蘇洵論禮蠡測—兼論其經史觀

A Discussion of Su Hsun's Ritual Theory: Also about His Outlook of the Relationship between Classics and History

10.6243/BHR.2012.047.063

蔣義斌(I-Pin Chiang)

蘇洵 ； 禮 ； 經史關係 ； 太常因革禮 ； Su Hsun ； ritual ； Relationship between Classics and History ； "Tai chang yin ge li"

臺灣師大歷史學報

47期（2012 / 06 / 01）

63 - 104

繁體中文

蘇洵（1009-1066）為北宋蜀學的重要學者，他完成有關禮的論述，自成體系，約可分為禮的內容及禮的實踐兩方面。禮的內容方面：包括論述禮具有神聖性、權威力量、內化和諧、人情基礎；禮的實踐方面：說明禮與民俗的辯證關係、檢討合宜與否（賞罰）的依據。其中禮的實踐方面，論證「史」的時空環境、反省，亦是禮能遂行的要件之一。蘇洵對禮有完整的論述，並強調禮必須在歷史中實踐，他的禮論凸顯出歷史的重要性。蘇洵重史的立場，也形成他經史「義一體二」說，經史相資互用，經、史均不可絕對化，在經史關係上，亦是甚有特色的論述。蘇洵晚年參與《太常因革禮》的修撰，以「史」來落實對以禮治國的關懷。該書因蘇洵堅持以「史」的立場來撰寫，而非撰寫「禮典」，故得以順利完成。「因革」的體例，可以掌握史實細節，同時使「善惡自著」。蘇洵主張對「禮」的討論，必須落實到歷史之中。由「迹」來驗證「道」的發展，有其理論的依據，同時他也證明了這是種重要的方法。

Su Hsun (1009-1066) is an important scholar of Shu School in Northern Sung China. He finished a theory about ritual system that could divide into two parts. Firstly, the contents of ritual, that will included ritual has being sacred, authority and power, transforming harmony, and its foundation of human feelings. Secondly, the practice of ritual, he explained that will have dialectics relation between ritual and custom, and discussed the principle of justice that could be as a base to reward and punishment. The second part of his theory of ritual, he wanted to proof that time-space environment and introspection in history is a fundamental element.In the theory of ritual that established by Su Hsun, ritual must practice in history. In his theory about ritual, history is a fundamental element, that forming his view about the relation of classics and history. He will call the new relation is yi yi tie er, one way two type. They are no absolutely advantageous between classics and history. It is a characteristic discuss in the intellectual history of China.In Su Hsun's old age, he participated in a team to compose royal ritual, named ”Tai chang yin ge li”. In this royal ritual records, Sh Hsun insist that composed principle should be history not ritual codes. This ritual records book has been finished for his insist. Yin ge means continuous and change, that constituted the main contents of history. The style of Yin ge could recorded details and examine introspection both.Su Hsun claims ritual must practicable, and the development of history could test and verify the way. It is not just a theory, in the works of composing ritual records book Su Hsun prove that history is an important method.Su Hsun (1009-1066) is an important scholar of Shu School in Northern Sung China. He finished a theory about ritual system that could divide into two parts. Firstly, the contents of ritual, that will included ritual has being sacred, authority and power, transforming harmony, and its foundation of human feelings. Secondly, the practice of ritual, he explained that will have dialectics relation between ritual and custom, and discussed the principle of justice that could be as a base to reward and punishment. The second part of his theory of ritual, he wanted to proof that time-space environment and introspection in history is a fundamental element.In the theory of ritual that established by Su Hsun, ritual must practice in history. In his theory about ritual, history is a fundamental element, that forming his view about the relation of classics and history. He will call the new relation is yi yi tie er, one way two type. They are no absolutely advantageous between classics and history. It is a characteristic discuss in the intellectual history of China.In Su Hsun's old age, he participated in a team to compose royal ritual, named ”Tai chang yin ge li”. In this royal ritual records, Sh Hsun insist that composed principle should be history not ritual codes. This ritual records book has been finished for his insist. Yin ge means continuous and change, that constituted the main contents of history. The style of Yin ge could recorded details and examine introspection both.Su Hsun claims ritual must practicable, and the development of history could test and verify the way. It is not just a theory, in the works of composing ritual records book Su Hsun prove that history is an important method.

1. 朱溢(2010)。唐至北宋時期的皇帝親郊。政治大學歷史學報，14，1-52。
   連結：
2. 李溢(2009)。從郊丘之爭到天地分合之爭─唐至北宋時期郊祀主神的變化。漢學研究，27(2)，267-296。
   連結：
3. (1995)。錢賓四先生全集。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。
4. (1996)。通志堂經解。楊州:江蘇廣陵古籍刻印社。
5. 元馬端臨(1986)。文獻通考。北京:中華書局。
6. 宋王應麟編(1987)。玉海。上海:上海書店。
7. 宋司馬光(1972)。資治通鑑。臺北:宏業書局。
8. 宋宋綬編、宋宋敏求編(1962)。宋大詔令集。北京:中華書局。
9. 宋李燾編(1985)。續資治通鑑長編。北京:中華書局。
10. 宋孟元老、伊永文注(2007)。東京夢華錄箋注。北京:中華書局。
11. 宋曾鞏(1984)。曾鞏集。北京:中華書局。
12. 宋歐陽修(1988)。太常因革禮。上海:江蘇古籍出版社。
13. 宋歐陽修(1983)。歐陽修全集。臺北:世界書局。
14. 宋歐陽修(1979)。新五代史。臺北:鼎文書局。
15. 宋鄭樵(1982)。通志略。臺北:里仁書局。
16. 宋蘇洵、曾棗莊箋註、金成禮箋註(1993)。嘉祐集箋註。上海:上海古籍出版社。
17. 宋蘇轍(1983)。蘇氏春秋集解。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
18. 宋蘇轍(1990)。蘇轍集。北京:中華書局。
19. 清徐松纂輯(1964)。宋會要輯稿。臺北:世界書局。
20. 漢司馬遷(1979)。史記。臺北:鼎文書局。
21. 漢班固(1979)。漢書。臺北:鼎文書局。
22. Hatch, George(1993).Su Hsun's Pragmatic Statecraft.Ordering the World : Approaches to State and Society in Sung Dynasty China,Berkeley:
23. Wechsler, Howard J.(1985).Offerings of jade and silk : ritual and symbol in the legitimation of the T'ang Dynasty.New Haven:Yale University Press.
24. 小島毅(1989)。郊祀制度の變遷。東洋文化研究所紀要，108，123-219。
25. 山内弘一(1981)。北宋の国家と玉皇─新禮恭謝天地を中心に。東方學，62，83-97。
26. 山内弘一(1985)。北宋時代の郊祀。史學雜誌，92(1)，40-66。
27. 不著撰人。京口耆舊傳。臺北:新文豐出版公司。
28. 孔凡禮(2004)。三蘇年譜。北京:北京古籍出版社。
29. 王水照(2000)。王水照自選集。上海:上海教育出版社。
30. 王通(1983)。中說。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
31. 田中正樹(2001)。蘇氏蜀學考─出版から見た蘇學の流行ついて。宋代史研究會研究報告第七冊：宋代人の認識─相互性と日常空間，東京:
32. 西上勝(2004)。蘇洵晚學。山形大學紀要（人文科學），15(3)，250-255。
33. 吳孟復、詹亞圓(1982)。蘇洵思想新探。安徽大學學報，1982(3)，67-70。
34. 吳武雄(1993)。蘇洵「六經論」意蘊。台中商專學報（文史社會篇），25，223-257。
35. 吳錚強、杜正貞(2011)。北宋南郊神位變革與玉皇祀典的構建。歷史研究，5，51。
36. 汪聖鐸(2010)。宋代政教關係研究。北京:人民出版社。
37. 周予同(1983)。經今古文。周予同經學史論著選集，上海:
38. 郝明工(1998)。蘇氏蜀學之經學考察。成都大學學報（社科版），1998(3)，43-47。
39. 高橋弘臣(2011)。南宋の皇帝祭祀と臨安。東洋史研究，69(4)，624-628。
40. 張文昌(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北，臺大歷史研究所。
41. 陳立(1973)。公羊義疏。臺北:鼎文書局。
42. 陳致宏(1998)。蘇洵六經論次第與經學思想探析。孔孟月刊，37(3)，25-34。
43. 章潢(1983)。圖書編。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
44. 曾棗莊(1983)。蘇洵評傳。成都:四川大學出版社。
45. 曾棗莊編、舒大剛編(2001)。三蘇全書。北京:語文出版社。
46. 曾棗莊編、舒大剛編(2001)。三蘇全書。北京:語文出版社。
47. 程俱、張富祥校證(2000)。麟台故事校證。北京:中華書局。
48. 逯耀東(1992)。論司馬遷「成一家之言」的兩個層次《太史公自序》的「拾遺補藝」（上）。台大歷史學報，17，43-64。
49. 楊倩描(1988)。宋代郊祀制度初探。世界宗教研究，1988(4)，75-81。
50. 趙升(2007)。朝野類要。北京:中華書局。
51. 趙伯雄(2004)。春秋學史。濟南:山東教育出版社。
52. 劉子健(1964)。封禪文化與宋代明堂祭天。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，18，45-49。
53. 劉俊文編(1995)。日本中青年學者論中國史─六朝隋唐卷。上海:上海古籍出版社。
54. 蔣義斌(1988)。宋代儒釋調和論及排佛論之演進。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
55. 蔣慶(1995)。公羊學引論。瀋陽:遼寧教育出版社。
56. 黎靖德編(1982)。徽州本朱子語錄。京都:中文出版社。
57. 齋木哲郎(2005)。蘇洵と《春秋》─史論の《春秋》化。鳴門教育大學研究紀要（人文.社會科學編），20，27-38。