题名

從實務中的辨識能力看組織常規的績效－以開刀團隊執行新常規為例

并列篇名

Investigating the Performance of Organizational Routines from the Knowing Competency in Practice-An Example of Medical Teams Implementing New Routines in Operating Rooms

DOI

10.6504/JOM.2014.31.03.02

作者

黃經洲(Jin-Jon Huang)；陳加屏(Jia-Ping Chen)；艾昌瑞(Chang-Rui Ai)

关键词

學習曲線 ； 組織學習 ； 組織常規 ； 個案研究法 ； 實務中辨識 ； organizational routines ； knowing in practice ； case study research ； learning curve ； organizational learning

期刊名称

管理學報

卷期/出版年月

31卷3期（2014 / 09 / 01）

页次

199 - 215

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

組織常規能處理許多日常重複性的業務，對組織營運效益影響甚大。因此，當組織常規只安於次佳狀態時，往往會導致組織僵化，嚴重影響組織競爭力。本文主張嵌入在團隊成員每日工作互動中對組織常規的辨識，能提升執行組織常規的績效。宏觀研究著重於將公司內部的常規聚合起來推論全公司之績效，導致組織常規的個人層面如何影響公司整體的績效，仍處在未發展完全的階段。因此，必須發展微觀研究才能填補宏觀觀點的不足。然而，組織常規是多數行動者互動的現象，過程關係複雜，想要分析個別因素對常規功能的影響極為困難，使得微觀研究的發展遇到瓶頸，有必要藉由將實務現象相關的理論和組織常規結合才能突破。因此，本研究引進實務中辨識與組織常規連結。本研究針對兩開刀團隊每日工作互動情境進行訪談，探索團員對新常規的學習與辨識。透過對兩開刀團員問卷施測及統計分析，發現兩團隊在每日工作互動中對新常規的辨識存在顯著差異，影響開刀團隊執行新常規的績效。宏觀觀點主張組織常規改變前會先呈現穩定狀態。然而，從微觀觀點看組織常規卻處於一種微幅修正的連續過程。因此，管理者必須學習、了解及引導這種內生性的轉變力量，才能夠累積出創新組織常規所需具備的能量。
英文摘要

Implementing organizational routines can facilitate processing multiple daily repetitive tasks and yield a significant impact on organizational operations. However, sub-optimal organizational routines often result in organizational rigidity and severely affect organizational performance. This study proposes that the embedded knowledge in daily interactions between team members can improve the efficiency of organizational routines. Aggregating routines of internal firm from the macro perspective infers overall company performance and organizational capabilities, resulting in leaving the impact of personal level of organizational routines on an entire company performance undeveloped totally. Thus, developing micro perspective can facilitate the insufficiencies of the macro perspective. However, organizational routines is the phenomenon of interaction of many personal actions, which is so complex in processing that it's difficult to analyze the impact of individual factors on routines, and that makes the development of macro perspective come across obstacle, and it can be broken through by the related theory in the practice and the combination of organizational routines. Thus, the study introduces knowing in practice to connect with organizational routines. This study conducts interviews with two surgical teams regarding their daily work interaction situations and explores the learning and understanding of the team members in implementing new routines. Through questionnaires and data analysis with two surgical teams, it is found that there's a significant difference in new routines with interactions of daily work between team members, affecting surgical teams in implementing the performance of new routines. The process of organizational members pursuing optimal organizational routines is organizational learning. During this process, optimizing routines is achieved through dynamic interactions among people and between people and knowledge. The macro perspective proposes that organizational routines will appear stable prior to its alteration. However, from the micro perspective, organizational routines are in a slightly-altered successive process. Thus, managers must learn, understand, and guide the endogenous energy inside to accumulate the energy needed in innovating organizational routines.
主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. 2004. Organizational routines: A sceptical look. DRUID Working Paper, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.
  2. Wright, T. P. 1936. Factors affecting the costs of airplanes. Journal Aeronautical Science, 3: 122-128.
  3. Abell, P.,Felin, T.,Foss, N. J.(2008).Building microfoundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links.Managerial and Decision Economics,29(6),489-502.
  4. Adler, P. S.,Clark, K. B.(1991).Behind the learning curve: A sketch of the learning process.Management Science,37(3),267-281.
  5. Argote, C.,Insko, C. A.,Yovetich, N.,Romero, A. A.(1995).Group learning curves: The effect of turnover and task complexity on group performance.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,25(6),512-529.
  6. Argote, L. B.,McEvily, B.,Reagans, R.(2003).Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes.Management Science,49(4),571-582.
  7. Argyris, C.,Schön, D. A.(1996).Organizational learning II- theory, method and practice.New York:Addison-Wesley.
  8. Becker, M. C.(2004).Organizational routines: A review of the literature.Industrial and Corporate Change,13(4),643-677.
  9. Becker, M. C.(2005).A framework for applying organizational routines in empirical research: Linking antecedents, characteristics and performance outcomes of recurrent interaction patterns.Industrial and Corporate Change,14(5),817-846.
  10. Becker, M. C.,Lazaric, N.,Nelson, R. R.,Winter, S. G.(2005).Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change.Industrial and Corporate Change,14(5),775-791.
  11. Claus, R.,Feldman, M. S.(2011).Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trialand-error learning.Academy of Management Journal,54(3),577-610.
  12. Cohen, M. D.,Bacdayan, P.(1994).Organization routines are stored as procedural memory-evidence from a laboratory study.Organization Science,5(4),554-568.
  13. Cohen, M. D.,Burkhart, R.,Dosi, G.,Egidi, M.,Marengo,L.,Warglien, M.,Winter, S. G.(1996).Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues.Industrial and Corporate Change,5(3),653-688.
  14. Cook, S. D. N.,Brown, J. S.(1999).Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing.Organization Science,10(4),381-400.
  15. Cyert, R. M.,March, J. G.(1963).A behavioral theory of the firm.Cambridge, MA:Blackwell.
  16. Edmondson, A. C.(2003).Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams.Journal of Management Studies,40(6),1419-1452.
  17. Edmondson, A. C.,Bohmer, R. M.,Pisano, G. P.(2001).Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals.Administrative Science Quarterly,46(4),685-716.
  18. Eisenhardt, K. M.,Martin, J. A.(2000).Dynamic capabilities: What are they?.Strategic Management Journal,21(10),1105-1121.
  19. Faraj, S.,Xiao, Y.(2006).Coordination in fast response organizations.Management Science,52(8),1155-1169.
  20. Feldman, M. S.(2003).A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines.Industrial and Corporate Change,12(4),727-752.
  21. Feldman, M. S.,Pentland, B. T.(2003).Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change.Administrative Science Quarterly,48(1),94-118.
  22. Felin, T.,Foss, N. J.(2009).Organizational routines and capabilities: Historical drift and a course-correction toward microfoundations.Scandinavian Journal of Management,25(2),157-167.
  23. Hansen, N. K.,Voge, I. R.(2011).Organizational routines: A review and outlook on practices-based micro-foundations.Economics, Management, and Financial Markets,6(3),86-111.
  24. Labatut, J.,Aggeri, F.,Girard, N.(2012).Discipline and change. How technologies and organizational routines interact in new practice creation.Organization Studies,33(1),39-69.
  25. Lapre, M. A.,Mukherjee, A. S.,Luk, N.,Wassenhove, V.(2000).Behind the learning curve: Linking learning activities to waste reduction.Management Science,46(5),596-611.
  26. Lave, J.(1988).Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  27. Lave, J.,Wenger, E.(1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  28. Lincoln, Y. S.(1991).The arts and sciences of program evaluation.Evaluation Practice,12,1-7.
  29. Mathieu, J. E.,Heffner, T. S.,Goodwin, G. E.,Cannon-Bowers, J. A.,Salas, E.(2005).Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons.Journal of Organizational Behavior,26(1),37-56.
  30. Nelson, R. R.,Winter, S. J.(1982).An evolutionary theory of economic change.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  31. Orlikowski, W. J.(2002).Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing.Organization Science,13(3),249-273.
  32. Parmigiani, Howard-Grenville(2011).Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives.The Academy of Management Annals,5(1),413-453.
  33. Pentland, B. T.,Feldman, M. S.(2005).Organizational routines as a unit of analysis.Industrial and Corporate Change,14(5),793-815.
  34. Pisano, G. P.,Bohmer, R. M.,Edmondson, A. C.(2001).Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery.Management Science,47(6),752-68.
  35. Polanyi, M.(1967).The tacit dimension.New York:Doubleday.
  36. Reagans, R.,Argote, L.,Brooks, D.(2005).Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together.Management Science,51(6),869-881.
  37. Rico, R.,Sanchez-Manzanares, M.,Gil, F.,Gibson, C.(2008).Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach.Academy of Management Review,33(1),163-184.
  38. Roach, G. W.,Kanchuger, M.,Mangano, C. M.(1996).Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery.New England Journal of Medicine,335(25),1857-1863.
  39. Schön, D. A.(1987).Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the profession.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  40. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  41. Teece, D. J.,Pisano, G.,Shuen, A.(1997).Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.Strategic Management Journal,18(7),509-533.
  42. Tyre, M. J.,Hippel, E. V.(1997).The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations.Organization Science,8(1),71-83.
  43. Weick, K. E.,Roberts, K. H.(1993).Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks.Administrative Science Quarterly,38,357-381.
  44. Winter, S. G.(2003).Understanding dynamic capabilities.Strategic Management Journal,24(10),991-995.
  45. Yin, R. K.(1994).Case study research: Design and methods.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications.
  46. Zbaracki, M. J.,Bergen, M.(2010).When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines.Organization Science,21(5),955-972.
  47. Zollo, M.,Reuer, J. J.,Singh, H.(2002).Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances.Organization Science,13(6),701-713.
print cancel