题名

高等教育在學率擴充的因素、類型與差異分析

并列篇名

Exploring the Factors Involved in Higher Education Expanding and in the Ratio Pattern of Higher Education and Their Different Influences

DOI

10.6431/TWJHSS.200606.0133

作者

張芳全(Fang-Chung Chang)

关键词

人力資本理論 ; 高箏教育在學率 ; 吉尼係數 ; human capital theory ; the ratio of higher education ; Gini coefficient

期刊名称

思與言:人文與社會科學期刊

卷期/出版年月

44卷2期(2006 / 06 / 01)

页次

133 - 187

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

人力資本對國家發展非常重要。本研究以人力資本理論為基礎探索影響各國高等教育在學率的相關因素。本研究運用多元迴歸分析、集群分析與區別分析,檢定本研究提出的假設。本研究以世界銀行發展報告書的統計為依據,共選定1970年、1975年、1980年、1985年、1990年、1995年各國高等教育在學率為分析資料。研究中運用人口成長率、中等教育在學率、國民所得、經濟成長率、教育經費占國民生產毛額比率、高等教育單位學生成本來暸解影響高等教育在學率的因素。此外,以6個年度的高等教育在學率進行高度、中度與低度國家發展分類,並檢定不同群組間的高等教育在學率的差異。最後以吉尼係數測定高等教育在學率的均等度,以及t考驗檢定不同年度的高等教育在學率的差異。本研究提出10項假設檢定相關問題。研究結果拒絕8項假設。本研究從研究結論提出相關建議。

英文摘要

The human capital is important for a nation to be developed. Prompted by this proposition, the current study applied the human capital theory to explore the factors involved in higher education expanding and their potential influences. The ratios of higher education in years of 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, and 1995 that had been reported in World Development Report and World Development Index Data were collected and used as the data. Statistical techniques, including Multi-Regression, Cluster Analysis, and Discriminant Analysis, were employed to test ten null hypotheses. In the regression model, the annual population growth rate, the enrollment ratio of secondary education, and the annual economic growth rate along with the per capital income, the GDP ratio of educational expenditure, and the per student cost of higher education were employed to test the variables that could serve as significant predictors of better higher education. These data were also used to discriminate and cluster the high, middle, and low higher education quantity in different countries. In addition, they were analyzed in terms of identifying any differences in the ratio of higher education across countries. Finally, the Gini coefficient was chosen to test the equality of the ratio of higher education, whereas the t-test was used to analyze the difference in the ratio of higher education. Results showed that eight hypotheses were rejected. Based on these findings, suggestions for promoting quality of higher education were provided.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 張芳全(2004)。影響開發中國家教育品質因素之模型檢定。教育與社會研究,6,27-68。
    連結:
  2. Asonuma, A.(2002).Finance Reform in Japanese Ligher Education.Higher Education,43,109-126.
  3. Banya, K.,Elu, J.(2001).The World Bank and Financing Ligher Education in Sub-Saharan Africa.Higher Education,42,1-34.
  4. Becker, G. S.,Murphy, K.,Tomura, R.(1990).Human Eapital, Fertility and Economic Growth.Journal of Political Economy,98,279-288.
  5. Bourdieu, P.,Passeron, J.(1977).Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture.London:Sage Publication.
  6. Cohen, D.(2002).Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 2001/2002.
  7. Cohen, D.,Addison, J. T.(1998).The Economic Returns to Lifelong Learning in OECD Countries.Education Economics,6,253-307.
  8. Eicher, J. C.(1998).The Costs and Financing of Higher Education in Europe.European Journal of Education,33(1),31-39.
  9. Gamage, D. T.,Mininberg, E.(2003).The Australian and American Higher Education: Key Issues of the First Decade of the 21st Century.Higher Education,45,183-202.
  10. Kanellopoulos, C. N.(1996).Recent Developments in Greek Education.International Journal Educational Development,16(1),65-77.
  11. Lucas, R. E.(1988).On the Mechanics of Economic Development.Journal of Monetary Economics,22,3-42.
  12. Mankiew, N. G.,Romer, D.,Weil, D. R.(1992).A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth.Quarterly Journal of Economics,107,407-438.
  13. Mass, J. van. L.,Criel, C.(1982).World Bank Staff Working Papers no.511.Washington, DC.:Oxford University Press.
  14. McMahon, W. W.(1984).Investment in Higher Education.London:Lexington.
  15. Meek, L.(1994).Higher Education Policy: An International Comparative Perspective.New York:Pergamon Press.
  16. Menon, M. E.(1997).The Demand for Higher Education in Cyprus: An Educational Policy Perspective.Higher Education Policy,10(1),31-39.
  17. Nielsen, F.,Hannan, M. T.(1977).The Expansion of National Educational Systems: Tests of Apopulation Ecology Model.American Sociological of Review,42(3),479-490.
  18. Perraakis, P. E.,Stamatakis, D.(2002).Growth and Educational Levels: A Comparative Analysis.Economics of Education Review,21,513-521.
  19. Psacharopoulos, G.(1994).Returns to Investment: A Global Update.World Development,22,1325-1343.
  20. Quigley, J. M.,Rubinfeld, D. L.(1993).Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  21. Ram, R.(1990).Education Expansion and Schooling Inequality: International Evidenve and Some Implications.The Review of Economics and Statistics,72(2),266-274.
  22. Rodrigues, A. J.,Wandiga. S. O.(1997).Cost Sharing in Public Universities: A Kenyan Case Study.Higher Education Policy,10(1),55-80.
  23. Selvaratnam, V.(1994).World Bank Technical Paper Number 222. Asia Technical Department Series.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  24. Sheret, M.(1988).Equality Trends and Comparisons for Education System of Papua New Guinea.Studies in Educational Evaluation,14(1),91-112.
  25. Silva, L. E. O.(1996).Transformation Dynamics for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean.Higher Education Policy,9(1),67-74.
  26. Thomas, V.,Wang, Y.,Fan, X.(2000).Measuring Education Inequality: Gini Coefficients of Education.Washington, DC.:Oxford University Press.
  27. Tilak, J. B. G.(1997).The Dilemma of Reforms in Financing Higher Education in India.Higher Education Policy,10(1),7-21.
  28. UNESCO(2000).World education report 2000.Paris:
  29. United Nations Development Programme(UNDP)(2000).Human Development Report.New York:Oxford University Press.
  30. Vandenberghe, V.(1999).Combining Market and Bureaucratic Control in Education: An Answer to Market and Bureaucratic Failure?.Comparative Education,35(3),271-282.
  31. Walters, P. B.(1984).Occupational and Labour Market Effects on Secondary and Postsecondary Educational Expansion in the United States: 1922-1979.American Sociological of Review,49(5),659-671.
  32. Walters, P. B.,Rubinson, R.(1983).Educational Expansion and Economic Output in the United States, 1890-1969: A Production Function Analysis.American Sociological of Review,48(4),480-493.
  33. World Bank(1981).World Development Report 1981.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  34. World Bank(1991).World Development Report 1991.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  35. World Bank(1997).Vietnam: Education Financing.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  36. World Bank(1996).World Development Report 1996.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  37. World Bank(1986).World Development Report 1986.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  38. World Bank(1971).World Development Report 1971.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  39. World Bank(2000).Educational Change in Latin America and the Caribbean.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  40. World Bank(2000).The Task Force on Higher Education and Society.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  41. World Bank(1976).World Development Report 1976.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  42. World Bank(2000).World Development Indicators 2000.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  43. Wotherspoon, T.(1998).The Sociology of Education in Canada: Critical Perspectives.Washington, DC:Oxford University Press.
  44. 孫清山、黃毅志(1996)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。台灣社會學刊,19,95-139。
  45. 張芳全(2003)。影響開發中國家教育品質因素分析:國際觀點。國立台北師範學院學報,16(2),187-224。
  46. 張芳全(2004)。1970-1999年開發中國家人口成長、國民所得與文盲率的關聯分析。國立政治大學教育與心理研究,27(1),29-64。
  47. 張芳全(2003)。1990年與1996年男女教育量表差異與發展類型探索。國立政治大學教育與心理研究,26(2),241-276。
  48. 張芳全、余民寧(2002)。開發中國家教育與經濟發展、人口成長的關係。國立政治大學教育與心理研究,25(2),485-520。
  49. 張芳全、余民寧(2001)。開發中國家文盲率、國民所得與人口成長之關係。國立政治大學教育與心理研究,25,121-147。
  50. 教育部(1998)。中華民國教育統計。台北:教育部。
  51. 黃毅志(1995)。台灣地區教育機會不平等性之變遷。中國社會學刊,18,243-273。
  52. 黃毅志(1998)。教育階層、教育擴充與經濟發展。國立政治大學社會學報,28,25-55。
被引用次数
  1. 紀博棟(2018)。陸生來臺就讀高等教育之理論基礎與人數變化分析。中國地方自治,71(10),3-26。
  2. (2019)。臺灣的學仕化議題:建構在仕紳化三個世代的研究。臺灣教育社會學研究,19(1),91-143。