兒童文學不能說的秘密：論蔡宜蓉兒童小說中的情與愛

The Unspeakable Love and Desire for and of Children-A Reading of Yi-Rung Tsai's Novels for Children

10.6637/CWLQ.2014.43(3).107-138

劉鳳芯(Fiona Feng-Hsin Liu)；施敏惠(Min-Hui Shih)

蔡宜容 ； 兒童文學 ； 臺灣兒童文學 ； 童年研究 ； 賈桂琳‧蘿絲 ； Yi-Jung Tsai ； children's literature ； children's literature in Taiwan ； childhood studies ； Jacqueline Rose

中外文學

43卷3期（2014 / 09 / 01）

107 - 138

繁體中文

英國精神分析暨文化研究學者蘿絲（Jacqueline Rose）在其專書《彼得潘個案研究：論兒童文學的不可能》（The Case of Peter Pan; or, TheImpossibility of Children's Fiction）中主張「成人與兒童之間存在不可能純真的關係」；蘿絲所謂不可能純真的關係，指的並非成人對兒童實際的情慾作為，而是成人對兒童的慾望。蘿絲認為「兒童文學顯然就在講這種關係，卻總是顧左右而言他，不願直指核心」。本論文同意蘿絲的觀點，但也認為在當代，童年的真相與成人情慾或許不必然是童書寫作的禁忌。越來越多童書直探兒童與成人的不可能關係，而臺灣兒文創作者蔡宜容的小說便是一例：蔡宜容作品《中美五街，今天20號》（2010）、《癡人》（2011）主題皆圍繞成人如何戀物兒童、戀棧童年。本論文首先將爬梳和釐清蘿絲的論點，接著分析蔡宜容的小說如何刻畫成人對兒童的愛戀以及與兒童之間的情慾流動，並討論蔡宜容如何與兒童文學書寫傳統對話、協商，使其作一方面另闢書／殊途，另一方面卻仍保有童書況味。

Jacqueline Rose in ＂The Case of Peter Pan＂; or, ＂The Impossibility of Children's Fiction＂ (1984) contends that adults' relations with children are never innocent. By making such a controversial statement, Rose does not suggest the existence of any actual sexual deeds, but emphasizes how children become adults' objects of desire. Rose further argues that children's literature apparently is about these relations of desire; nevertheless, by insisting on the innocence of childhood, it always shies away from acknowledging the truth. This essay agrees with Rose's views; however, it also argues that adults' desire for children may no longer be a taboo issue. More and more children's books nowadays openly tackle this issue; for example, the novels written by Yi-Rung Tsai, a contemporary children's books writer in Taiwan, reflect exactly this trend. Tsai's recent works, ＂The Obsessed＂ (2010) and ＂It Is the 20th on Zhongmei 5th Street＂ (2011) both deal with adults' fetishization of children. Focusing on these two novels, the essay attempts to enact a dialogue between Tsai's novels and Rose's view on childhood. Furthermore, it analyzes how Tsai negotiates with children's literature conventions to remain within the familiar parameters of children's literature while manages to stake out a distinctive style of her own.

1. Arata, Stephen(1996).Fictions of Loss in the Victorian Fin-de-Siècle: Identity and Empire.New York:Cambridge UP.
2. Barrie, J. M.,Hollindale, Peter(Ed.)(1995).Peter Pan and Other Plays.Oxford:Oxford UP.
3. Bettelheim, Bruno(1976).The Uses of Enchantment.New York:Vintage.
4. Doyle, Arthur Conan(1998).The Lost World.Charlottesville:U of Virginia Library.
5. Falconer, Rachel(2009).The Crossover Novel: Contemporary Children's Fiction and Its Adult Readership.New York:Routledge.
6. Geer, Jennifer(2003).'All sorts of pitfalls and surprises': Competing Views of Idealized Girlhood in Lewis Carroll's Alice Books.Children's Literature,31,1-24.
7. Kincaid, James R.(1992).Child-Loving: The Erotic Child and Victorian Culture.New York:Routledge.
8. Nodelman, Perry(2008).The Hidden Adult: Defining Children's Literature.Baltimore:John Hopkins UP.
9. Nodelman, Perry(2010).Former Editor's Comments; or, The Possibility of Growing Wiser.Children's Literature Association Quarterly,35(3),230-42.
10. Nodelman, Perry(1985).The Case of Children's Fiction; or, The Impossibility of Jacqueline Rose.Childrens Literature Association Quarterly,10(3),98-100.
11. Nodelman, Perry,Reimer, Mavis(2002).The Pleasures of Children's Literature.New York:Pearson.
12. Oulton, Carolyn W. de la L.(2007).Romantic Friendship in Victorian Literature.Aldershot, UK:Ashgate.
13. Owen, Gabrielle(2010).Queer Theory Wrestles the 'Real' Child: Impossibility, Identity, and Language in Jacqueline Rose's The Case of Peter Pan.Children's Literature Association Quarterly,35(3),255-73.
14. Parsons, Wendy,Nicholson, Catriona(1999).Talking to Philip Pullman: An Interview.The Lion and the Unicorn,23(1),116-34.
15. Reynolds, Kimberley(2007).Radical Children's Literature: Future Visions and Aesthetic Transformation in Juvenile Fiction.New York:Palgrave MacMillan.
16. Rose, Jacqueline(1984).The Case of Peter Pan; or, The Impossibility of Children's Fiction.Philadelphia:U of Pennsylvania P.
17. Rudd, David,Pavlik, Anthony(2010).The (Im)Possibility of Children's Fiction: Rose Twenty-Five Years On.Children's Literature Association Quarterly,35(3),227-28.
18. Townsend, John Rowe(1976).Written for Children: An Outline of English-language Children's Literature.Harmondsworth:Penguin.
19. White, Donna R.(ed.),Tarr, C. Anita(ed.)(2006).J. M. Barrie's Peter Pan in and out of Time: A Children's Classic at 100,Lanham:
20. 拉‧喬凡尼奧里、蔡宜容改寫(1992)。萬夫莫敵。台北:小魯文化。
21. 林良(2011)。淺語的藝術。台北:國語日報。
22. 施敏惠(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中，國立中興大學臺灣文學與跨國文化研究所教師碩士在職專班。
23. 徐國能(2011)。夢裡的鵝：評蔡宜容《癡人》。文訊，312，103。
24. 張希清編、趙一新編、徐文光編(2011)。黃公望與『富春山居圖』研究。北京:文物出版社。
25. 郭金足(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台東，國立台東大學兒童文學研究所。
26. 黃宗慧(1999)。他不看她時她在嗎？以《天龍八部》中段正淳身邊的女性為例談自戀、戀物、攻擊慾。金庸小說國際學術研討會論文集，台北:
27. 樓秋華(2010)。『富春山居圖』真偽。杭州:浙江大學出版社。
28. 樓秋華(2010)。『富春山居圖』真偽。杭州:浙江大學出版社。
29. 蔡宜容(1995)。晉晉的四年仁班。台北:小魯文化。
30. 蔡宜容(2010)。中美五街，今天20 號。台北:小魯文化。
31. 蔡宜容(1994)。舟舟的日記。台北:國語日報。
32. 蔡宜容(2011)。癡人。台北:小魯文化。
33. 蔡宜容(1997)。石縫裡的信：妞妞日記。台北:小兵。
34. 蔡宜容(1992)。邊城兒小三。台北:小魯文化。