菸害健康認知量表之發展與測試

Developing and Testing a Tobacco Harm to Health Cognition Scale

10.6142/VGHN.34.2.179

陳杏雯(Hsing-Wen Chen)；葉美玲(Mei-Ling Yeh)

菸害健康認知量表 ； 生理認知 ； 心理認知 ； 因素分析 ； tobacco harm to health cognitive scale (THHCS) ； physical cognition ； psychological cognition ； factor analysis

榮總護理

34卷2期（2017 / 06 / 01）

179 - 187

繁體中文

菸害衛教是防治菸害最常見介入措施，針對衛教內容進行評值，可瞭解衛教成效。本研究目的為發展與測試菸害健康認知量表；第一階段為建構菸害健康認知量表並檢定內容效度。第二階段針對未吸菸者及吸菸者施測，並進行探索性因素分析以檢定量表效度。本研究通過北部某區域醫院倫理審查委員會核可，經方便取樣，針對該院內外科住院病人進行調查，共140 位未吸菸者及249 位吸菸者完成問卷。菸害健康認知量表共計22 題。以未吸菸者資料萃取出三個因素，分別是生理認知- 記憶性、理解性及心理認知，可解釋總變異量為52.13%。而吸菸者資料萃取出四因素，分別是生理認知- 記憶性、理解性、應用性及心理認知，可解釋總變異量為50.87%。菸害健康認知量表可適用於評量未吸菸者與吸菸者之菸害衛教後之菸害認知。其中生理認知次量表歸類因素不盡相同，但可區辨未吸菸者及吸菸者間之認知差異性，以作為菸害防治工作之參考。

Health education regarding the harms of tobacco use is essential for preventing tobacco-related health problems. The health education content of a test was analyzed to establish the results and effectiveness of health education. The aim of this study was to develop a tobacco harm to health cognitive scale (THHCS). In the first phase of the construction of the THHCS, the content validity was tested. The second phase involved nonsmokers and smokers being administered the test. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied to detect the validity of the scale. This study was approved by the ethics institutional review board of the study hospital. Convenience sampling was used. A total of 140 nonsmoking and 249 smoking inpatients completed the questionnaire in the medical and surgical wards of the study hospital. The THHCS comprised 22 questions. The EFA of nonsmokers involved extracting three factors, namely physiological cognition, memory/ comprehension, and psychological cognition; the total explanatory variation was 52.13%. The EFA of smokers involved extracting four factors, namely physiological cognition, memory/ comprehension/application, and psychological cognition; the total explanatory variation was 50.87%. The THHCS can be applied to both nonsmokers and smokers after tobacco harm education for tobacco harm prevention. ＂Physiological perception＂ had different subscales for nonsmokers and smokers; therefore, the scoring scale required consideration of whether users were nonsmokers or smokers.

1. Chen, H. W.,Chu, N. F.,Chen, H. H.,Yeh, M. L.(2014).The smoking behaviors of indigenous Taiwanese: Individual and family/community factors of infl uence.The Journal of Nursing Research,22(1),12-19.
   連結：
2. Lin, F. L.,Hsu, C. C.,Mehling, W.,Yeh, M. L.(2017).Translation and psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness.The Journal of Nursing Research,25(1),76-84.
   連結：
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention【CDC】. (2016b). Health effects of secondhand smoke. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke/health_effects/index.htm
4. Ben-Gan, I.(2005). Don't Avoid the Unknown. Retrieved from http://sqlmag.com/t-sql/dont-avoid-unknown
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention【CDC】. (2016a). Health effects of cigarette smoking. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/effects_cig_smoking/
6. World Health Organization【WHO】. (2016). Global Health Observatory (GHO) data: Prevalence of tobacco use. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gho/tobacco/use/en/
7. Barnier, A. J.,Sutton, J.,Harris, C. B.,Wilson, R. A.(2008).A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory.Cognitive Systems Research,9(1-2),33-51.
8. Hendricks, P. S.,Wood, S. B.,Baker, M. R.,Delucchi, K. L.,Hall, S. M.(2011).The smoking abstinence questionnaire: Measurement of smokers' abstinence-related expectancies.Addiction,106(4),716-728.
9. Hogarty, K. Y.,Hines, C. V.,Kromrey, J. D.,Ferron, J. M.,Mumford, K. R.(2005).The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of sample size, communality, and over determination.Educational and Psychological Measurement,65(2),202-226.
10. Krau, S. D.(2011).Creating educational objectives for patient education using the New Bloom's Taxonomy.Nursing Clinics of North America,46(3),299-312.
11. Li, H. C. W.,Chan, S. S.,Lam, T. H.(2015).Smoking among Hong Kong Chinese women: Behavior, attitudes and experience.BMC Public Health,15(1),183.
12. Mocan, N.,Altindag, D. T.(2014).Education, cognition, health knowledge, and health behavior.The European Journal of Health Economics,15(3),265-279.
13. Polit, D. F.,Beck, C. T.(2006).The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.Research in Nursing & Health,29(5),489-497.
14. Shomar, R. T. A.,Lubbad, I. K.,EI Ansari, W.,Al-Khatib, I. A.,Alharazin, H. J.(2014).Smoking, awareness of smoking-associated health risks, and knowledge of tobacco legislation in Gaza, Palestine.Central European Journal of Public Health,22(2),80-89.
15. Thomas, J. L.,Bronars, C. A.,Stewart, D. W.,Okuyemi, K. S.,Befort, C. A.,Nazir, N.,Ahluwalia, J. S.(2009).Psychometric properties of a Brief Smoking Consequences Questionnaire for Adults (SCQ-A) among African American light smokers.Substance Abuse,30(1),14-25.
16. Williams, J.(2012).Patient stoma care: Educational theory in practice.British Journal of Nursing,21(13),786-794.
17. Xu, X.,Leung, D. Y.,Li, B.,Wang, P.,Zhao, Y.(2015).Smoking-related knowledge, attitude, social pressure, and environmental constraints among new undergraduates in Chongqing, China.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,12(1),895-909.
18. 林琴玲、涂慧慈、蔡玉霞、史麗珠、薛敏生、藍旻暉、鄭學慧(2009)。都會原住民戒菸衛教成效之初探。秀傳醫學雜誌，9(3&4)，71-82。
19. 洪耀釧、王素真、陳住銘(2015)。科技大學學生對於吸菸的健康危害認知、態度與行為之探討。華醫社會人文學報，31，33-49。
20. 胡益進、李明憲、林怡岑、殷蘊雯、馬藹屏、祁安美、姚克武(2008)。金門縣民眾對形成無菸環境之認知、態度與執行把握度等相關因素之研究。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌，28，111-135。
21. 陳玉婷、陳品玲(2013)。防制孩童暴露於家庭二手菸害之介入成效：系統性文獻回顧。長庚護理，24(3)，252-266。
22. 陳杏雯、王桂芸、林瑞琪、葉美玲(2015)。吸菸與否之差異及二手菸暴露之預測。榮總護理，32(4)，416-423。
23. 陳杏雯、祝年豐、陳興夏、葉美玲(2011)。探討中部居民吸菸行為之相關因素。志為護理，10(5)，66-76。
24. 衛生福利部國民健康署(2016)。2016台灣菸害防制年報。