题名

公司治理機制與公司績效之實證研究

并列篇名

An Empirical Study between the Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm Performance

DOI

10.29735/SJEB.200706.0001

作者

李馨蘋(Shin-Ping Lee);莊宗憲(Tsung-Hsien Chuang)

关键词

股權結構 ; 董事會規模 ; 公司績效 ; 追蹤型資料二階段最小平方法 ; Ownership Structure ; Board Size ; Firm Performance ; Two-stage Least Squares Regression For Panel Data Model

期刊名称

東吳經濟商學學報

卷期/出版年月

57期(2007 / 06 / 01)

页次

1 - 27

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究主要探討股權結構、董事會規模與公司績效之聯立方程組,以1994年至2003年間台灣上市公司資料進行實證觀察。因本研究所採用的資料為橫斷面與混合時間數列的資料,故使用追蹤型資料之二階段最小平方法來分析,經由F-test、LM test與Hausman test之驗證顯示各模型均適用於固定效果模型為實證分析的依據。實證結果顯示內部人持股比例、董事會規模、機構法人持股比例與公司經營績效四者彼此間互相影響,具有內生效果。再者,內部人持股比例與公司績效之非線性相關檢定並不顯著。

英文摘要

The main purpose of this study is to examine the determinants and interrelationships among ownership structure, board size and firm performance using a sample of Taiwan's listed firms. This study re-builds the simultaneous equations that impact the inter-action effects among ownership structure, board size and firm performance. This model is applied to the data of the Taiwan stock market for 1994-2003 to investigate the effects for all samples and for dominated industries explained by endogenous variables, and to find the possible reasons. This study collects a panel data set. We will apply two-stage least squares regression (2SLS) for panel data model. Furthermore, applies F-test, LM-test and Hausman test to determine the best statistic method (ordinary least squares method, fix-effects model or random-effects model). Under our system of equations, insider ownership, board size, institutional ownership, and corporate performance are dependent on each other, and also on other exogenous variables, such as dividend payout ratio. According to the result of this study, it should be useful information to the industry and academy.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 財金及會計學
参考文献
  1. Agrawal, A.,C. R. Knoeber(1996).Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,3,377-397.
  2. Andres, P. D.,V. Azofra,F. Lopez(2005).Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Functioning and Effectiveness.Corporate Government,13(2),197-210.
  3. Bacon, J.(1973).Corporate Directorship Practices: Membership and Committees of The Board.New York:The Conference Board.
  4. Barnhart, S. W.,S. Rosenstein(1998).Board Composition, Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis.The Financial Review,33,1-16.
  5. Bathala, C. T.,K. P. Moon,R. P. Rao(1994).Managerial Ownership, Debt Policy and The Impact of Institutional Holdings: An Agency Perspective.Financial Management,23,38-50.
  6. Bradley, M.,G. Jarrell,E. H. Kim(1984).On the Existence of an Optimal Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence.Journal of Finance,39,857-878.
  7. Chan, S. H.,J. D. Martin,J. W. Kensinger(1990).Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value?.Journal of Financial Economics,26,255-276.
  8. Chen, C. R.,T. L. Steiner(1999).Managerial Ownership and Agency Conflicts: A Nonlinear Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, Risk Taking, Debt Policy, and Dividend Policy.The Financial Review,34,119-136.
  9. Cho, M. H.(1998).Ownership Structure, Investment, and The Corporate Value: An Empirical Analysis.Journal of Financial Economics,47,103-121.
  10. Crutchley, C. E.,R. S. Hansen(1989).A Test of the Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage and Corporate Dividends.Financial Management,18,36-46.
  11. Crutchley,C. E.,M. R. H. Jensen, J. S. Jahera Jr.,J. E. Raymond(1999).Agency Problems and The Simultaneity of Decision Making: The Role of Institutional Ownership.International Review of Financial Analysis,8,177-197.
  12. Demsetz, H.,B. Villalonga(2001).Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance.Journal of Corporate Finance,7,209-233.
  13. Demsetz, H.,K. Lehn(1985).The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences.Journal of Political Economy,93,1155-1177.
  14. Eakins, S. G.,S. R. Stansell,P. E. Wertheim(1998).Institutional Portfolio Composition: An Examination of The Prudent Investment Hypothesis.Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,38,93-109.
  15. Eisenberg, T.,S. Sundgren,M. T. Wells(1998).Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms.Journal of Financial Economics,48,35-54.
  16. Fan, P. H.,T. J. Wong(2002).Corporate Ownership Structure and the Information of Accounting Earnings in East Asia.Journal of Accounting and Economics,33,401-425.
  17. Hermalin, B. E.,M. Weisbach(2003).Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature.Economic Policy Review,9,7-26.
  18. Hermalin, B. E.,M. Weisbach(1991).The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance.Financial Management,20,101-112.
  19. Hermalin, B. E.,M. Weisbach(1987).The Determinants of Board Composition.RAND Journal of Economic,19,589-606.
  20. Hudson, C.,J. Jahera,W. Lloyd(1992).Further Evidence on the Relationship Between Ownership and Performance.The Financial Review,27,227-239.
  21. Jensen, G. R.,D. P. Solberg,T. S. Zorn(1992).Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,27,247-263.
  22. Jensen, M. C.,W. H. Meckling(1976).Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics,3,305-360.
  23. Jensen,M. C.,R. S. Ruback(1983).Market for Corporate Control: Empirical Evidence.Journal of Financial Economics,1,5-50.
  24. Jensen. M. C.(1993).The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems.The Journal of Finance,48(3),831-880.
  25. Kiel, G. C.,G. J. Nicholson(2003).Board Compositiona and Corporate Performance: How the Australian Experience Informs Contrasting Theories of Corporate Governance.Corporate Governance,11,189-205.
  26. Kula, V.(2005).The Impact of the Roles, Structure and Process of Boards on Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey.Corporate Governance,13(2),265-276.
  27. Lipton, M.,J. Lorsch(1992).A Modest Proposal Improved Corporate Governance.Business Lawyer,48,59-77.
  28. Mak, Y. T.,Y. Li(2001).Determinants of Corporate Ownership and Board Structure: Evidence from Singapore.Journal of Corporate Finance,7,235-256.
  29. McConnell, J. J.,H. Servaes(1990).Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.Journal of Financial Economics,27,595-612.
  30. Morck, R.,A. Shleifer,R. W. Vishny(1988).Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.Journal of Financial Economics,20,293-315.
  31. Oswald, S. L.,Jahera(1991).The Influence of Ownership on Performance: An Empirical Study.Strategic Management Journal,12,218-228.
  32. Pound, J.(1988).Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight.Journal of Financial Economics,20,237-265.
  33. Shleifer, A.,R. W. Vishny(1986).Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.Journal of Political Economy,94,461-488.
  34. Titman, S.,R. Wessels(1988).The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice.Journal of Finance,43,1-19.
  35. Vance, S.(1995).Inside or Outside Directors: Is There Really a Difference.Across The Board,15-17.
  36. Yermack, D.(1996).Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors.Journal of Financial Economics,40,185-211.
  37. 王大維(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。淡江大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
  38. 王元章(2001)。內部人持股、風險、股利、負債、投資與公司價值。證拱市場以展,13(3),29-69。
  39. 王玉珍(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
  40. 王惠昕(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
  41. 何里仁(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所未出版碩士論文。
  42. 沈立平(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
  43. 周夢柏(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
  44. 柯璟瑩(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
  45. 張雅琳(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。大葉大學會計資訊研究所未出版碩士論文。
  46. 曾斐金(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學企業管理學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
  47. 黃璟琦(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣第一科技大學金融營運所未出版碩士論文。
  48. 葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩(1990)。公司治理與評等系統。台北:商智文化。
  49. 葉銀華、邱顯比(1996)。資本結構、股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究:代理成本理論。台大管理論業,57-90。
  50. 劉靜容(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。淡江大學產業經濟學所未出版碩士論文。
  51. 鄭筱凡(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。東吳大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
  52. 嚴月玲(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學財務金融系所未出版碩士論文。
被引用次数
  1. 李俊興(2016)。公司治理對企業捐贈之實證研究。長榮大學經營管理研究所學位論文。2016。1-44。
  2. 莊美玲(2017)。董監事特性、股權結構和公司營運績效的關係。長榮大學經營管理研究所學位論文。2017。1-54。