Toward a Discursive Basis of Public Reason in the Internet World

論網路時代以論述為基礎的公共理性

10.6416/SLR.200804.0001

陳起行(Chi-Shing Chen)

典範移轉 ； 哈伯瑪斯 ； 論述理論 ； 互生性 ； 公共領域 ； 羅斯 ； 公共理性 ； 德沃金，裁判理論 ； 訴訟外爭議解決 ； 線上爭議解決 ； Paradigm Shift ； Juergen Habermas ； Discourse Theory ； Co-originality ； Public Sphere ； John Rawls ； Public Reason ； Ronald Dworkin ； Theory of Adjudication ； Alternate Dispute Resolution ADR ； Online Dispute Resolution

東吳法律學報

19卷4期（2008 / 04 / 01）

1 - 30

英文

隨資訊科技的發展，法律的改變可以用典範移轉形容之。本文嘗試為未來法律進入下一個典範勾勒出一個可能的路徑。哈伯瑪斯(Juergen Habermas)持續以其互生(co-originality)理論批判羅斯(John Rawls)的公共理性以及德沃金(Ronald Dworkin)的裁判理論。由這個領域的理論對話出發，本文期望能導出未來法院裁判與訴訟外爭議解決機制之間相互辯證的重要性。而如何建構以論述為基礎的網路爭議解決機制便是未來法律邁向新典範的關鍵。

A paradigm shift is how the legal change after the advancement of information technology has been described. Looking for the next paradigm, this article suggests an approach to initiate the change. Rawls's concept of public reason and Dworkin's theory of adjudication form a consistent chain of thought and are consistently critiqued by the cooriginality thesis of Habermas. The discussions of their theoretical exchanges lead to an idea of public conflict resolution emphasizing the dialectic relationship between the court and alternate dispute resolution. The latter can be a discursive public sphere on the internet which is critical for leading us to the next legal paradigm.

1. Chen, C.(2007).The New Legal Paradigm of Jean Cohen and Its Implication on Public Online Dispute Resolution.EurAmerica,37(4),1.
   連結：
2. Agre, P.,Real-Time Politics(2002).the Internet and the political Process.the Information System,18,311.
3. Alexy, R.,Fiedler, Haft,Traunmueller (ed.)(1488).Legal Expert Systems and Legal Theory, in Expert Systems in Law: Impacts on Legal Theory and Computer Law.
4. Alexy,Peczenik(1990).the Concept of Coherence and Its Significance for Discursive Rationality.Ratio Juris,3,130-147.
5. Allen,Saxon｜Walter E.(1992).Automatic Retrieval of Legal Literature: Why and How.Meyer Research Institute of Law.
6. Balkin, J.(2004).Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society.N. Y. U. L. Rev,7,1.
7. Baxter, H.(2002).Habermas`s Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Buffalo L. Rev,50,205.
8. Bing, J(1978).Legal Information Retrieval Systems: The Need for and the Design of Extremely Simple Retrieval Strategies.Computer/L. J.,1,379.
9. Bone, R.(1995).Lon Fuller`s Theory of Adjudication and False Dichotomy between Dispute Resolution and Public Law Models of Litigation.Boston University Law Review,75,1273.
10. Bush, V.(1945).As We May Think.Atlantic Monthly,176(1),101-108.
11. Chayes, A.(1976).the Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation.Harv. L. Rev.,89,1281.
12. Chen, C.(2001).Dworkin`s Jurisprudence, Coherence and Legal Information System.Chengchi Law Review,65,1.
13. Chen, C.,Ola Zetterquist (ed.)(2004).The Internet as a Forum of Law.Law and Modernity: Particular Problems (2003 IVR Proceedings).
14. Davis, K(1986).Judicial, legislative, and administrative lawmaking: A proposed research service for the Supreme Court.Minnesota Law Review,71,1.
15. Dworkin, R.(1986).Law`s Empire.
16. Dworkin, R.(1997).Hard Cases, in Taking Rights Seriously.
17. Dyzenhaus, D.(1996).The Legitimacy of Legality.U. of Toronto L. J.,46,129.
18. Ess, C.(1996).the Political Computer: Democracy, CMC, and Habermas, in Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communicationthe Political Computer: Democracy, CMC, and Habermas, in Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication,未出版
19. Fiss, O.(1995).Emerging Media Technology and the First Amendment: In Search of a New Paradigm.Yale L. J.,104,1613.
20. Fiss, O.(1979).Forward: the Forms of Justice.Harv. L. Rev.,93,39.
21. Fraser, N.,M. Escamilla,M. Saavedra (ed.)(2005).Re-Framing Justice in a Globalizing World in Plenary Sessions Lectures of IVR 2005.Law and Justice in a Global Society.
22. Froomkin, M.(2003).Habermasiscourse.net: Toward a critical theory of Cyberspace.Havard Law Review,116,749.
23. Fuller, L.(1978).the Forms and Limits of Adjudication.Harv. L. Rev.,92,353.
24. Fuller, L.,Winston, K. (ed.),Revised (Ed.)(2001).In the Principles of Social Order, Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller.the Forms and Limits of Adjudication,101
25. Fung, A.,Survey Article(2003).Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.the Journal of Political Philosophy,11,338-367.
26. Gimmler, A.(2001).Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet.Philosophy and Social Criticism,27,21.
27. Goedan, C.(1986).Legal Comparativists and Computerized Legal Information Systems.General Problems and the Present German Status of Computerized Legal Information, Intl. J. of Legal Information.
28. Goldstein, P.(1997).Copyright and Its Substitute.Wis. L. Rev,1997,865.
29. Habermas J.(1996).Between Facts and Norms.
30. Habermas J.(1995).Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls`s Political Liberalism.the Journal of Philosophy,92,109-131.
31. Habermas J.,Rosenfeld,Arato (ed.)(1998).Paradigms of Law.in Habermas on Law and Democracy,13,21-25.
32. Habermas J.,Teubner, G. (ed.)(1986).Law as Medium and Law as Institution.in Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State,203
33. Heng,Moor(2003).From Habermas`s Communicative Theory to Practice on the Internet.Info Systems,13,331.
34. Jeffries, J.(1991).Online Legal Databases: France and the European Communities.L. Lib. J.,83,237.
35. Katsh, E.(1989).the First Amendment and Technological Change: The New Media Has a Message.Geo. Wash. L. Rev.,57,1459.
36. Katsh, E.(1991).the Electronic Media and the Transformation of Law.New York:Oxford University Press.
37. Katsh,Rifkin(2001).Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace.
38. Kuhn, T.(1996).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
39. Levenbook, B.(1984).the Role of Coherence in Legal Reasoning.Law and Philosophy,3,355-374.
40. Luban, D.(1998).Rediscovering Fuller`s Legal Ethics.Geo. J. Legal Ethics,11,801.
41. Lucy, W.,Jules Coleman,Scott Shapiro (ed.)(2002).Adjudication.in the Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law.
42. Marmor, A.(1991).Coherence, Holism, and Interpretation: the Epistemic Foundations of Dworkin`s Legal Theory.Law and Philosophy,10,383-412.
43. McCarthy, T.(1994).Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue.Ethics,105,44.
44. McCarthy, T.,Kearney,Dooley (ed.)(1999).Enlightenment and the Idea of Public Reason.in Questioning Ethics,164,178.
45. McCarty, T.(1990).Artificial Intelligence and Law: How to Get There from Here.Ratio Juris,3,189.
46. McMahon, C.(2002).Why There is No Issue Between Habermas and Rawls.the Journal of Philosophy,99,111.
47. Michelman, F.,S. Freeman (ed.)(2003).Rawls on Constitutionalism and Constitutional Law.in the Cambridge Companion to Rawls.
48. Mueller, H.(1991).Legal Information Systems and Other Law-Related Databases in Germany, Australia, and Switzerland.L. Lib. J.,83,253.
49. Pahel, K.(1985).The Public Process of Moral Adjudication.Social Theory and Practice,11,183.
50. Peczenik, A.(1994).Why Shall Legal Reasoning be Coherent?.ARSP-Beiheft,53
51. Rasmussen, D.,M. Evans (ed.)(2001).Accommodating Republicanism.in the Edinburgh Companion to Contemporary Liberalism,1888
52. Rasmussen, D.,R. Kearney,M. Dooley (ed.)(1999).Paradigms of Public Reason: Reflections on Ethics and Democracy.In Questioning Ethics.
53. Rawls, J.(1995).Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas.the Journal of Philosophy,92,132.
54. Rawls, J.(1993).Political Liberalism.
55. Sabel,Simon(2004).Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Success.Harv. L. Rev.,117,1015.
56. Seters, P.(ed.)(2006).Communitarianism in law and society.
57. Shih, W.(2003).Reconstruction Blue: A Critique of Habermasian Adjudication Theory.Suffolk University Law Review,36,331.
58. Tanaka, S.,Z. Kitagawa (ed.)(1998).Metamorphous of the legal systems: Toward a pluralistic coordinating forum.in Das recht vor der herausforderung eines neuen jahrhundents: Erwartungen in Japan und Deutschland,91
59. Wessel, R.(1986).Alternative Dispute Resolution for the Socio-scientific Dispute.Journal of Law and Technology,1,1.

1. (2015)。論違憲審查之程序理性—從Dworkin獨白取向之裁判理論到Habermas之司法法律論辯理論。中研院法學期刊，16，127-209。