台灣區農會信用部經營效率評估：非意欲因素資料包絡分析法的應用

Measuring the Efficiency of the Credit Department of Farmers' Associations in Taiwan: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis with Undesirable Factors

10.29735/SJEB.200603.0001

莊忠柱(Chung-Chu Chuang)；吳振國(Chen-Kuo Wu)

非欲意因素 ； 資料包絡分析法 ； 效率 ； Tobit模型 ； 農會信用部 ； Undesirable factors ； Data envelopment analysis ； Efficiency ； Tobit model ； Credit department of farmers' associations

東吳經濟商學學報

52期（2006 / 03 / 01）

1 - 25

繁體中文

本研究以2002年台灣區246家農會信用部的4項投入因素（員工人數、總利息支出、非利息費用與淨值）與3項產出因素（放款收入、非放款收入與逾期放款比率），利用非欲意因素資料包絡分析法，分析農會信用部經營效率的評估，並提出達到相對有效率應改善的方向。此外，並進一步利用Tobit模型，探討影響農會信用部經營效率的非財務因素。 研究發現：捨棄逾放款比率與不捨棄逾放款比率的產出導向BCC模型間，有21家農會信用部經營效率評估有不同，占全體樣本的8.54%，顯現兩種方法有其差異性。此乃農會信用部逾放款比率愈高，需要付出更多的人力去催討與處理抵押品的損失，皆會影響農會信用部經營效率。此外，投入或產出項需要調整的農會信用部有199家，占全部農會信用部的80.89%。此外，利用Tobit模型，發現農會規模大小對農會信用部經營效率有正向影響。農會信用部經營效率不彰的主要原因是資源分配不當，如何降低經營成本與開拓業務實屬當務之急。

This study is to investigate the management efficiency of the 246 credit department of farmers' associations in Tai an. Undesirable factors data envelopment analysis with four input factor (employee number, total interest paid, non-interest fees and net worth) and three output factors (loans incomes, non-loan incomes and overdue loan ratio) in 200 is used. The directions need to improve the level of input and output variables are also proposed. In the meantime, the Tobit model is used to analyze nonfinancial determinants of the management efficiency of the credit department of farmers' association. There are 21 units in differenet measures of management efficiency between output-oriented BCC model without undesirable factors and with undesirable ones, which totals up 8.54% of sampling size. It is attributed to that the credit department of farmers' associations need to more human resources to press for payment of debt and handle the loss of collaterals for more overdue loan ratio, and these will decrease the management efficiency. Additionallly, it is necessary for 199 units to make improvement levels of input and output factors. After Tobit model is further used, the effect of the scale size of farmers' association on the efficiency of the credit department of farmers' association is significantly positive. Thus, ho to decrease the input factors and increase the output factors for the business will be the first priority.

1. Altunbas Y.,J. Goddard,P. Molyneux(1999).Technical Change in Banking.Economics Letters,64(2),215-221.
2. Aly, H. Y.,R. Grabowski,C. Pasurka,N. Rangan(1990).Technical, Scale and Allocative Efficiencies in U.S. Banking: An Empirical Investigation.Review of Economics and Statistics,72(2),212-218.
3. Banker, R. D.,A. Charnes,W. W. Cooper(1984).Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.Management Science,30(9),1078-1092.
4. Chang, C. C.(1999).The Nonparametric Risk-Adjusted Efficiency Measurement: An Application to Taiwan`s Major Rural Financial Intermediaries.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,81(4),902-913.
5. Charnes, A.,W. W. Cooper,E. Rhodes(1978).Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444.
6. Chen, T. Y.(2001).An Estimation of X-inefficiency in Taiwan`s Banks.Applied Financial Economics,11(3),237-242.
7. Elyasiani, E.,S. Mehdian(1995).The Comparative Efficiency Performance of Small and Large U.S. Commercial Banks in the Pre-and Post-Deregulation Eras.Applied Economics,27(11),1069-1079.
8. Färe, R.,S. Grosskopf,C. A. K. Lovell,C. Pasurka(1989).Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach.The Review of Economics and Statistics,71(1),90-98.
9. Farrell, M.(1957).The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,120(3),253-281.
10. Ferrier, G. D.,C. A. K. Lovell(1990).Measuring Cost Efficiency in Banking- Econometric and Linear Programming Evidence.Journal of Econometrics,46(12),229-245.
11. Miller, S.M.,A.G. Noulas(1996).The Technical Efficiency of Large Bank Production.Journal of Banking and Finance,20(3),495-509.
12. Rangan. N.,R. Grabowski,H. Y. Aly,C. Pasurka(1988).The Technical Efficiency of U. S. Banks.Economics Letters,28(6),169-175.
13. Seiford, L. M.,J. Zhu(2002).Modeling Undesirable Factors in Efficiency Evaluation.European Journal of Operational Research,142(1),16-20.
14. Sherman, H. D.,F. Gold(1985).Bank Branch Operating Efficiency: Evaluation with Data Envelopment Analysis.Journal of Banking and Finance,9(2),297-315.
15. Yue, P.(1992).Data Envelopment Analysis and Commercial Bank Performance: A Primer with Applications to Missouri Banks.Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review,74(1),31-45.
16. 中央銀行經濟研究處。中華民國台灣地區金融統計月報（1992～2002年）。中央銀行經濟研究處。
17. 王美惠、陳亞為、劉聰衡(1998)。信用合作社與商業銀行財務結構與經營績效差異之比較分析。淡江學報，36，211-227。
18. 台灣省農會。台灣區各級農會年報（1996~2003年）。
19. 林秋發(1995)。信用合作社的規模、營業區域與經營績效之研究。臺灣銀行季刊，46(4)，50-70。
20. 黃台心(1997)。臺灣地區本國銀行成本效率之實證研究－隨機邊界模型之應用。人文及社會科學集刊，9(1)，85-123。
21. 黃瓊慧、侯玉燡(2000)。臺灣地區信用合作社經營績效評估之研究。當代會計，1(1)，55-88。
22. 葉彩蓮、陳澤義(2000)。銀行經營績效評估：財務比率與DEA的整合。東吳經濟商學學報，30，19-42。

1. 連健甫(2018)。直轄市農會信用部經營績效之研究-兩階段 DEA 之應用。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系學位論文。2018。1-60。