由社會性問答網站探求個人投資理財資訊需求

Exploring Information Need of Personal Investment and Finance from Social Q&A Websites

10.6245/JLIS.201904_45(1).0001

葉乃禎(Nai-Chen Yeh)；黃元鶴(Yuan-Ho Huang)

資訊需求 ； 資訊需求特徵 ； 投資理財資訊 ； 問題類型 ； 社會性問答網站 ； Information Needs ； Information Need Characteristics ； Investment and Finance Information ； Question Types ； Social Q&A

圖書館學與資訊科學

45卷1期（2019 / 04 / 01）

4 - 35

繁體中文;英文

本研究旨在由社會性問答網站探索投資理財資訊之資訊需求，透過分析投資理財類提問資料之問題類型與資訊需求特徵，以瞭解國人投資理財之資訊需求與趨勢。本研究以內容分析法，分析Yahoo！奇摩知識＋「儲蓄」、「股票」、「保險」與「房地產」四項知識類別之提問問題，每項知識類別各抽取200筆，共計800筆提問資料為研究樣本。研究結果顯示四項知識類別提問之問題類型可歸納為事實型、建議型、確認型、品質型、指示型與其他型六類，其中以面臨事實型問題為居多，表示客觀的資訊為投資理財者較需要的資訊種類。問題階段可分為資訊釐清期、評估期與決策期三階段，其中以資訊釐清期占最多，顯示投資理財者剛開始接觸投資理財的議題時，最容易面臨問題。四項知識類別提問之問題特徵分為行動、認知與情感三項構面，各知識類別之問題構面要素均不相同，整體而言，各知識類別之提問特徵皆以提出行動構面為最多，其次為認知構面、情感構面。於行動構面，投資理財者面臨儲蓄問題時，較常以直接提出疑問來表達其資訊需求，而面臨保險問題時，投資理財者最常提供自己的相關資訊，如年齡、職業、薪資與病史等資料，以利得到最合適的答案；認知構面中，投資理財者於股票類別，較需要分析性之資訊，而房地產類別，投資理財者對事實型的資訊需求度較高；於情感構面，房地產類別次數較多，但股票類之情感種類最多元，正負面情緒類型多樣化。

The purpose of the study is to explore investment and finance information needs from social Q&A websites. The question types and information need characteristics were analaysized from social Q&A websites's question data in order to understand investment and finance information needs and trend. This study used content analysis method to analyze a total of 800 questions selected from savings, stock, insurance and real estate knowledge categories of Yahoo! Answers. The research results six question types are shown as the followings: factual, advice, identification, quality, prescriptive and others. The factual question is the most frequent questions among six question types; it indicates that investors need objective information. Furthermore, three problem stages were identified in this study including information clarification stage, assess stage and decision‐making stage. Most questions are asked during the information clarification stage, it shows that investors encountered difficulties when they explore investment and finance information from the very beginning. Question characteristics include action, cognition, and emotion dimensions. Each knowledge categories appear different dimension characteristics. Overall, in each knowledge categories, the action dimension is the most frequent question dimensions; thereafter, cognition dimension and emotion dimension. In action dimension, when investors encountered savings problem, they asked direct questions with few personal background information. However, investors often provided their personal information in order to get the suitable answer when encountering insurance problem. In cognition dimension, investors needed more analytical information in stock knowledge categories and more factual information in real estate knowledge categories. In emotion dimension, the highest amount of questions was in the real estate knowledge categories. Questions among stock knowledge categories presented the most various types of emotions and showed variety kinds of positive and negative emotions.

1. Belkin, N. J.,Oddy, R. N.,Brooks, H. M.(1982).ASK for information retrieval: Part I. background and theory.Journal of Documentation,38(2),61-71.
2. Bouazza, A.(1986).Pittsburgh,University of Pittsburgh.
3. Buckland, S.(1994).Unmet needs for health information: A literature review.Health Libraries Review,11(2),82-95.
4. Choi, E.,Kitzie, V.,Shah, C.(2012).Developing a typology of online Q&A models and recommending the right model for each question type.Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,49(1),1-4.
5. Derr, R. L.(1983).A conceptual analysis of information need.Information Processing and Management,19(5),273-278.
6. Gibbins, K. (2008). Savers surf their way to financial decisions. Retrieved from http://www.prlog.org/10154712-savers-surf-their-way-to-financial-decisions.html
7. Glazer, J. D.(Ed.),Powell, R. R.(Ed.)(1992).Qualitative research in information management.Englewood, CO:Libraries Unlimited.
8. Harper, F. M.,Moy, D.,Konstan, J. A.(2009).Facts or friends? Distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q & A sites.Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
9. Harper, F. M.,Weinberg, J.,Logie, J.,Konstan, J. A.(2010).Question types in social Q&A sites.First Monday,15(7)
10. Holsti, O. R.(1969).Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
11. Horrigan, J., & Raine, L. (2006). The internet’s growing role in life’s major moments. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2006/04/19/the-internets-growing-role-in-lifes-major-moments/
12. Kent, A.(Ed.)(1989).Encyclopedia of library and information science.New York:Marcel Dekker.
13. Krikelas, J.(1983).Information seeking behavior: Pattern and concepts.Drexel Library Quarterly,19(2),5-20.
14. Kuhlthau, C. C.(1991).Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,42(5),361-371.
15. Kuhlthau, C. C.(2004).Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services.Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited.
16. Lancaster, F. W.(1995).Needs, demands and motivations in the use of sources.Journal of Information, Communication, and Library Science,1(3),3-19.
17. Lin, Q. C.,Lee, J.(2004).Consumer information search when making investment decisions.Financial Services Review,13,319-332.
18. Smith, S. (2007). Consumers look to internet for financial guidance. Retrieved from http://ezinearticles.com/?Consumers-Look-To-Internet-For-Financial-Guidance&id=833310
19. Wilson, T. D.(1981).On user studies and information needs.Journal of Documentation,37(1),3-15.
20. Zhang, Y.(2010).Contextualizing consumer health information searching: An analysis of questions in a Social Q&A community.Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium
21. 王念慈, Nien-Tzu(2006)。彰化市=Changhua City, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系=National Changhua University of Education。
22. 王傳蒂, Chuan-Ti(2006)。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan，台北市立教育大學社會科教育研究所=Taipei Municipal University of Education。
23. 李家興, Chia-Hsing(2012)。新北市=New Taipei City, Taiwan，淡江大學國際商學碩士在職專班=Tamkang University。
24. 沈秋霜, Chen-Chiow(2012)。屏東市=Pingtung City, Taiwan，國立屏東教育大學社會科教育學系碩士班=National Pingtung University of Education。
25. 林芳姿, Fang-Tzu(2010)。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan，台北市立教育大學歷史與地理學系碩士班=Taipei Municipal University of Education。
26. 林讓均, Rang-Jyun(2018)。國人退休準備不及格超過六成會挪用未來老本。遠見，8 月號
27. 波仕特科技行銷（2015）。高所得理財仰賴銀行理專多，4 成大眾累積財富目標值低於千萬。檢自：http://www.pollster.com.tw/Aboutlook/lookview_item.aspx?ms_sn=2931【Bōshìtè kējì xíngxiāo (2015). Gāosuǒdélǐcái yǎnglài yínhánglǐzhuānduō, sìchéng dàzhòng lèijī cáifù mùbiāozhí dīyú yīqiānwàn. Retrieved from http://www.pollster.com.tw/Aboutlook/lookview_item.aspx?ms_sn=2931】
28. 邱銘心, Ming-Hsin Phoebe,吳寂絹, Chi-Chuan(2012)。健康歷程中的資訊尋求行為：以整合式ACE 架構分析社會性問答服務之健康提問。圖書資訊學研究，7(1)，129-170。
29. 高振興, Chen -Hsing(2013)。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan，實踐大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班=Shih Chien University。
30. 陳向明, Xiang-Ming(2009).社會科學質的研究.台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan.
31. 陳珮雯, Pei-Wen(2013)。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan，國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所=National Taiwan University。
32. 陸裕方, Yu-Fang(2008)。高雄市=Kaohsiung City, Taiwan，國立高雄第一科技大學風險管理與保險所=National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology。
33. 創市際市場研究顧問（2016）。財經資訊網站調查與使用概況。檢自：http://www.ixresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/report/InsightXplorer%20Biweekly%20Report_20160516.pdf【Chuàngshìjì shìchǎng yánjiū gùwèn (2016). Cáijīng zīxùn wǎngzhàn diàocháyǔshǐyòng gàikuàng. Retrieved from http://www.ixresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/report/InsightXplorer%20Biweekly%20Report_20160516.pdf】
34. 創市際市場研究顧問（2012）。2012 年11 月財經理財資訊網站篇。檢自：http://www.insightxplorer.com/specialtopic/2012_11_12.htm【Chuàngshìjì shìchǎng yánjiū gùwèn (2012). 2012 nián 11 yuè cáijīng lǐcái zīxùnwǎng zhàn piān. Retrieved from http://www.insightxplorer.com/－specialtopic/2012_11_12.htm】
35. 創市際市場研究顧問（2010）。『理財行為篇』。數位媒體行銷資源庫電子報，10。檢自：http://distance.shu.edu.tw/98dmcix/d10.htm【Chuàngshìjì shìchǎng yánjiū gùwèn (2010). 『lǐcáixíngwèipiān』. Shùwèi méitǐ xíngxiāo zīyuánkù diànzǐbào, 10. Retrieved from http://distance.shu.edu.tw/98dmcix/d10.htm】
36. 創市際市場研究顧問（2012）。2012 年03 月上網行為篇。檢自：http://www.insightxplorer.com/specialtopic/2012_03_19.htm【Chuàngshìjì shìchǎng yánjiū gùwèn (2012). 2012 nián 3 yuè shàngwǎngxíngwéi piān. Retrieved from http://www.insightxplorer.com/specialtopic/2012_03_19.htm】
37. 復華金管家（2016）。【經理人理財力調查出爐】理財這件事，你做對了嗎？。檢自：https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/52265【FùhuáJīn Guǎnjiā (2016). [jīnglǐrén lǐcáilì diàocháchūlú] lǐcái zhèjiànshì, nǐzuòduìlema ?. Retrieved from https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/52265】
38. 黃思婷, Si-Ting(2010)。屏東市=Pingtung City, Taiwan，國立屏東教育大學社會發展學系=National Pingtung University。
39. 黃詩涵, Shi-Han(2008)。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan，世新大學經濟學研究所（含碩專班）=Shih Hsin University。
40. 楊國益, Kuo-Yi(2005)。高雄市=Kaohsiung City, Taiwan，義守大學管理研究所管理研究所碩士班=I-Shou University。
41. 資策會產業情報研究所（2014）。96.2%台灣網友近期曾使用社交網站。檢自：https://mic.iii.org.tw/micnew/IndustryObservations_PressRelease02.aspx?sqno=364【Zīcèhuì chǎnyè qíngbào yánjiūsuǒ (2014). 96.2% táiwān wǎngyǒu jìnqī céng shǐyòng shèjiāo wǎngzhàn. Retrieved from https://mic.iii.org.tw/micnew/IndustryObservations_PressRelease02.aspx?sqno=364】
42. 劉彥斌, Yan-Bin(2011).上班賺錢下班理財.北京市=Beijing City:中信出版社=CITIC Press Corporation.
43. 蔡享翰, Shieunt-Han(2011)。探討金融風暴後年輕族群之致富與投資觀念。中州管理與人文科學叢刊，1(1)，199-211。
44. 謝雅茜, Ya-Chein(2012)。台南市=Tainan City, Taiwan，康寧大學資訊傳播研究所=University of Kang Ning。