行動地理資訊系統應用於國小鄉土地理教學之研究

A Study on Application of Mobile GIS Learning System for Local Geography Instruction in Elementary School

10.6161/jgs.2009.56.04

蕭顯勝(Hsien-Sheng Hsiao)；洪琬諦(Wan-Ti Hong)；簡正杰(Zheng-Jie Jian)

行動GIS ； 鄉土地理教學 ； 認知風格 ； mobile GIS ； local geography instruction ； cognitive style

地理學報

56期（2009 / 08 / 01）

59 - 81

繁體中文

本文旨在建置行動地理資訊系統（行動GIS）應用於國小戶外鄉土地理教學，建置之系統能即時顯示與反應學習者所在的環境特徵並提供適合的學習內容，讓學習者能夠貼近學習場域的真實環境，迅速得知課程內容。本文亦針對不同認知風格的學生，探討其學習表現。教學實驗以臺北縣八里鄉某國小5年級學生3班爲研究對象，分別實驗組2、實驗組1和對照組。實驗組2進行戶外行動GIS教學，實驗組1進行教室內GIS教學，而對照組採用戶外傳統教學方式進行。實驗結束後，針對不同組別學生以及各組不同認知風格學生的學習成效進行資料分析。本研究發現，行動GIS教學較室內GIS教學及戶外傳統教學更能提升學習者的學習成就。認知風格爲場地獨立的學生在行動GIS教學之學習成就與室內GIS教學顯著優於戶外傳統教學。問卷調查結果也顯示行動GIS教學活動可有效提升國小五年級學童學習的意願。

This study aimed to construct a mobile GIS learning system and to apply it to the outdoor teaching activities for the course of Local Geography in elementary school. Mobile GIS, combined with GPS, immediately provides the suitable learning materials for learners. With this learning system, this study proposed to evaluate the effects of Local Geography Instruction. We also evaluated the achievement of students with different cognitive styles. Experiment samples were composed of three classes of fifth grades in one elementary school in Bali Township of Taipei County. The learners were divided into experimental group2, experimental group1 and control group. Experimental group2 used mobile GIS learning system; experimental group1 adopted the indoor GIS learning system; and control group underwent traditional outdoor learning activities. After the experiments, the learning effects of different learning methods and different cognitive styles were analyzed. According to the research results, the achievements of students of Local Geography using mobile GIS learning method were phenomenally better than those of students using indoor GIS learning method and traditional outdoor learning method. For students of the Field Independent cognitive style, mobile GIS learning method was more efficient than outdoor traditional learning method. The results of the questionnaire investigation also indicated that the mobile GIS learning method did improve the learning intention of students.

1. Ayersman, D. J.,Minden, A. V.(1995).Individual differences, computers and instruction.Computer in Human Behavior,11(3/4),371-390.
2. Baggaley, A. R.(1955).Concept formation and its relation to cognitive variables.Journal of General Psychology,52,297-306.
3. Birch, A.,Hayward, S.(1994).Individual Difference.Basingstoke:The Macmillan Press Ltd..
4. Chou, C.,Lin, H.(1998).The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learner's performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,7(2/3),151-176.
5. Clark, A.,Monk, J.,Yool, S.(2007).GIS pedagogy, web-based learning and student achievement.Journal of Geography in Higher Education,31(2),225-239.
6. Davis, J. K.,Haueisen, W. C.(1976).Field independence and hypothesis testing.Perceptual and Motor Skills,43,763-769.
7. D''Zurilla, T. J.,Goldfried, M. R.(1971).Problem solving and behavior modification.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,78(1),112-119.
8. Eshach, H.(2007).Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: formal, non-formal, and informal education.Journal of Science Education and Technology,16,171-190.
9. Küpper, A.(2005).Location-based Services: Fundamentals and Operation.UK:John Wiley.
10. Naiman, N. M.,Frohlich, H. S.,Todesco, A.(1978).The Good Language Teacher, Research in Education Series No. 7,Toronto:
11. Ohnmacht, F. W.(1966).Effects of field independence and dogmatism on reversal and nonreversal shifts in concept formation.Perceptual and Motor Skills,22,491-497.
12. Shapson, S. M.(1977).Hypothesis testing and cognitive style in children.Journal of Educational Psychology,69,452-463.
13. Smith, S. M.,Woody, P. C.(2000).Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles.Teaching of Psychology,27(3),220-223.
14. Styliadis, A.,Karamitsos, I.,Zachariou, D.(2006).Personalized e-learning implementation-the GIS case.International Journal of Computers, Communications and Control,1(1),59-67.
15. Summerby-Murray, R.(2001).Analyzing heritage landscapes with historical GIS: contributions from problem-based inquiry and constructivist pedagogy.Journal of Geography in Higher Education,25(1),37-52.
16. Thompson, M.(1988).Individualizing instructions with microcomputer produced text.Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education Communication and Technology,New Orleans, L. A.:
17. Walther, U.,Fischer, S.(2001).Locaphone-location-aware group communication for mobile groups.CD-Romand online, INET2001 Proceedings.
18. Warburton, J.,Higgitt, M.(1997).Improving the preparation for fieldwork with "IT": two examples from physical geography.Journal of Geography in Higher Education,21(3),169-179.
19. Witkin, H. A.,Moore, C. A.,Goodenough, D. R.,Cox, P. W.(1977).Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications.Review of Educational Research,47(1),1-64.
20. Zerger, A.,Bishop, I. D.,Escobar, F.,Hunter G. J.(2002).A self-learning multimedia approach for enriching GIS education.Journal of Geography in Higher Education,26(1),67-80.
21. 王佩珊(2004)。國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所。
22. 王淑芬(2004)。國立臺灣師範大地理研究所。
23. 江培菁(2005)。國立臺南大學社會科教育學系。
24. 吳裕益(1987)。認知能力與認知型態個別差異現象之探討。教育學刊，7，253-300。
25. 周天穎(2003)。地理資訊系統。臺北:儒林。
26. 林一宏(2001)。八里坌全覽手冊－關懷淡水河系列叢書之四。臺北:鼎文。
27. 邱名秀(2005)。國立臺北教育大學社會教育學系。
28. 柯芝嫻(2005)。國立臺北教育大學社會教育學系。
29. 洪瑞佑(1998)。國立嘉義教育大學國民教育研究所。
30. 韋煙灶(2002)。鄉土教學及教學資源調查。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學地理學系。
31. 楊錦松(2004)。國立成功大學測量工程研究所。
32. 劉炳輝(1999)。國立中山大學教育研究所。
33. 蕭顯勝、李昆璟、許甲奇(2008)。以定位技術支援無所不在學習系統之建置。TWELF 2008第四屆臺灣數位學習發展研討會論文摘要集，臺中:
34. 高中職校園地理資訊系統建置暨推廣計畫
35. 賴進貴、陳玉文、許秀桃(2003)。地理資訊系統在環境教育應用之探討。環境教育研究，1(1)，1-18。
36. 饒世妙(2002)。臺中師範學院自然科學教育學系。

1. 黃雅彙、丁志堅(2015)。如何利用地理資訊系統培養學童的地理能力。地理學報，76，1-23。