自戀、傷口與責任：努薇之納西瑟斯閱讀與法蘭西的瑪麗之〈基熱馬〉與〈狼人〉

Narcissism, Wound, and Responsibility: Claire Nouvet's Reading of Narcissus and Marie de France's ＂Guigemar＂ and ＂Bisclavret＂

10.6637/CWLQ.202112_50(4).0005

羅章彥(Chang-Yen Lo)

努薇 ； 法蘭西的瑪麗 ； 納西瑟斯 ； 〈基熱馬〉 ； 〈狼人〉 ； 精神分析 ； 自戀 ； 傷口 ； 責任 ； 倫理 ； Claire Nouvet ； Marie de France ； Narcissus ； ＂Guigemar＂ ； ＂Bisclavret＂ ； psychoanalysis ； narcissism ； wound ； responsibility ； ethics

中外文學

50卷4期（2021 / 12 / 31）

113 - 153

繁體中文

美國學者努薇透過解構與精神分析閱讀，將納西瑟斯詮釋為一個主體性與意識遭到內部他者阻斷的自戀主體，並解釋這般與內部他者的遭逢是不可避免的。在十二世紀，法蘭西的瑪麗之敘事詩〈基熱馬〉與〈狼人〉也深刻探索相關主題。本論文首先透過交織努薇的納西瑟斯、精神分析理論與瑪麗的〈基熱馬〉與〈狼人〉，探討三個文本如何呈現並變形自戀主體、傷口與內部他者等主題，並進一步討論內部他者如何喚起三個文本裡的抵抗閱讀；此閱讀除了挑戰並顛覆原本主宰的、權威性的意義，同時也促使讀者負起閱讀文本內傷口的責任。此外，筆者強調瑪麗的匿名與晦澀文意等寫作策略，除了能夠使作者與讀者避免本身的自戀盲目，更提醒所有主體皆必須接納並擁抱多樣異質性。最後，對努薇與瑪麗而言，面對他者的倫理是永不停歇的實踐，主體必須不斷敞開自己面向那未知，並詰問那不可理解的他者到底是誰、想要什麼，才能協調並配置自我與那不斷侵擾的內部他者的關係。

In Claire Nouvet's deconstructive and psychoanalytic reading, Narcissus is interpreted as a narcissistic subject whose subjectivity and consciousness are ruptured by his inner Other; such an encounter is ineluctable. In the twelfth century, Marie de France's lais ＂Guigemar＂ and ＂Bisclavret＂ also delve into similar themes. By interweaving Nouvet's reading of Narcissus, psychoanalysis, and Marie's lais, this paper first aims to elucidate how these texts present and transform the themes of the narcissistic subject, the wound, and the inner Other. Next, I further discuss how the inner Other in the texts facilitates a resistant reading which challenges and transgresses the dominant, authoritative meaning and asks the reader to take the responsibility of reading the marginalized textual ruptures. Moreover, I emphasize that Marie's writing strategies of anonymity and obscurity not only prevent both the author and the reader from being narcissistic but also urge all human beings to accept and embrace heterogeneity. Finally, for both Nouvet and Marie, the ethics of facing the Other is a persistent practice in which the subject has to keep the self open to the unknown and to question what the unfathomable Other wants in order to reconfigure the relations between the self and the Other.

1. Online Edition, Anglo-Norman Dictionary Online. Web. 10 Sept. 2020.
2. Barthes, Roland,Heath, Stephen(Trans.)(1977).The Death of the Author.Image, Music, Text,New York:
3. Barthes, Roland,Miller, Richard(Trans.)(1975).The Pleasure of the Text.New York:Hill and Wang.
4. Benkov, Edith(1988).The Naked Beast: Clothing and Humanity in Bisclavret.Chimères,19(2),27-43.
5. Berger, Anne-Emmanuelle(1996).The Latest Word from Echo.New Literary History,27(4),621-640.
6. Blanchot, Maurice(1980).L’Écriture Du Désastre.Paris:Gallimard.
7. Bloch, R. Howard(2003).The Anonymous Marie de France.Chicago:U of Chicago P.
8. Brenkman, John(1976).Narcissus in the Text.The Georgia Review,30(2),293-327.
9. Brumlik, Joan(1988).Thematic Irony in Marie de France’s Guigemar.French Forum,13(1),5-16.
10. Burgwinkle, William E.(2004).Sodomy, Masculinity and Law in Medieval Literature: France and England, 1050-1230.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
11. Bynum, Caroline Walker(2005).Metamorphosis and Identity.New York:Zone.
12. Campbell, Emma(2013).Political Animals: Human/Animal Life in Bisclavret and Yonec.Exemplaria,25(2),95-109.
13. Cassin, Barbara(Ed.),Rendall, Steven(Trans.)(2013).Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon.Princeton:Princeton UP.
14. Coulson, Victoria(2013).The Baby and the Mirror: The Sexual Politics of the Narcissus Myth in Poststructuralist Theory, Winnicottian Psychoanalysis, and Ovid’s Metamorphoses III.Textual Practice,27(5),805-823.
15. Damon, S. Foster. “Marie De France: Psychologist of Courtly Love.” PMLA 44.4 (1929): 968-96. [https://doi.org/10.2307/457705]
16. Marie de France and Thomas Atkinson Jenkins. L’Espurgatoire Seint Patriz of Marie de France. Philadelphia: Alfred J. Ferris, 1894.
17. de France, Marie,Spiegel, Harriet(Ed. Trans.)(1987).Fables.Toronto:U of Toronto P.
18. Derrida, Jacques,Labarrière, Pierre-Jean,Guibal, Francis(Ed.),Breton, Stanislas(Ed.)(1986).Altérités: Jacques Derrida et Pierre-Jean Labarrière: avec des études de Francis Guibal et Stanislas Breton.Paris:Osiris.
19. Edwards, Robert(2006).The Flight from Desire: Augustine and Ovid to Chaucer.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
20. Evans, Dylan(1996).An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis.London:Routledge.
21. Freeman, Michelle A.(1985).Dual Natures and Subverted Glosses: Marie de France’s Bisclavret.Romance Notes,25(3),288-301.
22. Freud, Sigmund. “The Dissection of the Psychical Personality.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol XXII. Ed. James Strachey et al. London: Hogarth, 1923. 57-80.
23. Freud, Sigmund. “On Narcissism: An Introduction.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol XIV. Ed. James Strachey et al. London: Hogarth, 1914. 67-102.
24. Freud, Sigmund. “The Ego and the Id.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol XIX. Ed. James Strachey et al. London: Hogarth, 1923. 1-66.
25. Gallop, Jane(2011).The Deaths of the Author: Reading and Writing in Time.Durham:Duke UP.
26. Gaunt, Simon(2006).Love and Death in Medieval French and Occitan Courtly Literature Martyrs to Love.Oxford:Oxford UP.
27. Gertz, Sunhee Kim(1992).Transferral, Transformation, and the Act of Reading in Marie de France’s Bisclavret.Romance Quarterly,39(4),399-410.
28. Gertz, Sunhee Kim(2003).Echoes and Reflections: Memory and Memorials in Ovid and Marie de France.Amsterdam:Rodopi.
29. Greene, Virginie(2006).What Happened to Medievalists After the Death of the Author?.The Medieval Author in Medieval French Literature,New York:
30. Groebner, Valentin,Selwyn, Pamela(Trans.)(2004).Defaced: The Visual Culture of Violence in the Late Middle Ages.New York:Zone.
31. Haidu, Peter(2004).The Subject Medieval/Modern: Text and Governance in the Middle Ages.Stanford:Stanford UP.
32. Johnson, Luke(2016).The Author Is Dead, But: A Lacanian Response to Barthes’s Return-to-the-Author Paradox.Texas Studies in Literature and Language,58(1),1-19.
33. Kennedy, Ruth(Ed.),Meecham-Jone, Simon(Ed.)(2005).Writers of the Reign of Henry II: Twelve Essays.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Kinoshita, Sharon,McCracken, Peggy(2012).Marie de France: A Critical Companion.Woodbridge:D.S. Brewer.
35. Labbie, Erin Felicia(2006).Lacan’s Medievalism.Minneapolis:U of Minnesota P.
36. Lacan, Jacques,Fink, Bruce(Trans.)(2006).Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English.New York:Norton.
37. Lacan, Jacques,Gallagher, Cormac(Trans.).Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XV: The Psychoanalytic Act, 1967-1968. Trans. Cormac Gallagher from unedited French typescripts..
38. Lacan, Jacques,Miller, Jacques-Alain(Ed.),Forrester, J.(Trans.)(1988).The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book I, Freud’s Papers on Technique, 1953-1954.New York:Norton.
39. Lacan, Jacques,Miller, Jacques-Alain(Ed.),Grigg, Russell(Trans.)(1993).The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book III, The Psychoses, 1955-1956.New York:Norton.
40. Lacan, Jacques,Miller, Jacques-Alain(Ed.),Grigg, Russell(Trans.)(2007).The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII: The Other Side of Psychoanalysis.New York:Norton.
41. Lacan, Jacques,Miller, Jacques-Alain(Ed.),Porter, Dennis(Trans.)(1992).The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book VII, The Ethics Of Psychoanalysis, 1959-1960.New York:Norton.
42. Lacan, Jacques,Miller, Jacques-Alain(Ed.),Sheridan, Alan(Trans.)(1998).The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis.New York:Norton.
43. Lacan, Jacques,Miller, Jacques-Alain(Ed.),Tomaselli, Sylvana(Trans.)(1988).The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book II, The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954-1955.New York:Norton.
44. Marcechal, Chantal A.(Ed.)(1992).Quest of Marie de France: A Twelfth-Century Poet.Lewiston:Edwin Mellen.
45. Nouvet, Claire(1991).An Impossible Response: The Disaster of Narcissus.Yale French Studies,79,103-134.
46. Ovid(1997).Ovid’s Metamorphoses.Norman:U of Oklahoma P.
47. Ovid(1997).Ovid’s Metamorphoses.Norman:U of Oklahoma P.
48. Ovid(1997).Ovid’s Metamorphoses.Norman:U of Oklahoma P.
49. Ovid(1997).Ovid’s Metamorphoses.Norman:U of Oklahoma P.
50. Ovid,Anderson, William Scovil(Trans. Ed.)(1997).Ovid’s Metamorphoses.Norman:U of Oklahoma P.
51. Pickens, Rupert T.(1974).Thematic Structure in Marie de France’s Guigemar.Romania,95(378-379),328-341.
52. Rothschild, Judith Rice(1973).A Rapprochement between Bisclavret and Lanval.Speculum,48(1),78-88.
53. Rothwell, William(Ed.)(2012).Anglo-Norman Dictionary.Aberystwyth:Aberystwyth U.
54. Rychner, Jean(1983).Les Lais De Marie de France.Paris:H. Champion.
55. Sconduto, Leslie A.(2008).Metamorphoses of the Werewolf: A Literary Study from Antiquity through the Renaissance.Jefferson:McFarland.
56. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty(1993).Echo.New Literary History,24(1),17-43.
57. Waters, Claire M.(Ed. Trans.)(2018).The Lais of Marie de France: Text and Translation.Peterborough:Broadview.
58. Whalen, Logan E.(Ed.)(2011).A Companion to Marie de France.Leiden:Brill.
59. 沈志中, Chih-Chung(2019).永夜微光：拉岡與未竟之精神分析革命.臺北=Taipei:臺大出版中心=National Taiwan UP.
60. 拉普朗虛, Jean,彭大歷斯, J.-B.,沈志中（譯）, Chih-Chung(Trans.),王文基（譯）, Wen-Ji(Trans.)(2000).精神分析辭彙.臺北=Taipei:行人=Editions du Flaneur.