美國法上數位證據之取得與保存

Obtaining and Preserving Electronic Evidence in American Law

10.6416/SLR.201101.0095

法思齊(Sze-Chie Fa)

電腦犯罪 ； 搜索扣押 ； 數位證據 ； 電磁紀錄 ； 電子通訊隱私法 ； 美國聯邦憲法增修條文第四條 ； computer crime ； search and seizure ； electronic evidence ； digital evidence ； the Fourth Amendment ； Electronic Communication Privacy Act ； Spoliation

東吳法律學報

22卷3期（2011 / 01 / 01）

95 - 147

繁體中文

自電腦於1946年發明以來，其應用的領域已從一開始的科學計算、資料處理不斷的擴張。然而，隨著電腦與網路的普及，各類之電腦網路犯罪卻也因此開始滋生。惟此類牽涉到電腦或網路之犯罪，因電腦及其相關電子設備本身之特性，故相較於傳統犯罪而言，較不容易偵查，執法上亦因此面臨著許多的困難。 在美國，早期針對搜索扣押與犯罪有關之電腦檔案等數位證據時，司法解釋上曾出現過許多爭議。惟近年來，美國法院對於電腦犯罪案件中數位證據之搜索與扣押所可能會牽涉到的幾點重要爭議，已逐漸形成共識。本文之目的，即在於透過美國近年來有關數位證據即時偵查之法制、搜索扣押以及保存數位證據之相關規範及實務見解，來了解數位證據之取得與保全於法制上應遵守那些規範？當相關規範之適用出現疑問或困難時，美國法院又係如何解決數位證據在刑事訴訟中所面臨之種種程序或法制上之考驗？藉此作為未來國內後續相關研究以及執法實務上之參考。

Over the past several decades, computers have become a principle means for storing personal, financial, and other information for large numbers of people. The significance of computers as a source of information suggests that access to computer records will become increasingly important in law enforcement. However, computerized records have several unique characteristics that are different from the physical evidence, and those unique characteristics have increased the difficulty in criminal activity's investigation and prosecution. In response, the Department of Justice in the United States have created numerous programs and deployed new technologies to aid in the investigation and prosecution of computer crime. Department of Justice's efforts to combat crimes that involved computer are centralized in its Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section. The Section has published ”Prosecuting Computer Crimes” and ”Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations” manuals to examine the federal laws that relate to computer crimes. In addition, courts and legal academics have been responding to this trend with increasing regularity, struggling to apply Fourth Amendment jurisprudence to the new contexts. Therefore, this article will examine legal issues related to search and seizure of computers and the preservation of computerized evidence.

1. Arent, Lisa M.(2002).Discovery: Preserving, Requesting & Producing Electronic Information.SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L. J.,19,131+138.
2. Ballon, Ian C.(1998).How Companies Can Reduce the Costs and Risks Associated with Electronic Discovery.COMPUTER L.,15,8.
3. BRITZ, MARJIE T.(2009).COMPUTER FORENSICS AND CYBER CRIME: AN INTRODUCTION.Pearson.
4. Casey, Eoghan(2000).Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers and the Internet.San Diego:Academic Press.
5. Chung, Christine Sgarlata,Byer, David J.(1997).The electronic Paper Trail: Evidentiary Obstacles to Discovery and Admission of Electronic Evidence.B.U.J. SCI. & Tech. L.,2,5.
6. Clancy, Thomas K.(2005).The Search and Seizure of Computer and Electronic Evidence: The Fourth Amendment Aspects of Computer Searches and Seizures: A Perspective and A Primer.Miss. L.J.,75,193.
7. CLIFFORD, RALPH D.(2006).CYBERCRIME: THE INVESTIGATION, PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE OF A COMPUTERRELATED CRIME.North Carolina:Carolina Academic Press.
8. FRIEDMAN, SHELDON E.,ESQ.(2005).THE LITIGATOR'S GUIDE TO ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE AND TECHNOLOGY.Denver, Colorado:Bradford Publishing Co..
9. Hellums, Sandy D.(2002).Note, Bits and Bytes: The Carnivore Initiative and the Search and Seizure of Electronic Mail.Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J.,10,827.
10. Johnson, Thomas A.(ed.)(2006).FORENSIC COMPUTER CRIME INVESTIGATION.New York:Taylor & Francis Group.
11. LANGE, MICHELE C. S.,NIMSGER, KRISTIN M.(2004).ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE AND DISCOVERY: WHAT EVERY LAWYER SHOULD KNOW.Illinois:American Bar Association.
12. MASON, STEPHEN(2008).INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE XXXV.
13. MOORE, ROBERT(2005).SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF DIGITAL EVIDENCE.New York:LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
14. National Institute of Justice(2001).Electronic Crime Scene Investigation: A Guide for First Responders.
15. NEWMAN, ROBERT C.(2007).COMPUTER FORENSICS: EVIDENCE COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT.New York:Auerbach publications.
16. Reetz, C. Ryan(1987).Note, Warrant Requirement for Searches of Computerized Information.B.U.L. Rev.,67,179.
17. RICE, PAUL R.(2005).ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE: LAW AND PRACTICE.Illinois:American Bar Association.
18. SCOTT, A HUGH.(2001).COMPUTER AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CRIME: FEDERAL AND STATE LAW.Washington D.C.:BNA Books.
19. TAYLOR, ROBERT W.(2006).DIGITAL CRIME AND DIGITAL TERRORISM.New Jersey:Pearson Education Inc..
20. Trepel, Samantha(2007).Digital Searches, General Warrants, and The Case for The Courts.Yale J. L. & Tech.,10,120.
21. USDOJ(2002).Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations.
22. Winick, Raphael(1994).Searches and Seizures of Computers and Computer Data.HARV. J. L. & TECH.,8,75+110.
23. 丁秋玉(2004)。美國網路犯罪搜索扣押之案例研究。警大法學論叢，9，171。
24. 王兆鵬(2004)。美國刑事訴訟法。台北:元照。
25. 王銘勇(2003)。網路犯罪之搜索與扣押。法學叢刊，191，45。
26. 林宜隆(2003)。資通安全鑑識與數位證據之探討。電腦稽核，9，30。
27. 陳佳瑤、吳佳育(2002)。數位證據於現行法律之相關問題。「網路空間：資訊、法律與社會」學術研究暨實務研討會論文集（一）
28. 謝昆峰(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台灣大學法律研究所。

1. 李榮耕(2016)。數位資料及附帶搜索─以行動電話內的資訊為例。臺北大學法學論叢，100，245-322。
2. 劉育偉,馬宇凡(2022)。日美通訊監察法制體系研析－兼論與臺灣之比較。東亞論壇，517，1-18。
3. 施育傑(2018)。「IP位址使用者資料」是「通訊使用者資料」嗎？－從若干實務見解出發，論通訊保障及監察法相關規範。法令月刊，69(9)，126-162。
4. (2021)。論數位證據之原件、複製品與最佳證據法則──最高法院107年度台上字第3724號等8則刑事判決評析。月旦法學雜誌，311，71-96。