以動態能力觀點探討企業經營流程變革與網路地位重塑關係之研究

A Dynamic Capability Perspective on the Relations between the Business Process Change and the Network Status Reshape

10.6504/JOM.2009.26.02.03

吳建明(Chien-Ming Wu)；胡哲生(Jer-San Hu)

企業網路 ； 動態能力 ； 經營流程變革 ； 價值創造 ； Business Network ； Dynamic Capability ； Business Process Change ； Value Creation

管理學報

26卷2期（2009 / 04 / 01）

145 - 166

繁體中文

受到全球化資源佈局與產品科技所影響，傳統產業的產品價值多由品牌商或銷售商所掌握，原料供應商或製造商處於較低影響力的經營地位。在此情境下，原料供應商如何在既有企業網路中維持或甚至創造競爭優勢，為本研究關切所在。為此，本研究以一個包括原料供應商、品牌商等成員所組成的企業網路為例，透過諸成員互動的作業流程、作業價值與網路型態關係的長期觀察與深度訪談分析，試圖釐清前述關係。研究發現，原料商所以能在企業網路演化歷程之中維持甚至創造競爭優勢，在其具有特殊領域的動態能力，同時能將該動態能力與當時的網路情境條件結合進行經營流程變革，據而建構優勢的網路價值與網路地位。

Due to the influence of global resource deployment and product technology, the product value is usually determined by brand enterprises and vendors, the raw material suppliers and manufacturers are inferior in terms of operating status. This study concerns about how the material suppliers can create and sustain their competitive advantages in the business network under such circumstance. A case consisting of material suppliers and brand enterprises were studied. The activities of this study are phased over two stages. First, it is to reveal the activities relationship within material supplier, brander, and clothier, and inductive the type of business network. Secondly, it is to reveal the evolution of material supplier's inner-as well as outer-environmental entities, business process change, value creation and business network status. By carefully examining a profound observation and in-depth interview, this study intended to establish an explicit interpretation for the relations among the member interaction in operating process, the importance of operation, and the network prototype. The inferiority of transformed Taiwanese business environment due to the drastic globalization, information technology innovation and the new competitions rapidly arising in Southeast Asia was the main reason leaded us to start the study. It would be expected to benefit this enterprise if we can discover how the successful Taiwanese enterprise can overcome the detrimental environment as mentioned; nowadays. Among it, we strongly concern how to preserve the enterprises' sustain competitive competence, build the dynamic capability, and promote information technology's performance. The results indicated that upstream supplier which can sustain or even create competitive advantages during the business network evolution process and carry dynamic capacity. Meanwhile, the successful enterprise can combine the dynamic capacity within the network condition to change the business process and establish advantage network value as well as network status. The case studied revealed the fact that an enterprise must contiguously observe and clarify its network position in business network, and so that it could place the dynamic capability on the core scope of its business network. Furthermore, for enhancing the effects of the operating performance, an enterprise has to be flexible enough in terms of inter-organizational cooperation and leaning. A business network is based on the complementation and heterogeneous characteristics of its members, therefore the development, good or bad, of the business network is strongly affected by every of the members' ability and status. Finally, an enterprise must exam network condition and status when applying information system application. An enterprise will be more powerful on the network status and network value if it enhances its whole network performance combining with business process changing activities.

1. Anderson, J. C.,Häkansson, H.,Johanson, J.(1994).Dyadic Relationship within a Business Network Context.Journal of Marketing,58(4),1-15.
2. Anderson, J. C.,Narus, J. A.(1999).Business Marketing Management: Understanding, Creating, and Delivering Value.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
3. Barney, J.(1991).Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.Journal of Management,17(1),99-120.
4. Barney, J.,Wright, M.,Ketchen, D. J.(2001).The Resource-based View of the Firm: Ten Years after 1991.Journal of Management,27(6),625-641.
5. Berghman, L.,Matthyssens, P.,Vandenbempt, K.(2006).Building Competences for New Customer Value Creation: An Exploratory Study.Industrial Marketing Management,35(8),961-973.
6. Borders, A. L.,Johnston, W. J.,Rigdon, E. E.(2001).Beyond the Dyad: Electronic Commerce and Network Perspectives in Industrial Marketing Management.Industrial Marketing Management,30(2),199-205.
7. Bovel, D.,Martha, J.(2000).From Supply Chain to Value Net.Journal of Business Strategy,21(4),24-28.
8. Burgess, T. F.(1994).Making the Leap to Agility: Defining and Achieving Agile Manufacturing Through Business Process Redesign and Business Network Redesign.International Journal of Operations & Production Management,14(11),23-34.
9. Creswell, J. W.(1998).Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
10. Daniel. E.,Wilson. H.,McDonald, M.(2003).Towards A Map of Marketing Information Systems: An Inductive Study.European Journal of Marketing,37(6),821-847.
11. David, M.,Sutton, C. D.(2004).Social Research: the Basics.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
12. Dedrick. J.,Kraemer, K. L.(2005).The Impacts of It on Firm and Industry Structure: the Personal Computer Industry.California Management Review,47(3),122-142.
13. Ehret, M.(2004).Managing the Trade-off Between Relationships and Value Networks: Towards A Value-based Approach of Customer Relationship Management in Business-to-Business Markets.Industrial Marketing Management,33(6),465-473.
14. Eisenhardt, K.,Martin, J.(2000).Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?.Strategic Management Journal,21(11),1105-1121.
15. Ellinger, A. E.,Ketchen, D. J.,Hult, G. T. M.,Elmadağ, A. B.,Richey, R. G.(2007).Industrial Marketing Management.In Press.
16. Feldman, M. S.,Pentland, B. T.(2003).Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as A Source of Flexibility and Change.Administrative Science Quarterly,48(1),94-118.
17. Flint, D. J.(2004).Strategic Marketing in Global Supply Chains: Four Challenges.Industrial Marketing Management,33(1),45-50.
18. Ford, D.,Redwood, M.(2005).Making Sense of Network Dynamics through Network Pictures: A Longitudinal Case Study.Industrial Marketing Management,34(7),648-657.
19. Ford, D.,Saren, M.(2001).Managing and Marketing Technology.Londosn:Thomson Learning.
20. Fredericks, E.(2005).Infusing Flexibility into Business-to-Business Firms: A Contingency Theory and Resource-based View Perspective and Practical Implications.Industrial Marketing Management,34(6),555-565.
21. Gadde, L.–E.,Huemer, L.,Håkansson, H.(2003).Strategizing in Industrial Networks.Industrial Marketing Management,32(5),357-364.
22. Glesne, C.(2006).Becoming Qualitative Researchers: an Introduction.Boston:Pearson.
23. Goffman, E.(1974).Frame Analysis: an Essay on the Organization of Experience.Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.
24. Golfetto, F.,Gibbert, M.(2006).Marketing Competencies and the Sources of Customer Value in Business Markets.Industrial Marketing Management,35(8),904-912.
25. Hagel, J. III.,Singer, M.(1999).Unbundling the Corporation.Harvard Business Review,77(2),133-141.
26. Håkansson, H.,Ford, D.(2002).How Should Companies Interact in Business Networks?.Journal of Business Research,55(2),133-139.
27. Håkansson, H.,Waluszewski, A.(2002).IKEA, the Environment and Technology.New York:Routledge.
28. Hamel, G.,Prahalad, C. K.(1994).Competing for the Future.Boston, Mass:Harvard Business Press.
29. Hammer, M.,Champy, J.(1993).Reengineering the Corporation: a Manifesto for Business Revolution.New York:HarperCollins.
30. Holmen, E.,Pedersen, A. –C.(2003).Strategizing Through Analyzing and Influencing the Network Horizon.Industrial Marketing Management,32(5),409-418.
31. Jacob, F.(2006).Preparing Industrial Suppliers for Customer Integration.Industrial Marketing Management,35(1),45-56.
32. Jaiswal, M. P.,Kaushik, A.(2005).Realising Enhanced Value Due to Business Network Redesign through Extended ERP Systems: Case Study of HLL Net.Business Process Management Journal,11(2),171-184.
33. Jensen, M.(2003).The Role of Network Resources in Market Entry: Commercial Banks' Entry into Investment Banking, 1991-1997.Administrative Science Quarterly,48(3),466-497.
34. Jick, T. D.(1979).Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.Administrative Science Quarterly,24(4),602-611.
35. Kamp, B.(2005).Formation and Evolution of Buyer-Supplier Relationships: Conceiving Dynamism in Actor Composition of Business Networks.Industrial Marketing Management,34(7),658-668.
36. Klein, K.J.,Tosi, H.,Cannella, A. A.(1999).Multilevel Theory Building: Benefits, Barriers, and New Developments.Academy of Management Review,24(2),243-248.
37. Kothandaraman, P.,Wilson, D. T.(2001).The Future of Competition Value-Creating Networks.Industrial Marketing Management,30(4),379-389.
38. Lambe, C. J.,Wittmann, C. M.,Spekman, R. E.(2001).Social Exchange Theory and Research on Businessto-Business Relational Exchange.Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing,8(3),1-36.
39. Lawson, B.,Samson, D.(2001).Developing Innovation Capability in Organizations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach.International Journal of Innovation Management,5(3),377-400.
40. Lindgreen. A.,Wynstra, F.(2005).Value in Business Markets: What Do We Know? Where Are We Going?.Industrial Marketing Management,34(7),732-748.
41. Matthyssens, P.,Vandenbempt, K.,Berghman, L.(2006).Value Innovation in Business Markets: Breaking the Industry Recipe.Industrial Marketing Management,35(6),751-761.
42. Miles, M. B.,Huberman, A. M.(1994).Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
43. Narayandas, D.,Rangan, V. K.(2004).Building and Sustaining Buyer-Seller Relationships in Mature Industrial Markets.Journal of Marketing,68(3),63-77.
44. Pavlou, P. A.(2004).University of Southern California.
45. Ploetner, O.,Ehret, M.(2006).From Relationships to Partnerships-New Forms of Cooperation between Buyer and Seller.Industrial Marketing Management,35(1),4-9.
46. Powell, T. C.,Dent-Micallef, A.(1997).Information Technology As Competitive Advantage: The Role of Human, Business, and Technology Resources.Strategic Management Journal,18(5),375-405.
47. Radjou, N.(2003).U.S. Manufacturers' Supply Chain Mandate: Increase IT Funding and Unleash Innovation.World Trade,16(12),42-46.
48. Rindova, V. P.,Kotha, S.(2001).Continuous "Morphing": Competing through Dynamic Capabilities, form, and Function.Academy of Management Journal,44(6),1263-1280.
49. Samiee, S.,Walters, P. G. P.(2006).Supplier and Customer Exchange in International Industrial Markets: An Integrative Perspective.Industrial Marketing Management,35(5),589-599.
50. Sharma, A.,Krishnan, R.,Grewal, D.(2001).Value Creation in Markets: A Critical Area of Focus for Business-to-Business Markets.Industrial Marketing Management,30(4),391-402.
51. Short, J. E.,Venkatraman, N.(1992).Beyond Business Process Redesign: Redefining Baxter's Business Network.Sloan Management Review,34(1),7-21.
52. Sull, D.N.(1999).Why Good Companies Go Bad.Harvard Business Review,77(4),42-52.
53. Teece, D. J.,Pisano, G.,Shuen, A.(1997).Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.Strategic Management Journal,18(7),509-533.
54. Weick, K.E.(2001).Making Sense of the Organization.Malden, MA:Blackwell Business.
55. Wernerfelt, B.(1984).A Resource Based View of the Firm.Strategic Management Journal,5(2),171-180.
56. Willcocks, L. P.,Plant. R.(2003).How Corporations ESource: From Business Technology Projects to Value Networks.Information Systems Frontiers,5(2),175-193.
57. Wilson, H.,Daniel, E.(2007).The Multi-Channel Challenge: A Dynamic Capability Approach.Industrial Marketing Management,36(1),10-20.
58. Wu, F.,Yeniyurt, S.,Kim, D.,Cavusgil, S. T.(2006).The Impact of Information Technology on Supply Chain Capabilities and Firm Performance: A Resource-Based View.Industrial Marketing Management,35(4),493-504.
59. Yin, R. K.(2003).Applications of Case Study Research.Thousand Oaks:Sage.

1. 陳明惠、張家維、邱文宏(2015)。法人研究機構之技術商品化合作模式：以中科院為例。科技管理學刊，20(1)，55-92。