進—出宗教之間：臺灣新時代靈性實踐的分析

In and Out Religion: The Spiritual Practices of Taiwan’s New Agers

陳家倫(Chia-Luen Chen)

新時代運動 ； 宗教與靈性 ； 反宗教 ； 宗教市場 ； 個人靈性 ； the New Age Movement ； religion and spirituality ； anti-religion ； religious market ； individual spirituality

思與言：人文與社會科學期刊

53卷3期（2015 / 09 / 01）

47 - 85

繁體中文

1960年代興起於西方社會的各種新興宗教運動中，新時代運動代表一種超越宗教制度、宗教組織界限以及宗教認同的新形式靈性追求。在多元化與商品化的宗教市場中，新時代靈性實踐在現代社會的流行，反映了「自我」主題和個人靈性在宗教領域的顯著影響。本文從認知和行動兩個面向，檢視臺灣新時代運動參與者對新時代與宗教的態度，以及他們實際參與宗教活動的狀況，藉以瞭解新時代靈性實踐與宗教的關係。作者從訪談資料歸納出五個認知類型和四個行動類型。認知類型有典型新時代原型、開放新時代原型、新時代基進型、佛道融合型和廣泛融合型。行動類型有非宗教型、流動終止型、改宗型和多元整合型。這些多元的認知和行動類型，說明了臺灣新時代靈性實踐與宗教的關係是相當多元的。新時代靈性實踐經常被視為「靈性，非宗教」的範例，然而本文研究的結果發現，仍有許多臺灣新時代運動參與者對宗教抱持正面的評價，也有不少人持續參與宗教團體的活動。因此，新時代靈性實踐並非都是反宗教或去宗教，對許多新時代運動的參與者而言，新時代靈性實踐與宗教並非二元對立或互斥，而是可以相容和互補的。此一現象正是強調自我靈性以及高度融合傾向的新時代靈性觀的重要特徵。

The New Age Movement is seen as a new kind of spiritual quest, one that has obscured or diminished the boundaries between religious organizations, identities, and institutions in many ways. This paper explores the multiplicity and diversity of spirituality practiced by Taiwan's new agers, and it's relation with religion. According to the contents in the interview, I discern five recognition types and four action types among Taiwan's new agers. The five recognition types are typical new age prototype, liberal new age prototype, new age radical type, Buddhist and/or Taoist fusion type, and inclusive fusion type. The four action types are the mobile to static type, the conversion type, and the integration type, in addition to those who have no previous contact with religion as the non-religion type. The empirical evidences show the multiple relationships between new age spirituality and religion. Some of them are dereligion, while others are pro-religion. The multi-facet relationships between new age spirituality and religion is quite accord to the syncretism and selfspirituality of new age practices.

1. Ammerman, Nancy T.(2013).Spiritual But Not Religious? Beyond Binary Choices in the Study of Religion.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,52(2),258-278.
2. Berger, Peter(1967).The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion.Garden City, New York:Doubleday.
3. Campbell, Colin(1972).The Cult, the Cultic Milieu and Secularization.A Sociological Yearbook of Religion in Britain,5,119-136.
4. Chandler, Russell(1991).Understanding the New Age.Dallas:Word Publishing.
5. Chaves, Mark(2011).American Religion: Contemporary trends.NJ:Princeton University.
6. Fuller, Robert C.(2001).Spiritual, but Not Religious: Understanding Unchurched America.Oxford:Oxford University.
7. Hanegraaff, Wouter J.(1998).New Age Religion and Western Culture: Esotericism in the Mirror of Secular Thought.Albany, New York:State University of New York Press.
8. Heelas, Paul(1996).The New Age Movement: The Celebration of the Self and the Sacralization of Modernity.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers.
9. Heelas, Paul,Woodhead, Linda(2004).The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion is Giving Way to Spirituality.Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishers.
10. Levi-Strauss, Claude(1966).The Savage Mind.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
11. Luckmann, Thomas(1967).Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society.New York:The Macmillan Company.
12. Luckmann, Thomas(1991).The New and the Old in Religion.Social Theory for a Changing Society,Oxford:
13. MacLaine, Shirley(1987).It Is All Playing.New York:Simon and Schuster.
14. Marler, Penny Long,Hadaway, C. Kirk(2002)."Being religious" or "Being spiritual" in America: A zero-sum proposition?.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,41(2),289-300.
15. McGuire, Meredith B.(2008).Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life.New York:Oxford University Press.
16. Melton, Gordon(1990).New Age Encyclopedia.New York:Gale Research.
17. Mukatananta, Swami、王季慶譯(1989)。拙火─生命的祕密。臺北:方智。
18. Newport, John P.(1998).The New Age Movement and the Biblical Worldview Conflict and Dialogue.Cambridge, UK:William B. Eerdmans.
19. Pargament, Kenneth I.(2011).Spiritually Integrated Psychotherapy: Understanding and Addressing the Sacred.New York:Guilford Press.
20. Robbins, Thomas(1988).Cult, Converts and Charisma: the Sociology of New Religious Movements.Beverly Hill, CA:Sage Publications.
21. Stark, Rodney,Bainbridge, William Sims(1985).The Future of Religion: Secularization, Revival and Cult Formation.Berkeley:University of California.
22. Stark, Rodney,Bainbridge, William Sims(1979).Of Churches, Sects, and Cults: Preliminary Concepts for a Theory of Religious Movement.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,18(2),117-33.
23. Stone, Donald(1978).New Religious Consciousness and Personal Religious Experience.Sociological Analysis,39(2),123-134.
24. York, Michael(1999).The Religious Supermarket: Local Constructions of the New Age within the World Network.Social Compass,46(2),173-179.
25. Young, Lawrence A.(Ed.)(1997).Rational Choice Theory and Religion.New York:Routledge.
26. 王季慶(1997)。心內革命─邁入愛與光的新時代。臺北:方智。
27. 陳家倫(2005)。與諸神共舞：什麼是新時代運動？。弘光人文社會學報，3，426-470。
28. 陳家倫(2002)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北，國立臺灣大學社會學研究所。
29. 陳家倫(2006)。臺灣新時代團體的網絡連結。臺灣社會學刊，36，109-165。
30. 陳淑娟(2007)。靈性非宗教、轉化非救贖：對臺灣新時代運動靈性觀的社會學考察。臺灣宗教研究，6(1)，57-112。

1. (2020)。遍地開花：宗教社會學的跨世代探索。台灣社會學，40，190-201。
2. (2023)。朝向「入世救贖靈性主義」：漢人民眾宗教的當代擴張與系統嵌合。華人宗教研究，22，1-53。