性別主流化與人才培力：醫學大學職員性別意識培力課程之經驗探析

Gender Mainstreaming and Personnel Empowerment: A Case Study on the Training Curriculum and Teaching for Medical University Administrative Staff

楊幸真(Hsing-Chen Yang)

性別主流化 ； 性別意識 ； 培力教育 ； 高教職員 ； Gender Mainstreaming ； Gender Consciousness ； Empowerment Education ； University Administrative Staff

思與言：人文與社會科學期刊

57卷1期（2019 / 03 / 01）

181 - 230

繁體中文

人才培力，是性別主流化核心的一環。如何培養出具備性別平等意識的各種人才，是校園推動性別主流化的成敗關鍵；其中，對於學校職員的性別意識培力更是不可或缺的一部分，但卻也是過往較少受到關注與發展之處。本研究主張，高教職員是校園推動性別主流化、落實性別平等的關鍵行動者；透過培力職員的性別意識與知能，方能有效促進性別主流化在校園裡的紮根與落實。因此，本研究以高雄醫學大學為研究場域，以質性取向固定樣本研究，透過問卷調查與半結構深度訪談進行資料搜集，探究高教職員性別主流化培力教育課程之學習成效，審視反思教育訓練課程與教學，並以此作為大學職員性別培力課程與教學實施之參考。本研究發現，系統性的課程設計及作好制度獎勵配套措施，是提高職員學習動機和參與意願的基本要件。其次，成功的性別培力課程與內容須具備「相關性」、「切身性」，以及涵納「性別特定」觀點。高教職員的性別主流化課程不只著重認知層面的學習，還需有態度改變與實際行動參與的設計，方能讓職員有參與感、認同感及體認改變的可能。最後，根據研究發現，本研究提出高教職員性別主流化培力教育課程之建議。

Cultivating the gender consciousness of university administrative staff members is crucial for gender mainstreaming at universities. Administrative staff members of higher education institutions are key agents for promoting gender mainstreaming and implementing gender equality on campuses. This study adopted a qualitative panel design using questionnaires and semistructured in-depth interviews to investigate administrative staff members' learning outcomes from a gender mainstreaming curriculum at Kaohsiung Medical University and subsequently reflected on this educational training. The results indicate that implementing a systematic curriculum and offering rewards are fundamental elements for promoting learning motivation. Moreover, a successful gender mainstreaming curriculum must be relevant and possess a gender-specific perspective. Empowering administrative staff members through education with a gender mainstreaming curriculum emphasizes cognitive learning, attitude alteration and active participation. Basis on these research findings, several suggestions are proposed for gender mainstreaming curricula for university administrative staff.

1. 王大維(2012)。提升職前教師性別意識之研究：以「性別教育」課程實踐為例。教育科學期刊，11(1)，1-24。
   連結：
2. 李雪菱(2011)。教師性別意識與教學困境：反思中小學教師的性別教育課程設計與教學實踐。女學學誌，28，133-174。
   連結：
3. 陳怡孜,王宏仁(2012)。學術後勤與教育前線之間：大學系務秘書的橋接勞動。思與言，50(3)，1-49。
   連結：
4. 陳淑敏(2012)。論全球公民教育與其教學實踐─以大學生的學習為例。當代教育研究季刊，20(4)，121-153。
   連結：
5. 彭渰雯(2008)。當官僚遇上婦運：臺灣推動性別主流化的經驗初探。東吳政治學報，26(4)，1-59。
   連結：
6. 彭渰雯,李秉叡(2011)。推動性別主流化之過程評估：架構建立與先導研究。公共行政學報，38，115-150。
   連結：
7. 蘇芊玲(2014)。《性別平等教育法》：我的認識、思考與想像。婦研縱橫，101，24-30。
   連結：
8. Bengtsson, Elin A. (2011). JÄMI (A Swedish commission for gender mainstreaming report). Retrieved July 28, 2015, from university of Gothenburg, Website: http://www.jamiprogram.se/english/1-11-report-jami-a-swedish-commission-for-gender-mainstreaming/
9. Bishop-Sambrook, Clare(2000).The Logical Framework as a Tool for Gender Mainstreaming in University.Gender and Education,12(2),239-247.
10. Connell, Raewyn W.(2005).Change among the Gatekeepers: Men, Masculinities, and Gender Equality in the Global Arena.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,30,1801-1825.
11. Denzin, Norman K.(Ed.),Lincoln, Yvonna S.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
12. Dewey, John(1966).Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education.New York:Free Press.
13. Elmore, Richard F.,Fuhrman, Susan H.,陳佩正（譯）,基隆河畔策略聯盟（譯）(2005).學校課程的決定：1994 年美國視導與課程發展學會（ASCD）年鑑.臺北:心理.
14. Griffin, Christine(1989).‘I’m nor a women's libber, but…’: Feminism, Consciousness and Identity.The Social Identity of Women,London:
15. Gurin, Patricia,Townsend, Aloen(1986).Properties of Gender Identity and their Implications for Gender Consciousness.British Journal of Social Psychology,25,139-148.
16. Gurung, Min B., Diederik Prakke & Brigitte Leduc (2009). Guidelines for Gender Sensitive Training. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Website: https://www.icimod.org/resource/1291
17. Kuhlmann, Ellen(Ed.),Annandale, Ellen(Ed.)(2010).The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare.New Youk:Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Kwesiga, Joy C.,Ssendiwala, Elizabeth N.(2006).Gender Main-streaming in the University Context: Prospects and Challenges at Makerere University, Uganda.Women's Studies International Forum,29,592-605.
19. Lagro-Janssen, Toine(2007).Sex, Gender and Health Developments in Research.European Journal of Women's Studies,14(1),9-20.
20. Lipsky, Michael(1980).Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services.New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
21. Malloy, Jonathan(1999).What Makes a State Advocacy Structure Effective? Conflicts between Bureaucratic and Social Movement Criteria.Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration,12(3),267-288.
22. Meier, Petra,Celis, Karen(2011).Sowing the Seeds of Its Own Failure: Implementing the Concept of Gender Mainstreaming.Social Politics,18(4),469-489.
23. Morley, Louise(2007).Sister-Matic: Gender Mainstreaming in Higher Education.Teaching in Higher Education,12(5-6),607-620.
24. Nobelius, Ann-Maree,Wainer, Jo(2004).Gender and Medicine: A Conceptual Guide for Medical Educators.Traralgon Victoria, Australia:Monash University School of Rural Health.
25. Payne, Sarah(2011).Beijing Fifteen Tears on: The Persistence of Barriers to Gender Mainstreaming in Health Policy.Social Politics,18(4),515-542.
26. Porter, Fenella(Ed.),Sweetman, Caroline(Ed.)(2005).Mainstreaming Gender in Development: A Critical Review.Oxford:Oxfam GB.
27. Stanley, Liz,Wise, Sue(1993).Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology.New York:Routledge.
28. Tisdell, Elizabeth J.(1995).Creating Inclusive adult Learning Environments: Insights from Multicultural Education and Feminist Pedagogy.Columbus OH:Center on Education and Training for Employment.
29. United Nations (1997). Report of the Economic and Social Council for 1997 United Nations General Assembly 52nd Session a/52/3. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from United Nations, Website: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/docs/52/plenary/a52-3.htm
30. Verdonk, Petra,Benschop, Yvonne,De Haes, J. C. J. M.,Lagro-Janssen, A. L. M.(2008).Making a Gender Difference: Case Studies of Gender Mainstreaming in Medical Education.Medical Teacher,30,194-201.
31. Verdonk, Petra,Mans, Linda J. L.,Lagro-Janssen, Toine L. M.(2006).How is Gender Integrated in the Curricula of Dutch Medical Schools? A Quick-scan on Gender Issues as an Instrument for Change.Gender & Education,18(4),399-412.
32. Verloo, Mieke(2001).IWM Working PaperIWM Working Paper,Vienna:.
33. Walby, Sylvia(2005).Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice.Social Politics,12(3),321-343.
34. Yang, Hsing-Chen(2016).Transforming Concepts into Practices: Mainstreaming Gender in Higher Education.Asian Journal of Women's Studies,22(4),392-413.
35. 林芳玫(2009)。性別主流化在臺灣：從國際發展到在地化實踐。新世紀智庫論壇，45，32-38。
36. 張雯婷,楊幸真(2017)。性別主流化在高等教育：高醫大「性別主流化與職員業務職掌之融合」課程記要。性別平等教育季刊，78，77-84。
37. 畢恆達(2004)。女性性別意識形成歷程。通識教育季刊，11(1-2)，17-146。
38. 游美惠(2014).性別教育小詞庫.臺北:巨流.
39. 程慧娟(2008)。他山之石：向荷、加、美、澳借鏡。性別平等教育季刊，43，62-68。
40. 黃淑玲(2014)。全球典範！？瑞典性別主流化實施模式。公共治理，2(2)，69-82。
41. 楊幸真(2015)。校園性別主流化：以高醫大推動職員性別意識培力為例。性別平等教育季刊，72，72-78。
42. 蔡清田,黃光雄(2015).課程發展與設計新論.臺北:五南.
43. 瞿海源（編）,畢恆達（編）,劉長萱（編）,楊國樞（編）(2012).社會及行為科學研究法（二）質性研究.臺北:東華.

1. (2022)。性別融入社區課程與婦團女性講師培力。社區發展季刊，178，343-355。