题名

探討壓瘡防治多元教學策略對護理人員認知及病人壓瘡發生率之影響

并列篇名

Effect of a Multistrategy Pressure Ulcer Prevention Education Program on Nurse Cognition and Pressure Ulcer Incidence Rates

DOI

10.6142/VGHN.34.2.118

作者

吳秀玲(Hsiu-Ling Wu);莊秋萍(Chiu-Ping Chuang);林麗華(Li-Hwa Lin);鄒怡真(Yi-Chen Tsou);熊道芬(Tao-Fen Hsiung);桑潁潁(Yiing-Yiing Sang);洪世欣(Shih-Hsin Hung);黃子珍(Tzyy-Jen Huang);周幸生(Shin-Shang Chou)

关键词

多元教學策略 ; 護理人員認知 ; 壓瘡 ; 壓瘡發生率 ; multistrategy education program ; nurse cognition ; pressure ulcers ; pressure ulcer incidence rate

期刊名称

榮總護理

卷期/出版年月

34卷2期(2017 / 06 / 01)

页次

118 - 129

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究目的係運用壓瘡防治多元教學策略進行教育訓練,探討護理人員壓瘡照護之知能及對全院病人壓瘡發生率之影響。研究於北部某醫學中心施行,以實證指引為基礎設計6 小時壓瘡防治課程,利用課室教學、即時互動回饋及情境模擬等多元教學策略進行10 場教學(2016.08.02-22),以測驗卷測量護理人員教育前後壓瘡認知之差異。擷取該院通報壓瘡指標資料分析教育介入前(2015.09-12)、後(2016.09-12) 相同四個月份之病人壓瘡發生率。全院50.4% 臨床護理人員(924位) 參與,壓瘡認知之後測較前測平均分數提高19.0 分(p < .0001);一般病房壓瘡發生率在教育介入後顯著下降(0.124%, p = .009),部位以薦骨為最多,二級發生率下降0.026%。加護病房壓瘡發生率在教育介入後亦顯著下降(0.152%, p =.006),甚至低於全國醫學中心壓瘡發生率平均值(0.328%)。一般病房發生壓瘡病人平均年齡超過70 歲,且以男性及內科病人為最多,壓瘡危險因子評估表並未納入上述選項,未來可考慮加入壓瘡危險因子評估之選項及教育訓練之內容。

英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to explore the differences in nurses' cognition regarding pressure ulcer (PU) prevention and treatment, as well as the pressure ulcer incidence rates (PUIRs) in patients before and after the implementation of a multistrategy education program. A 6-hour program was developed based on evidence-based practice guidelines, combining lectures, interactive response systems, and simulation teaching strategies. A total of 10 sessions were held (2016.08.02-22) for clinical staff nurses. A questionnaire was used to measure the differences in nurses' cognition before and after the session. The data regarding patients' PUIRs (2015.09-12 and 2016.09-12) were provided by hospital PUIR reporting systems to the Taiwan clinical performance indicator (TCPI) system on a monthly basis. A total of 924 nurses attended the program. After the program, their mean cognition scores were higher (p < .0001), and PUIRs and stage 2 PU rates were significantly lower in general wards. In critical care units, the PUIR was improved (0.152%, p = .009), and even lower than the average data in the TCPI system (0.328%). The study results confirm the importance of multistrategy education programs in reducing PUIRs. PU was significantly more common among male patients, aged over 70 years and in patients staying in medical units. A greater emphasis should be placed on risk factors that are not listed on assessment tools.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2014). Preventing Pressure Ulcers in Hospitals. Content last reviewed October 2014. Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/hospital/pressureulcertoolkit/putool7b.html
  2. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2017).How to improve pressure ulcers. Last accessed April 11, 2017. Retrieved from http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx
  3. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. ( 2011 ) . How-to Guide : Prevent Pressure Ulcers. Retrieved from http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/HowtoGuidePreventPressureUlcers.aspx
  4. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. (2016). NPUAP Pressure Injury Stages. Retrieved from http://www.npuap.org/resources/educational-and-clinical-resources/npuap-pressure-injury-stages/
  5. 台灣臨床成效指標系統(2011).加護綜合照護.取自http://tcpi.tjcha.org.tw/tcpi/
  6. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (2008). NPUAP Pressure Ulcer Stages. Retrieved from http://www.npuap.org/pr2.htm
  7. 國立師範大學教學發展中心(2015).即時反饋系統,讓教室動起來.取自https://www.ctld.ntnu.edu.tw/epaper
  8. Armstrong, D. G.,Ayello, E. A.,Capitulo, K. L.,Fowler, E.,Krasner, D. L.,Levine, J. M.,Smith, A. P.(2008).New opportunities to improve pressure ulcer prevention and treatment: implications of the CMS inpatient hospital care present on admission indicators/hospital-acquired conditions policy: A consensus paper from the International Expert Wound Care Advisory Panel.Advances in Skin & Wound Care,21(10),469-478.
  9. Bauer, K.,Rock, K.,Nazzal, M.,Jones, O.,Qu, W.(2016).Pressure Ulcers in the United States' Inpatient Population From 2008 to 2012: Results of a Retrospective Nationwide Study.Ostomy/wound management,62(11),30-38.
  10. Beeckman, D.,Schoonhoven, L.,Fletcher, J.,Furtado, K.,Heyman, H.,Paquay, L.,Defloor, T.(2010).Pressure ulcers and incontinence-associated dermatitis: effectiveness of the Pressure Ulcer Classifi cation education tool on classifi cation by nurses.BMJ Quality and Safety,19(5),e3.
  11. Brown, J. S.,Collins, A.,Duguid, P.(1989).Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher,18(1),32-42.
  12. Edsberg, L. E.,Black, J. M.,Goldberg, M.,McNichol, L.,Moore, L.,Sieggreen, M.(2016).Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System.Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing,43(6),585-597.
  13. Jankowski, I. M.,Nadzam, D. M.(2011).Identifying gaps, barriers, and solutions in implementing pressure ulcer prevention programs.The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety,37(6),253-264.
  14. Moore, Z.,Price, P.(2004).Nurses' attitudes, behaviours and perceived barriers towards pressure ulcer prevention.Journal of Clinical Nursing,13(8),942-951.
  15. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel,European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel,Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance,Haesler, Emily(Ed.)(2014).Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide.Perth, Australia:Cambridge Media.
  16. Norman, J.(2012).A systematic review of the literature on simulation in nursing education.The ABNF Journal,23(2),24-28.
  17. Stein, D.(1998).ERIC DigestERIC Digest,未出版
  18. Strand, T.,Lindgren, M.(2010).Knowledge, attitudes and barriers towards prevention of pressure ulcers in intensive care units: A descriptive cross-sectional study.Intensive and Critical Care Nursing,26(6),335-342.
  19. Worsley, P. R.,Clarkson, P.,Bader, D. L.,Schoonhoven, L.(2016).Identifying barriers and facilitators to participation in pressure ulcer prevention in allied healthcare professionals: A mixed methods evaluation.Physiotherapy
  20. 李文怡、藺寶珍、翁嘉杏、林怡伶、蔡紋苓(2012)。降低長時間俯臥手術病人臉部壓瘡發生率之專案。護理雜誌,59(3),70-78。
  21. 陳妮婉、張彩秀、張素惠(2013)。護理人員壓瘡預防行為之系統性文獻查證。澄清醫護管理雜誌,9(2),40-47。
  22. 黃微真、張秀如、唐琦敏(2014)。降底兒童外科加護病房壓瘡發生密度。護理雜誌,61(2),60-67。
  23. 蔡秀敏、鄭靜瑜、劉淑如(2011)。護理敏感品質指標介紹─以美國護士協會及國家品質論壇為例。領導護理,12(3),95-101。
  24. 鍾卉庭、徐玲蕙、潘昭君、楊淑燕、陳婉宜(2011)。降低外科加護病房病人壓瘡發生率之專案。護理雜誌,58(3),56-63。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡麗萍,傅珮儀,陳徵維,陳彩惠(2022)。降低呼吸照護病房病人壓傷發生率。領導護理,23(3),150-165。
  2. 鄧佩如,葉子綺,陳麗貞,許美惠(2020)。降低外傷急症加護病房病人壓力性損傷發生率。長庚護理,31(3),368-381。
  3. 賴郁蓓,蔡惠婷,黃敏勤,周碧玲(2023)。提升初診斷食道癌病人護理指導之完整率。台灣專科護理師學刊,10(1),24-37。
  4. 葉修玎,陳雅琳,張煦婕,施秀鈴,邱春榕,林靖雅(2021)。降低安寧住院病人壓傷發生率。源遠護理,15(3),37-44。
  5. 鄭佳蓉,練美華,黃心蘭,陳盈嫣,陳冬蜜,高巧如,洪美鳳,何妙靜(2021)。運用多元教學提升急診二年期護理人員急救復甦處置完整性之專案。長庚護理,32(3),77-94。
  6. 鄭金里,湯婉孏,莊美芳,張如吟,李婕儒(2021)。提升亞急性呼吸照護護理人員操作遠紅外線儀之正確率。志為護理-慈濟護理雜誌,20(6),84-95。
  7. 莊孟蓉,王維芳(2022)。實施多元教學策略於加護病房護理師之初探。台灣健康照顧研究學刊,25,18-34。
  8. (2023)。運用組合式照護提升壓傷預防性照護之完整率。源遠護理,17(3),44-52。