Digital Copyright Law-Making and the Future Development of E-government

論數位著作權法律形成與未來電子化政府之發展

10.6416/SLR.201101.0187

陳起行(Chi-Shing Chen)

互生性 ； 數位千禧年著作權法 ； 電子化政府 ； 法律原則 ； 自發性法律 ； Co-originality ； DMCA ； E-government ； Legal Principle ； Reflexive Law

東吳法律學報

22卷3期（2011 / 01 / 01）

187 - 218

英文

未來法律形成與電子化政府的發展需要重視典範的移轉。本文檢視Jean Cohen教授所提出的一項典範移轉，並用於批判一項著作權的立法－數位千禧年著作權法。數位著作權保護的課題確實十分具有爭議性，該議題的研究，亦涉及法學，社會，政治，經濟，以及文化面向等科際整合上的難題，這項特質，使得傳統法律形成的模式，在數位著作權課題上，面臨困境。所需要的新思維，必須更加重視對話，以及國家立法與自我規制之間合作的關係。

Future approach toward law making as well as e-government are in need of paradigm shift. This paper examines one of such new legal paradigm advocated by Jean Cohen and illustrates why it deserves our consideration through testing on a digital copyright legislation-Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Digital copyright protection issues are extremely controversial, and are highly interdisciplinary as they relate to both traditional legal scholarship and modern social political, economic and cultural dilemmas. Such a characteristic explains why the traditional law making approach is facing difficulty and why an approach that emphasizes more on dialogue and the cooperative relationship between government and self-regulatory efforts is essential in the future.

1. Agre, P.(2002).Real-Time Politics: the Internet and the Political Process.The Information Society,18,311.
2. Balkin, J.(2004).Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society.New York University Law Review,79,1.
3. Bechtold, S.(2004).Digital Rights Management in the United States and Europe.American Journal of Comparative Law,52,323.
4. Bekkers,Homburg(2007).The Myths of E-Government: Looking Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government.The Information Society,23,373.
5. Coglianese, C.(2004).The Internet and Citizen Participation in Rulemaking.I/S Journal,1,33.
6. Cohen, J.(2002).Regulating Intimacy, A New Legal Paradigm.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
7. Dusollier, S.(2003).Open Source And Copyleft: Authorship Reconsidered? Columbia Journal of Law & Arts,26,281.
8. Dworkin, R.(1986).Law's Empire.Massachusetts:Harvard.
9. Dworkin, R.(1977).Taking Rights Seriously.Massachusetts:Harvard.
10. Froomkin, M.(2003).Habermasiscourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace.Harvard Law Review,116,749.
11. Ginsburg, J.(2002).Essay-How Copyright Got A Bad Name For Itself.Columbia Journal of Law & Arts,26,61.
12. Ginsburg, J.(1990).Creation and Commercial Value: Copyright Protection of Works of Information.Columbia Law Review,90,1865.
13. Ginsburg, J.(1997).Authors and Users in Copyright.Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.,45,1-20.
14. Glendon, M.(1991).Rights talk: the impoverishment of political discourse.New York, N.Y.:Free Press.
15. Goldstein, P.(1997).Copyright and its Substitutes, the Kastenmeier Lecture.Wisconsin Law Review,865.
16. Habermas, J.(1996).Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Cambridge, U.K.:Polity Press.
17. Herman,Gandy(2006).Catch 1201: A Legislative History and Content Analysis of the DMCA Exemption Proceedings.Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,24,121.
18. Houweling, M.(2005).Distributive Values In Copyright.Texas Law Review,83,1535.
19. Hunter, D.(2003).Cyberspace as Place And The Tragedy Of The Digital Anticommons.California Law Review,91,439.
20. Imfeld,Ekstrand(2005).The Music Industry and the Legislative Development of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's Online Service Provider Provision.Communication Law and Policy,10,291.
21. Janssen(2007).Scenario Building for E-Government in 2020: Consolidating the Results from Regional Workshops.Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
22. K. Winston(ed.)(2001).The Principles of Social Order, Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller.Oxford:Hart.
23. Katsh, E.(1989).The First Amendment and Technological Change: The New Media Has a Message.George Washington Law Review,57,1459-1478.
24. Katsh, E.(1991).The Electronic Media and the Transformation of Law.New York, N.Y.:Oxford University Press.
25. Katyal, S.(2003).The New Surveillance.Case Western Reserve Law Review,54,297.
26. Kolsaker, A.(2006).Reconceptualising E-government as a Tool of Governance: the UK Case.Electronic Government,3(4),347.
27. Kuhn, T.(1996).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago, IL.:University of Chicago Press.
28. Lemley,Reese(2005).A Quick And Inexpensive System For Resolving Peer-To-Peer Copyright Disputes.Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,23,1.
29. Litman, J.(2001).Digital Copyright: Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet.Amherst, N.Y.:Prometheus Books.
30. Litman, J.(1989).Copyright Legislation and Technological Change.Oregon Law Review,68,275.
31. Lobel, O.(2004).The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought.Minnesota Law Review,89,342.
32. Lofstedt, U.(2005).E-Government-Assessment of Current Research and Some Proposals for Future Directions.International Journal of Public Information Systems,2005(1),39.
33. Macintosh, A.(2004).Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making.Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
34. Maxey, S.(2003).That CARP is No Keeper: Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels-Change is Needed, Here is Why, and How.Journal of Intellectual Property Law,10,385.
35. Nimmer, D.(2002).Appreciating Legislative History the Sweet and Sour Spots of the DMCA's Commentary.Cardozo Law Review,23,909.
36. Nimmer, D.(2003).Kluwer Law International.Netherlands:Hague.
37. Noveck B.(2004).The Electronic Revolution in Rulemaking.Emory Law Journal,53,433.
38. Nunziato, D.(2005).The Death of the Public Forum in Cyberspace.Berkeley Technology Law Journal,20,1115.
39. Reitz, J.(2006).E-Government.The American Journal of Comparative Law,54,733.
40. Rosenfeld, M.(ed.),Arato, A.(ed.)(1998).Habermas on Law and Democracy.
41. Shulman, S.(2004).The Internet Still Might (but Probably Won't) Change Everything.I/S Journal,1,111-145.
42. Stanley,Weare(2004).The Effects of Internet Use on Political Participation-Evidence From an Agency Online Discussion Forum.Administration & Society,36,503-527.
43. Sturm, S(2001).Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach.Columbia Law Review,101,458.
44. Takeyama(2005).Developments in the Economics of Copyright: Research and Analysis.Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos, U.K.:Northampton, Mass.
45. Tambouris(2007).A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools.Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
46. Teubner(ed.)(1994).Environmental Law and Ecological Responsibility: The Concept and Practice of Ecological Self-Organization.New York:John Wiley.
47. Teubner, G.(1983).Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law.Law & Society Review,17,239.
48. Wagner, P.(2005).Reconsidering the DMCA.Houston Law Review,42,1107.
49. Wagner, R.(2003).Information Wants To Be Free: Intellectual Property And The Mythologies Of Control.Columbia Law Review,103,995.
50. Welch,Fulla(2005).Virtual Interactivity Between Government and Citizens: The Chicago Police Department's Citizen ICAM Application Demonstration Case.Political Communication,22,215-236.
51. Woodmansee, M.(ed.),Jaszi, P.(ed.)(1994).The Construction of Authorship, Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature.Durham, NC.:Duke University Press.
52. Zavestoski(2006).Democracy and the environment on the Internet, Electronic Citizen Participation in Regulatory Rulemaking.Science, Technology, and Human Values,31,383-408.