半導體產業之績效評估－跨國分析與比較

Performance Assessment of Semiconductor Industries: Based on Cross-Country Evidence

李揚(Yang Li)；鐘棠祺(Tang-Chi Chung)

半導體產業 ； 資料包絡分析 ； 方向性距離函數 ； 共同邊界 ； Semiconductor industry ； DEA ； Directional distance function ； meta-frontier

東吳經濟商學學報

89期（2015 / 06 / 01）

61 - 88

繁體中文

半導體科技產業被視為二十一世紀最具關鍵性的全球性產業，因具龐大的商機使其成為各國競相發展的重心。在全球化的趨勢下，半導體科技廠商面對來自於全球市場的激烈競爭，單一國家之經營績效分析實在無法窺其全貌。本研究將可同時縮減投入與擴張產出的方向性距離函數，納入可處理不同群組技術之共同邊界分析架構，據以分析日本、台灣、美國與韓國等半導體科技產業技術領先國廠商之經營績效。樣本取自於OSIRIS資料庫，研究期間為2006年至2008年，包括253家廠商，共計759筆觀測值。實證結果顯示：（1）各國的群組邊界存在顯著的差異，因此本研究的確應採用共同邊界分析架構；（2）除了韓國之無效率廠商外，所有國家之無效率廠商，大都應以美國具有技術效率的廠商為學習標竿；（3）各國首重提升市場價值及降低固定資產；（4）韓國廠商之間的同質性較高，而日本廠商之間具有較大的異質性。

The semiconductor industry has been regarded as a key global industry of the 21st century. Because of its property of globalization, it is unlikely to understand the whole picture of the operational performance by simply analyzing a single country. This study, therefore, incorporates the directional distance function into the metafrontier framework in order to evaluate efficiencies of leading countries (Japan, Taiwan, USA, and Korea) of the semiconductor industry. The sample, obtained from OSIRIS database, consists of 253 firms and a total of 759 observations for the period from 2006 to 2008. Empirical results indicate: (1) Each country has her own frontier so the metafrontier framework is an appropriate approach in this study;(2) Most of inefficient firms, except those from Korea, should mainly take American efficient firms as benchmarks;(3) Every country should give priority to increasing market values and reducing fixed assets;(4) The group of Korean firms appears the highest homogeneity, while that of Japanese ones reveals the largest heterogeneity.

1. 王肇蘭、許義忠、徐偉初(2008)。台灣地區地方政府效率暨生產力之評估。應用經濟論叢，84，71-120。
   連結：
2. 李揚、郭睿淇、李威龍、林孟熙(2010)。中國與印度銀行產業之群體績效評估。應用經濟論叢，特刊，87-116。
   連結：
3. Banker, R. D.,Charnes, A.,Cooper, W.(1984).Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.Management Science,30(9),1078-1092.
4. Barney, J. B.(1997).Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage.New York:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
5. Beck, R.,Wigand, R. T.,König, W.(2005).Integration of E-Commerce by SMEs in the Manufacturing Sector: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach.Journal of Global Information Management,13(3),20-32.
6. Carbone, T. A.(2000).Measuring Efficiency of Semiconductor Manufacturing Operations Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).IEEE,56-62.
7. Charnes, A.,Cooper, W. W.,Rhodes, E.(1978).Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.European Journal of Operational Research,2(4),429-444.
8. Chen, Y.-S.,Chen, B.-Y.(2011).Applying DEA, MPI, and Grey Model to Explore the Operation Performance of the Taiwanese Wafer Fabrication Industry.Technological forecasting and social change,78,536-546.
9. Chen, Y.-S.,Chen, B.-Y.(2009).Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to Evaluate the Operational Performance of the Wafer Fabrication Industry in Taiwan.Journal of Manufacturing Technology,20(4),475-488.
10. Chen,W.-C.,Chien, C.-F.(2011).Measuring Relative Performance ofWafer Fabrication Operations:A Case Study.Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,22,447-457.
11. Christopher, M.(ed.)(1992).Logistics: The strategic issue.London:Chapman & Hall.
12. Chu, M.-T.,Shyu, J. Z.,Khosla, R.(2008).Measuring the Relative Performance for Leading Fabless Firms by Using Data Envelopment Analysis.International Journal of Manufacture,19(3),257-272.
13. Cooper, W. W.,Seiford, L. M.,Tong, K.(2007).Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-solver Software.New York:Springer.
14. Färe, R.,Grosskopf, F.,Russell, R. R.(2005).New Directions: Efficiency and Productivity.Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Farrell, M. J.(1957).The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,A120,499-513.
16. Gebrekidan, D. A.,Awuah, G. B.(2002).Interorganizational Cooperation: A New View of Strategic Alliances–The Case of Swedish Firms in the International Market.Industrial Marketing Management,31(8),679-693.
17. Halkos, G. E.,Tzeremes, N. G.(2007).International Competitiveness in the ICT Industry: Evaluating the Performance of the Top 50 Companies.Global Economic Review,36(2),167-182.
18. Hatami-Marbini, A.,Tavana, M.,Gholami, K.,Beigi, Z. G.(2015).A Bounded Data Envelopment Analysis Model in a Fuzzy Environment with an Application to Safety in the Semiconductor Industry.Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications,164,679-701.
19. Hsiao, B.,Chen, C.-C.,Yu, M.-M.(2012).Measuring the Relative Efficiency of IC Design Firms Using the Directional Distance Function and a Meta-Frontier Approach.Decision Support Systems,53,881-891.
20. Hsiao, F. S. T.,Park, C.(2005).Korean and Taiwanese Productivity Performance: Comparisons at Matched Manufacturing Levels.Journal of Productivity Analysis,23(1),85-107.
21. Hung, S.-W.,He, D.-S.,Lu, W.-M.(2014).Evaluating the Dynamic Performances of Business Groups from the Carry-Over Perspective: A Case Study of Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry.Omega,46,1-10.
22. Hung, S.-W.,Lu, W.-M.(2008).The Comparative Productivity Efficiency of Taiwan's Integrated Circuits Packaging/Testing FiRms.Information Systems and Operational Research,46(3),189-198.
23. Jagoda, K.,Thangarajah, P.(2014).A DEA Approach for Improving Productivity of Packaging Production Lines: A Case Study.Production Planning & Control,25(2),193-202.
24. Kao, L.-J.,Chiu, S.-Y.,Ko, H.-T.(2014).A study of the Talent Training Project Management for Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan: The Application of a Hybrid Data Envelopment Analysis Approach.The Scientific World Journal,2014,1-11.
25. Kao, L.-J.,Lu, C.-C.,Chiu, C.-C.(2011).The Training Institution Efficiency of the Semiconductor Institute Programme in Taiwan-Application of Spatiotemporal ICA with DEA Approach.Journal of the Operational Research Society,62,2162-2172.
26. Kozmetsky, G. ,Yue, P.(1998).Comparative Performance of Global Semiconductor Companies.Omega,26(2),153-175.
27. Li, Y.,Chiu, Y.-H.,Tzeng, Z. T.(2007).Performance Evaluation of Asian Biotech Firms: Application of Three-Stage Approach.Pacific Rim Conference of Western Economic Association International,Beijing, China:
28. Liu, F.-H. F.,Wang, P.-H.(2008).DEA Malmquist Productivity Measure: Taiwanese Semiconductor Companies.International Journal of Production Economics,112,367-379.
29. Lu, W.-M.,Hung, S.-W.(2010).Assessing the Performance of a Vertically Disintegrated Chain by the DEA Approach-A Case Study of Taiwanese Semiconductor Firms.International Journal of Production Research,48,1155-1170.
30. Lu, W.-M.,Wang, W.-K.,Lee, H.-T.(2013).The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Performance: Evidence from the US Semiconductor Industry.International Journal of Production Research,51(19),5683-5695.
31. Montoya-Torres, J. R.(2006).Manufacturing Performance Evaluation in Wafer Semiconductor Factories.International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,55(3/4),300-310.
32. O'Donnell, C. J.,Rao, D. S. P.,Battese, G. E.(2008).Metafrontier Frameworks for the Study of Firm-Level Efficiencies and Technology Ratios.Empirical Economics,34(2),231-255.
33. Pan, W.-H.,Feng, Y.-Y.,Huang, Y.-C.,Chen, Y.-K.(2008).Performance Review of Taiwanese IC Design Industry: DEA-based Malmquist Productivity Measure.SEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMPUTERS,7(8),1291-1199.
34. Pelagatti, M.,Colombo, E.(2014).On the Empirical Failure of Purchasing Power Parity Tests.Journal of Applied Econometrics
35. Retzlaff-Roberts, D.,Chang, C. F.,Rubin, R. M.(2004).Technical Efficiency in the Use of Health Care Resources: A Comparison of OECD Countries.Health Policy,69,55-72.
36. Shy, Oz(1995).Industrial Organization: Theory and Applications.Cambridge:The MIT Press.
37. Stuart, T. E.(2000).Interorganizational Alliances and the Performance of Firms: A Study of Growth and Innovation Rates in a High-Technology Industry.Strategic Management Journal,21(8),791-811.
38. Taylor, A. M.,Taylor, M. P.(2004).The Purchasing Power Parity Debate.Journal of Economic Perspectives,18(4),135-158.
39. Wackerly, D. D.,Mendenhall III, W.,Scheaffer, R. L.(2008).Mathematical Statistics with Applications.CA.:Duxbury.
40. Wen, H.-C.,Huang, J.-H.,Cheng, Y.-L.(2012).What Japanese Semiconductor Enterprises Can Learn from the Asset-Light Business Model for Sustainable Competitive Advantage.Asian Business and Management,11(5),615-649.
41. Windrum, P.,Tomlinson, M.(1999).Knowledge-Intensive Services and International Competitiveness: A Four Country Comparison.Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,11(3),391-408.
42. Wu, C.-C.,Li, C.-C.,Wang, T.-H.(2007).Multifactor Performance Measure Model with an Application to Semiconductor Industry Performance.WSEAS
43. 李揚、李曉娟(2008)。亞洲生技產業之總要素生產力研究。農業與資源經濟，5(1)，55-76。
44. 高強、黃旭男、Toshiyuki, Sueyoshi(2003)。管理績效評估管資料包絡分析法。台北:華泰文化事業公司。

1. 劉培林,李宗倫,方崇懿(2019)。一個無線通訊材料領導廠商經營模式的分析－系統動態觀點。管理與系統，26(4)，451-485。
2. (2020)。公司治理與動態效率之關聯性研究－以台灣半導體產業為例。績效與策略研究，17(1)，1-30。