题名

人類世中的女性主義：立足點、地方與實踐

并列篇名

Feminism in the Anthropocene: Standpoints, Places and Practices

DOI

10.6637/CWLQ.202003_49(1).0002

作者

張君玫(Chun-Mei Chuang)

关键词

人類世 ； 生態轉向 ； 後人類 ； 能動力 ； 女性主義所在地政治 ； Anthropocene ； ecological turn ； posthuman ； agency ； feminist politics of location

期刊名称

中外文學

卷期/出版年月

49卷1期（2020 / 03 / 31）

页次

13 - 60

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本中以「抵抗的立足點」、「測量的政治」和「生命的肯定」等三條論述的線索出發，探討了六位當代女性主義思想家的生態想像，並透過這些討論，繪製出一張關於人類世中女性主義思考與實踐的地圖。在本文繪製的動態航線中，席娃的「自然的創造力」、普姆伍德的「新的人性模式」、哈洛威的「製造奇異親族」、巴芮德的「酷兒展演能動力」、布拉達蒂的「泛人性化成」以及班內特的「化人的活力物質」都彰顯了其獨特的所在地政治，以及特定的肉身、地方和歷史立足點。除了延續拆解文化和自然的層級化二元對立，在人類世中的女性主義生態批判更需要正視能動力的不均衡分配，釐清人類行動者在多物種與跨類別的後人類化成中的實踐與責任。
英文摘要

This paper discusses six contemporary feminist thinkers' ecological imagination through three interconnected perspectives: the standpoint of resistance, the politics of measurement, and the affirmation of life. I thereby draw up a dynamic map of theory and practice in which Vandana Shiva's ＂nature's creativity,＂ Val Plumwood's ＂new mode of humanity,＂ Donna Haraway's ＂making oddkin,＂ Karen Barad's ＂queer performative agency,＂ Rosi Braidotti's ＂pan-human becoming,＂ and Jane Bennett's ＂anthropomorphic vibrant matter＂ all respectively highlight their specific politics of location as well as their particular bodily, local, and historical standpoints. Continuing to deconstruct the hierarchical dualism of culture and nature, feminism in the Anthropocene has called our attention to the uneven distribution of agency and the urgency of clarifying the orientations and responsibilities of human agents in the multispecies and transversal posthuman becoming in which we've always already participated.
主题分类 人文學 > 中國文學
人文學 > 外國文學
参考文献
  1. Adams, Carol,Tyler, Tom(2006).An Animal Manifesto Gender, Identity, and Vegan-Feminism in the Twenty-First Century: An interview with Carol J. Adams.Parallax,12,120-128.
  2. Alaimo, Stacy(ed.),Hekman, Susan(ed.)(2008).Material Feminisms.Bloomington:Indiana UP.
  3. Amos, Jonathan. 2018. “Welcome to the Meghalayan Age—A New Phase in History.” BBC News. 18 July. Web. 5 Oct. 2018.
  4. Barad, Karen(2017).No Small Matter: Mushroom Clouds, Ecologies of Nothingness, and Strange Topolo-gies of Spacetimemattering.Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene,Minneapolis:
  5. Barad, Karen(2012).On Touching-The Inhuman That Therefore I Am.differences,23(3),206-223.
  6. Barad, Karen(2010).Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come.Derrida Today,3(2),240-268.
  7. Barad, Karen(2012).What Is the Measure of Nothingness: Infinity, Virtuality, Justice: 100 Notes, 100 Thoughts: Documenta Series 099.Kassel, Ger.:Hatje Cantz.
  8. Barad, Karen(2012).Nature’s Queer Performativity (the authorized version).Women, Gender and Research,1-2,25-53.
  9. Barad, Karen(2003).Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,28(3),801-831.
  10. Barad, Karen(2015).Transmaterialities: Trans*/Matter/realities and Queer Political imaginings.GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies,21(2-3),387-422.
  11. Barad, Karen(2014).Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart.Parallax,20(3),168-187.
  12. Barad, Karen(2007).Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning.Durham:Duke UP.
  13. Bennett, Jane(2012).Systems and Things: A Response to Graham Harman and Timothy Morton.New Literary History,43(2),225-233.
  14. Bennett, Jane(2009).Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.Durham:Duke UP.
  15. Braidotti, Rosi(2002).Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming.Cambridge:Polity.
  16. Braidotti, Rosi(2017).Four Theses on Posthuman Feminism.The Anthropocene Feminism,Minneapolis:
  17. Braidotti, Rosi(2011).Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti.New York:Columbia UP.
  18. Braidotti, Rosi. 2014. “Metamorphic Others and Nomadic Subjects.” Text written for the exhibition by Oliver Laric at ar/ge kunst Galerie Museum, 28.11.2014-24.01.2015. ar/ge kunst. Web. 20 Feb. 2018.
  19. Braidotti, Rosi(1994).Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory.New York:Columbia UP.
  20. Braidotti, Rosi(2013).The Posthuman.Cambridge:Polity.
  21. Butler, Judith(1997).Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative.New York:Routledge.
  22. Butler, Judith(1990).The Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.New York:Routledge.
  23. Butler, Judith(2015).Notes Towards a Performative Theory of Assembly.Cambridge:Harvard UP.
  24. Chakrabarty, Dipesh(2009).The Climate of History: Four Theses.Critical Inquiry,35,197-222.
  25. Chakrabarty, Dipesh(2016).Whose Anthropocene? A Response.RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society,2,103-113.
  26. Chakrabarty, Dipesh(2015).The Anthropocene and the Convergence of Histories.The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch,New York:
  27. Clough, Patricia Ticineto(ed.),Halley, Jean(ed.)(2007).The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social.Durham:Duke UP.
  28. Cochrane, Alasdair(2018).Sentientist Politics: A Theory of Global Inter-Species Justice.New York:Oxford UP.
  29. Code, Lorraine(2006).Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location.Oxford:Oxford UP.
  30. Corradi, Laura(2001).Feminism of Color: Challenges White Sociological Theory and Color-blind Eco-feminism.An International Feminist Challenge to Theory,5,41-50.
  31. Cotter, Jennifer(ed.),Defazio, Kimberly(ed.),Faivre, Robert(ed.),Sahay, Amrohini(ed.),Torrant, Julie P.(ed.),Tumino, Stephen(ed.),Wilkie, Robert(ed.)(2016).Human, All Too (Post)Human: The Humanities after Humanism.Lanham:Lexington.
  32. Crutzen, Paul J.(2002).Geology of mankind.Nature,415,23.
  33. Crutzen, Paul J.,Stoermer, Eugene F.(2000).The Anthropocene.IGBP Newsletter,41,17-18.
  34. Dockrill, Peter. 2018. “Scientists Are Having an Ugly Fight Over Whether We Truly Live in a New Geological Age.” Science Alert. 24 Sept. Web. 5 Oct. 2018.
  35. Dolphijn, Rick,van der Tuin, Iris(2012).New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies.Ann Arbor:Open Humanities.
  36. Donaldson, Sue,Kymlicka, Will(2011).Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights.Oxford:Oxford UP.
  37. Edwards, Paul N.(2017).Knowledge Infrastructures for the Anthropocene.The Anthropocene Review,4(1),34-43.
  38. Emmett, Robert(ed.),Lekan, Thomas(ed.)(2016).Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s Four Theses.RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society,2
  39. Foster, John Bellamy,Clark, Brett,York, Richard(2010).The Ecological Rift: Capitalism’s War on the Earth.New York:Monthly Review.
  40. Gaard, Greta(2017).Critical Ecofeminism.Lanham, MD:Lexington.
  41. Grusin, Richard(ed.)(2015).The Nonhuman Turn.Minneapolis:U of Minnesota P.
  42. Grusin, Richard(ed.)(2017).The Anthropocene Feminism.Minneapolis:U of Minnesota P.
  43. Haraway, Donna(1997).Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.femaleman©_Meets_ OncomouseTM: Feminism and Technoscience.New York:Routeldge.
  44. Haraway, Donna(1991).Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.New York:Routeldge.
  45. Haraway, Donna(2016).Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene.Durham:Duke UP.
  46. Haraway, Donna. 2017. Lecture. “Making Oddkin: Story Telling for Earthly Survival.” Yale University Youtube Channel. 26 Oct. Web. 15 Feb. 2018.
  47. Haraway, Donna(2008).When Species Meet.Minneapolis:U of Minnesota P.
  48. Haraway, Donna(2003).The Companion Species Manifesto.Chicago:Prickly Paradigm.
  49. Harding, Sandra(1998).Is Science Multi-Cultutal?: Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies.Bloominghan:Indiana UP.
  50. Harman, Graham(2014).Materialism Is Not the Solution: On Matter, Form, and Mimesis.The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics,47,94-110.
  51. Harman, Graham(2016).Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory.Cambridge:Polity.
  52. Hecht, Gabrielle(2018).Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality, and Violence.Cultural Anthropology,33(1),109-114.
  53. Latour, Bruno(2014).Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene.New Literary History,45(1),1-18.
  54. Latour, Bruno,Porter, Catherine(Trans.)(2017).Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures On the New Climate Regime.Cambridge:Polity.
  55. Meyer, Robinson. 2018. “Geology’s Timekeepers Are Feuding.” The Atlantic Magazine. 20 July. Web. 5 Oct. 2018.
  56. Moore, Jason W.(ed.)(2016).Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism.Oakland:PM.
  57. Morton, Timothy(2013).Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World.Minneapolis:U of Minnesota P.
  58. Norris, Marcos(2016).Ecocriticism and Moral Responsibility: The Question of Agency in Karen Barad’s Performativity Theory.The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association,49(1),157-184.
  59. Plumwood, Val(1993).Feminism and the Mastery of Nature.London:Routledge.
  60. Plumwood, Val(2009).Ecological Humanities: Nature in the Active Voice.Australian Humanities Review,46,113-129.
  61. Plumwood, Val(2002).Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason.New York:Routledge.
  62. Raffnsøe, Sverre(2016).Philosophy of the Anthropocene: The Human Turn.Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.
  63. Revkin, Andrew C. 2011. “Confronting the ‘Anthropocene.’” The New York Times 11 May. Web. 7 Feb. 2018.
  64. Rose, Deborah Bird(2013).Val Plumwood’s Philosophical Animism: Attentive Interactions in the Sentient World.Environmental Humanities,3,93-109.
  65. Shiva, Vandana(2016).Who Really Feeds the World?: The Failures of Agribusiness and the Promise of Agroecology.Berkeley:North Atlantic.
  66. Shiva, Vandana(1991).Biodiversity, Biotechnology and Profits.Biodiversity: Social & Ecological Perspectives,London:
  67. Shiva, Vandana(2008).Soil Not Oil: Environmental Justice in an Age of Climate Crises.Cambridge, MA:South End.
  68. Shiva, Vandana(2005).Earth Democracy: Justice, Sustainability, and Peace.Minneapolis:Consortium.
  69. Shiva, Vandana(1993).Monocultures of Mind: Perspectives on Biodiversity and Biotechnology.Dehra Dun:Natraj.
  70. Shiva, Vandana(1997).Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge.Cambridge, MA:South End.
  71. Shiva, Vandana. 2016b. “The New Nature.” Boston Review: A Political and Literary Forum. 1 Jan. Web. 9 Feb. 2018.
  72. Shiva, Vandana(2007).Manifestos on the Future of Food and Seed. Manifestos on the Future of Food and Seed.Cambridge, MA:South End.
  73. Shiva, Vandana(2017).Seeds of Hope, Seeds of Resilience: How Biodiversity and Agroecology Offer Solutions to Climate Change by Growing Living Carbon.New Delhi:Navdan-ya/RFSTE.
  74. Steffen, Will,Crutzen, Paul J.,McNeill, John R.(2007).The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?.Ambio,36(8),614-621.
  75. Stevens, Lara(ed.),Tait, Peta(ed.),Varney, Denise(ed.)(2017).Feminist Ecologies: Changing Environments in the Anthropocene.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
  76. Wilson, Edward O.(2016).Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life.New York:Liveright.
  77. Women’s Earth & Climate Action Network, International. 2015. Women’s Climate Action Agenda (WCAA). 2013. California: Women’s Earth & Climate Action Network, International. Web. 18 Feb. 2018.
  78. Yakupitiyage, Tharanga. 2017. “Indigenous Women: The Frontline Protectors of the Environment.” Inter Press Service (IPS). 27 Apr. Web. 18 Feb. 2018.
  79. 張君玫, Chun-Mei(2018)。人類世中的展演能動力。社會理論學報，21(2)，359-378。
  80. 張君玫, Chun-Mei(2016).後殖民的賽伯格：哈洛威和史碧華克的批判書寫.台北=Taipei:群學出版社=Socio Publishing.
  81. 張君玫, Chun-Mei(2017)。思考歷史能動力：原住民立足點與批判的展演政治。臺灣社會學刊，61，185-221。
被引用次数
  1. 張君玫(Chun-Mei Chuang)(2021)。共生與批判：一個分子女性主義的探討。中外文學。50(3)。17-54。 
print cancel