論象徵利益－從布赫迪厄的視角出發

On Symbolic Interest: From the Perspective of Bourdieu

賴曉黎(Shau-Lee Lai)

象徵利益 ； 利益空缺 ； 特殊者的利益 ； 普遍者的利益 ； Symbolic Interest ； Disinterestedness ； Interest of the Particular ； Interest of the Universal

思與言：人文與社會科學期刊

59卷2期（2021 / 06 / 01）

139 - 192

繁體中文

從利益的複數性出發，布赫迪厄主張：有多少場域就有多少利益。利益是指向外在對象並受客觀條件制約的驅力（drives），一種驅使人們朝向特定有意義的、有價值行動的動力。象徵利益就是與物質利益作出區辨的否認的利益。在差異邏輯的作用下，通過否認物質利益，象徵利益對原來未區辨者作出區辨，並運用利缺性策略實作出某種特定的新利益，從而建立相對自主的新場域。在與現代經濟利益的區辨中，作為社會分化動力的象徵利益讓新的文化場域不斷興起。其中，追逐特殊者利益的文化場域與追求普遍者利益的科層場域，處於既合作又競爭的狀態。然而兩者的差異亦是明顯的：前者著重於「特殊者」（the particular）利益的追求，主張「為其自身之故」以及除了自身之外沒有別的目的等等；後者則強調「普遍者」（the universal）的利益，通過將自己的特殊利益建立為普遍者，把特殊利益的觀點變成普遍觀點，他們的目的是通過掩蓋私利、遮蔽真相的方式達到壟斷普遍者。

Starting from the plurality of interests, Bourdieu argues that there are as many interests as there are fields. An interest is a drive that points to external objects and is subject to objective conditions, a drive that drives people toward certain meaningful and valuable actions. Symbolic interest is denied interest. By the effect of logic of difference and the denegation of interest, symbolic interest distinguishes the undistinguished. Using the strategy of disinterestedness operates new specific interests, and rises a field of relative autonomy. Cultural fields and bureaucratic fields are two different types: the former for interest of the particular and the latter for interest of the universal. In elaborating a theory of public service and of public order, the agents had an interest in giving a universal form to their generic interests. They want monopoly of the universal.

1. Appiah, Kwame Anthony(2010).The Honor Code: How Moral Revolutions Happen.New York:W. W. Norton & Company.
2. Berleant, Arnold(1986).The Historicity of Aesthetics II.The British Journal of Aesthetics,26(3),195-203.
3. Bourdieu, P.(Ed.),Thompson, J. B.(Ed.),Raymond, G.(Trans.),Adamson, M.(Trans.)(1991).Language and Symbolic Power.Cambridge:Polity Press.
4. Bourdieu, P.,Passeron, J. C.(1977).Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture.Beverly Hills:Sage.
5. Bourdieu, Pierre(1992).The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field.Stanford, Calif:Meridian.
6. Bourdieu, Pierre(1985).Social Space and the Genesis of Groups.Theory and Society,14(6),723-744.
7. Bourdieu, Pierre(1998).Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action.Stanford, CA:Stanford U. Press.
8. Bourdieu, Pierre(1984).Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.Trans.
9. Bourdieu, Pierre(1991).Genesis and Structure of the Religious Field.Comparative Social Research,13,1-44.
10. Bourdieu, Pierre,Adamson, Matthew(Trans.)(1990).In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
11. Bourdieu, Pierre,Fernbach, David(Trans.)(2014).On the state: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989-1992.David Fernbach Polity.
12. Bourdieu, Pierre,Nice, Richard(Trans.)(1977).Outline of a Theory of Practice.New York:Cambridge University Press.
13. Bourdieu, Pierre,Raymond, Gio(Trans.),Adamson, Matthew(Trans.)(1991).Language and Symbolic Power.Polity Press.
14. Bourdieu, Pierre,Richard Nice, Richard(Trans.)(1990).The Logic of Practice.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
15. Bourdieu, Pierre,Richard Nice, Richard(Trans.)(2000).Pascalian Meditations.Stanford, Calif.:Stanford University Press.
16. Bourdieu、 Pierre,李猛（譯）,李康（譯）(2009).布赫迪厄社會學面面觀.臺北市:麥田.
17. Breton, Rob(2012).Bourdieu, ‘The Chimes’, and the Bad Economist: Reading Disinterest.College Literature,39(1),74-93.
18. Elias, Nobert(1994).The Civilizinq Process.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
19. Ferguson, Adam(1996).An Essay on the History of Civil Society.Cambridge University Press.
20. Grenfell, Michael James(ed.)(2014).Pierre Bourdieu (Key Concepts).Routledge.
21. Habermas, Jürgen,Shapiro, Jeremy J.(Trans.)(1971).Knowledge and Human Interests.Boston:Beacon Press.
22. Hirschman, Albert O.(1997).The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph.Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press.
23. Hobbes, Thomas,Tuck, Richard(Ed.)(1996).Leviathan.New York:Cambridge University Press.
24. Loyal, Steven,Quilley, Stephen(2017).The Particularity of the Universal: Critical Reflections on Bourdieu’s Theory of Symbolic Power and the State.Theory and Society,46(5),429-462.
25. Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm,Clark, Maudemarie(Trans.),Leiter, Brian(Trans.)(1997).Daybreak.Cambridge University Press.
26. Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm,Diethe, Carol(Trans.)(2007).On the genealogy of morality.New York:Cambridge University Press.
27. Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm,Hollingdale, R. J(Trans.),Schacht, Richard(Trans.)(1996).Human, All Too Human.Cambridge University Press.
28. Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm,Mencken, H.L.(Trans.)(1999).The Anti-Christ.Tucson:See Sharp Press.
29. Richardson, J.(1986).Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education.Westport, CT:Greenwood.
30. Sallaz, Jeffrey J.,Zavisca, Jane(2007).Bourdieu in American Sociology, 1980-2004.Annual Review of Sociology,33,21-41.
31. Sayer, Andrew(1999).Bourdieu, Smith and Disinterested Judgement.The Sociological Review
32. Simmel, Georg,Bottomore, Tom(Trans.),Frisby, David(Trans.)(2004).The Philosophy of Money.London:Routledge.
33. Smith, Adam(1994).An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.New York:Modern Library.
34. Swartz, David L.(1997).Culture & Power: the Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
35. Swedberg, Richard(2003).The Changing Picture of Max Weber’s Sociology.Annu. Rev. Sociology,29,283-306.
36. Wallis, Paul(1977).Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs.New York:Columbia University Press.
37. Weber, Max,Kalberg, Stephen(Trans.)(2002).The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.Los Angeles, Calif.:Roxbury Pub.Co Press.
38. Weber, Max,Roth, Guenther(ed.),Wittich, Claus(ed.)(1979).Economy and Society: an Outline of Interpretive Sociology.Berkeley:University of California Press.
39. Weber、 Max,康樂（譯）(1989).宗教與世界：韋伯選集（II）.臺北市:遠流.
40. Weber、 Max,顧忠華（譯）(1993).社會學基本概念.臺北市:遠流.

1. 徐瑋瑩(2023)。臺灣舞蹈藝術範式如何轉移？以一九七○年代雲門舞集的實踐為例。中山人文學報，55，1-27。