题名

聯合國「關切之人」與東南亞「人的安全」：以泰緬周遭之難民為例

并列篇名

＂Persons of Concern＂ to UNHCR and Human Security in Southeast Asia: A Study on Refugees around the Thailand-Burma Border

作者

蔡育岱(Yu-Tai Ts'ai)；李思嫺(Szu-Hsien Lee)

关键词

聯合國難民署 ； 關切之人 ； 國際難民 ； 人類安全 ； 泰緬邊境 ； UNHCR ； Persons of Concern ； International Refugees ； Human Security ； Thailand-Burma Border

期刊名称

思與言：人文與社會科學期刊

卷期/出版年月

56卷4期（2018 / 12 / 01）

页次

71 - 97

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

既使進入21世紀，世界難民問題依然嚴重。敘利亞內戰開始於2011年，截至2016年底造成了約1,200萬難民，當敘利亞衝突仍然方興未艾之時，據「聯合國難民署」估計，約19萬緬甸的羅興亞人，正漂流在泰國、菲律賓和馬來西亞海域，同時約有40萬克倫族人因受政治迫害，居住在泰緬邊境受聯合國與泰國政府保護。在國際法相關難民問題上，根據1951年「關於難民地位公約」和1967年「關於難民地位的議定書」定義，敘利亞難民、緬甸羅興亞人、克倫族人等無庸置疑可被歸類為國際難民，並予以庇護安置。而在人類安全研究中，國際社會所「關切之人」（Persons of Concern）是用來描述「聯合國難民署」所要保護與援助需求的遭難者總稱。「聯合國難民署」將其分類為一般的難民（公約定義）、境內難民、無國籍者、尋求庇護者與歸國難民等。爰本文主要目的先行從「聯合國難民署」定義下的「關切之人」概念分析，涉及東南亞「關切之人」部分，再循「以民為本」（people centered）的人類安全途徑詮釋國際難民議題與東南亞「人的安全」，進而以東南亞泰緬周遭之難民為個案探討，引導出東南亞的國際難民問題正挑戰「東協模式」，考驗著東協的團結；最後藉由東南亞難民問題，能有更深一層的認識與了解東南亞「人的安全」。
英文摘要

Even in the 21st century, the world refugee problem has remained acute. The Syrian civil war that began in 2011 created some 12 million international refugees by late 2016. As the conflict in Syria has continued to unfold, the UNHCR estimates that more than 190,000 people, mostly Rohingya, left on flimsy boats to countries such as Thailand, the Philippines, and Malaysia. Meanwhile, 400,000 Karen people are homeless and protected around the Thailand-Burma border by UN and government of Thailand. The Syrian refugees, Rohingya people, and Karen people fulfilled the requirements to be categorized as a refugee, based on the meaning of refugee in the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugee and the 1967 Protocol. Hence, the main purpose of this article is to evaluate the definition of ＂Persons of Concern and its relevance with Southeast Asia. Besides, the aim of the present research is to provide a thorough analysis of the issues of international refugees and Human Security in Southeast Asia underthe ＂people-centered＂ approach.
主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 楊昊(2008)。新憲章規範下的東協區域主義：回顧與展望。臺灣東南亞學刊，5(1)，147-179。
    連結：
  2. 蔡育岱,李思嫺(2015)。國際法下的難民權利：以羅興亞人為例。臺灣國際法學季刊，12(4)，73-97。
    連結：
  3. ABS-CBN News (2017). Malaysia Disputes Cayetano's ASEAN Chair Statement on Rohingya. Retrieved December 6, 2017, from ABS-CBN News, Website: http: //news.abs-cbn.com/overseas/09/25/17/malaysia-disputes-cayetanos-asean-chair-statement-on-rohingya
  4. Akaha, Tsuneo(2009).Human Security in East Asia: Embracing Global Norms through Regional Cooperation in Human Trafficking, Labour-Migration, and HIV/AIDS.Journal of Human Security,5(2),11-34.
  5. Arakan Rohingya National Organization (2011). Muslim Influence in the Kingdom of Arakan. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from Arakan Rohingya National Organization, Website: http://www.rohingya.org/portal/index.php/scholars/65-nurul-islam-uk/293-muslim-influence-in-the-kingdom-of-arakan.html
  6. ASEAN (2017a). ASEAN Overview. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from ASEAN, Website: http://asean.org/asean/about-asean/overview/
  7. ASEAN (2017b). ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from ASEAN, Website: http://asean.org/asean-socio-cultural/
  8. Australian Karen Foundation (2017). The Karen People. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from Australian Karen Foundation, Website: http://australiankarenfoundation.org.au/karen_people_18.html
  9. Ba, Alice D.(2011).Renegotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.California:Stanford University Press.
  10. Bradley, Megan(2014).Rethinking Refugeehood: Statelessness, Repatriation, and Refugee Agency.Review of International Studies,40,101-124.
  11. Burmalink (2014). Karenni Background. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from Burmalink, Website: http://www.burmalink.org/background/burma/ethnic-groups/karenni/
  12. Central Intelligence Agency (2017). The World Factbook. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from Central Intelligence Agency, Website:https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html
  13. Clad, James(Ed.),McDonald, Sean M.(Ed.),Vaughn, Bruce(Ed.)(2011).The Borderlands of Southeast Asia: Geopolitics, Terrorism, and Globalization.Washington, D.C.:National Defense University Press.
  14. Collins, Alan(Ed.)(2007).Contemporary Security Studies.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  15. Cook, Tonya L.,Shannon, Patricia J,Vinson, Gregory A,Letts, James P,Dwee, Ehtaw(2015).War Trauma and Torture Experiences Reported During Public Health Screening of Newly Resettled Karen Refugees: a Qualitative Study.BMC International Health and Human Rights
  16. Dasgupta, Sanjeev (2015). A New ‘ASEAN Way’: Finding a Regional Solution for Human Rights Violations in Rakhine State. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from The Kenan Institute for Ethics at Duke University, Website: http://kenan.ethics.duke.edu/humanrights/snowball/a-new-asean-way-finding-a-regional-solution-for-human-rights-violations-in-rakhine-state/
  17. Ellison, Christine S.,Smith, Alan(2013).Education and Internally Displaced Persons.New York:Bloomsbury Academic.
  18. Feller, Erika(Ed.),Türk, Volker(Ed.),Nicholson, Frances(Ed.)(2003).Refugee Protection in International Law.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  19. Ferris, Elizabeth G.(2011).The Politics of Protection: The Limits of Humanitarian Action.Washington, D.C.:the Brooking Institution.
  20. Goh, Gillian(2003).The ‘ASEAN Way’, Non-Intervention and ASEAN's Role in Conflict Management.Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs,3(1),113-118.
  21. Gunawan, Yordan,Priambodo, Gatot(2013).Burma's Rohingya Case in International Law Perspective.Journal Media Hukum,20(1),171-177.
  22. Humanity & Inclusion UK (2016). Mae La Refugee Camp in Thailand, a Difficult Place to be a Child. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from Humanity & Inclusion UK, Website: https://www.handicap-international.org.uk/news/mae-refugee-camp-in-thailand-difficult-place-to-be-child
  23. Lumpur, Kuala(2015).The Rohingyas: The Most Persecuted People on Earth?.The Economist,Jun 13th
  24. Miller, Tracy (Ed.)(2009).,未出版
  25. Newman, Edward(2010).Critical Human Security Studies.Review of International Studies,36,77-94.
  26. Nishikawa, Yukiko(2010).Human Security in Southeast Asia: Viable Solution or Empty Slogan?.New York, NY:Routledge.
  27. Perlez, Jane (2014). Rise in Bigotry Fuels Massacre Inside Myanmar. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from New York Times (March 5, 2014), Website: http://cn.nytimes.com/asia-pacific/20140305/c05myanmar/zhhant/#tabC_mostViewedWeek
  28. Restless Beings (2017). Refugee Rights: Rohingya. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from Restless Beings, Website: http://www.restlessbeings.org/projects/rohingya
  29. Rogers, Benedict(2012).Burma: a Nation at the Crossroads.London:Rider.
  30. Ross, Eleanor (2017). Suu Kyi Rejects U.N. Inquiry into Rohingya Abuse. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from Newsweek (May 3, 2017), Website: http://www.newsweek.com/suu-kyi-rejects-un-inquiry-rohingya-abuse-593512
  31. Szczepanski, Kallie (2017). Who Are the Rohingya? Retrieved July 15, 2017, from Thought Co, Website: http://asianhistory.about.com/od/Asian_History_Terms_N_Q/g/Who-Are-The-Rohingya.htm
  32. Tan, Vivian (2017). Over 168,000 Rohingya Likely Fled Myanmar since 2012 - UNHCR Report. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from UNHCR News, Website: http://www.unhcr.org/news/latest/2017/5/590990ff4/168000-rohingya-likely-fled-myanmar-since-2012-unhcr-report.html
  33. Thakur, Ramesh,Newman, Edward(2004).Introduction: Non-traditional Security in Asia.Broadening Asia's Security Discourse and Agenda: Political, Social, and Environmental Perspectives,Tokyo:
  34. UNHCR (2017e). Ministerial Meeting of States Parties to the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and UNHCR's Global Consultations on International Protection. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from UNHCR, Website: http://www.unhcr.org/protection/globalconsult/3c1622ab4/ministerial-meeting-states-parties-1951-convention-relating-status-refugees.html
  35. UNHCR (2016c). Myanmar Refugees/CAMPS. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from UNHCR, Website: http://reporting.unhcr.org/node/10117
  36. UNHCR (2016d). Voluntary Return. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from UNHCR, Website: http://reporting.unhcr.org/node/11826
  37. UNHCR (2017d). Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from UNHCR, Website: http://www.unhcr.org/protection/statelessness/3bbb25729/convention-relating-status-stateless-persons.html
  38. UNHCR (2017a). Global Trends Forced Displacement in 2016. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from UNHCR, Website: http://www.unhcr.org/dach/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2017/06/2016_Global_Trends_WEB-embargoed.pdf
  39. UNHCR (2016b). Civil status documentation. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from UNHCR, Website: http://reporting.unhcr.org/node/11828
  40. UNHCR (2015). With You. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from UNHCR, Website: http://www.unhcr.org.hk/unhcr/en/get_involved/newsletter_list/newsletter_details.html?id=19
  41. UNHCR (2017c). UNHCR Global Appeal 2016-2017-- Populations of Concern to UNHCR. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from UNHCR, Website: http://www.unhcr.org/564da0e3b.html
  42. UNHCR (2017b). Global Resettlement Need. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from UNHCR, Website: http://www.unhcr.org/protection/resettlement/575836267/unhcr-projected-global-resettlement-needs-2017.html
  43. UNHCR (2016a). Beyond Detention: A Global Strategy to Support Governments to End the Detention of Asylum-seekers and Refugees 2014-2019. Retrieved July 15, 2017, from UNHCR, Website: http://www.unhcr.org/protection/detention/57b579e47/unhcr-global-strategy-beyond-detention-progress-report.html?query=August%202016%20Progress%20Report%20mid-2016
  44. Vatikiotis, Michael (2017). Asia's Palestine? Myanmar's Rohingya: Stateless, Persecuted and a New Cause for Religious Extremism. Retrieved December 6, 2017, from South China Morning Post (September 9, 2017), Website: http://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/2110418/asias-palestine-myanmars-rohingya-stateless-persecuted-and-new
  45. 中華人權協會臺北海外和平服務團（2017）。〈泰國工作團〉。中華人權協會，網址：http://www.cahr.org.tw/tops/service_1.php。點閱日期：2017 年7 月15 日。
  46. 司徒宇,顧長永(2015)。緬甸政府與少數民族之互動探析─以克欽族、撣族、克倫族、羅興亞族為例。國會，43(9)，24-40。
  47. 李榮源(2012)。泰緬邊境難民─哪裡為家？又該何去何從？。臺灣人權促進會季刊，冬季刊
  48. 陳隆志(2006).國際人權法─文獻選集與解說.臺北:前衛.
  49. 彭淮棟（2016）。〈11 位諾貝爾和平獎得主批翁山蘇姬未保護緬甸少數民族〉。聯合新聞網（2016 年12 月30 日），網址：https://udn.com/news/story/6809/2200671。點閱日期：2017 年7 月15日。
  50. 楊昊(2015)。共同體在東亞與東亞的共同體：簡約制度主義及其超越？。東亞的理論與理論的東亞，臺北:
  51. 貌強（2005）。〈被世界遺棄的緬甸克倫尼族〉。大紀元（2005 年6 月7 日）， 網址：http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/5/6/7/n947742.htm。點閱日期：2017 年7 月15 日。
  52. 蔡育岱(2014).人類安全與國際關係：概念、主題與實踐.臺北:五南.
  53. 蔡育岱(2015)。從國際法的角度評議『羅興亞人』事件。戰略安全研析，122，4-11。
  54. 蔡育岱(2015)。轉變中的區域秩序？人類安全概念在東亞的發展與「應用」。東亞的理論與理論的東亞，臺北:
被引用次数
  1. 呂嘉穎(2022)。從Gambia v. Myanmar於ICJ之控訴談起－翁山蘇姬的兩難與緬甸政治局勢之現實。德明學報，45，1-19。
print cancel