提倡性別正義之法：定位蘇珊˙歐肯之貢獻

Methods for Advocating Gender Justice: Situating Susan Okin's Contribution

陸品妃(Pin-Fei Lu)

女性主義 ； 蘇珊˙歐肯 ； 性別正義 ； 人文自由主義 ； 性別存有學 ； Feminism ； Susan Moller Okin ； Gender Justice ； Humanist Liberalism ； Ontological Accounts of Gender

思與言：人文與社會科學期刊

51卷2期（2013 / 06 / 01）

165 - 209

繁體中文

當代政治哲學家蘇珊．歐肯（Susan Moller Okin）呈現自由主義進路的性別正義理論，她的分析涵蓋類如因性別所造成的男女前景差異，婚姻家庭中養兒育女的生活，應該怎樣安排才符合分配正義的要求。本文一方面提出如何理解歐肯性別正義觀及其重要性之說明，另一方面則指出其理論限制並討論其它可能。闡述主旨如下。歐肯理論為開展「性別如何得以正義」的論述理路奠基，其性別正義的要求，能夠避免實踐性別時的盲點與誤用，進而促使公民互以公平對待。公民互以公平相待，更將兌現正義的要求。然而我們若以哈斯蘭兒（Sally Haslanger）的區分架構來思考歐肯主張的性別存有觀，亦即解消論（eliminativism），將會發現，此論僅得作為回答「性別如何得以正義」提問的立場之一。另有建構論（constructivism）與自然論（naturalism）等立場，可作為有效的性別正義觀基礎。因而正義社會裡自由又平等的成員，並非一定為歐肯所倡議的無性別（genderless）者。

This article devotes itself to critically introduce Susan Moller Okin's account of gender justice. It first demonstrates the vintage point Okin exemplified in thinking about gender, that is, gender is focused through the lens of justice. Okin's account provides a basis for theorizing in respond to the question 'how gender can be just.' Okin's arguments demand gender justice, which would awaken us avoid wrongs from gender practices and enhance fair treatments among citizens. Second, it concludes that in order to answer the question 'how gender can be just', the ontological account of gender in Okin's gender justice, eliminativism, remains one as valid as the others, constructivism and naturalism. Members in a just society, when free and equal, are not necessarily genderless, as Okin suggested.

1. 吳秀瑾(2005)。依靠與平等：論 Kittay 愛的勞動。女學學誌，19，157-183。
   連結：
2. 陸品妃(2006)。「不平等」的平等。政治與社會哲學評論，19，85-112。
   連結：
3. (1982).Choice, Welfare and Measurement.Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishing.
4. Grayling, Anthony C. (2005). ……or is that just what we could do without? Retrieved July 10, 2012, from New Humanist, Website: http://newhumanist.org.uk/919/or-is-that-just-what-we-could-do-without.
5. Antony, Louise M.(2000).Natures and Norms.Ethics,111(1),8-36.
6. Antony, Louise M.(Ed.),Witt, Charlotte E.(Ed.)(2002).A Mind of One's Own: feminist essays on reason and objectivity.Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press.
7. Cohen, Joshua(1992).Okin on Justice, Gender, and Family.Canadian Journal of Philosophy,22(2),263-282.
8. Estlund, David(Ed.),Nussbaum, Martha(Ed.)(1998).Laws and Nature: Shaping Sex, Preference, and Family.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
9. Fausto-Sterling, Anne(1993).The Five Sexes: Why male and female are not enough.The Sciences,1993(Mar/April),20-24.
10. Fausto-Sterling, Anne(2000).Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality.NewYork, NY:Basic Books.
11. Fullinwider, Robert K.(Ed.),Mills, Claudia(Ed.)(1986).The Moral Foundations of Civil Rights.Totowa, New Jersey:Rowman & Littlefield.
12. Haslanger, Sally(2003).Future Genders?. Future Races?.Philosophic Exchange,34,4-27.
13. Haslanger, Sally(2001).Gender and Race: (What) Are They, (What) Do We Want Them to Be?.Noûs,34(1),31-55.
14. Jaggar, Alison(1974).On Sexual Equality.Ethics,84,275-92.
15. Kittay, Eva Feder,Jennings, Bruce,Wasunna, Angela(2005).Dependency, Difference and the Global Ethic of Longterm Care.The Journal of Political Philosophy,13(4),443-469.
16. Koenig, Barbara A.(Ed.),Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin(Ed.),Richardson, Sarah S.(Ed.)(2008).Revistiting Race in a Genomic Age.New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press.
17. Okin, Susan M.(Ed.),Mill, John Stuart(1988).The Subjection of Women.Indianapolis, IN:Hackett Publishing.
18. Okin, Susan Moller(2004).Justice and Gender: An Unfinished Debate.Fordham Law Review,72(5),1537-1567.
19. Okin, Susan Moller(2005).Forty Acres and a Mule' for Women: Rawls and Feminism.Politics, Philosophy & Economics,4(2),233-248.
20. Okin, Susan Moller(1994).Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender.Ethics,105(1),23-43.
21. Okin, Susan Moller(1989).Justice, Gender and the Family.New York, NY:Basic Books.
22. Okin, Susan Moller(1979).Women in Western Political Thought.NJ, Princeton:Princeton University Press.
23. Okin, Susan Moller(1992).Women, Equality, and Citizenship.Queen's Quarterly,99(1),56-71.
24. Okin, Susan Moller(1999).Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
25. Pateman, Carole(Ed.),Shanley, Mary Lyndon(Ed.)(1991).Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory.College Park, PA:The Pennsylvania State University Press.
26. Phillips, Anne(Ed.)(1998).Feminism and Politics.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
27. Plato,Lindsay, Alexander D.(Translated)(1993).Republic.London, UK:Orion Publishing Group.
28. Rawls, John(2005).Political Liberalism.New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
29. Rawls, John(1999).A Theory of Justice.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
30. Rosenblum, Nancy L.(Ed.)(1989).Liberalism and the Moral Life.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
31. Russell, J. S.(1995).Okin's Rawlsian Feminism? Justice in the Family and Another Liberalism.Social Theory and Practice,21(3),397-426.
32. Satz, Debra,Reich, Bob(2009).Toward Humanist Justice: The Political Philosophy of Susan Moller Okin.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
33. Scanlon, Thomas(2003).The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
34. Williams, Bernard(1986).Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.Cambridge, UK:Harvard University Press.
35. 梁文韜(2004)。性別、家庭與女性主義正義論─評析 Susan Okin 的社會正義論。知識型構中性別與權力的思想與辯證，臺北:
36. 黃競涓(2002)。性別、公民與公私領域。政治學報，34，1-16。

1. 陳志南,張佳穎(2021)。國中學生道德疏離與性別平等意識之關係研究：以臺中市國中學生為例。學生事務與輔導，60(3)，41-59。
2. 陸品妃(2019)。民主人的群體歸屬與認同。東吳哲學學報，40，67-98。
3. 陸品妃(2019)。平等正義的涵蓋面。政治與社會哲學評論，71，51-101。