题名

論人工智慧創作之法律屬性與保護

并列篇名

A Study on the Legal Status and Protection of AI-Generated Work

作者

徐龍(Long Xu)

关键词

人工智慧 ； 人工智慧創作 ； 著作權 ； 著作人身分 ； 原創性 ； 鄰接權 ； 資料庫 ； 法律保護 ； Artificial Intelligence (AI) ； AI-generated work ； Copyright ； Authorship ； Originality ； Neighboring Rights ； Database ； Legal Protection

期刊名称

東吳法律學報

卷期/出版年月

33卷1期（2021 / 07 / 01）

页次

139 - 181

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文旨在針對人工智慧技術對當下法律之衝擊，以著作權與鄰接權理論為基礎，探討人工智慧創作之法律屬性與保護，以因應法律適用之窘境，尋覓法制與科技之平衡。首先，人工智慧創作之本質係透過演算法對大量作品樣本進行解碼、學習與訓練，形成表徵作品集合之內在邏輯規律的概率模型，並依此進行模仿之結果。人工智慧所習得之作品集內在邏輯與規律可體現著作人對構成元素之原創性選擇與編排，具有可著作性，其著作人是對學習資料、生成模式風格等之選擇與編排具有原創性之人工智慧使用者；其次，對於不具原創性但需要大量資本、技術或勞力投入才能獲得的人工智慧創作，基於保護投資、激勵創造之目的，可參考歐盟資料庫鄰接權之規定，給與15年的鄰接權保護；再次，在法律保護制度上，應當綜合考量多元主體之參與貢獻，並兼顧公共利益，對投資者、研發者、使用者、資料庫者、消費者以及公共大眾進行利益分配，以達到激勵科技創新與進步，增進社會福祉之目的。
英文摘要

In order to respond to the legal implications caused by artificial intelligence, this article explores the legal status and protection of AI-generated works based on the theories of copyright and neighboring right, tries to solve the dilemma of legal application, and finds a balance between law and science. Firstly, the essence of AI-generated works is to decode, learn and train a large number of samples through algorithms to form a probability model that expresses the inherent logic and rules of the collection. The in-house logic and rules of the collection of works obtained by artificial intelligence can reflect the original selection and arrangement of the elements of the author, which is copyrightable. And the author is the artificial intelligence user with the minimal degree of creativity in the selection and arrangement of learning materials, modes and styles of generation, etc. Secondly, as for AI-generated works that are not original but require substantial investment to obtain, we can refer to the EU Database Directive 96/9/EC and give a 15-year protection of neighboring right based on the purpose of protecting investment and incenting creation. Thirdly, as far as the legal protection of AI-generated works, considering the contribution of multiple entities and the public interests, this article emphasizes that the rights and responsibilities among investors, researcher, users, digital owners, consumers and the public should be clarified, in order to incent the innovation and development of science, and enhance social welfare.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. 吳柏憑(2016)。人工智慧對於著作權概念的衝擊——日本著作權的新政策發展方向。科技法律透析，28(12)，26-31。
    連結：
  2. ＡＩによって生み出される創作物の取扱い ，內閣官房知的財産戦略推進事務局，頁 20，2016 年 1 月，http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/titeki2/tyousakai/kensho_hyoka_kikaku/2016/jisedai_tizai/dai4/siryou2.pdf（最後瀏覽日：2020/7/9）。
  3. 中國法院宣判寫稿機器人 Dreamwriter 擁有著作權？，iThome，https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/135305（最後瀏覽日：2020/12/3）。
  4. 人工智能會寫詩了！什麼是靈魂？什麼是自由意志？，CROSSING，https://crossing.cw.com.tw/article/8259（最後瀏覽日：2020/6/20）。
  5. (2016)。,知的財産戦略本部検証・評価・企畫委員會次世代知財システム検討委員會。
  6. European Parliament resolution of January 19, 2016 on Towards a Digital Single Market Act (2015/2147(INI)), paragraph 108, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do? pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P8-TA-2016-0009+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN (last visited 2020/12/3).
  7. ART-IFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: THE CURIOUS CASE OF EDMOND DE BELAMY, ISIS, https://isismagazine.org.uk/2019/03/art-ificial-intelligence-the-curious-case-of-edmond-de-belamy/ (last visited 2020/12/3).
  8. 昕力資訊 ChatFlex-AI 智能客服機器人獲選 Gartner 2018 年亞太地區最酷 AI 交談供應商—台灣唯一入選企業，iThome，https://www.ithome.com.tw/pr/128913（最後瀏覽日：2020/11/20）。
  9. A PROPOSAL FOR THE DARTMOUTH SUMMER RESEARCH PROJECT ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dar-tmouth/dartmouth.html (last visited 2020/12/3).
  10. Computer Software Protection, http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/other/clrc/6.html#Heading341 (last visited 2020/7/5).
  11. Open Letter to The European Commission Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, http://www.robotics-openletter.eu/ (last visited Nov. 9, 2020).
  12. 史上最強 Banner 製造機！阿里 AI「魯班」每秒做 8000 張助力雙 11！，INSIDE，https://www.inside.com.tw/article/11037-alibaba-ai-banner（最後瀏覽日：2020/11/20）。
  13. 新聞記者要失業了嗎？AI 機器軟體一季能寫 3 千則新聞，iThome，https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/93868（最後瀏覽日：2020/12/3）。
  14. Musician Taryn Southern on composing her new album entirely with AI: How artificial intelligence simplifies music production for solo artists, THE VERGE, https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/27/16197196/taryn-southern-album-artificial-intelligence-interview (last visited 2020/12/3).
  15. Study in Support of the Evaluation of Directive 96/9/EC on the Legal Protection of Databases.
  16. (2016).Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights And Constitutional Affairs, European Civil Law Rules In Robotics Study.
  17. Abbott, Ryan(2016).I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law.B.C. L. REV.,57,1079-1126.
  18. Baker, Tom,Dellae, Benedict(2018).Regulating Robo Advice Across the Financial Services Industry.IOWA L. REV.,103,713-746.
  19. Bridy, Annemarie(2016).The Evolution of Authorship Work Made by Code.COLUM. J. L ARTS,39,395-404.
  20. Bridy, Annemarie(2012).coding creativity: copyright and the artificially intelligent author.STAN. TECH. L. REV.,5,1-27.
  21. Buckland, Michael(2012).What Kind of Science Can Information Science Be?.J. INFO. SCI. & TECH.,63(1),1-7.
  22. Butler, Timothy L.(1982).Can a Computer be an Author - Copyright Aspects of Artificial Intelligence.HASTINGS COMMC’N & ENTM’T L. J.,707-747.
  23. CHOPRA, SAMIR,WHITE, LAURENCE F(2011).A LEGAL THEORY FOR AUTONOMOUS ARTIFICIAL AGENTS.U.S.A.:THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRESS.
  24. Clifford, Ralph D.(1997).Intellectual Property In The Era Of The Creative Computer Program: Will The True Creator Please Stand Up?.TUL. L. REV.,71,1675-1703.
  25. Cofone, Ignacio N.(2018).Servers and Waiters: What Matters in the Law of A.I..STAN. TECH. L. REV.,21,167-197.
  26. Comm. On Legal Aff., Follow up to the European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 on civil law rules on robotics 1-3, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meet-docs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/JURI/DV/2017/11-20/A8-0005-2017_EN.pdf (last visited Nov. 9, 2020).
  27. Comm. On Legal Aff., Draft Report With Recommendations To The Commission On Civil Law Rules On Robotics 1 (2016), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PR-582443_EN.pdf (last visited Nov. 2, 2020).
  28. Comm. On Legal Aff., Report With Recommendations To The Commission On Civil Law Rules On Robotics 28 (2017), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0005_EN.pdf (last visited Nov. 2, 2020).
  29. Fisher W., “Theories of Intellectual Property”, http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/tfisher/iptheory.html (last visited 2020/7/5)
  30. GUIBAULT, LUCIE M. C. R.(2002).COPYRIGHT LIMITATIONS AND CONTRACTS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRACTUAL OVERRIDABILITY OF LIMITATIONS ON COPYRIGHT.THE HAGUE, THE NETHERLANDS:KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL.
  31. Hadjeres, Gaëtan,Pachet, François,Nielsen, Frank(2017).DeepBach: A Steerable Model for Bach Chorales Generation.PROC. OF THE 34TH INT’L CONF. ON MACHINE LEARNING
  32. Hardin, Garrett(1968).The Tragedy of the Commons.SCIENCE,162,1243-1248.
  33. Hristov, Kalin(2017).Artificial Intelligence and The Copyright Dilemma.IDEA: J. FRANKLIN PIERCE FOR INTELL. PROP.,57,431-453.
  34. Hubbard, F. Patrick(2011)."Do Androids Dream?": Personhood and Intelligent Artifacts.TEMP. L. REV.,83,405-473.
  35. Hughes, Justin(1988).The Philosophy of Intellectual Property.GEORGETOWN L. J.,77,287-366.
  36. Jackson, Jonathan C.(1993).Legal Aspects of Computer Art.RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L. J.,19,495-515.
  37. Khoury, Amir H.(2017).Intellectual Property Rights for ‘Hubots’: on the Legal Implications of Human- Like Robots as Innovators and Creators.CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L. J.,35,635-668.
  38. Lacey, Linda J.(1989).Of Bread and Roses and Copyrights.Duke L. J.,6,1532-1596.
  39. Lauber-Rönsberg, Anne,Hetmank, Sven(2019).The Concept of Author Ship and Inventorship Under Pressure. Does Artificial Intelligence Shift Paradigms?.J. INTELL. PROP. L. & PRAC.,14,570-579.
  40. John McCarthy, What is AI? / Basic Questions, PROFESSOR JOHN MCCARTHY (May 8, 2018, 19:57 PM), http://jmc.stanford.edu/artificial-intelligence/what-is-ai/index.html（最後瀏覽日：2020/6/20）
  41. Perry, Mark,Margoni, Thomas(2010).From Music Tracks to Google Maps: Who Owns Computer-Generated Works?.COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW,26,621-629.
  42. Ramalho, Ana(2017).Will Robots Rule The (Artistic) World?: a Proposed Model For The Legal Status Of Creations By Artificial Intelligence Systems.J. INTERNET L.,21,12-38.
  43. RAMALHO, ANA(2016).THE COMPETENCE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IN COPYRIGHT LAWMAKING: A NORMATIVE PERSPECTIVE OF EU POWERS FOR COPYRIGHT HARMONIZATION.SWITZERLAND:SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING.
  44. RUSSELL, STUART J.,NORVIG, PETER(2010).ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE:AMODERN APPROACH.NEW JERSEY, U.S.A.:PEARSON EDUCATION INC..
  45. Samuelson, Pamela(1986).Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-Generated Works.U. PITT. L. REV.,47,1185-1224.
  46. Scherer, Matthew U.(2016).Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies.HARV. J. OF L. & TECH.,29,353-398.
  47. Shoyama, Rex M.(2005).Intelligent Agents: Authors, Makers, and Owners of Computer-Generated Works in Canadian Copyright Law.CANADIAN J. L. & TECH.,4,129-140.
  48. Solum, Lawrence B.(1992).Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences.NORTH CAROLINA L. REV.,70,1231-1288.
  49. STEWART, STEPHEN M.(1989).INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT AND NEIGHBORING RIGHTS.LONDON, UK:BUTTERWORTHS.
  50. Teubner, Gunther(2006).Rights of Non-humans Electronic Agents and Animals as New Actors in Politics and Law.J. L. & SOC.,33(4),497-521.
  51. VAN GOMPEL, STEF JOHAN(2011).FORMALITIES IN COPYRIGHT LAW: AN ANALYSIS OF THEIR HISTORY, RATIONALES AND POSSIBLE FUTURE.THE HAGUE, THE NETHERLANDS:KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL.
  52. Wu, Andrew J.(1997).from video games to artificial intelligence: assigning copyright ownership to works generated by increasingly sophisticated computer programs.AIPLA Q. J.,25,131-177.
  53. Yanisky-ravid, Shlomit(2018).Generating Rembrandt: Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, and Accountability in the 3a Era--the Human-like Authors Are Already Here--a New Model.MICH. ST. L. REV.,2017,659-721.
  54. Yen, Alfred C.(1990).Restoring the Natural Law: Copyright as Labor and Possession.OHIO STATE L. J.,51,517-559.
  55. Yu, Robert(2017).The Machine Author: What Level of Copy right Protection Is Appropriate for Fully Independent Compute-generated Works?.U. PA. L. REV.,165,1245-1269.
  56. 上野達弘(2017)。人工知能による発明と創作 AI 生成物に関する知的財産権。PI×AI（特許情報×人工知能）─第四次産業革命が特許情報の未來をどう変えていくのか─特集
  57. 文化庁（1993 年 11 月），著作権審議會第 9 小委員會（コンピュータ創作物関系）報告書， https://www.cric.or.jp/db/report/h5_11_2/h5_11_2_main.html（最後瀏覽日：2020/7/9）。
  58. 出井甫(2016)。AI 創作物に関する著作権法上の問題點とその対策案。パテント，69(15)，35-45。
  59. 行政院：「AI小國大戰略」，https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/50a08776-e33a-4be2-a07c-a6e523f5031b（最後瀏覽日：2020/6/2）。
  60. 行政院：「臺灣 AI 行動計劃」， https://digi.ey.gov.tw/File/4C622B6A10053DAD （最後瀏覽日：2020/11/20）。
  61. 吳漢東(2017)。人工智慧時代的制度安排與法律規制。法律科學（西北政法大學學報），5，128-136。
  62. 林利芝(2018)。初探人工智慧的著作權爭議——以「著作人身分」為中心。智慧財產權，237，61-78。
  63. 林洲富(2017).著作權法：案例式.五南.
  64. 高淩瀚（譯）,Grands, Claude Colombet(1995).世界各國著作權和鄰接權的基本原則.上海外國語教育出版社.
  65. 梁志文(2017)。論人工智慧創造物的法律保護。法律科學（西北政法大學學報），5，156-165。
  66. 許力儒,莊弘鈺(2019)。人工智慧創作之著作權適格與歸屬——法律與技術之綜合觀點。第二十三屆全國科技法律研討會論文集
  67. 陳鋕雄(2019).人工智慧與相關法律議題.元照.
  68. 章忠信(2003)。表演人權利之保護。智慧財產權月刊，50，17-36。
  69. 章忠信(2001)。「表演」於我國著作權法之保護。律師雜誌，258，36-47。
  70. 馮震宇(2020)。從人類創作到 AI 創作：智財權利主體與權利歸屬之挑戰。月旦法學教室，212，34-43。
  71. 馮曉青,潘柏華(2020)。人工智慧「創作」認定及其財產權益保護研究——兼評「首例人工智慧生成內容著作權侵權案」。西北大學學報（哲學社會科學版），50(2)，39-52。
  72. 奧邨弘司(2017)。人工知能が生み出したコンテンツと著作権。パテント，70(2)，10-19。
  73. 楊智傑(2012).作權法：判決與評論.新學林.
  74. 葉奇鑫。當電腦也開始創作——人工智慧(AI)著作未來可能之立法保護方式初探。智慧 20 再創價值：慶祝智慧局 20 週年特刊
  75. 葉茂林(1998).資訊法律（二）.書泉.
  76. 劉靜怡,沈宗倫(2018).人工智慧相關法律議題芻議.元照.
  77. 蔡明誠(1996)。從比較法觀點論著作之原創性及創作性要件。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，26(1)，177-194。
  78. 鄭志峰（譯）,Weaver, John Frank(2018).Robots Are People Too 機器人也是人：人工智慧時代的法律.元照.
  79. 鄭冠宇(2019).民法總則.新學林.
  80. 謝銘洋(2018).智慧財產權法.元照.
  81. 顏上詠(2019)。人工智慧商業時代及智慧財產權研究。智慧財產權與法律風險析論：人工智慧商業時代的來臨
被引用次数
  1. 鄭冠宇,徐龍(2023)。論機器學習之著作權困境與應對。臺大法學論叢，52(2)，391-475。
print cancel