侵害陪伴動物之慰撫金賠償與界限

Recovery of the Owner's Non-Pecuniary Loss and Its Limitation When Companion Animals Are Wrongful Damaged

陳汝吟(Ju-Yin Chen)

侵權行為 ； 人格權 ； 情感利益 ； 慰撫金 ； 損害賠償 ； 陪伴動物 ； 寵物 ； torts ； personal rights ； sentimental value ； recovery of non-pecuniary loss ； compensation ； companion animal ； pet

東吳法律學報

30卷3期（2019 / 01 / 01）

45 - 96

繁體中文

陪伴動物是現代社會許多人情感利益所繫，本文借鏡比較法例上瑞士、日本民法及美國等立法與司法實務裁判之新近發展，分析在臺灣現行法律架構下，侵害動物之慰撫金請求是否可行，並提出以陪伴動物之內涵概念、飼主人格利益須證明受有損害、以及加害人主觀要件上限於故意及重大過失等為界線，可謂民法第195條第1項前段之「情節重大」；同時斟酌飼主責任，體現損害賠償正義，落實與有責任之損害歸責原理。藉此希望法律可反映社會現況，提供此方面後續法學研究參考。

The sentimental value ties that owners feel towards their companion animals in modern society. This article review comparative legislation and judicial practices from Swiss and Japanese Civil Code, as well as substantial changes in the U.S. in recent years. To ensure the justice in compensation, I'll bring up proposals for reasonable interpretation of Article 195 ＂wrongfully damaged in a severe way＂, which is in accordance with tort purposes and allow for damages for their genuine mental anguish; meanwhile, I'll line the requirements with the concept of pets, burden of proof, and offender's Intentional or gross negligence Infliction. This may not only meet the society's expectations but also facilitate legal research and legislative action.

1. 王澤鑑(2016)。損害賠償法上的與有過失。法令月刊，67(4)，1-38。
   連結：
2. 陳聰富(2006)。人身侵害之損害概念。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，35(1)，47-110。
   連結：
3. Agorianitis, Vasiliki(2006).Being Daphne's Mom: An Argument for Valuing Companion Animals as Companions.J. Marshall L. Rev.,39,1453.
4. Banakas, Stathis(2015).Non-Pecuniary Loss in Personal Injury: Topography Architecture and Nomenclature in the European Landscape.Journal of Comparative Law (JCL),10(2),291.
5. Brehm, Roland(2006).Berner Kommentar zum schweizerischen Privatrecht.Bern:
6. Byszewski, Elaine T.(2003).Valuing Companion Animals in Wrongful Death Cases: A Survey of Current Court and Legislative Action and a Suggestion For Valuing Pecuniary Loss of Companionship.Animal L.,9,215.
7. Chapman, Casey(2009).Not Your Coffee Table: An Evaluation of Companion Animals as Personal Property.Cap. U. L. Rev.,38,187.
8. Cohen, Carl,Regan, Tom(2001).THE ANIMAL RIGHTS DEBATE.Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
9. Cupp, Richard L.(2017).Cognitively Impaired Humans, Intelligent Animals, and Legal Personhood.Florida Law Review,69,465.
10. Cupp, Richard L., Jr.(2016).Animals as More Than "Mere Things," but Still Property: A Call for Continuing Evolution of the Animal Welfare Paradigm.U. Cin. L. Rev.,84,1023.
11. Epstein, Lynn A.(2001).Resolving Confusion in Pet Owner Tort Cases: Recognizing Pets' Anthropomorphic Qualities Under a Property Classification.S. Ill. U. L.J.,26,31.
12. Favre, David(2000).Equitable Self-Ownership for Animals.DUKE L.J.,50,473.
13. Frasch, Pamela,Hessler, Katherine,Kutil, Sarah,Waisman, Sonia(2016).ANIMAL LAW IN A NUTSHELL.West Publishing.
14. Goldberg, Phil(2013).Courts Legislatures Have Kept the Proper Leash on Pet Injury Lawsuits: Why Rejecting Emotion-Based Damages Promotes the Rule of Law, Modern Values, and Animal Welfare.Stan. J.Animal L. & Pol'y,6,30.
15. Hankin, Susan J.(2007).Not a Living Room Sofa Changing the Legal Status of Companion Animals.Rutgers J. L. & Pub. Pol'y,4,314-410.
16. Hannah, Harold W.(2001).Animals as Property-Changing Concepts.S. ILL. U. L.J.,25,571.
17. Huss, Rebecca J.(2002).Valuing Man's and Woman's Best Friend: The Moral and Legal Status of Companion Animals.Marq. L. Rev.,86,47.
18. Huss, Rebecca J.(2004).Valuation in Veterinary Malpractice.Loy. U. Chi. L.J.,35,479.
19. Huss, Rebecca J.(2005).Recent Developments in Animal Law.Tort Trial & Ins. Prac. L.J.,40,233.
20. Kayasseh, Eveline Schneider(2009).Haftung bei Verletzung oder Tötung eines Tieres unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Schweizerischen und U.S.-Amerikanischen Rechts.Zurich:
21. Knellwolf, Peggy A,Strub, Patrick,von Flüe, Karin(2008).ZGB für den Alltag : kommentierte Ausgabe aus der Beobachter-Beratungspraxis.Zürich:Beobachter.
22. Krepper, Peter(2008).Affektionswert-Ersatz bei Haustieren.Aktuelle Juristische Praxis (AJP),704.
23. Landolt, Hardy(2007).Zürcher Kommentar.Zurich:
24. Livingston, Margit(2004).The Calculus of Animal Valuation: Crafting a Viable Remedy.Neb. L. Rev.,82,783.
25. Magnotti, Lauren(2006).Pawing Open the Courthouse Door: Why Animals' Interests Should Matter When Courts Grant Standing.St. John's L. Rev.,80,455.
26. McKenzie, Jade(2016).Em "BARK" ing on the Journey to Expand Recovery of Damages for the Loss of a Companion Animal.Chap. L. Rev.,19,659.
27. Michel, Margot,Kayasseh, Eveline Schneider(2011).The Legal Situation of Animals in Switzerland: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back – Many Steps to go.Journal of Animal Law, Michigan State University College of Law,7,1-42.
28. Pintar, Janice M.(2002).Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress and the Fair Market Value Approach in Wisconsin: The Case for Extending Tort Protection to Companion Animals and Their Owners.Wis. L. Rev.,2002,735.
29. Probst, Thomas(2010).Der Ersatz "immateriellen Schadens" im schweizerischen Haftpflicht- und Strassenverkehrsrecht.Strassenverkehrsrechts-Tagung,Bern:
30. Rogers, W.V. Horton(ed.)(2001).Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective.Springer.
31. Schwartz, Victor E.,Laird, Emily J.(2006).Non-Economic Damages in Pet Litigation: The Serious Need To Preserve a Rational Rule.Pepp. L. Rev.,33,227.
32. Schwenzer, Ingeborg H.(2012).Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht: Allgemeiner Teil.Bern:Stämpfli.
33. Simmons, Schyler P.(2013).What is the Next Step for Companion Pets in the Legal System? The Answer May Lie with the Historical Development of the Legal Rights for Minors.Tex. A&M L. Rev.,1,253.
34. Singer, Peter(2001).ANIMAL LIBERATION.Ecco Press.
35. Sirois, Lauren M.(2015).Recovering for the Loss of a Beloved Pet: Rethinking the Legal Classification of Companion Animals and the Requirements for Loss of Companionship Tort Damages.U. Pa. L. Rev.,163,1199.
36. Squires-Lee, Debra(1995).In Defense of Floyd: Appropriately Valuing Companion Animals in Tort.N.Y.U.L. Rev.,70,1059.
37. Sullivan, Diane,Vietzke, Holly(2008).AN ANIMAL IS NOT AN IPOD.J. Animal L.,4,41.
38. Waisman, Sonia S.(2005).Non-Economic Damages: Where Does it Get Us and How Do We Get There?.J. Animal L.,1,7.
39. Wilson, Kelly(2009).Catching the Unique Rabbit: Why Pets Should be Reclassified as Inimitable Property Under the Law.Clev. St. L. Rev.,57,167.
40. 山口真佑子(2013)。ペットブームに伴う動物の在り方の変化について－ドイツの動物愛護体制と日本の裁判例を比較して－。法律學研究，50，379-399。
41. 王澤鑑(2012).人格權法－法釋義學、比較法、案例研究.
42. 王澤鑑(1991)。時間浪費非財產上損害之金錢賠償。萬國法律，57，2-12。
43. 史尚寬(1954).債法總論.
44. 吉井啓子(2006)。フランス民法典における動物の地位－動物保護法制に関するアントワーヌ報告書－。国学院法学，44(1)，117-142。
45. 吉田克己編、片山直也編(2014)。財の多様化と民法学。商事法務出版。
46. 佐野智也(2014)。民法起草時における参照外国法令の分析。名古屋大學法政論集，257，89-108。
47. 吳瑾瑜(2005)。由「物」之法律概念論寵物之損害賠償。中原財經法學，15，175-224。
48. 岡孝(2014)。明治民法起草過程における外国法の影響。国際哲学研究，別冊4?，16-33。
49. 林婉昀(2011)。中正大學法律學研究所。
50. 林誠二(2015).債編各論新解 － 體系化解說（中）.
51. 邱聰智,姚志明（修訂）(2014).新訂民法債編通則（上）.自版.
52. 青木人志(2002)。動物の比較法文化－動物保護法の日欧比較。有斐閣。
53. 孫森焱(2005).民法債編總論.自版.
54. 孫森焱(2001).新版民法債編總論.自版.
55. 曾世雄(2005).非財產上損害賠償.元照.
56. 曾世雄(1996).損害賠償法原理.自版.
57. 曾隆興(2011).詳解損害賠償法.
58. 黃立(2006).民法債編總論.自版.
59. 鄭玉波(1990).民法債編總論.三民.
60. 鄭冠宇(2017).民法債編總論.新學林.
61. 齋藤修(2010)。慰謝料算定の理論。ぎょうせい。
62. 杨立新,朱呈义(2004)。动物法律人格之否定─兼论动物之法律“物格”。法学研究，5，86-102。

1. 陳汝吟(2023)。論慰撫金與懲罰性賠償之關係：從歷史背景及功能演變談近年發展。臺大法學論叢，52(1)，73-130。
2. 顏佑紘(2023)。2022年民事法發展回顧。臺大法學論叢，52(S)，1233-1261。
3. (2021)。論飼主就寵物遭不法侵害之慰撫金賠償問題──以我國與德國之發展趨勢為中心。興大法學，30，73-116。