题名

論海洋噪音污染之國際規範與國家實踐－以離岸風電開發為例

并列篇名

The Study of the International Laws and State Practices on Marine Noise Pollution - Focusing on the Offshore Wind Energy Development

作者

楊健弘(Oscar C.H. Yang)

关键词

離岸風電 ； 海洋噪音污染 ； 海洋環境保護 ； 聯合國海洋法公約 ； 海洋污染防治法 ； 野生動物保育法 ； 國家海洋政策白皮書 ； Marine Noise Pollution ； Offshore Wind Power Energy ； Marine Environmental Protection ； United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea ； Marine Pollution Control Act ； Wildlife Conservation Act ； Nation Ocean Policy White Paper

期刊名称

東吳法律學報

卷期/出版年月

34卷1期（2022 / 07 / 01）

页次

209 - 269

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

海洋噪音污染對於海洋生物及環境造成之危害已獲得科學證實，而我國近年來全力發展離岸風電，使得風場建置造成之海洋噪音污染受到各界高度矚目。本文首先研析有關海洋噪音防治之國際規範，包括海洋法公約、國際海事組織（IMO）所屬公約、國際環境保護公約等條約有關海洋噪音污染之規定，再分析可能具習慣國際法地位之國際環境保護原則對於海洋噪音污染之可適用性。此外，聯合國、IMO及動物保護公約之委員會等國際組織長期以來對於海洋噪音污染作出諸多決議、報告並通過標準與指引。此等軟法文件雖不具有強制拘束力，但對於國際規範之形成具有重要價值，亦為國家實踐之重要參考。本文並研析歐盟指令及美國聯邦法律有關海洋噪音之規範，並討論英國、德國、美國有關海洋噪音量測指引，藉由綜整上述國家實踐，作為我國之借鏡。最後研析我國海洋污染防治法、野生動物保育法等法律適用於海洋噪音污染防治之可能性，並提出修法建議，盼能藉由完善海洋噪音污染法制以平衡離岸風電開發與海洋環境保護。
英文摘要

Proven by scientists, ocean noise pollution impacts marine species and environment. In recent years, Taiwan has made efforts to develop offshore wind farms and thus attracted the public's attention to the marine noise pollution caused by such development. This study first examines treaty articles of marine pollution control under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), International Maritime Organization (IMO), and other marine species protection conventions. Furthermore, this article analyzes the applicability of principles of international environmental law with potential customary international law status to marine noise pollution. International organizations such as the United Nations, IMO, and animal protection conventions have long made many resolutions, reports, and adopted standards and guidelines on marine noise pollution. Although these soft law documents do not have legal binding forces, they are of great value to forming international norms and are also important references for state practice. As a reference to amending Taiwan law, the European Union directives, and the United States (U.S.) Federal laws related to marine pollution, including the guidelines to measure marine noise in the United Kingdom, Germany, and the U.S., are discussed. Finally, via the applicability of Taiwan's Marine Pollution Control Act and Wildlife Conservation Act, this paper proposes potential amendments to the constitution to balance marine energy development and marine environmental protection.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. 牛惠之(2005)。預防原則之研究－國際環境法處理欠缺科學證據之環境風險議題之努力與爭議。臺大法學論叢，34(3)，1-71。
    連結：
  2. 周怡(2014)。海洋廢棄物的法制規範。臺灣海洋法學報，11(1、2)，81-103。
    連結：
  3. 張文貞(2012)。環境影響評估作為國際法上的義務：國際法院判決評析。台灣國際法季刊，9(1)，7-48。
    連結：
  4. 張欣楣(2020)。美國法之環境損害賠償──兼論我國相關法制及裁判。中正大學法學集刊，69，109-186。
    連結：
  5. 陳貞如(2016)。歐盟對於國際海洋法秩序之影響及其實踐。歐美研究，46(1)，97-164。
    連結：
  6. 劉中平,何文智,沈劍虹,張啟隱(2020)。臺灣海洋污染防治應變機制之研究。臺灣海洋法學報，28，107-147。
    連結：
  7. (2014).OSPAR database on offshore wind-farms.
  8. Helsinki Convention, 11th Meeting of the Working Group on Reduction of Pressuresfrom the Baltic Sea Catchment Area (Oct. 22-25, 2019), https://helcom.fi/marine-litter-underwater-noise-and-chemical-contamination-are-addressed-at-helcom-pressure-in-brussels/ (last visited May 28, 2022).
  9. United Nations Treaty Collection, Depositary, Convention on Environmental ImpactAssessment in a Transboundary Context, https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx? src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-4&chapter=27 (last visited May 28, 2022).
  10. ACCOBAMS(2013).ACCOBAMS, Anthropogenic Noise and Marine Mammals: Review of the Effort in Addressing the Impact of Anthropogenic Underwater Noise in the ACCOBAMS and ASCOBANS Areas, Fifth Meeting of the Parties to ACCOBAMS, ACCOBAMS-MOP5/2013/Doc 22 Rev1, (Oct. 29, 2013)..
  11. ACCOBAMS(2009).ACCOBAMS, Adverse Effects of Underwater Noise on Marine Mammals during OffshoreConstruction Activities for Renewable Energy Production, 6th Meeting of the Parties to ASCOBANS, Resolution No. 2, U.N. Campus, Bonn, Germany (Sep.16-18, 2009)..
  12. ACCOBAMS(2013).ACCOBAMS, Methodological Guide: “Guidance on Underwater Noise Mitigation Measures, Fifth Meeting of the Parties to ACCOBAMS, ACCOBAMS-MOP5/2013/Doc24 (Oct. 8, 2013)..
  13. ASCOBANS(2010).ASCOBANS, Final Report of the ASCOBANS Intersessional Working Group on the Assessment of Acoustic Disturbance (2010), 17th ASCOBANS AdvisoryCommittee Meeting, AC17/Doc.4-08 (WG), Dist. (Apr. 9, 2010)..
  14. ASCOBANS, Underwater Noise, https://www.ascobans.org/en/species/ threats/underwater-noise (last visited May 28, 2022).
  15. Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission.,未出版
  16. BSH(2011).BSH (2011), Offshore wind farms: Measuring instruction for underwater sound monitoring,Current approach with annotations, Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie,Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency..
  17. BSH(2013).,Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency.
  18. BSH(2013).,Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency.
  19. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, CaliforniaActivities, https://www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities/california?fbclid=IwAR3Z6S7hHJsUDt1DFJ78dXPeTtLSnppLRsDsejDv2y-IaMp1xumzJQ-aLXQ (last visited May 28, 2022).
  20. CBD, Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, Twenty-fourthmeeting Montreal, Canada (Aug. 17-22, 2020), https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/8040/a363/f73193dc9717705faa1ffe10/sbstta-24-06-en.pdf (last visited May 28, 2022).
  21. CBD(2020).CBD, Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, Twenty fourth meeting Montreal, Canada (Aug. 17-22, 2020)..
  22. CHRISTODOULOU-VAROTSI, IlIANA(2018).MARINE POLLUTION CONTROL: LEGAL AND MANAGERIALFRAMEWORKS.
  23. CMS, Adverse Impacts Of Anthropogenic Noise On Cetaceans And Other MigratorySpecies, Adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its 12th Meeting (Manila,Oct. 2017). https://www.cms.int/sites/default/files/document/cms_cop12_res.12.14_marine-noise_e.pdf (last visited May 28, 2022).
  24. CMS, Technical Support Information to the CMS Family Guidelines on EnvironmentalImpact Assessment for Marine Noise-generating Activities (Oct. 2017) https://www.cms.int/en/guidelines/cms-family-guidelines-EIAs-marine-noise (last visitedMay 28, 2022).
  25. DIXON, MARTIN(2007).TEXTBOOK ON INTERNATIONAL LAW.
  26. Dotinga, Harm M.,Oude Elferink, Alex G.(2000).Acoustic Pollution in the Oceans: The Search for Legal Standards.OCEAN DEV.&INT’L L.,31(1-2),151-2 182.
  27. ELENA MC CARTHY(2004).INTERNATIONAL REGULATION OF UNDERWATER SOUND: ESTABLISHINGRULES AND STANDARDS TO ADDRESS OCEAN NOISE POLLUTION.
  28. European Marine Strategy Framework Directive - Good Environmental Status=MSFDGES(2012).,未出版
  29. European Union. (2008a). Council directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament andof the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community actionin the field of marine environmental policy (marine strategy framework directive).Official Journal of the European Union, L164: 19-40.
  30. European Union (2011). Council directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament andof the Council, of 13 December 2011, on the Assessment of the Effects ofCertain Public and Private Projects on the Environment. Official Journal of theEuropean Union, L 26, 28.
  31. European Union (2014). Council Directive 2014/52/EU of the European Parliament andof the Council of 16 April 2014 Amending Directive 2011/92/EU on theAssessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on theEnvironment Text with EEA Relevance. Official Journal of the European Union,L 124, 25
  32. GARNER, BARYAN A.(2011).BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY.
  33. Harris, Benjamin A.(2017).Turn Down The Volume: Improved Federal Regulation Of Shipping NoiseIs Necessary To Protect Marine Mammals.UCLA J. ENVTL. L. & POL’Y,35,206-256.
  34. Helsinki Convention(2019).Helsinki Convention, 11th Meeting of the Working Group on Reduction of Pressures from the Baltic Sea Catchment Area (Oct. 22-25, 2019)..
  35. IMO(2014).IMO, Guidelines for The Reduction of Underwater Noise from Commercial Shipping to Address Adverse Impacts on Marine Life, MEPC.1/Circ.833 (Apr. 7, 2014).
  36. IMO, Member States, https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/ERO/Pages/MemberStates.aspx(last visited May 28, 2022).
  37. IMO(2012).Maritime Safety Committee, Adoption of Amendments to the International Conventionfor the Safety of Life at Sea.
  38. IMO, List of IMO Conventions, https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/List-OfConventions.aspx (last visited May 28, 2022).
  39. IMO and anthropogenic underwater noise, https://www.un.org/depts/los/consultative_process/contributions_19cp/IMO.pdf (last visited May 28, 2022).
  40. IMO, Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), https://www.imo.org/en/About/Pages/Structure.aspx (last visited May 28, 2022).
  41. International Maritime Organization, Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas, https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/PSSAs.aspx (last visited May 28, 2022).
  42. IWC, Resolution on Anthropogenic Underwater Noise, https://iwc.int/anthropogenic-sound(last visited May 28, 2022).
  43. LEPARD, BRIAN D.(2010).LEPARD, CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW – A NEW THEORY WITH PRACTICALAPPLICATIONS.
  44. MALANCZUK, PETER(1997).AKEHURST’S MODERN INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL LAW.
  45. Markus, Till,Sánchez, P.P.S.(2017).Managing and Regulating Underwater Noise Pollution.HANDBOOK ON MARINE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
  46. McCarthy, Elena(2001).International Regulation Of Transboundary Pollutants: The EmergingChallenge Of Ocean Noise.OCEAN & COASTAL L. J.,6,257-292.
  47. McCarthy, Elena,Lichtman, Flora(2007).The Origin And Evolution Of Ocean Noise Regulation Under The U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act.OCEAN & COASTAL L. J.,13,1-46.
  48. National Marine Fisheries Service(2016).,U.S. Dept. of Commer..
  49. NOAA, Marine Mammal Acoustic Technical Guidance, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-acoustic-technical-guidance(last visited May 28, 2022).
  50. NOAA, Cetacean & Sound Mapping, https://cetsound.noaa.gov/sound-index (last visitedMay 28, 2022).
  51. NOAA Fisheries Service, Endangered and Threatened Species under NMFS’ Jurisdiction,https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species-directory/threatened-endangered (last visitedMay 28, 2022)
  52. Nordtvedt Reeve, Lora L.(2012).Of Whales And Ships: Impacts On The Great Whales Of Underwater Noise Pollution From Commercial Shipping And Proposals For Regulation Under International Law.OCEAN & COASTAL L. J.,18,127-166.
  53. OSPAR Commission(2008).Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Offshore Wind-Farms.
  54. OSPAR Commission(2008).Assessment of the environmental impact of offshore wind-farms.
  55. Robinson, S.P.,Lepper, P.A.,Hazelwood, R.A.(2014).,Teddington, England:National Measurement Office, Marine Scotland, The Crown Estate.
  56. SANDS, PHILIPPE(2012).PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.
  57. Scott, Karen N.(2004).Scott, International Regulation of Undersea Noise.ICLQ,53,287-324.
  58. SHOW, MALCOLM N.(2003).INTERNATIONAL LAW.
  59. TANAKA, YOSHIFUMI(2019).THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE SEA.
  60. Triton wind farm(2021).,未出版
  61. U.N(2016).U.N. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 23December 2016, A/RES/71/257 (Feb. 20, 2017)..
  62. U.N(2011).U.N. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 24 December 2011, A/RES/66/231(Dec. 24, 2011)..
  63. U.N(2018).U.N. General Assembly, Oceans and the law of the sea, Report of the Secretary-General, A/73/68 (Mar. 20, 2018)..
  64. U.N(2005).U.N. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 29 November 2005, A/RES/60/30(Mar. 8, 2006)..
  65. U.N. Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea,https://www.un.org/depts/los/consultative_process/consultative_process.htm (last visited May 28, 2022).
  66. U.N(2021).U.N. General Assembly, Oceans and the law of the sea, Report of the Secretary-General, A/76/311 (Aug. 30, 2021)..
  67. U.N(2019).U.N. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 10 December 2019, A/RES/73/292,A/RES/74/19 (Dec. 20, 2019)..
  68. U.N. General Assembly, Oceans and the law of the sea, Report of the Secretary-General,A/76/311 (Aug. 30, 2021), https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N21/237/46/PDF/N2123746.pdf? OpenElement (last visited May 28, 2022).
  69. U.N(2006).U.N. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 20 December 2006, A/RES/61/222(Mar. 16, 2007)..
  70. U.N. Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea,Discussion Panel on “Anthropogenic underwater noise”, A/73/124 (Jul. 9, 2018),https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N18/216/69/PDF/N1821669.pdf? OpenElement (last visited May 28, 2022).
  71. U.N.(2018).U.N. Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea, Discussion Panel on “Anthropogenic underwater noise,” A/73/124 (Jul. 9, 2018)..
  72. U.N. General Assembly, Oceans and the law of the sea, Report of the Secretary-General,A/73/68 (Mar. 20, 2018), https://daccess-ods.un.org/tmp/6597288.25092316.html(last visited May 28, 2022).
  73. 丘宏達,陳純一(2021).現代國際法.三民書局.
  74. 民視新聞網，離岸風力發電干擾白海豚環團、漁會動員抗議，https://www.ftvnews.com.tw/news/detail/2017C13L15M1 ，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  75. 周怡(2020)。論聯合國海洋法公約就國家保護海洋環境所建立的法律架構。法規與遵循，3(2)，21-34。
  76. 林明鏘(2020)。地利聯邦動物保護法－兼論其對我國動保法之借鏡。興大法學，28，1-83。
  77. 林晏平，美國離岸風電推動政策架構，工研院產科國際所，2019 年 3 月，https://km.twenergy.org.tw/Knowledge/knowledge_more? id=4764，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  78. 姜皇池(2018).國際海洋法.新學林.
  79. 姜皇池(2018).國際海洋法.新學林.
  80. 姜皇池(2021).國際公法導論.新學林.
  81. 洪德欽(2015).歐盟法之基礎原則與實務發展.臺大出版中心.
  82. 科技新報，拜登大推離岸風電，拚 2030 年供電 1 千萬戶，2021 年 3 月 30 日，https://technews.tw/2021/03/30/biden-offshore-wind/ 最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  83. 海洋委員會(2020).2020 年海政白皮書.海洋委員會.
  84. 海洋保育署，強化海域污染風險控管、海保署公告離岸風電開發商為從事海域工程之公私場所並預告賠償責任限額，2020 年 7 月 21 日，https://www.oca.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp? id=14&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202007210001，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  85. 海洋風力發電股份有限公司，海洋風電(Formosa I)台灣首座離岸風場海洋風電正式開始商業運轉，2019 年 12 月 31 日， https://formosa1windpower.com/2019/12/31/cod/，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  86. 紐約時報中文網，美國政府發起控制海洋噪聲污染行動，2012 年 12 月 22 日，https://cn.nytimes.com/science/20121222/c22ocean/zh-hant/，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  87. 國家地理雜誌，十年後，英國石油漏油事件的衝擊仍未釐清，https://www.natgeomedia.com/environment/article/content-11176.html ，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  88. 陳冬(2005)。美國環境公民訴訟的理論基礎之探析。鄭州大學學報，36(6)，115-117。
  89. 陳貞如(2021)。國際海事組織之國際規範與台灣法制—以《壓艙水公約》公約為例。台灣法學新課題（十六）
  90. 陳貞如(2013)。面對國際海洋法規範中的科學不確定性—預警原則適用之內涵與極限。中華國際法與超國界法評論，9(2)，217-241。
  91. 陳琪芳,胡惟鈞,徐淑貞(2019)。離岸風場水下噪音。科學發展，560，28-31。
  92. 陳慈陽(2003).環境法總論.元照.
  93. 陳慈陽(2011)。環境法上之公益訴訟──以環境公益團體及環境公益訴訟要件為研究對象。行政訴訟二級二審制實施十週年回顧論文集
  94. 勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所，雙語詞彙，https://www.ilosh.gov.tw/1245/1254/temporary-threshold-shift/ ，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  95. 湛翔智，離岸風場施工及營運期海洋噪音監測評估方法，頁 3，2017 年 10 月 13 日。知洋科技股份有限公司網站，http://www.awareocean.com/doc/171013_%E9%9B%A2%E5%B2%B8%E9%A2%A8%E5%A0%B4%E6%96%BD%E5%B7%A5%E5%8F%8A%E7%87%9F%E9%81%8B%E6%9C%9F%E6%B0%B4%E4%B8%8B%E5%99%AA%E9%9F%B3%E7%9B%A3%E6%B8%AC%E8%A9%95%E4%BC%B0%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95_%E4%B8%8A%E7%B6%B2.pdf，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  96. 湛翔智,蕭婷宇,潘柔安,連永順,王珮蓉,胡芳瑜,林子皓(2017)。以國際技術指引探討我國離岸風場水下噪音監測評估適用方法。2017 台灣風能協會會員大會暨學術研討會與科技部成果發表會
  97. 黃異(2017).國際海洋法.新學林.
  98. 楊海寧(2005)。海洋污染防治法淺析。律師雜誌，306，42-58。
  99. 經濟部，推動能源轉型「展綠、增氣、減煤、非核」，https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/populace/Policy/Policy.aspx? menu_id=32800&policy_id=9，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  100. 經濟部技術處，產業技術評析淺談全球離岸風電發展關鍵趨勢，2020 年 11 月 11 日，https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/doit/industrytech/IndustryTech.aspx? menu_id=13545&it_id=333，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  101. 蔡沛倫(2021)。離岸風電與環境影響評估──國際環境法義務及對我國之啟示。離岸風電的政策、法律、經濟與風險
  102. 蔡東賢(2000)。海洋污染防治法通過。理律法律雜誌雙月刊，2000(11 月)，17-19。
  103. 墾丁國家公園，阿瑪斯貨輪漏油事件，https://www.ktnp.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=4061A3F0B105B5AE&sms=4F4352FC5DEBA421&s=EC967125A96818FF，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  104. 環境資訊中心，為白海豚減噪學者模擬風機真實打樁噪音，證實可能傷及海豚免疫力，2020 年 07 月 16 日，https://e-info.org.tw/node/225593，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  105. 聯合新聞網，國海院「台灣水下聲景監測機制」 加把勁就有軍事用途，2021 年 8 月 15，https://udn.com/news/story/10930/5675468，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  106. 聯合新聞網，西部海域白海豚僅剩65隻，離岸風場、航道恐危及生存，2021年6月23日，https://udn.com/news/story/7470/5552227，最後瀏覽日：2022/5/28。
  107. 魏靜芬(2008).海洋法.五南.
print cancel