《顏氏家訓》家庭教育之父職問題澄清

Clarification on the Problems of the Paternal Role in the Family Education in "Yan Shi Jia Xun"

蘇嫈雰(Ying-Fen Su)

《顏氏家訓》 ； 父職 ； 以教為事 ； 說理引喻 ； 學做人 ； "Yan Shi Jia Xun" ； paternal role ； to regard educating children as the most important thing ； to expound with metaphor ； to learn to interact with people

思與言：人文與社會科學期刊

51卷3期（2013 / 09 / 01）

35 - 65

繁體中文

從《顏氏家訓》一書中探討父親在家庭教育中的職分，以下幾點問題有待澄清。首先，《顏氏家訓．勉學》：「子當以養為心，父當以學為教。」宋本作「父當以教為事」，究竟父親在家庭教育中當以學為教？還是以教為事？如未能加以澄清，則父職在扮演家庭教育角色的模擬兩可（以學為教或是以教為事）情況下，勢必會造成家庭教育現場角色、關係、認知的混淆，無法充分發揮家庭教育的實質功效。因此，此文以《顏氏家訓．勉學》所論及在家庭教育扮演至關重要的角色──父職當以何為本作澄清，接續談〈序致〉及與家庭教育極相關的三個篇章〈教子〉、〈治家〉、〈勉學〉中談父當如何教子以及父當教子的內容。透過本文的探討，除了嘗試回顧顏之推撰寫此書的初衷，也希望提供現代父職在家庭教育提供經濟支柱外亦能發揮的幾點可能具體建議。

To discuss the paternal role in the family education from the viewpoint of ”Yan Shi Jia Xun”, there are some problems to be clarified. Firstly, it is said, ”Children should take serving their parents to heart; fathers should take learning as the way to educating children.” in ”Yan Shi Jia Xun”: Encouraging Study; however, it is said, ”Fathers should regard educating children as the most important thing.” in the version of the Song Dynasty. Should the paternal role in the family education be ”to take learning as the way to educating children” or ”to regard educating children as the most important thing”? If these two things cannot be clarified, the paternal role in the family education would become ambiguous, causing confusions of roles, relations, and cognition to the family education on the spot, failing to actualize the effects of family education. Therefore, this thesis starts from clarifying on which basis the paternal role is to be established in the family education, and then proceeds to discussing how and what a father is to teach his children. Through the research in this thesis, not only do I try to reflect upon the heart of Yan Zhi Tui when he was writing ”Yan Shi Jia Xun”, but also hope to provide some possible and practical advices on the paternal role in the family education, apart from merely being the breadwinner for the family members.

1. （北齊）顏之推，（清）趙曦明（注），（清）盧文弨（補注）（1939）。《顏氏家訓》（附傳補遺補正），國學基本叢書。長沙：商務。
2. Whitehead, Alfred N. (1927-28). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: The Free Press.
3. Whitehead, Alfred N. (1929). The Aims of Education and Other Essays. New York: New American Library.
4. 北齊顏之推、王利器集解(1982)。顏氏家訓集解。臺北:明文。
5. 漢許慎、清段玉裁注(1992)。說文解字注。臺北:天工。
6. Whitehead, Alfred N.、吳志宏譯(1994)。教育的目的。臺北:桂冠。
7. 尤雅姿(2005)。顏之推及其家訓之研究。臺北:文史哲。
8. 王國維(1964)。宋本觀堂集林。臺北:世界。
9. 李振興注譯、黃沛榮注譯、賴明德注譯(1993)。新譯顏氏家訓。臺北:三民。
10. 李祥政(2005)。論先秦儒家忠孝觀的繼承和發展。咸寧學院學報，25(4)，77-79。
11. 杜維明(1992)。人性與自我修養。臺北:聯經。
12. 杜維明、曹幼華譯、單丁譯、周文彰校(1996)。儒家思想新論─創造性轉換的自我。江蘇:人民。
13. 孫希旦(1997)。禮記集解。臺北:文史哲。
14. 秦元(2008)。顏之推《顏氏家訓》的說理方式初探。臨沂師範學院學報，30(2)，103-105。
15. 張世超、孫凌安、金國泰、馬如森(1996)。金文形義通解。京都:中文。
16. 曾春海編、曾春海、葉海煙、尤煌傑、李賢中(2005)。中國哲學概論。臺北:五南。
17. 韓鍾文(2002)。美善境界的尋求─儒家教育哲學思想研究。濟南:齊魯書社。
18. 蘇嫈雰(2012)。從孔孟談君子之教子觀。孔孟學報，906，143-155。

1. 蘇嫈雰(2014)。女性成家的自由與束縛：《顏氏家訓》母職問題澄清。哲學與文化，41(1)，101-116。