警察行使職權違反禁止酷刑的本土風險因素

The Risk Factors of Torture and Other Forms of Ill-treatment in the 'Field of Policing' in Taiwan

張淵菘(Yuan-Song Chang)；黃彥彰(Yen-Chang Huang)；章光明(Kuang-Ming Chang)

人權 ； 禁止酷刑公約 ； 警察文化實踐 ； 警務場域 ； 慣習 ； human rights ； UNACT ； police culture practice ； field of policing ； habitus

思與言：人文與社會科學期刊

61卷1期（2023 / 03 / 01）

39 - 117

繁體中文;英文

警察權的行使係行政權介入人權的一種態樣。在此過程如有不慎，可能衍生酷刑和其他不當對待，戕害人權及人性尊嚴，進而違背聯合國《禁止酷刑公約》人權保障精神。我國在推動禁止酷刑工作之際，亟需了解警察違反禁止酷刑及其他不當對待的風險因素，及其隱含的意涵。為探究此課題，本文以學者Janet Chan修正Pierre Bourdieu有關「場域」和「慣習」等理論所得出的「警務場域」、「警察慣習」及「警察文化實踐」概念為立基，透過「互動管理」會議及「內容分析法」等質性研究方法來進行。研究發現：我國的警察文化實踐包含酷刑和其他不當對待；我國警察在行使職權的過程，存在數十種違反禁止酷刑和其他不當對待的風險因素；這些同時併存的因素，可分別被歸類至「環境」、「制度」、「情境」及「個人」等面向中；而在是類風險因素中，存在8種明顯的增強關係；會有這樣的警察文化實踐，係在「警務場域」與「警察慣習」間的互動過程中所形塑的。在建議的部分，本文認為我國警察在警務場域內遂行職務的過程，須衡酌秩序維護及人權保障間的平衡點。如欲降低警察行使職權致生酷刑和其他不當對待的風險，應透過外顯建構制度並落實教育訓練，同時形塑內隱優質警察文化，厚植警察人權保障素養及道德判斷力。

The current study aims to answer: what explains police torture and other forms of ill-treatment in the 'field of policing' in Taiwan? In accordance with 'the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UNCAT)', there are no circumstances that justify the infliction of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment (hereafter other forms of ill-treatment). In addition, States shall prevent the occurrence of such acts through the reduction of risk factors. Since the exercise of police power and police use of force may sometimes amount to torture and other forms of ill-treatment, the Taiwan government, with the upcoming domestication of the UNCAT, shall consider risk factors of police torture and other forms of ill-treatment in the 'field of policing' in Taiwan, as well as addressing ways of risk reduction. By using Interactive Management at the beginning, this study identifies 18 risk factors of part of the Taiwan's police culture practice, which are police torture and other forms of ill-treatment. Content analysis is employed as well to verify the results. It analyses a total of 151 courts' judgments about officer-involved torture and other forms of ill-treatment in Taiwan between 1988 and 2020. An analysis indicates that 12 out of 18 risk factors mentioned before are the culprits of police torture and other forms of ill-treatment in Taiwan. In the final, a Bourdieusian theoretical framework is used to explain the police culture practice in Taiwan. It finds that an interaction between the 'field of policing' and 'police cultural knowledge' really matters.

1. 王必芳(2015)。得宜的監禁條件與收容人尊嚴的尊重：歐洲人權法院相關裁判研究。歐美研究，45(4)，619-690。
   連結：
2. 林鈺雄(2013)。2012 年刑事程序法發展回顧：從國際人權公約內國法化的觀點出發。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，42(特刊)，1067-1117。
   連結：
3. 林鈺雄(2014)。2013 年刑事程序法發展回顧：從國際人權公約內國法化的觀點出發。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，43(特刊)，1265-1298。
   連結：
4. 張寧,汪明生,郭瑞坤(2007)。社會判斷理論對互動管理成果之評估。管理學報，24(2)，135-154。
   連結：
5. 楊雲驊(2014)。「公民與政治權利國際公約」第 7 條對國內法之效力：以預防性刑求為中心。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，43，957-1029。
   連結：
6. Agnew, Robert(2006).Pressured into Crime: An Overview of General Strain Theory.Los Angeles, CA:Roxbury.
7. Albrecht, James F.(2017).Police Brutality, Misconduct, and Corruption: Criminological Explanations and Policy Implications.Cham, Switzerland:Springer.
8. Amnesty International (2021). Police Violence, What We Do. Retrieved June 8, 2021, from Amnesty International, Website: https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/police-brutality/
9. Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT) (2021). Groups in Situations of Vulnerability. Retrieved June 10, 2021, from Association for the Prevention of Torture, Website: https://www.apt.ch/en/knowledge-hub/detention-focus-database/groups-situations-vulnerability
10. Bayley, David H.(1996).Police Brutality Abroad.Police Violence: Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force,New Haven, CT:
11. Bernath, Barbara (2015). Body Searches: Addressing Risk Factors to Prevent Torture and Ill-treatment (2nd edition). Retrieved August 1, 2022, from Penal Reform International, Website: https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/factsheet-4-searches-2nd-v5.pdf
12. Bernath, Barbara(2010).,Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
13. Cao, Liqun,Chen, Fei-Lin,Wu, Yuning,Sun, Ivan Y.(2022).Police Integrity in Taiwan and Its Correlates.Asian Journal of Criminology,17,353-369.
14. Chan, Janet(1996).Changing Police Culture.The British Journal of Criminology,36(1),109-134.
15. Chan, Janet(2004).Using Pierre Bourdieu's Framework for Understanding Police Culture.Droit et Société,56-57,327-347.
16. Czachor, Emily M. (2022). Thomas Lane, Former Police Officer Convicted in George Floyd's Killing, Sentenced to 21/2 Years on Federal Charge. Retrieved August 1, 2022, from CBS News, Website: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/thomas-lane-sentence-george-floyd-death-civil-rights/?intcid=CNI-00-10aaa3a
17. Durán, Robert J.,Shroulote-Durán, Charlene M.(2021).The Racialized Patterns of Police Violence: The Critical Importance of Research as Praxis.Sociology Compass,15(8),1-15.
18. European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) (2002). 12th General Report on the CPT's Activities. Retrieved August 1, 2022, from Council of Europe, Website: https://rm.coe.int/1680696a76
19. European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) (2019). 28th General Report of the CPT. Retrieved August 1, 2022, from Council of Europe, Website: https://rm.coe.int/16809420e3
20. Friedrich, Robert J.(1980).Police Use of Force: Individuals, Situations, and Organizations.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,452,82-97.
21. Fyfe, James J.(1996).Training to Reduce Police-Civilian Violence.Police Violence: Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force,New Haven, CT:
22. Hall, Peter A.,Taylor, Rosemary C. R.(1996).Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.Political Studies,44(5),936-957.
23. Herzberg, Frederick,Mausner, Bernard,Snyderman, Barbara B.(1959).The Motivation to Work.New York, NY:John Willey & Sons.
24. Huber, Andrea (2015). Pre-trial Detention: Addressing Risk Factors to Prevent Torture and Ill-treatment (2nd edition). Retrieved August 1, 2022, from Penal Reform International, Website: https://www.apt.ch/sites/default/files/publications/factsheet-1_pre-trial-detention-en.pdf
25. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (2014). Prohibition and Punishment of Torture and Other Forms of Ill-treatment (June 25th 2014). Retrieved June 10, 2021, from International Committee of the Red Cross, Website: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/prohibition-and-punishment-torture-and-other-forms-ill-treatment
26. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (2016). Torture and Other Forms of Ill-treatment: The Definitions Used by the ICRC (January 1st 2016). Retrieved June 10, 2021, from International Committee of the Red Cross, Website: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/torture-and-other-forms-ill-treatment-definitions-used-icrc
27. Jacob, Herbert(Ed.)(1974).The Potential for Reform of Criminal Justice.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications.
28. Kane, Robert J.(2002).The Social Ecology of Police Misconduct.Criminology,40(4),867-896.
29. Klockars, Carl B.(1996).A Theory of Excessive Force and Its Control.Police Violence: Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force,New Haven, CT:
30. Lai, Yung-Lien,Chu, Doris C.,Wu, Szu-Chien,Luo, Fei,Lo, Tzu-Ying(2022).Perceptions of Police Misconduct in Taiwan: Does Procedural Justice Matter?.Journal of Crime and Justice,1-20.
31. Lardy, Anne(2016).Guide on Anti-torture Legislation.:Association for the Prevention of Torture=APT.
32. Lersch, Kim M.(1998).Police Misconduct and Malpractice: A Critical Analysis of Citizens´ Complaints.Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management,21(1),80-96.
33. Lipsky, Michael(2010).Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service.New York, NY:Russell Sage Foundation.
34. Lundman, Richard J.(1979).Organizational Norms and Police Discretion-An Observational Study of Police Work with Traffic Law Violators.Criminology,17(2),159-171.
35. Manning, Peter K.(1980).Violence and the Police Role.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,452(1),135-144.
36. Manning, Peter K.(2010).Democratic Policing in a Changing World.Boulder, CO:Paradigm Publishers.
37. Milgram, Stanley(1963).Behavioral Study of Obedience.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,67(4),371-378.
38. Min, Bruno,Burke, Roseanne(2020).Eliminating Incentives for Torture in the OSCE Region: Baseline Study and Practical Guidance.:The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights=ODIHR.
39. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights=OHCHR(2002).Human Rights and Law Enforcement: A Trainer´s Guide on Human Rights for the Police.Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
40. Reilly, Emma(2008).Torture in International Law: A Guide to Jurisprudence.:The Association for the Prevention of Torture=APT.
41. Schein, Edgar H.(1985).Organizational Culture and Leadership.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
42. Sherman, Lawrence W.(1980).Causes of Police Behavior: The Current State of Quantitative Research.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,17(1),69-100.
43. Sherman, Lawrence W.(1980).Perspectives on Police and Violence.The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science,452(1),1-12.
44. Silverstein, Jason (2021). The Global Impact of George Floyd: How Black Lives Matter Protests Shaped Movements Around the World. Retrieved August 1, 2022, from CBS News, Website: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/george-floyd-black-lives-matter-impact/
45. Skolnick, Jerome H.(1966).Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society.New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
46. Stinson, Philip M.(2020).Criminology Explains Police Violence.Oakland, CA:University of California Press.
47. Wahl, Rachel(2014).Justice, Context, and Violence: Law Enforcement Officers on Why They Torture.Law & Society Review,48(4),807-836.
48. Weitzer, Ronald,Tuch, Steven A.(2004).Race and Perceptions of Police Misconduct.Social Problems,51(3),305-325.
49. Westley, William A.(1953).Violence and the Police.American Journal of Sociology,59(1),34-41.
50. Wirtschafter, Valerie (2021). How George Floyd Changed the Online Conversation Around BLM. Retrieved August 1, 2022, from Brookings, Website: https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/how-george-floyd-changed-the-online-conversation-around-black-lives-matter/
51. Worden, Robert E.(1996).The Causes of Police Brutality: Theory and Evidence on Police Use of Force.Police Violence: Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force,New Haven, CT:
52. 內政部（2020）。〈禁止酷刑及其他殘忍不人道或有辱人格之待遇或處罰公約施行法草案〉。內政部，網址：https://www.moi.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=144&s=123176。點閱日期：2022 年 6月 26 日。
53. 江世雄(2021)。禁酷公約及其議定書之條約義務履行監督機制──規範架構之分析。涉外執法與政策學報，11，93-121。
54. 李震山(2015)。人權發展與警察職權──以司法院大法官解釋為例。中央警察大學學報，52，1-13。
55. 汪明生(2010).公共事務研究方法.臺北:五南.
56. 周懷廉(2014)。反酷刑在我國之實踐─以酷刑刑罰化為中心。檢察新論，15，133-147。
57. 林明輝(2018)。我國建立國家防範酷刑機制（NPM）作為。臺灣法學雜誌，335，31-44。
58. 法務部（2015）。〈國際人權專家「結論性意見與建議」專案追蹤〉（2015 年 4 月）。法務部，網址：https://www.humanrights.moj.gov.tw/17725/17733/17760/17770/17776/Lpsimplelist。點閱日期：2022 年 6 月 26 日。
59. 法務部（2012）。〈《公民與政治權利國際公約》執行情形：簽約國根據《公約》第 40 條提交的初次報告〉（2012 年 4 月）。法務部， 網址：https://www.humanrights.moj.gov.tw/17725/17733/17760/17761/17762/23500/post。點閱日期：2022 年 6 月 26 日。
60. 姚孟昌(2019)。將酷刑犯行以獨立罪章論處之國家義務──以禁止酷刑公約第 1 條與第 4 條為核心。臺灣人權學刊，5(2)，27-60。
61. 姚孟昌(2019)。落實普遍刑事管轄是追訴酷刑犯罪的國家義務──以《禁止酷刑公約》第 5 條第 2 項為核心。新世紀智庫論壇，87/88，96-111。
62. 姚孟昌(2019)。聯合國禁止酷刑公約之規範內涵與國家義務。新世紀智庫論壇，86，80-98。
63. 財團法人民間司法改革基金會（2022）。〈聯合記者會｜讓酷刑歸零立即通過《禁止酷刑公約施行法》〉（2022 年 6 月 24 日）。財團法人民間司法改革基金會，網址：https://www.jrf.org.tw/articles/2316。點閱日期：2022 年 8 月 1 日。
64. 國家人權委員會(2020).兩公約第三次國家報告獨立評估意見.國家人權委員會.
65. 張寧(2005)。互動管理之方法與應用。公共事務評論，6(2)，1-24。
66. 梅可望,陳明傳,李湧清,朱金池,章光明,洪文玲(2008).警察學.桃園:中央警察大學.
67. 陳淳文(2001)。再論國家緊急權──以法國法制為中心。人文及社會科學集刊，13(1 增刊)，111-136。
68. 黃炎東(2013)。警察執法與人權之維護──以釋字五三五號解釋為中心。華人前瞻研究，9(1)，81-91。
69. 趙春碧(2012)。單獨隔離監禁及禁止與外界接觸之監禁。法學叢刊，57(3)，111-147。
70. 鄧衍森(2020)。禁止酷刑公約國際標準之探討。法學叢刊，65(1)，19-50。
71. 錢建榮（2019）。〈錢建榮專欄：臺灣也有酷刑罪〉（2019 年 7 月31 日 ），《 上報 》， 網址：https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?SerialNo=68214。點閱日期：2021 年 6 月 15 日。