社會議題的中介與轉化：以撒舒優．渥巴拉特兩部台灣原住民族紀錄片為例

Mediations and Transformations of Social Issues: Analysis of Two Taiwan Indigenous Documentaries of Sasuyu Ubalat

10.6637/CWLQ.202012_49(4).0003

林文玲(Wen-ling Lin)

原住民紀錄片 ； 中介 ； 現代性轉化 ； 聲音 ； 物質 ； indigenous documentary ； mediation ； transformation in modernity ； voice ； matter

中外文學

49卷4期（2020 / 12 / 31）

25 - 66

繁體中文

台灣原住民族導演的紀錄片創作，自1990年代末期至今已有二十多年的發展。台灣社會在這期間進一步捲入全球化、資本流動，以及新自由主義經濟的體系與環節。而生活於偏鄉的原住民族社群則歷經政治、經濟與文化的急速變遷，從中浮現的社會衝突，以及關於生存權利的尖銳議題，成為近年原住民族紀錄影片的重要主題。《最後12.8公里》與《原來我們不核》在面對「道路修築與否」以及「核廢料貯存場」如此意見分歧與不同訴求的衝突情境，排灣族導演撒舒優．渥巴拉特透過影音序列的建構，安置在地族人的不同觀點、立場或認知框架，並在公開映演的各個場合持續發酵與延展。作為物質與媒介的道路與核廢料，在影像媒介的內部與外部發出其獨特的聲響，進而與影片的敘事、觀點產生共振。《最後12.8公里》以及《原來我們不核》兩部紀錄片描繪與中介了台灣原住民族所遭遇之現代性課題，在地族人如何援用傳統作為因應，以及從中產生的多元轉化。

Indigenous documentary in Taiwan has been developing for more than 20 years since the late 1990s. During this period, Taiwanese society has been further implicated in the system of globalization, capital flows, and the neoliberal economy. The aboriginal communities living in the remote counties have undergone rapid changes in politics, economy, and culture. The social conflicts that emerged from these changes and the sharp issues concerning survival rights have become significant themes in the indigenous documentary films in recent years. Paiwan director Sasuyu Ubalat's two films, Last 12.8km and Get Out, face and deal with the contested and controversial issues of road construction and nuclear waste storage site selection. The director juxtaposes diverse positions and viewpoints of the local people through the audio-visual construction of these two documentaries. In so doing, these two films present, confront, and extend the divergence of opinions in the space of intermediality. The roads and nuclear wastes, which are materials and media themselves, also emit their unique sounds inside and outside the images, and resonate with the narratives and viewpoints of the films, thus mediating the contemporary issues facing indigenous people and their multi-dimensional transformations in the process of modernity.

1. 范玫芳, Meifang(2017)。誰的風險？誰的管制與檢測標準？蘭嶼核廢料爭議之研究。傳播研究與實踐，7(1)，107-139。
   連結：
2. 〈衝著回饋金達仁南田村將有條件接受核廢〉 “Chongzhe huikui jin daren nantian cun jiang you tiaojian jieshou hefei” [For Receiving Rebate Money, Nantian Village of Daren Township Will Conditionally Accept Nuclear Waste]。2012。《環境資訊中心》Huanjing zixun zhongxin [Environmental Information Center]。TEIA，4 月18 日。網路。2019 年2 月16 日 [18 Apr. Web. 16 Feb. 2019]。
3. 〈列核廢選址名單達仁設籍人口增〉“Lie hefei xuanzhi mingdan daren sheji renkou zeng” [Listed on the List of Sites for Nuclear Waste, the Number of Registered Population in Daren Township Increased]。《原文會原視》Yuanwen hui yuanshi [IPCF-TITV]。2011。YouTube TW，12 月12 日。網路。2019 年3 月1 日 [12 Dec. Web. 1 Mar. 2019]。
4. Abu-Lughod, Lila(1997).The Interpretation of Culture(s) After Television.Representations,59,109-134.
5. Adorno, Theodor W.(1997).Aesthetic Theory.Minneapolis:U of Minnesota P.
6. Appadurai, Arjun(2015).Mediants, Materiality, Normativity.Public Culture,27(2),221-237.
7. Bennett, Jane(2010).Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.Durham, NC:Duke UP.
8. Callan, Hilary(Ed.)(2018).The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology.London:Wiley-Blackwell.
9. Couldry, Nick(2010).Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism.London:Sage.
10. Fardon, Richard(Ed.),Harris, Olivia(Ed.),Marchand, Trevor H. J.(Ed.),Nuttall, Mark(Ed.),Shore, Cris(Ed.),Strang, Veronica(Ed.),Wilson, Richard A.(Ed.)(2012).The SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology.London:Sage.
11. Ginsburg, Faye(1995).Mediating Culture: Indigenous Media, Ethnographic Film, and the Production of Identity.Fields of Vision: Essays in Film Studies, Visual Anthropology, and Photography,Berkeley:
12. Ginsburg, Faye(1995).The Parallax Effect: The Impact of Aboriginal Media on Ethnographic Film.Visual Anthropolog y Review,11(2),64-76.
13. Ginsburg, Faye D.(Ed.),Abu-Lughod, Lila(Ed.),Larkin, Brian(Ed.)(2002).Media Worlds Anthropology on New Terrain.Berkeley:U of California P.
14. Harvey, Penny(2016).Introduction: Infrastructure Complications.Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion,London:
15. Herzogenrath, Bernd(ed.)(2015).Media Matter: The Materiality of Media, Matter as Medium.New York:Bloomsbury.
16. Horn, Eva(2007).There Are No Media.Grey Room,29,6-13.
17. Husband, Charles(2009).Between Listening and Understanding.Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies,23(4),441-443.
18. Ihde, Don(2007).Listening and Voice: Phenomenologies of Sound.Albany, NY:SUNY P.
19. Ingold, Tim(2011).Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description.London:Routledge.
20. Iovino, Serenella(2012).Steps to a Material Ecocriticism: The Recent Literature about the "New Materialisms" and Its Impact on Ecocritical Theory.Ecozon@,3(1),134-145.
21. Larkin, Brian(2013).The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure.Annual Review of Anthropology,42,327-343.
22. Livingstone, Sonia(2009).On the Mediation of Everything: ICA presidential address 2008.Journal of Communication,59(1),1-18.
23. Martin-Barbero, Jesus,Fox, Elizabeth(Trans.),White, Robert A.(Trans.)(1993).Communication, Culture and Hegemony: From the Media to Mediations.London:Sage.
24. Mazzarella, William(2004).Culture, Globalization, Mediation.Annual Review of Anthropology,33,345-367.
25. Mcluhan, Marshall(1964).Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man.New York:McGraw-Hill.
26. Pias, Claus(2004).Kursbuch Medienkultur: Die masgeblichen Theorien von Brecht bis Baudrillard.Stuttgart:Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt=DVA.
27. Theall, Donald(2001).The Virtual Marshall McLuhan.Montreal:McGill-Queens UP.
28. Williams, Raymond(2015).Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society.London:Oxford UP.
29. 布魯克, Peter,王志弘（譯）, Jhihhong(Trans.),李根芳（譯）, Genfang(Trans.)(2003).文化理論詞彙.台北=Taipei:巨流出版社=Chuliu Publisher.
30. 吳正忠（Wu, Tsungtsong）。2015。《臉書》Lianshu [Facebook]。Facebook，1 月29 日。網路。2019 年5 月30 日 [29 Jan. Web. 30 May 2019]。
31. 呂建蒼, Chientsang(1998)。來自台東的反核怒火。台北環境季刊，18
32. 周志豪（Zhou, Zhihao）。2018。〈台電核廢貯存場全台都納入選址範圍〉“Taidian hefei zhucun chang: Quan tai dou naru xuanzhi fanwei” [Taipower Nuclear Waste Storage Site: All Taiwan Are Included in the Site Selection]。《Udn 午後快報》Udn wuhou kuaibao [Udn Afternoon Express]。聯合電子報 [udn.com]，3 月3 日。網路。2018 年10 月30 日 [3 Mar. 2018. Web. 30 Oct. 2018]。
33. 林文玲, Wenling(2013)。製作「原住民」：轉換中的技術載體，轉化中的文化身分。臺灣人類學刊，11(1)，155-187。
34. 洪申翰（Hong, Shenghan）。2014。〈歧視的困局：懂得核廢之難與痛，就不會笑了〉“Qishi de kunju: Dongde hefei zhi nan yu tong, jiu buhui xiao le” [The Predicament of Discrimination: If You Understand the Difficulty and Pain of Nuclear, You Would Not Laugh]。《報導者》Bao dao zhe [The Reporter]。The Reporter，2 月24 日。網路。2019 年4 月13 日 [24 Feb. Web. 13 Apr. 2019]。
35. 陳彥廷（Chen, Yanting）。2018。〈台26 線貫通公路總局：視屏縣能否解禁〉“Tai 26xian guan tong Gonglu zongju: Shi ping xian nengfou jiejin [Taiwan 26 Line through Highway administration: It Depends on Whether the Pingtung County Government Can Lift the Ban]。《自由時報》Ziyou shibao [Liberty Times Net]。The Liberty Times，5 月9 日。網路。2018 年10 月17 日 [9 May. Web. 17 Oct. 2018]。
36. 奧沙利文, Tim,楊祖珺（譯）, Zujun(Trans.)(1997).傳播及文化研究主要概念.臺北=Taipei:遠流=Yuan-Liou.
37. 撒舒優‧ 渥巴拉特，導（Sasuyu Ubalat, dir.）。2015。《原來我們不核》Yuanlai women buhe [Get Out]。版權為導演個人所有，未委託商業發行。
38. 撒舒優‧ 渥巴拉特，導（Sasuyu Ubalat, dir.）。2013。《最後12.8 公里》Zuihou 2.8 gongli [The Last 12.8 km]。版權為導演個人所有，未委託商業發行。
39. 撒舒優‧ 渥巴拉特=Sasuyu Ubalat(2018)。撒舒優‧ 渥巴拉特（Sasuyu Ubalat）。2018a。個人訪談Geren fangtan [Personal interview]。8 月27 日 [27 Aug.]。
40. 撒舒優‧ 渥巴拉特=Sasuyu Ubalat(2018)。撒舒優‧ 渥巴拉特（Sasuyu Ubalat）。2018b。個人訪談 Geren fangtan [Personal interview]。9 月4 日 [4 Sept.]。
41. 撒舒優‧ 渥巴拉特=Sasuyu Ubalat(2019)。撒舒優‧ 渥巴拉特（Sasuyu Ubalat）。2019。個人訪談 Geren fangtan [Personal interview]。5 月27 日 [27 May]。
42. 潘志華, Chihhua(2014)。國立台東大學公共與文化事務學系南島文化碩士班=Austronesian Culture Master Program, Department of Public and Cultural Affairs, National Taitung University。
43. 潘建志（Pan, Chien-Chih）。2018。〈阿塱壹的故鄉旭海村長潘呈清改選代表〉“Alangyi de guxiang Xuhai cunzhang Pan Chengqing gaixuan daibiao” [Alongyi’s Hometown, Xuhai Village Head Pan Chengqing Re-elected Representative]。《中時新聞網》Zhongshi xinwen wang [Chinatimes]。China Times Group，11 月2 日。網路。2019 年2 月5 日 [2 Nov. Web. 5 Feb. 2019]。
44. 蔡卉荀、洪申翰（Tsai, Huihsun, and Shenghan Hong）。2018。〈核廢料真的能包起來放你家？低階和高階核廢料有什麼不同？〉“He feiliao zhende neng bao qilai fang nijia? dijie he gaojie he feiliao you shime butong?” [Can Nuclear Waste Really Be Wrapped Up in Your Home? What Is the Difference between Low-end and Highend Nuclear Waste?]。《關鍵評論》Guanjian pinglun [The News Lens]。The News Lens，11 月20 日。網路。2019 年5 月21 日 [20 Nov. Web. 21 May 2019]。
45. 賴品瑀（Lai, Pinyu）。2014。〈南田老頭目：「核電的大便我們就是不要！」〉“Nantian lao toumu: ‘Hedian de dabian women jiushi buyao!’” [The Old Headman of Nantian Village: “We Just Don’t Want the Poop from Nuclear Power!”]。《環境資訊中心》Huanjing zixun zhongxin [Environmental Information Center]。TEIA，3 月14 日。網路。2019 年5 月11 日 [14 Mar. Web. 11 May 2019]。
46. 謝蓓宜, Beiyi(2016)。國立政治大學公共行政學系=Department of Public Administration, National Chengchi University。
47. 顏士傑、林瓊瑤（Yan, Shijie, and Chiungyao Lin）。2009。〈歷史的道路－琅嶠－卑南道〉“Lishi de daolu-langqiao-beinan dao” [The Road of History-Langqiao-Beinan Road]。《臺灣國家公園》Taiwan guojia gongyuan [National Parks of Taiwan]。內政部營建署 [Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior]，8 月24 日。網路。2018 年10 月3 日 [24 Aug. Web. 3 Oct. 2018]。

1. 林文玲(2022)。同時不共代的道路時間景觀。考古人類學刊，97，65-122。
2. (2021)。撒舒優．渥巴拉特：《Masan caucau成為真正的人》。臺灣人類學刊，19(2)，276-279。
3. (2024)。族群的再現與在線：台灣原住民族群正名的社交媒體實踐。傳播與社會學刊，68，85-115。