英文摘要
|
This paper examines the transnational turn in Asian American Literature and the ways in which ethnic subjects migrate multiply at the interstices of different forms of power through reading Karen Tei Yamashita's novel Tropic of Orange. The migrant ethnic subjects in transnational contexts are portrayed not in terms of "difference" and "hybridity" but as sites of transit, simultaneously negotiating with sovereignty, global capitalism, and biopower. While transcending the geopolitical power of the nation still holds true in their transnational practices, they are constantly challenged by other forms of rule that relate to one another dialectically. Crossing the borders suggest not just crossing "beyond," but also "into" different skills of governmentality, forcing the migrant ethnic subjects to constantly reexamine their practices of migration, border-crossings and the skills of "homing." In the first part of the paper, I examine the parallel developments between capitalism and modes of power as explicated by Hardt and Negri to point out the blind spot in their celebration of a society without outside. While their incorporation of Foucauldian biopower into the theoretical construction of globalization is important and significant, they fail to detect the possibility of reterritorialization behind the technologies of biopolitics. In the meantime they fail to recognize the coexistence of these complex forms of power, and their interlocking dialectic relationships. The second part of the paper moves to a close reading of Tropic of Orange, discussing the paradox of "crossing" that characterizes the subjects of interstices in the novel. Taking Los Angeles as a city established on the borderland histories of imperialism, nationalism, global capitalism and biopower, I scrutinize the ways in which the ethnic subjects challenge nation state and racism, only to find themselves confronted by yet another form of rule-neoliberalism or biopolitical governmentality-that produces and reproduces their everyday life by depriving the significance of their ethnicity. Finally, I explore the possibility of counter-conduct through examining the minority subjects' lines of flight within the multiple realms of power.
|
参考文献
|
-
李鴻瓊(2011)。共在虛實間:論朱天心《古都》中的記憶與共群。文山評論,4(2),1-36。
連結:
-
張淑麗(2010)。眾聲喧嘩的「非常」與「日常」:沙娣‧史密斯的《白牙》與倫理的偶然與必然。英美文學評論,16,23-54。
連結:
-
廖詩文(2004)。末世天使城的魔幻想像:《橘子回歸線》中的洛城、移民與跨界。中外文學,32(8),55-76。
連結:
-
Adams, Rachel(2007).The Ends of America, the Ends of Postmodernism.Twentieth Century Literature,53(3),248-72.
-
Anzaldúa, Gloria E.(2007).Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza.San Francisco:Aunt Lute.
-
Arrighi, Giovanni,Hopkins, Terence K.,Wallerstein, Immanuel(1989).Antisystemic Movements.London:Verso.
-
Baudrillard, Jean,Glaser, Sheila Faria(Trans.)(1994).Simulacra and Simulation.Ann Arbor:U of Michigan P.
-
Burchell, Graham(ed.),Gordon, Colin(ed.),Miller, Peter(ed.)(1991).The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality.Chicago:U of Chicago.
-
Chuh, Candice(2006).Of Hemispheres and Other Spheres: Navigating Karen Tei Yamashita's Literary World.American Literary History,18(3),618-37.
-
Coward, Martin(2005).The Globalization of Encounter: Interrogating the Geopolitics of Empire.Third World Quarterly,26(6),855-71.
-
Dirlik, Arif(2007).Global Modernity: Modernity in the Age of Global Capitalism.London:Paradigm.
-
Dunn, Timothy(1996).The Militarization of the U.S. Mexico Border, 1978-1922: Low Intensity Conflict Doctrine Comes Home.Austin, TX:CMAS.
-
Dyer-Witheford, Nick(2001).The New Combinations: Revolt of the Global Value.CR: The New Centennial Review,1(3),155-200.
-
Foucault, Michel(2008).The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Foucault, Michel(2007).Security, Territoty, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977-1978.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Giddens, Anthony(1990).The Consequences of Modernity.Standford, California:Standford UP.
-
Glixman, Elizabeth P.(2007).An Interview with Tei yamashita.Reviews & Interviews,Oct/Nov
-
Gonzalez, Gilbert G.,Fernandez, Raul E.(2003).A Century of Chicano History: Empire, Nations and Migration.New York:Routledge.
-
Grewal, Inderpal(2005).Transnational America: Feminism, Diasporas, Neoliberlism.Durham:Duke UP.
-
Hardt, Michael,Negri, Amtonio(2004).Multitude.New York:Penguin.
-
Hardt, Michael,Negri, Amtonio(2000).Empire.Cambridge, MA:Harvard UP.
-
Harvey, David(2003).The New Imperialism.New York:Oxford UP.
-
Lee, Erika(2005).Orientalism in the Americas: A Hemispheric Approach to Asian American History.Journal of Asian American Studies,8(3),235-56.
-
Lefebvre, Henri,Elden, Stuart(Trans.),Moore, Gerald(Trans.)(2004).Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life.London:Continuum.
-
Lemke, Thomas(2001).The Birth of Bio-politics': Michel Foucault's Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality.Economy and Society,30(2),190-207.
-
Levander, Caroline F.(ed.),Levine, Robert S.(ed.)(2008).Hemispheric American Studies.New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers UP.
-
Sadowski-Smith, Claudia(2008).Border Fictions: Globalization, Empire, and Writing at the Boundaries of the United States.Charlottesville:U of Virginia P.
-
Sadowski-Smith, Claudia(2002).Globalization on the Line: Culture, Capital, and Citizenship at U. S. Borders.New York:Palgrave.
-
Shih, Shu-mei(ed.),Lionnet, Françoise(ed.)(2005).Minor Transnationalism.Durham:Duke UP.
-
Ty, Eleanor(ed.),Goellnicht, Donald C.(ed.)(2004).Asian North American Identities Beyond the Hyphen.Bloomington:Indiana UP.
-
Wallace, Molly(2001).Tropics of Globalization: Reading the North America.Symploke,9(1-2),145-60.
-
Yamashita, Karen Tei(1997).Tropic of Orange.Minneapolis:Coffee House.
-
Zizek, Slavoj(1999).The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Center of Political Ontology.New York:Verso.
|