動績效。具體而言,本文係探討在將研發投資與專利權蓄積之創新資本轉化為具體經營績效過程中,企業根據核心能耐選擇的經營型態將扮演何種角色?研發投入對經營績效之加值效益是否會受到企業經營型態所影響?累積專利權(類別)數對於績效之加值效益是否會受到經營型態所影響? 本文建議企業研發投入與累積專利權數將會對經營績效產生正面(遞延)效益。各種累積專利權類別數將對經營績效帶來不同程度影響效果。此外,本文建議研發投入對經營績效之加值效益將會受到經營型態所影響;相較於代工企業,自有品牌企業的研發活動績效較佳。值得說明的是,當企業同時採取自有品牌與代工經營模式,研發投入對績效創造之助益將會比企業採取單純品牌或單純代工型態來的高。最後,本文建議累積專利權數為自有品牌企業帶來的經營績效,平均而言,高於代工企業。累積專利權類別數對於績效之加值效益將會因不同經營型態而呈現專屬樣貌。值得說明的是,累積發明、新型與新式樣專利權數均不能為代工企業績效帶來正面助益。

英文摘要

The paper aims to explore how business type, which a firm chooses according to its core competence and competitive advantage, influences a firm's innovation strategies that in turn affect its operating performance. The paper will explore that whether a firm's R&D investments have positive and lagged effects on its operating performance. In addition, the paper will examine whether the patent counts of firm have positive effects on operating performance. The paper will examine whether the categories of patents of firm have different effects on operating performance. Finally, the paper will explore that what is the role of business type during the process of turning the innovation capital accumulated through R&D investments into operating performance? Does different business type influence on the value-added benefit of operating performance brought by R&D investments? Researchers have studied on the influence of various intangible assets (i.e. R&D expenditure) to firm performance and stock price in recent years. The paper relates intangible assets to strategy research issues and analyzes how do business types of firms affect the linkage of R&D capitals and performance. As for strategy literature, based on resource-based theory, researchers generally state that a firm will take core competence and competitive advantage into consideration while choosing a proper business type. However, no previous researches have studied on whether the choice of business type will influence innovation investment strategies and operating performance. This paper uses large sample data to demonstrate that business type will influence the creation of firm value through formulating strategies that will affect innovation development. This paper presents an important and clear research argument on the choice of business type, the formulation of innovation development strategies and creation of performance. The results of the paper are as follows. First, the paper shows that R&D expenditures by a high-tech firm have positive and lagged effects on operating performance. The categories of patents (the invention patents, utility model patents and design patents) do have different effects on operating performance. Second, the paper suggests that the value-added effect to operating performance of R&D investments by a high-tech firm will be affected by its own business type. The paper finds that on average, the performance resulted from R&D activities in OBM firms is better than that in ODM/OEM firms. The linkage of R&D investment and performance will increase gradually comparing ODM/OEM to OBM firms. Note particularly, the paper finds that R&D expenditures can contribute more for performance when firms adopt the hybrid type. Finally, the paper suggests that compared to ODM/OEM firms, the patent counts on average can create more benefits for OBM firms. The performance paths that the categories of patents can contribute for OBM and ODM/OEM firms show firm-specific features. Note particularly, the paper finds that compared with OBM firms, ODM/OEM firms cannot benefit from the invention patents, utility model patents and design patents.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 任立中、林婷鈴、陳靜怡、李吉仁(2006)。高科技產業產品價值創造與行銷價值專屬化之最適資源配置。中山管理評論,14(1),11-42。
    連結:
  2. Aaker, D. A.,R. Jacobson(1994).The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality.Journal of Marketing Research,31,191-201.
  3. Almon, A.(1965).The Distributed Lag between Capital Appropriations and Expenditures.Econometrica,33,178-196.
  4. Bidault, F.,C. Despres,C. Butler(1998).The Drivers of Cooperation between Buyers and Suppliers for Production Innovation.Research Policy,26,719-732.
  5. Cheng, S.(2004).R&D Expenditures and CEO Compensation.The Accounting Review,79(2),305-328.
  6. Chung, K. H.,S. W. Pruitt(1994).A Simple Approximation of Tobin`s Q.Financial Management,23,70-74.
  7. Deng, Z.,B. Lev,F. Narin(1999).Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance.Financial Analysts Journal,55(3),20-32.
  8. Doyle, P.(1990).Building Successful Brands: The Strategic Options.Journal of Consumer Marketing,7,5-20.
  9. Dutta, S.,O. Narasimhan,S. Rajiv(1999).Success in High-Technology Market: Is Marketing Capability Critical?.Marketing Science,18(4),547-568.
  10. Ettlie, J.(1998).R&D and Global Manufacturing Performance.Management Science,44(1),1-11.
  11. Gatignon, H.,A. B. Weitz,P. Bansal(1990).Brand Introduction Strategies and Competitive Environments.Journal of Marketing Research,27(4),390-401.
  12. Griliches, Z.(1981).Market Value, R&D, and Patents.Economic Letters,7(2),183-187.
  13. Griliches, Z.,A. Pakes,B. H. Hall,P. Dasgupta(Edited),P. Stoneman(1987).The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity, in Economic Policy and Technological Performance.Cambridge University Press.
  14. Hall, B. H.(1999).Innovation and Market Value.NBER Working Paper Series.
  15. Hobday, M.(1995).Innovation in East Asia: the Challenge to Japan.Brookfield, VT:Edward Elgar.
  16. Hope, J.,T. Hope(1997).Competing in the Third Wave: The Ten Key Management Issues of the Information Age.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
  17. Hsieh, P. H.,C. S. Mishra,D. H. Gobeli(2003).The Return on R&D Versus Capital Expenditures in Pharmaceutical and Chemical Industries.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,50(2),141-150.
  18. Kim, J.,G. Marschke(2004).Accounting for the Recent Surge in U.S. Patenting: Changes in R&D Expenditures, Patent Yields, and the High Tech Sector.Economics of Innovation and New Technology,13(6),543-558.
  19. Lev, B.,T. Sougiannis(1996).The Capitalization, Amortization, and Value-relevance of R&D.Journal of Accounting and Economics,21,107-138.
  20. Lin, B. W.,J. S. Chen(2005).Corporate Technology Portfolios and R&D Performance Measures: A Study of Technology Intensive Firms.R&D Management,35(2),157-170.
  21. Lin, B. W.,Y. Lee,S. C. Hung(2006).R&D Intensity and Commercialization Orientation Effects on Financial Performance.Journal of Business Research,59,679-685.
  22. Mairesse, J.,P. Mohnen(2004).The Importance of R&D for Innovation: A Reassessment Using French Survey Data.Journal of Technology Transfer,30,183-197.
  23. Megna, P.,M. Klock(1993).The Impact of Intangible Capital on Tobin`s Q in the Semiconductor Industry.American Economic Review,83(2),265-269.
  24. Miller, D. J.(2006).Technological Diversity, Related Diversification, and Firm Performance.Strategic Management Journal,27(7),601-619.
  25. Mudambi, R.,P. Doyle,V. Wong(1997).An Exploration of Branding in Industrial markets.Industrial Marketing Management,26,433-446.
  26. O`Brien, J. P.(2003).The Capital Structure Implications of Pursuing a Strategy of Innovation.Strategic Management Journal,24(5),415-431.
  27. Quinn, J. B.,F. G. Hilmer(1994).Strategic Outsourcing.Sloan Management Review,35(4),43-55.
  28. Seggie, S. H.,D. Kim,S. T. Cavusgil(2006).Do Supply Chain IT Alignment and Supply Chain Interfirm System Integration Impact upon Brand Equity and Firm Performance?.Journal of Business Research,59,887-895.
  29. Shefer, D.,A. Frenkel(2005).R&D, Firm Size and Innovation: A Empirical Analysis.Technovation,25,25-32.
  30. Sher, P. J.,P. Y. Yang(2005).The Effects of Innovative Capabilities and R&D Clustering on Firm Performance: the Evidence of Taiwan`s Semiconductor Industry.Technovation,25(1),33-43.
  31. Shortridge, R. T.(2004).Market Valuation of Successful versus Non-successful R&D Efforts in the Pharmaceutical Industry.Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,31(10),1301-1326.
  32. Singh, M.,S. Faircloth,A. Nejadmalayeri(2005).Capital Market Impact of Product Marketing Strategy: Evidence from the Relationship between Advertising Expenses and Cost of capital.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,33(4),432-444.
  33. Sougiannis, T.(1994).The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate R&D.The Accounting Review,69(1),44-68.
  34. Tsai, K. H.,J. C. Wang(2004).The R&D Performance in Taiwan`s Electronics Industry: A Longitudinal Examination.R&D Management,34(2),179-189.
  35. Weerawardena, J.,A. O`Cass,C. Julian(2006).Does Industry Matter? Examining the Role of Industry Structure and Organizational Learning in Innovation and Brand Performance.Journal of Business Research,59,37-45.
  36. White, H.(1980).A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.Econometrica,48,817-838.
  37. 洪廣朋、李文瑞、翁宗志(2002)。廠商間長期合作關係模式之研究-台灣資訊電子代工廠商之實證。管理學報,19(5),781-810。
  38. 陳振祥、李吉仁(1997)。ODM的成因與策略運作-水平式產業下的策略聯盟型態。中山管理評論,5(3),553-572。
  39. 資策會(2005)。資訊工業年鑑。經濟部。
  40. 資策會(2004)。經濟部ITIS計畫經濟部ITIS計畫,未出版
  41. 劉正田(2001)。研發支出資本化之會計基礎股票評價。會計評論,33,1-26。
  42. 歐進士(1998)。我國企業研究發展與經營績效關聯性之實證研究。中山管理評論,6(2),357-386。
被引用次数
  1. Lin, Tsui-Jung,Lee, I-Zhe,Hou, Chi-Ping,Chen,Yi-Pe,Chang, Li(2013).A Study of the Relationship among Family Business, CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Innovation.交大管理學報,33(1),105-140.
  2. Wang, Ma-Ju,Wang, Ma-Ju(2017).The Influences of the Plaintiffs/Defendants, Outcomes, and Settlements of Patent Litigations on the Stock Market.財務金融學刊,25(3),47-90.
  3. 蔡柳卿、楊朝旭、彭智偉(2013)。台商母公司研發資產與大陸子公司財務績效之關聯性:論企業策略之調節角色。中山管理評論,21(4),799-851。
  4. 曹淑琳(2021)。以Cobb-Douglas生產函數分析新冠肺炎後台灣半導體產業研發投入與獲利能力之關聯性。中科大學報,8(1),25-52。
  5. 曾真真(2009)。愈多資源愈有利成長?環境不確定性的調節效果。輔仁管理評論,16(2),77-98。
  6. 陳光政、紀信義(2017)。藥品許可證價值攸關性之研究。中華會計學刊,13(1),129-156。
  7. 陳光政、紀信義(2017)。製藥公司藥品許可證、研發與分析師盈餘預測關聯性之研究。中山管理評論,25(2),291-336。
  8. 陳欣妤,張慈玲,王曉雯(2018)。股票基礎薪酬與海外直接投資。中華會計學刊,14(1),31-62。
  9. 陳欣妤、陳以林(2017)。會計保守性、研發支出與現金持有。管理學報,34(2),257-275。
  10. 陳欣妤、吳佩珊、王曉雯(2013)。研發支出與總經理薪酬─公司控制與成長機會對抑止管理性投機之影響。管理評論,32(1),39-62+113-115。
  11. 陳以林,王泰昌(2023)。員工分紅費用化對研發支出之限制效應與對研發效率之影響。管理學報,40(4),383-416。
  12. 陳玉麟(2012)。企業策略、非財務績效衡量與總經理薪酬:電子業證據。會計評論,54,117-150。
  13. 陳姿妤,陳怡臻,施家蓉,林憲平,林芸妃(2021)。企業轉型之路上研發密度的角色-BCG矩陣模型的應用。商管科技季刊,22(4),427-464。
  14. 黃寶玉、康唯珍、倪衍森(2011)。公司治理會增強或削弱競爭力與多角化對公司價值影響?。商管科技季刊,12(2),175-208。
  15. 黃淑媛(2015)。台灣智慧資本研究:以TSSCI管理學門期刊為例。修平學報,30,147-176。
  16. 黃政仁、林秉孝(2016)。創新之價值創造結構分析:臺灣電子業之證據。會計評論,62,1-31。
  17. 李書行、吳明政、王曉雯(2011)。資本支出宣告與產業資訊移轉:由知識資本與價值鏈之影響論析。管理與系統,18(2),175-206。
  18. 林詠庭,王茂昌(2022)。臺灣生物科技產業之公司治理、研發支出與企業績效的關聯性:運用聯立方程模型。會計與公司治理,17(2),1-22。
  19. 劉念琪、王志袁(2011)。研發投入、研發組織管理與研發績效。商略學報,3(4),269-280。
  20. 盧美麗,蔡耀程,蔡文宬(2021)。運動服飾製造商轉型自有品牌策略分析。嶺東通識教育研究學刊,9(1),1-15。
  21. 盧貞秀、黃國芬、黃玟心、林靖傑(2013)。營利事業規避最低稅負之行為以及會計師稅務簽證功能之探討。當代會計,14(1),87-112。
  22. 魏志仲,賴⽂祥,陳靜瑜,林灼榮(2023)。國家創新策略關鍵因素與績效評估:AHP與Bounded-DEA之鏈結。管理與系統,30(3),289-322。
  23. 蕭義棋,趙義隆,葉峻賓(2021)。若即若離?探索TSSCI商管社群網絡結構及知識活動-編輯群重疊的策略觀點。管理與系統,28(2),115-155。
  24. 楊宜興、陳虹天(2013)。高值化創新、自有品牌與經營績效:臺灣電子產業之實證研究。中山管理評論,21(4),853-880。
  25. 楊志龍、黃仕斌(2018)。研發投入、研發績效對公司經營績效之影響:以台灣高科技產業為例。科技管理學刊,23(1),33-63。
  26. (2016)。創新資本與公司價值:動態調整下探討公司治理的作用。臺灣銀行季刊,67(4),1-18。
  27. (2018).The Impact of the Innovative Image of Media Reports on Corporate Performance.臺灣銀行季刊,69(4),27-70.
  28. (2018)。高階經理人權力與薪酬差距對創新與經營績效之影響:以台灣電子業為例。產業與管理論壇,20(4),1-10。
  29. (2022)。新冠肺炎後研發投資與公司治理對企業獲利能力之影響-以台灣上市電子業為例。臺灣銀行季刊,73(1),118-150。
  30. (2024)。會計穩健性與股價崩盤風險。管理與系統,31(2),237-274。
  31. (2024)。企業生命週期與成本僵固性關聯性:經營策略的調節效果。會計審計論叢,14(1),111-165。
  32. (2024)。研發投入與經營績效之遞延效果-以台灣半導體產業為例。經濟論文,52(3),277-318。